I have attached the file with all the assignment question and guides. Please meet the assignment criteria as mentioned.
Purpose of assignment: Each part of this assessment poses a question that will prepare the student for transition from student to graduate Registered Nurse. Post 1. Identify one (1) issue you expect to experience in your transition from student to graduate nurse. Using evidence-based literature, construct two (2) strategies which you could implement to address the identified issue. ( 300 words) (5 reference) use first person i Post 2. Outline 2 of the key differences between your current role as student nurse and your future role as Graduate RN. Support your discussion with evidence-based literature (300 words) (5 reference) use first person i Post 3. Access current research publications from CINAHL and critically reflect on the potential of social media to transform your future practice as a professional practitioner (300 words) (5 reference) use first person i Each post has a word limit of 300 words (+/- 10%) so these 3 posts will be around 1000 and can you please write separately the post which will be 300 words and at the please give reference and same to post 2 and 3. and you can use 1st person as this assignment is about u (student) and reference less than 5 year and apa 6th edition and 1 post equals to 5 reference Assessment Task 1 - Post 1 · Identify one (1) issue you expect to experience in your transition from student to graduate nurse. – TIME MANAGEMENT as an ISSUE · Using evidence-based literature, construct two (2) strategies that you could implement to address the identified issue. Instructions: · Once you have completed this module answer the above question. · Your post must be 300 words (+/- 10%) and must be posted on your tutorial forum. · (5 reference) use first person i · Make sure you review the AT1 rubric, Appendix A, of the Unit Outline for specific marking criteria. Assessment Task 1 – Post 2 · Outline 2 of the key differences between your current role as student nurse and your future role as Graduate RN. Support your discussion with evidence-based literature. Instructions: · Once you have completed this module answer the above question. · Your post must be 300 words (+/- 10%) and must be posted on your tutorial forum. · (5 reference) use first person i · Make sure you review the AT1 rubric, Appendix B, in the Unit Outline for specific marking criteria. Assessment Task 1 - Post 3 Assessment Task 1 - Post 3 · Access current research publications from CINAHL and critically reflects on the potential of social media to transform your future practice as a professional practitioner. Ensure you read this article by Casler, Radhakrishnan and Gillam (2020) about graduate nurse experiences which documents the value of social media as a way of mentoring new gradate nurses, before you write your post. Instructions: · Once you have completed this module, and the provided article, answer the above question. · Your post must be 300 words (+/- 10%) and must be posted on your tutorial forum. · (5 reference) use first person i · Make sure you review the AT1 rubric, Appendix B, of the Unit Outline for specific marking criteria. Note: Each post has a word limit of 300 words (+/- 10%) so these 3 posts will be around 1000 and can you please write separately the post which will be 300 words and you can use 1st person as this assignment is about u (student) and references should be less than 5 year and APA 6th edition Post 1. Identify one (1) issue you expect to experience in your transition from student to graduate nurse. Using evidence-based literature, construct two (2) strategies which you could implement to address the identified issue. ( 300 words) (5 reference) use first person i Post 2. Outline 2 of the key differences between your current role as student nurse and your future role as Graduate RN. Support your discussion with evidence-based literature (300 words) (5 reference) use first person i Post 3. Access current research publications from CINAHL and critically reflect on the potential of social media to transform your future practice as a professional practitioner (300 words) (5 reference) use first person i Each post has a word limit of 300 words (+/- 10%) so these 3 posts will be around 1000 and can you please write separately the post which will be 300 words and at the please give reference and same to post 2 and 3. and you can use 1st person as this assignment is about u (student) and reference less than 5 year and apa 6th edition and 1 post equals to 5 reference APPENDICES Appendix A - Criterion Referenced Rubric: Assessment 1 - Discussion Forum Posts 1, 2 & 3 Criteria (marks) High Distinction (HD) 100-85% Distinction (D) 84-75% Credit (CR) 74-65% Pass (PA) 64-50% Fail (NN) 49-0% Fail – No Attempt Post 1 Content and Critical Thinking 20 marks Comprehensive, concise discussion that is all directly relevant to the topic/s of the post. Clear identification and comprehensive analysis of a relevant transition issue. Development and construction of strategies that are all clear, relevant and feasible. 20-17marks Significant, concise discussion is directly relevant to the topic/s of the post. Clear identification and mostly thorough analysis of the relevant transition issue. Development and construction of strategies that are mostly clear, relevant and feasible. 16.5-15marks Mostly concise discussion that is mostly relevant to the topic/s of the post. Identification and some analysis of the relevant transition issue. Development and construction of strategies that are vague but are mostly relevant and feasible. 14.5-13 marks Repetitive discussion but content is mostly relevant to the topic/s of the post. Identification but minimal analysis of the relevant transition issue. Development and construction of strategies that are vague but some are relevant and feasible. 12.5-10marks Most of the discussio n is repetitive and is not relevant to the topic/s of the post. Unclear identifica tion and no analysis of the relevant transition issue. Develop ment and construct ion of strategie s that are vague and are mostly not relevant or feasible. 9.5-0 marks There is no post or the content is irrelevant. Post 1 Evaluation of the Evidence 10 marks Discussion is all supported and justified by high quality, credible and appropriate literature and evidence. There is evidence of both depth and breadth of reading. 10-8.5marks Discussion is almost all supported and justified by high quality, credible and appropriate literature and evidence. There is evidence of both depth and breadth of reading. 8.4 -7.5 marks Discussion is mostly supported and justified by adequate and appropriate evidence and literature. 7.4 -6.5 marks Discussion is supported by some minimal but appropriate evidence and literature. 6.4-5 marks Discussi on is supporte d by minimal and inapprop riate evidence and literature. 4.5-0 marks There is no evidence or literature. Post 2 Content and Critical Thinking 20 marks Comprehensive, concise discussion that is all directly relevant to the topic/s of the post. Clear identification and detailed analysis and contrast of the identified relevant key role differences. 20-17marks Significant, concise discussion that is directly relevant to the topic/s of the post. Clear identification and mostly thorough analysis of the identified relevant key role differences. 16.5-15marks Mostly concise discussion that is mostly relevant to the topic/s of the post. Identification and some analysis of the identified relevant key role differences. 14.5-13 marks Repetitive discussion but content is mostly relevant to the topic/s of the post. Identification but minimal analysis of the identified relevant key role differences. 12.5-10marks Most of the discussio n is repetitive and is not relevant to the topic/s of the post or there is no attempt. Unclear identifica tion and no analysis of the identified relevant key role differenc es. 9.5-0 marks There is no post or the content is irrelevant. 0 marks Post 2 Evaluation of the Evidence 10 marks Discussion is all supported and justified by high quality, credible and appropriate literature and evidence. There is evidence of both depth and breadth of reading. 10-8.5marks Discussion is almost all supported and justified by high quality, credible and appropriate literature and evidence. There is evidence of both depth and breadth of reading. 8.4 -7.5 marks Discussion is mostly supported and justified by adequate and appropriate evidence and literature. 7.4 -6.5 marks Discussion is supported by some appropriate and some inappropriate evidence and literature. 6.4-5 marks Discussi on is supporte d by minimal or no evidence . 4.5-0 marks There is no evidence or literature. 0 marks Post 3 Content and Critical Thinking 20 marks Comprehensive, concise discussion that is all directly relevant to the topic/s of the post. Comprehensive critical reflection on the potential of social media to transform future practice. 20-17marks Mostly thorough and concise discussion that is directly relevant to the topic/s of the post. Significant critical reflection on the potential of social media to transform future practice. 16.5-15marks Mostly concise discussion that is mostly relevant to the topic/s of the post. Identification and some reflection on the potential of social media to transform future practice. 14.5-13 marks Repetitive discussion but content is mostly relevant to the topic/s of the post.