Imagine you are the newly hired chief executive officer (CEO) of a large pharmaceutical company with major investment in medical equipment, prescription drugs, and other health-related supplies to...

2
A Case
The ethical issue conflicts or issues observed in this scenario are kickbacks that were provided to the shell organisation in an attempt for the company to get government assistance by exhibiting a persistent loss in services and revenue. It is an unethical practice of mutual gain in which a payment or commission is done to a member of the organisation. Giving or getting kickbacks has been corrupt practise that impairs the capacity of a worker or leader to ensure unbiased choices. Kickbacks are commonly categorised as a form of bribery (Dyer, 2020).
In a similar context, kickbacks are not just unethical, but also illegal. Involving in something illegal or unethical is a bad practice because the repercussions can be severe. It produces market distortions. Furthermore, the charge of kickbacks is oftenly passed on to consumers through the price of the product. Furthermore, the consumer had no alternative but to pay a premium cost for a lower-quality product. Kickbacks can be restricted by empowering a whistleblower culture in the organisation, establishing a regular 3rd party review process, and developing an SOP for novel vendor documentation and onboarding (Jha, 2022).
Moreover, I disagree with what was done. A conventional kickback is camouflaged in daily operations, making identification hard. It is a type of negotiated bribery commonly linked to white-collar workers. However, the overall process is designed in such a way that it is challenging to determine how and where the kickback framework came about. It makes little difference if the intent of the kickback is bad or good because the practise itself is malicious (Jia et al., 2021). There are numerous potential issues with kickback. Due to the corrupt leaders' bias,...