ACCT6006 Assessment 3 Group Case Study Page 1 of 6 ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Name ACCT6006 Auditing Theory and Practice Assessment Assesment 3 - Case Study Individual/Group Group (max of three...

1 answer below »
I have attached the file with all details, Make sure it has financial statement with it.Thanks





ACCT6006 Assessment 3 Group Case Study Page 1 of 6 ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Name ACCT6006 Auditing Theory and Practice Assessment Assesment 3 - Case Study Individual/Group Group (max of three students) Length 2,200 words (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes a) Describe the nature of auditing and critically evaluate the benefits and limitations of financial statement audits. b) Explain the current legal and ethical responsibilities of auditors including the application of the Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards. c) Explain the fundamentals of audit planning, audit risk and materiality. d) Demonstrate application of methodologies involved in the provision of audit services. e) Describe the process of compiling an audit report and completing an audit engagement. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Week 10 Weighting 25% Total Marks 60 Marks Task Summary Students are required to work in the group with maximum of three members. The assessment is designed to assess the subject learning outcomes above including students’ ability to research audit related issues and apply their knowledge to real cases. Students are expected to develop a professional report addressing tasks within following areas: i. Inheret risk identification ii. Audit procedures in response to inherent risks identified iii. Analytical review of the financial statemets with the purpose of identifying areas of concern or comfort iv. Susbtantive audit procedures addressing the identified risks v. Audit report, its basis and legal issues The report should include an Excective summary, Introduction, Body (covering all tasks) and Conclusion. ACCT6006 Assessment 3 Group Case Study Page 2 of 6 Context: The case study requires students to work in a group and develop a professional report. A key aspect in your group’s choice of format/layout should be to ensure you impart your key messages effectively (i.e., complete the requirements) and efficiently (i.e., it should be succinct and take into account the word limit). The report should be coherent and consistency is expected throughout (e.g., formatting, language style, linkages between the parts). Note, groups who split up the requirements and work independently are likely to have more difficulty accomplishing this objective compared to groups who work on each of the parts collaboratively (i.e., as an ‘audit team’). Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing : http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing Submission Instructions: Complete all tasks and submit your answers electronically using the link on BlackBoard under assessments overview and submission. Include the names and student ID numbers of the team members on the assignment cover sheet. Only one version of the assessment is to be submitted on behalf of the group. Please ensure that your submission is in compliance with all of Torrens Policies. http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing ACCT6006 Assessment 3 Group Case Study Page 3 of 6 Instructions: Review the audited annual reports including financial statements presented to the shareholders for the following organisations:  Telstra Corporation Ltd  Woolworths Group Ltd Assume that your audit team is responsible for planning the audits for both companies for the most recent financial year. Discuss your strategies addressing each of the tasks below: 1. Identify at least three inherent risks that you would have to consider for each company in the audit planning phase and justify your answer. Cite the relevant ASAs/ISAs to support your answer. (10 Marks) 2. Which audit procedures and/or tasks would you have planned to carry out in response to the inherent risks identified above? Cite the relevant ASAs/ISAs to support your answer. (12 Marks) 3. Carry out an analytical review on the financial statements of these companies in the planning phase and identify areas of concern (high risk, problem areas) or comfort. Identify at least three areas for each company and justify your answer. (10 Marks) 4. Which audit procedures and/or tasks would you have planned to carry out in response to the high risks or problem areas identified above? Alternatively, in relation to which area would you have minimised your evidence gathering procedure? (10 Marks) 5. Discuss ethical and legal responiblities/liabilities of the auditors in case they would have given an inappropriate audit opinion. Discuss safeguards available to the auditors. (6 Marks) Presentation quality and peer review (3 Marks + 3 Marks) The report should be coherent and consistency is expected throughout (e.g., formatting, language style, and linkages between the parts). Each group member is required to assess other members on the basis of collaboration and contribution towards the assessment tasks. Please include the peer review commentary at the end of your assessment after the conclusion section. Peer review marks have to be allocated in line with the learning rubric placed at the end of the assessment brief. ACCT6006_Assessment Brief_Group_Assignment_Due_Week_10 Page 4 of 6 Learning Rubric: Assessment ACCT6006 Case Study Assessment Criteria Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75 -84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Knowledge and understanding (technical and theoretical knowledge) 20 % Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge. Key components of the assignment are not addressed. 0 – 5.5 Marks Knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Often confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. 6 – 7.5 Marks Thorough knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. 8 – 8.5 Marks Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. 9 – 9.5 Marks A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning. 10 -12 Marks Evaluation of information selected to support the case study 60% Limited understanding of key concepts required to support the case study. Confuses logic and emotion. Information taken from reliable sources but without a
Answered Same DayNov 15, 2021ACCT6006Torrens University Australia

Answer To: ACCT6006 Assessment 3 Group Case Study Page 1 of 6 ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Name ACCT6006...

Akash answered on Nov 21 2021
144 Votes
AUDITING THEORY AND PRACTICE
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
1. Identify at least three inherent risks that you would have to consider for each company in the audit planning phase and justify your answer. Cite the relevant ASAs/ISAs to support your answer.    3
2. Which audit procedures and/or tasks would you have planned to carry out in response to the inherent risks identified above? Cite the relevant ASAs/ISAs to support your answer.    6
3. Carry out an analytical review on the financial statements of these companies in the planning phase and identify areas of concern (high risk, problem areas) or comfort. Identify a
t least three areas for each company and justify your answer.    7
4. Which audit procedures and/or tasks would you have planned to carry out in response to the high risks or problem areas identified above? Alternatively, in relation to which area would you have minimised your evidence gathering procedure?    10
5. Discuss ethical and legal responsibilities/liabilities of the auditors in case they would have given an inappropriate audit opinion. Discuss safeguards available to the auditors.    11
Conclusion    12
References    14
Introduction
In terms of professional judgment, key audit matters can be called those matters that gives a true and fair view as regards to consolidated financial position of the Telstra and Woolworths as on 30th June 2019. This report also delves deep into the consolidated financial performance of these two companies for the year ended on that date. For being compliant with the Australian Accounting Standards as well as the Corporations Regulations Act 2001, different auditing matters and techniques have been addressed and discussed contextual to the audited financial report on a comprehensive level. Furthermore, personal, systematic and critical opinion thereon have been formed to identify inherent risk, applicable audit procedures applicable for mitigation of such risks and analytical review of the financial statements identifying areas of concern or comfort. This report also explores the substantive audit procedures for addressing the risks identified pertinent to basis of audit report.
1. Identify at least three inherent risks that you would have to consider for each company in the audit planning phase and justify your answer. Cite the relevant ASAs/ISAs to support your answer.
The susceptibility to risk of material misstatement in absence of proper control is known as inherent risk. In the opinion of Knechel and Salterio (2016), the auditors use their judgement, knowledge and approximation as regards to the type of transactions the concerned company is having, the assets owned by the company, nature of financial instruments used and above all the nature of industry it is participating in. Here, the audited financial statements and annual reports of Telstra Corporation Ltd and Woolworths Group Ltd have been illustrated.
For Telstra, the balance sheet shows a strong position of net assets worth $14,530 million (Telstra, 2019). Hence, such high revenue generating entity inherently have more complex financial calculations and presentation which are more likely to be misstated. Here, as identified by Nicoll (2016), auditors should be more vigilant about line items like cash in hand, technological assets and inventory stock. By nature, cash in hand at the end of an accounting period is more susceptible to manipulation (theft or incorrect input) than a bulk stock inventory item. As the company is continuously making new and newer developments and investments in technologies and IT assets, Telstra sustains a higher risk of having huge amount of obsolete inventory or slow-moving products than other companies having a more labour-intensive approach. The last five-year financial trend analysis shows that Telstra did not perform well as compared to its competitors. In that case, as opined by Hay, Stewart and Botica Redmayne (2017), auditors must ensure that no misstatement or untrue picture has been exhibited solely meeting certain covenants. If a company, in past, has reported any particular balance or historical cost improperly, it tends to have a greater incentive to misstate it again.
Source: William Jr., Glover and Prawitt (2016)
Similarly, the complexities involved in case of Woolworths are mostly related to the large, frequent and ever-changing financial rules and regulations. The large number of employees (about 1,15,000) and outlets and service providing centres in 995 locations across Australia are naturally demand for more clear, concise and comprehensive process of computation and assessment (Woolworths, 2019). Woolworths have complicated and longstanding relationships with multiple parties as over the years it has acquired a number of grocery brands like Roelf Vos, Purity and Safeway. The Woolworths Group acquired the last Safeway store in 2017 (Woolworths, 2019). Such merger, acquisition and amalgamation have resulted in involvement with several entities at once demanding control of off-balance sheet entities and special-purpose vehicles. Furthermore, the supermarket giant has large numbers of client relationship, investors and stakeholders at different organisational structure level. Hence, as stated by Minnis and Shroff (2017), auditors must be careful about related parties as they are notoriously less loyal and transparent than separate entities. Furthermore, non-routine transactions or accounts may involve inherent risk. Any unique or unusual event in the current year or past financial years, such as accounting for acquisition of another company or fire damage require the auditors to focus more diligently. Henceforth, besides control risk and detection risk, inherent risk is the most pernicious of all other major risk components.
2. Which audit procedures and/or tasks would you have planned to carry out in response to the inherent risks identified above? Cite the relevant ASAs/ISAs to support your answer.
By utilising the following techniques, the above-mentioned inherent risks for both Telstra and Woolworths might be eliminated:
Theft or Fraudulent Reporting: Any susceptibility or...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here