I will send my assessment requirements through email

MANAGEMENT
Table of Contents
Task 1    3
Task 2    5
Task 3    8
Task 4    12
References    15
Task 1
Case 1
Factors
Tyres that are offered by the Auscarts imports Pty Ltd are not bound together and that caused flicked onto the track with the hit. Overview of the case scenario shows that within the go-karting business, the company mixture of tyres bolted together within the go-kart tracks and that serves the primary factor in the accident (Ward et al. 2018). Therefore among all the tyres of go-kart, some of the tyres were left loose by the employees of the company. Reports show that tyres that are offered through the go-kart business of this company are pushed hard-up against the concrete barrier and some sections of fence exposed unguarded concrete.
Relevant standards, Codes, Regulations and Acute requirements
Performances of the employees should be maintained with the delivery of skill development training. It must help employees to keep the quality of products that they manufactured within the go-kart business. The employees should use the seatbelt at the time of test driving, and if the seat belt and harness do not fit the patron, the driving must be cancelled. Safety measurements should be involved within the organisation for offering safety procedures to the track marshals during test driving. Most importantly, the management team of the company must deliver the focus on the manufacturing and fixing process of go-kart tyres.
Actions put in place
For the prevention of the same type of incident from occurring, proper management activities should be implemented in the go-kart business of this company. It would help to manage the performances of the employees based on appropriate monitoring. Not only that, but strict rules should be implemented to protect the lives of employees at the time of performing the role of track marshals. Furthermore, employees of the go-kart business should offer health care services in case of their injury at the time of performing their duties of track marshals.
Case 2
Factors
Overview of the presented case study reveals that the employees or the machine operators of McCain Foods did not have any proper knowledge regrading the function of the Magnuson Brush Machine. For this, the washing staff of the company was not able to operate all the switches on the machine. Not only that, but at the time of the use process of that machine, it was not properly isolated. This process created confusion to the washing staff for the proper use process of that machine due to the presence of various switches in the multiple drive motor machines.
Relevant standards, Codes, Regulations and Acute requirements
In case of the implementation of the new machine, the management team of McCain Foods should focus on the standards of the performances of their employees. This process helps in the application of the skilled staff in its required places. Therefore, within the organisational structure as well as within the stores of the McCain Foods there is the requirement of maintenance of code of conducts (Sellens et al. 2018). Presence of code of conduct allows employees to perform their organisational responsibilities by maintaining their comfort zones. Proper focus on the engagement of the employees in organisational activities is required in this frozen food company.
Actions put in place
For preventing this kind of situation from the McCain Foods, employees of the company should offer a developed training. Delivery of advanced training must help employees to have their better understanding regarding the technical assessment within the organisation. Based on the proper knowledge about the developed technological devices, employees can operate those multifunctional machines properly. It must help to reduce mistakes from the operating system of those multi-drive motor machines. Therefore, through this developed performance employees could not face any confusion to operate and isolate these multi-drive machines.
Case 3
Factors
Through the proper analysis of the case study, which is based on the Australian Aluminium Shopfitters Pty Ltd, it is noticed that one of the employees of this company faced fatal injury. In that context, it is evident that the deemed employee of this brand was assigned with a task to access the high points of the buildings which were under construction. For the compilation of that task, that deemed employee was positioned with a raised platform along with the cantilever mobile device (Pickering, 2020). Therefore, the chariot was made from the acquired plants, and that sustained the fall of that deemed employee from that seven-storied building. There was no presence of any fall protection in the building, and that can cause fatal injury to that deemed employee at the time of the inspection of the high points of the building.
Relevant standards, Codes, Regulations and Acute requirements
Overall case study of Australian Aluminium Shopfitters Pty Ltd signifies that within the high storeyed buildings of the company, the management team should focus on the entire activities of employees. Within this construction company, there is an implementation of safety law in the organisation actively to derive the safety issues. It helps employees to take beneficial factors in case of an injury at the time of working in the construction sites of the company. Therefore, for the inspection of the high points of the under-construction buildings, skilled employees must be appointed by the inspection team of the company.
Actions put in place
To prevent this kind of activity from the Australian Aluminium Shopfitters Pty Ltd, this company should reduce third party engagement from their business. The reduction of third party engagement must help them to manage their organisation successfully. Fall protection must be introduced by the management team in the under-construction buildings. It will help to protect employees from fatal injury in case of their fall.
Task 2
External, internal and workplace factors and motivators
External factors
· Positive social dynamics is recognised as the external factors in the implementation of WHS
Internal factors
· Organisational culture is noted as an internal factor in the introduction of WHS
Workplace factors and motivators
Employee safety is noted as the workplace factor, and that serves the requirement of introducing WHS in the workplace of the Salad fresh. Therefore, engagement of the employees in the organisational activities also requires the implementation of WHS in its proper format. Presence of safety measurements in the organisation will offer encouragement to the employees to provide their active participation in the different actions of the company.
WHS policy, processes and management responsibility
WHS policy
· Management commitment and employee involvement
· Training of employees to prevent accidents
· Presence of hazard prevention and control in the workplace
Process
The management team of the company will offer developed training to employees for the maintenance of safety procedures from the use of advanced tools or equipment (Linnan et al. 2019). Guards will be present to offer safety to employees at the time of working.
Management responsibility
In case of injury, employees in the organisation management team will offer healthcare services free of cost.
Relevant laws, standards, codes or guidelines
Health and safety law will be introduced in the organisational structure of Salad Fresh.
In the case of appointing employees in the organisational...