ACC03043: Assessment 1 Marking Rubric Grade F P C D HD Percent Less than 50 50 - 64 65- 74 75 -84 85 -100 Knowledge (30%) Poor, limited or confused knowledge of the topic and issues. Sound knowledge...

1 answer below »
ACC03043: Assessment 1 Marking Ru
ic
    Grade
    F
    P
    C
    D
    HD
    Percent
    Less than 50
    50 - 64
    65- 74
    75 -84
    85 -100
    Knowledge (30%)
    Poor, limited or confused knowledge of the topic and issues.
    Sound knowledge of the topic and issues.
    Competent knowledge of the topic and issues.
    Very good knowledge of the topic and issues.
    Excellent knowledge of the topic demonstrating depth of understanding of the issues.
    Application
(30%)
    Inability to apply knowledge or synthesise issues.
    Sound ability to apply knowledge and synthesise issues.
    Competent ability to apply knowledge and synthesise issues.
    Very good ability to apply knowledge and synthesise issues.
    Excellent application of knowledge to the issue demonstrating original thinking skills, insight and creativity.
    Communication
(30%)
    Poor writing skills demonstrating limited clarity and cogency. Grammar, spelling, punctuation and formatting e
ors and a poor report format and presentation
    Sound writing skills demonstrating adequate clarity and cogency. Minor grammar, spelling, punctuation and formatting e
ors and a satisfactory report presentation
    Competent writing skills demonstrating moderate clarity and cogency. Minimal grammar, spelling, punctuation and formatting e
ors and quality report presentation
    Very good writing skills demonstrating consistent clarity and cogency. Virtually no grammar, spelling, punctuation and formatting e
ors and very good report presentation
    Excellent writing skills demonstrating sustained clarity and cogency. No grammar, spelling, punctuation and formatting e
ors. Professional report presentation
    Referencing
(10%)
    Inadequate referencing and sourcing of materials. Less than 2 credible sources.
    Sound referencing and sourcing of material meeting the minimum standard of required references. At least 2 credible sources.
    Competent referencing and sourcing of material. At least 3 credible sources.
    Very good referencing and sourcing of material. At least 4 credible sources.
    Excellent referencing and sourcing of material. More than 4 credible sources.

Assessment Task 1
Length:
250 words total (+/- 10%) Reference list and cover sheet details are not included in this word-limit total.
Weighting:
Assessment Criteria
5% of total unit mark
· Demonstration of knowledge of the issues
· High quality written communication of corporate governance concepts
· Structure and professional presentation of the report
Required:
Assume you are employed in a management consulting firm and have expertise as a corporate governance specialist. Your client is a public company listed on the Australian Stock Exchange that has requested a one page
ief (maximum 250 words) specifying the essential criteria for a non-executive director to be appointed to the company’s board.
The client has said; ‘Make it
ief, I’m too busy to read a long document. You should follow the ideas of former UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill who stated:
‘To do our work, we all have to read a mass of papers. Nearly all of them are far too long. This wastes time, while energy has to be spent in looking for the essential points. I ask my colleagues and their staff to see to it that their reports are shorter. The aim should be reports which set out the main points in a series of short, crisp paragraphs…’
Winston Churchill, Memo to UK War Cabinet, 9 August 1940, During the Battle of Britain.
Answered Same DayJul 17, 2020ACC03043Southern Cross University

Solution

Akansha answered on Jul 18 2020
53 Votes
Essential Criteria         1
Name of the student:
Name of the institution:
Roll no:
Date of submission:
Contents
Criteria for non-executive director    3
References    4
Essential Criteria
There are three main roles of the non-executive director. They can help
oaden the horizon of the existing directors, provide various insights into the business and provide new insights and draw knowledge from their experience to the company (Gi
s, 2015). Non-executive directors thus have major shoes to fill for the company. The non-executive director should be chosen keeping some criteria in mind:
1. Expertise in the field: The non-executive director should know the general area that the organization is in. The organization is a public company that is listed on the stock...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here