im sharing my assessment brief and an example of how to do it and I work in Australia Post and im attaching one of my previous assignment for reference
ASSESSMENT TEMPLATE & MARKING RUBRIC Page 1 of 2 Subject Title Work-integrated Learning - 1 Subject Code WIL801 Lecturer / Tutor Your Academic Supervisor (MEM, MIB, MOM, MMTH) Assessment 3 Title Theory & Practice Report Learning Outcome/s (a) Analyse and critique the main research methods used in business contexts (b) Design, plan and execute an applied research project (c) Analyse and synthesise information in order to develop evidence-based and sustainable solutions for a business problem (d) Succinctly communicate work-related issues and outcomes to a range of organisational stakeholders Assessment type (group or individual) Individual Weighting 50% Word count 2,500 words (in total) Due date Week 12 Class submission On-line Submission type Turnitin Format / Layout of Assessment (details of what to include) Written Report Assessment instructions 50% Theory & Practice Report (2,500 words) - Week 12 At this stage you would ideally be settled into your placement, making a contribution and experiencing and/or observing how things are done. This represents a significant learning curve worthy of reflection and analysis. The framework and instructions below will help guide your to help you put your experiences and what you have learnt into the required report. Executive Summary - 250 words. A succinct summary of the report highlighting main aims and outcomes. Introduction - 500 words. Provide a brief overview of your current placement context including your department(s) / work area(s) and your current projects and/or on-going day- to-day activities. Theory & Practice - 1500 words. Choose at least two subject areas from your studies so far; one must be a core unit (i.e. marketing, accounting, economics, etc.), and one must be a unit from within your discipline specialisation (i.e. tourism & hospitality management, event management, international ASSESSMENT TEMPLATE & MARKING RUBRIC Page 2 of 2 business). Identify and explain the extent to which the concepts and theories that you learnt in the College in your chosen units are being applied (or not applied) in your organisation. Conclusion - 250 words. Summarise suggestions for improvement to be implemented in your organisation based on your theory and practice analysis. Briefly explain what has been gained from your placement that could not have been gained through theory. Acknowledge all used sources in accordance with ICMS 2021 Style Guide (APA Style 7th Edition). Readings for the assessment Prescribed textbook, journals or other readings: Auerbach, M. P. (2015). Cross-Cultural Relations . Research Starters: Business (Online Edition), .Call Number: Available on EBSCO Discovery Service. Login via MyAthens Avery, G., & Bergsteiner, H. (2011). Sustainable Leadership: Honeybee and Locust Approaches. Routledge. Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2013). Business Research Methods. (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN: 9780073521503 Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2017). Leadership Communication: Reflecting, Engaging, and Innovating. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(1), 3- 11. Call Number: Available on EBSCO Discovery Service. Login via MyAthens Rook, S. (2015). Work Experience, Placements and Internships. Palgrave MacMillan. ISBN: 9781137462015 Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research Methods for Business Students . (6th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson. ISBN: 9780273750758 Call Number: 650.072 SAU Tanaka, A., & Kleiner, B. (2015). Cross-Cultural Business Etiquette. Culture & Religion Review Journal, 2015(1), 9-19. Call Number: Available on EBSCO Discovery Service. Login via MyAthens Zikmund, W. & Quinlan, C. (2015). Business Research Methods. (1st ed.). Cengage. ISBN: 9781473704855 Grading Criteria / Rubric This assessment will be monitored and marked by the students’ academic supervisors. The academic supervisors will also instruct their students to complete the Individual Report based on their ideas posted in their journals. Peer Review Evaluation N/A https://lms.icms.edu.au/pluginfile.php/169288/mod_resource/content/3/Style%20Guide%202021%202nd%20ed.pdf https://lms.icms.edu.au/pluginfile.php/169288/mod_resource/content/3/Style%20Guide%202021%202nd%20ed.pdf ASSESSMENT TEMPLATE & MARKING RUBRIC Criteria HD (85-100) D (75-84) CR (65-74) PASS (50-64) FAIL (0-49) Executive Summary (10%) Highly effective summary of aims and results. Outstanding highlights, succinct yet detailed. Summarises aims and results concisely. Provides highlights. Generally appropriate summary. Some relevant information is presented, but some items missing. Limited summary of what was done. Few specific results presented. Executive summary is missing or contains no specific information. Introduction (10%) The purpose of the report is expertly explained. Outstanding context provided. Context is clear and main points outlined succinctly. Presented with significant clarity and logical flow. The purpose of the report is strongly explained. Well-described context provided. Context is clear and most main points covered. Presented with clarity and logical flow. The purpose of the report is explained. Generally appropriate context provided. Context is evident and some main points covered. Presented with appropriate clarity and flow. An average description of the purpose of the report is provided. Some context provided. Context is understood, limited points covered. The meaning is apparent but lacking some clarity and/or focus. The purpose of the report is not clearly described or may be missing completely. Provides little or no relevant context. Context is not clear and nearly all main points not covered. Lacks clarity and relevant information. Analysis - Theory and Practice (45%) Clearly identifies and discusses important issues and offers thoughtful insights. Response demonstrates an excellent in-depth reflection on, and personalisation of, classroom theories and concepts, in relation to practical workplace experiences. In-depth analysis demonstrates exceptional knowledge of theoretical concepts and the application or otherwise to practice. Discussion of key issues with detailed insights. Response demonstrates a strong in-depth reflection on, and personalisation of, theories and concepts, in relation to practical workplace experiences. Analysis demonstrates detailed knowledge of theoretical concepts and the application or otherwise to practice. Discussion and insights are understandable. Response demonstrates in-depth reflection on, and personalisation of, classroom theories and concepts, in relation to practical workplace experiences. Analysis may lack some depth of knowledge in theoretical concepts and the application or otherwise to practice. Limited discussion and insights. Response demonstrates a fair reflection on, and personalisation of, classroom theories and concepts, in relation to practical workplace experiences. Analysis may describe theoretical concepts and practice, with gaps in understanding and/or connection. Limited with no clarity or depth about issues. Response does not demonstrate reflection on, and personalisation of, classroom theories and concepts, in relation to practical workplace experiences. Analysis is lacking in detail and may not demonstrate knowledge of theoretical concepts and the application or otherwise to practice. ASSESSMENT TEMPLATE & MARKING RUBRIC Conclusion (15%) Clear and concise explanation including thoughtful insights and suggestions for improvement in future. Conclusion shows excellent evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained from reflecting on classroom theory/concepts and workplace experiences including implications for both the organisation and the students’ future goals. Effective explanation, offering useful insights and suggestions for improvement in future. Conclusion shows strong evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained from reflecting on classroom theory/concepts and workplace experiences including implications for both the organisation and the student’s future goals. Mostly clear and concise explanation. Some suggestions for improvement in future provided but may lack depth of thought. Conclusion shows evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained from reflecting on classroom theory/concepts and workplace experiences including implications for both the organisation and the student’s future goals. Simple explanation. No further suggested improvements in future provided. Conclusion provides an average reflection of the link between classroom theory/concepts and workplace experiences including implications for both the organisation and the student’s future goals. Little or no explanation provided. No attempt to provide suggestions for future improvements. Conclusion does not demonstrate clear evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained from reflecting on classroom theory/concepts and workplace experiences including implications for both the organisation and the student’s future goals. Presentation and Writing (10%) Full use of report style conventions with logical flow, appropriate sections / subsections. Exceptionally well written and clearly organised and essentially free from grammar, punctuation and spelling errors. Consistently writes in a very engaging manner. Full use of report style conventions with logical flow, appropriate sections / subsections. Well written and logically organised with minor errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Report structure is mostly free of errors. Above average writing style and logically organised with some errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Report structure may not be completely accurate. Average and/or casual writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or