I need - 1) Presentation slides, Presentation script , References, 4 members going to present this. The presentation time is 15 minutes and 5 minutes for Q&A. There are no limitations on the number of...

Assessment 1 Presentation (20 Marks) This assessment will be due as follows: - - Internal students – During class time Weeks 5 – 9 - Distance Students - Discuss with Unit Coordinator - Requirements: Students will choose Two Values from the ACS Code of Ethics / Conduct that is available on the Moodle Site and this Assessment Page and complete the following tasks. All the information collected below will become part of the students In Class Presentation Task 1 (Choose Two Values from ACS Code of Ethics / Conduct) - Choose any two values from ACS Code of Ethics / Conduct - Explain why you choose those values and why do you feel that these values are important Task 2 (Choose A Company / Organisation) - Choose a Company / Organisation that in your opinion is Complying or Defying the ACS Code of Ethics / Conduct Values that you have chosen above - The Company / Organisation that you choose must be a real Company / Organisation – However the company can be of any size / type - Explain why you think your chosen company is Complying / Defying the ACS Code of Ethics / Conduct - Explain what the Company / Organisation could do better, to comply with the ACS Code of Ethics / Conduct Task 3 (Prepare a Presentation) - Prepare a Power Point Presentation on the above materials you have collected and Present in Class - The presentation time is 15 minutes and 5 minutes for Q&A. There are no limitations on the number of slides but should fit in for 15 minutes presentation - Be Prepared for Questions & Answers at the end of the presentation Submission details: 1. Presentation File (.doc or .docx file or .pdf or .ppt) to Moodle. Marking Criteria (Total 20 marks) 8 Assessment item 1 – Presentation marking scheme Group Members (student name and number): Date: / / [This marking guide was adapted from examples given in “Assessing learning in universities”, compiled by P. Nightingale, I. Wiata, S. Toohey, G. Ryan, C. Hughes, D. Magin] Criteria No Yes Excellent Your Mark 1. Speaker appearance and other impressions: Appropriate standard of dress for the occasion (tidy and free of distracting features) First impression was one of confidence and poise Speakers attracted audience’s attention from the outset Little or no fidgeting and few distracting mannerisms (2.0 Marks) 2. Presentation structure (presenting the topic approved by the lecturer) - Introduction, Title/topic made clear/introduced the team (team presentations) Purpose and the outline of the presentation Unusual terms defined adequately - Body of presentation, Main points stated clearly Sufficient information and detail provided as key points Appropriate and adequate use of examples/anecdotes Content complies with introductory framework Discussion flowed logically; brief summaries after each section - Conclusion, - Ending of presentation signalled adequately - Main points summarised adequately/ideas brought to fruition - Conclusion linked to opening - Final message is clear and easy to remember - References (see next criterion for details) (4 Marks) 3. Referencing and paraphrasing Complying with CQU APA referencing guidelines and Academic Misconduct Procedures Variety of references (not just one or two references), all relevant to the topic and current (within 5 years where relevant). References are cited (acknowledged) in presentation slides and in other materials for any key points, images and for any direct quotations Correct APA formatting used in citations and in the reference list (4 Marks) 4. Coping with questions/facilitating the discussion Invited audience to ask questions Whole audience searched for questions Ability to listen 9 Criteria No Yes Excellent Your Mark Questions answered in order Questions handled adeptly Full audience addressed with answers Speaker maintained control of discussion (3.0 Marks) 5. Delivery Speech clear and audible to entire audience Suitable vocabulary (few clichés, little jargon and repetition) Interesting variety in tone of voice Clarity and quality of pronunciation Short comprehensible sentences Presentation directed to all parts of audience Appropriate level of eye contact held with audience throughout the presentation Meaningful gestures appropriately used Full text not read from notes or slides Speaker kept to time limit (start on time and finish within the time frame – maximum 15 minutes) Good use of time without rushing at the end Pace neither too fast or too slow Showed enthusiasm Audience rapport (e.g. approachable) (3.0 Marks) 6. Visual aids, activities and handouts (use of technology and tools) Visual aids clearly visible to entire audience Overhead/slide projector/computer etc. operated correctly Speaker familiar with own visual aids (e.g. OHPs, blackboard diagrams) Visual aids and/or activities well-prepared to suit presentation topic requirements Effective use of handouts and/or visual aids (i.e. integrated into the presentation) Handouts to the audience well-prepared and useful (2 Marks) 7. Target and audience Greet the audience courteously, and maintained their interest Presentation met level of knowledge and needs of audience Acknowledgment of variations in audience understanding Presentation met need for knowledge of audience (2 Marks) 8. Penalties. Students must not change to a different workshop after they have finalised group and presentation topic in one workshop without permission from the lecturer for that tutorial (penalties up to 5 marks); Students submit by the designated deadline. (penalties are calculated at 1 mark per calendar day, full or part, that the group submission is overdue). Overall Comments: Lecturer name: Lecturer signature: ACS Code Of Ethics ACS Code of Professional Conduct ACS |Code of Professional Conduct V.2.1 April 2014 Page 1 ACS Code of Professional Conduct Professional Standards Board Australian Computer Society April 2014 ACS |Code of Professional Conduct V.2.1 April 2014 Page 2 ACS Code of Professional Conduct Version History Date Document Version Revision History (reason for change) Author /Reviser 06.07.2012 V.2 Corporate Identity Changes Ruth Graham 04.04.2014 V2.1 Removed reference to Code of Professional Practice Graham Low Approvals Date approved Version Approved By Date in force Date of Next Review 2005 V.1 Professional Standards Board 2005 To be confirmed 2014 V2.1 Michael Johnson 4 April 2014 To be confirmed Custodian title & e-mail address: [email protected] Responsible Business Group: Professional Standards Board Distribution: General (no restriction on distribution) Content Security: Unclassified ACS |Code of Professional Conduct V.2.1 April 2014 Page 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACS Code of Professional Conduct ......................................................................................... 1.1. PREAMBLE................................................................................................................ 4 Relevance To Law ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2. THE CODE ................................................................................................................. 5 1.2.1. The Primacy of the Public Interest .................................................................... 6 1.2.2. The Enhancement of Quality of Life .................................................................. 6 1.2.3. Honesty ..................................................................