Individual Case #1: Financial Ratio AnalysisPurposeThis assignment is designed to help students obtain the ability to collect financialinformation and understand financial statements. Also, students...

1 answer below »
Individual Case #1: Financial Ratio AnalysisPurposeThis assignment is designed to help students obtain the ability to collect financialinformation and understand financial statements. Also, students are required to performfinancial analysis and benchmarking, evaluate financial performance, and providerecommendations to help the company to maximize its profit and market value.Requirements:• Identify two public listed companies in Canada• Retrieve their financial statements (company investor relation website orwww.sedar.com)• Perform financial analysis including vertical, horizontal and ratio analysis• Evaluate financial performance• Provide recommendationFormat• The maximum 10 pages of the body content and unlimited pages of the appendix• Single Space• Citation Style, APA or MLAIndividual Case Outline• Title Page• Executive Summary• Table of Content• Introductiono Company Backgroundo Main Competitor Background and Comparability Rational• Financial Assessmento Vertical Analysiso Horizontal Analysiso Financial Ratio Analysis• Recommendation• Conclusion• Reference• Appendix


Microsoft Word - Individual Case #1 2021W.docx Individual Case #1: Financial Ratio Analysis Purpose This assignment is designed to help students obtain the ability to collect financial information and understand financial statements. Also, students are required to perform financial analysis and benchmarking, evaluate financial performance, and provide recommendations to help the company to maximize its profit and market value. Requirements: • Identify two public listed companies in Canada • Retrieve their financial statements (company investor relation website or www.sedar.com) • Perform financial analysis including vertical, horizontal and ratio analysis • Evaluate financial performance • Provide recommendation Format • The maximum 10 pages of the body content and unlimited pages of the appendix • Single Space • Citation Style, APA or MLA Individual Case Outline • Title Page • Executive Summary • Table of Content • Introduction o Company Background o Main Competitor Background and Comparability Rational • Financial Assessment o Vertical Analysis o Horizontal Analysis o Financial Ratio Analysis • Recommendation • Conclusion • Reference • Appendix 1 19 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Executive Summary This report provides a detailed Financial Analysis of two IT companies: Telus and Shaw. Firstly, we are going to present the backgrounds of the companies, and determine the comparability rational. The report brings a Financial Analysis, which includes: horizontal, vertical, and rational analysis. Recommendations are provided as per the analysis to improve Shaw’s profitability and gain market share. Benchmarks with the leading competitor, Telus, will be presented. These recommendations include increasing the return on Stockholder's Equity for increased financial leverage. Also, the company should plan to decrease the liabilities and increase its total assets, which can be done by getting more contracts. The report ends by providing a conclusion. Table of Contents I. Introduction……………………………………………………………………4 1. Telus……………………………………............……………………...4 2. Shaw.........……………………………………………………………..4 3. Comparability Rational………………………………………………..4 II. Financial Analysis……………………………………………………………..5 1. Horizontal Analysis……………………………………………………5 2. Vertical Analysis………………………………………………………6 3. Financial Ratio Analysis……………………………………………….6 a) Liquidity Ratios………………………………………………..6 i. Current Ratio……………………………......................6 ii. Working Capital Ratio………………………..………..6 b) Solvency Ratios………………………………………………..6 i. Debt to Assets…………………..………..........……….7 ii. Equity Ratio…….....…….……………………………..7 c) Profitability Ratios……………………………………………..7 i. Return on Common shareholder's equity (ROE)………7 ii. Return on Assets (ROA)……………………………….7 III. Recommendations………………………………………………………………8 IV. Conclusion………………………………………..……………………………..9 V. References………………………………………………………………………10 VI. Appendix………………………………………………………………………..11 Introduction Telus Telus is the second largest Canadian telecommunication company; it is the result of the merger between British Columbia and Alberta companies in 1998, in Vancouver headquarters. Telus offers Canadians innovative technologies over 100 year, and its focus on two segments: Wireline (digital personal communications services, equipment sales and wireless Internet services) and Wireless (voice local and long distance, data and others). It offers consumers deals based on contract, which has lower turn rate and reward consumers with prizes, such as laptops, smartphones and television. The total Telus Revenue for the year 2019 was 14,7 billion CAD. Shaw Shaw is the smallest telecommunication company in Canada, but it is considered as the main competitor for Telus in the Western Canada. It main strategy is offer consumers freedom and flexibility with month-to-month contracts, in which consumers have the option to leave when is not satisfied. Shaw is experiencing a growth in market with the creation of Freedom Mobile. Shaw’s total Revenue for the year 2019 was 5,35 billion CAD. Comparability Rational Telus and Shaw both compete in the Communication industry, offering similar products/services related to Wireless and Wireline. There are only minor differences between both companies, and it is related to type of contract offer. While Telus offers its consumers usually 3-year contract deal, Shaw offers its consumers month-to-month deals. The following Financial Analysis provides a review of the company's performance using its Consolidated Balance Sheets and Income Statements. It illustrated the differences in their vertical and horizontal analysis from 2016 to 2019. Financial Analysis Horizontal analysis The horizontal analysis has the goal to verify and compare the evolution of different elements in the financial statements over a period of time. Analyzing the Telus balance sheet, we can confirm that the current assets increased 13,3% from 2018 to 2019, representing a significant decrease compared to the same period from 2017 to 2018 where current assets had increased by 33,2%. Simultaneously, the total assets increased dramatically to 14,88% in 2019, compared to the year 2016, in which the increase was only 6,56%. The increase in total assets is directly related to an increase in cash, which was 29,3% in 2019. By the year 2018, the company had experienced a loss in cash, represented by -18,77%. The acquiring of property and equipment has also impacted the rise in Telus’s total assets, which has invested over 2 million CAD and represents an increase of 17,1%. Shaw managed to substantially increase its current assets by 106,33% in the year 2019, which is due to the rise in cash by 276,56%. This represents an increase in the total assets by 16,4% from 2016 to 2019. The company also made a small improvement of 3,52% in property, plant, and equipment in 2019, but the percentage was smaller than the previous year by almost 5% investment that did not interfere in the increase of total assets. Telus total liabilities and shareholder’s equity had experienced a continuous drop among the years, starting from 6,56% in 2017 to 14,88% in 2019, which increased 8,32%. This has resulted in an increase in payment for current mature long-term debt by 59,33%, which did not happen in the previous year. The shareholder’s equity has also experienced a significant drop to 3,08% by 2019; the prior year showed a high peak of 25,15%. Shaw’s total liabilities and shareholder’s equity had increased through the years, starting by -7% in 2017 and reaching a high peak of 10,6% in 2019. This results in the continuous decrease in long-term borrowings by 5,9% in 2019 and the increase of shareholder’s equity 5,3% in the same year. Comparing the Income Statement of Telus for the years 2019 to 2017, there has been an increase in Revenue by 2%, 8%, and 3,9%, respectively. We also verify a dramatic rise in depreciation by 15,6% in 2019, compared to the average of 3,3% in the previous two years. We can visualize a continued drop in the operating income through the years; in 2017, it was marking 19,4%, and in 2019 only 4,9%. The total net income has experienced a decline in its growth percentage, while in 2017, the growth was 19,7% of net income, in 2019, the increase was by 9,4%. Shaw’s Income Statement brings exciting numbers. The company's revenue has increased by 3%, 6%, and 8% through the years 2019 to 2017, respectively. The operating income has experienced a incredible improvement, reaching the high peak of 2121% in 2019. Operating income from the previous years were -96% in 2018, and -31% in 2017. This unexpected change shows that Shaw is gaining market share, which is positive for the company and investors. Vertical Analysis The vertical analysis is applied to identify the proportion of each account; this will give us the importance of each account in the final report. Telus In 2019, Telus dropped 1,41% in cash and 5,17% in its accounts receivable, the principal account for the current assets. This means that Telus increased its operations and has money to receive, resulted in the service they offer. We can confirm that the company remains in the top position in the industry, analyzing its Revenue, in which 99,53% comes from contracts with consumers. The company maintains its dividend payment; it had varied from 1% to 0,9% in all years analyzed that proves Telus is a stable company to invest, and day pay its shareholders annually. Its current liabilities for 2019 were 14,68%, while its current assets are 11,46%, but the difference does not change the company's credibility. The company's net income for 2019 was 12,12%, which indicates the company's profitability margin. Shaw Shaw had a significant increase in its cash in 2019 by 9,24%, but only 1,8% in its accounts receivable. The increase in its cash is positive for the company because it shows that it has money to pay short-term debts. The small increase in its accounts receivable demonstrates that the company is gaining market share, but the process is slow. Shaw’s current liabilities are higher than current assets, by 18,12% and 14,16%, respectively. The total net income for the IT company was 13,7% in 2019. Financial Ratio Analysis I. Liquidity Ratios The liquidity ratios calculate the ability of the company to pay its debts in the period of a year. a) Current Ratio Current ratio is calculated by the division of the company current assets by its current liabilities. Telus liquidity ratio is 0,78 for the year 2019, which shows an improvement of the company’s efficiency in pay its liabilities when compared with the year 2016, when the ratio was 0,50. Shaw’s liquidity ratio is 0,78 in 2019, which has also increased compared with 0,58 in 2016. Surprisingly both companies had the same current ratio. b) Working Capital Ratio The working capital ratio is calculated subtracting the company current assets by its current liabilities. Telus WCR is -1221mi CAD for the year 2019, which shows an increase of the company’s deficiency in pay its liabilities when compared by the prior year, which was -1003mi CAD. Shaw’s WCR was -619 hundred thousand CAD in 2019, which was worse than 2018. II. Solvency Ratios This type of ratio verifies the ability of a company to pay its total debts, short and long term. a) Debt to Assets Ratio: Calculated by the division of total liabilities by total assets of the company. Telus debt ratio in 2019 is 0,72%, while Shaw’s is 0,60%. Comparing both companies, Shaw’s has more leverage than Telus, which makes the company slightly less risk of paying mature obligations. b) Equity Ratio: It is calculates by dividing the company long-term debt by its
Answered 1 days AfterMar 07, 2021

Answer To: Individual Case #1: Financial Ratio AnalysisPurposeThis assignment is designed to help students...

Tanmoy answered on Mar 08 2021
139 Votes
Individual Case #1
FINANCIAL RATIO ANALYSIS
Executive Summary
In this discussion we will try to analyse the horizontal income statement and the balance sheet of the two companies. We will also try to analyse the companies based on the ratio analysis by determining various ratios under the heads like liquidity, solvency and the profitability of the two companies. This analysis will help us to analyse how the companies are performing, their growth prospects and the best company for investment by the potential investors. Based on this we have chosen two companies which are (1) Canadian Natural Resource Limited (2) Pembina Pipeline Corporation. We have chosen the financial data of these two companies from WSJ Market.com website and analysed in Excel to derive at a conclusion.
Table of Content
I. Introduction
1. Comparability Rational………………………………………………..1
2. Company Background ………………………………………………...1
II. Main Competitor Background and Comparability Rational…………………..2
III. Financial Analysis
1. Horizontal Analysis………………………………………………….3 & 4
2. Vertical Analysis………………………………………………………5
3. Financial Ratio Analysis……………………………………………….
a) Liquidity Ratios………………………………………………..
i. Current Ratio……………………………......................6
ii. Working Capital Ratio………………………..………..6
b) Solvency Ratios………………………………………………..6
i. Debt to Assets…………………..………..........……….6
ii. Equity Ratio…….....…….……………………………..6
c) Profitability Ratios……………………………………………..7
i.
Return on Common shareholder's equity (ROE)………7
ii. Return on Assets (ROA)……………………………….7
IV. Recommendations………………………………………………………………7
V. Conclusion………………………………………..…………………………..7 & 8
VI. References………………………………………………………………………8
VII. Appendix………………………………………………………………………..10
Introduction
Comparability Rational
Both CNRL and PPL are from the energy industry and specialize in manufacturing of natural gas and oil. The only differences between the two companies are that while CNRL specializes in storage of million barrels of oil of which 63% is crude oil, PPL on the other hand are involved in transportation of oil to conventional, heavy infrastructural facilities and oil sands.
We will discuss on the two company’s financial statement which includes the Income Statement and the Balance Sheet for analysing the performance of the business. We will illustrate difference between these two companies based on the horizontal and vertical analysis of the financial statement from 2017 to 2020.
Company Background
Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL) is a hydrocarbon exploration company which is headquartered in Calgary in the city of Alberta, Canada. It is the largest natural gas manufacturer located in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. It was founded in the year 1973 and is presently the largest producer of natural gas and crude oil in Canada. Presently as of 2020 the revenue of the company stands at $16893 million.
On the other hand, Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL) is an oil and natural gas manufacturing company which is located in Western Canada. It was formed in the year 1954 and is presently headquartered in Calgary, Canada. It also manufactures Ethylene Oil which is the speciality of this company. It has some of its pipelines which works based on short as well as long term contracts. Presently the revenue of the company stands at $6202 million as of 2020.
Main Competitor Background and Comparability Rational
Cenovus Energy is an oil and natural gas company and is located also located in Calgary, Canada. It was founded in the year 2009 with emphasize of becoming an oil sand asset company. It has already acquired Husky Energy which is also a well known hydrocarbon exploration company in Calgary, Canada for CAD$3.9 billion. As of 2019, the revenue of Cenovus Energy stands at CAD$21.4 billion. It deals with manufacturing and extraction of oil sands, conventional oil and gas, refining and transportation of crude through rail.
Husky on the other hand has been acquired by Cenovus Energy. It is a public limited company and was established in the year 1938 as Husky Refining Company. It also dealt with the extraction of heavy oil and avail the opportunities in exploration of asphalt.
The only differences between the three companies are in the types of exploration and the contracts made by each of the companies. While Canadian Natural Resources deals with massive storage of oil reserves, the business operations of Pembina Pipelines Corporation and Cenovus Energy is to some extent similar as both transports oils and natural gases to the various heavy infrastructural facilities.
Financial Assessment
The financial analysis of the two companies Canadian Natural Resources (CNRL) and Pembina Pipelines Corporation (PPL) are based on the evaluation of the income statement and the balance sheet both from horizontal and vertical point of view.
Horizontal Analysis
CNRL
For CNRL based on the horizontal analysis of the income statement it can be stated that the there is a decline in the sales of the company in 2020 compared to the previous year 2019 by -26%. This was mainly due to the company’s production hit hard by global pandemic covid-19. There was also a decline in the gross income or profits of the company in 2020 compared to the previous year 2019 to -102% due to this issue. Although there was no increase in the expenses identified in 2020, yet the decline in the sales has impacted the net income of the company drastically. The net income of the company was down by -108% in 2020 compared to 2019.
By analysing the horizontal balance sheet of the CNRL it can be stated that there has been a decline in the total current assets of the company by –3% in 2020 compared to 2019. The total assets of the company by -7% in 2020 compared to the previous year 2019. This signifies that there was significant decline in the cash and short term investments and inventories for the current assets and in Net property, plant and equipments, other assets and total investments which impacted the total assets of the company.
On the other hand, the current liabilities of the company also declined in 2020 by -23% compared to 2019. Also there was a decrease in the total liabilities of the company by -6% in 2020 compared to 2019. This been has impacted due to repayment of the liabilities rather than keeping them due during the lockdown situation in 2020. This is a positive move by the company although there has been a significant rise in the amount and percentage of long term debt by $1444 million and 7% respectively observed in 2020 compared to 2019.
PPL
For Pembina Pipelines Corporation (PPL) we can notice that there has been a significant decline in the sales in 2020 by -14% compared to 2019 when analysing the horizontal income statement of the company. On the other hand, there has been a miraculous gross profit notice in 2020 where it rose to 1% compared to 2019. The unusual expense of the company was at 602% high in 2020 compared to 2019 and is definitely a concern for them. This expense has lead to the net income of the company decreased by -121% in 2020 compared to the previous year 2019.
If we observe the balance sheet of the company for PPL base on horizontal analysis we can observe that there was no change in the current assets of the company in 2020 compared to the previous year 2019. On the other hand the total asset of the company had declined by -4% in 2020 compared to 2019. This was mainly due to slow down in the process impacting the construction in progress, total investment and advances, long term note receivables and other intangibles of the company.
On the other hand, we can notice that the current liabilities of the company was increased by 23% in 2020 compared to the previous year which signifies that there was an increase in the current liabilities in order to meet the short term obligations of the company. The total liabilities of the company also increased by 3% which was mainly due to a slight increase in the borrowings in the form of long term debts by $166 million. There was a significant decrease in the equities of the company as well which signifies that the company shareholders have sold the shares due to reduced performance of the company in 2020.
Vertical Analysis
CNRL
As per the vertical analysis of the income statement, we can observe that the gross income of the company was down by -1% in 2020 against 27% in 2019 while the net income of the company was down by -3% in 2020 against 24% in 2019. This decline was mainly due to subdued production during the global pandemic situation in the year 2020.
On the other hand the vertical balance sheet of the company shows that there were no changes in the current asset of the company in 2020 against 2019. They were stable at 6%. The current liabilities of the company state that there was a decline of 1% in 2020 i.e. at 7% compared to 8% in 2019. Although it can be observed that there was a significant increase in the long term debt by 4% in 2020 i.e. 29% compared to the previous year 2019 at 25%.
PPL
As per the vertical analysis of the income statement of PPL it can be stated that the gross income of the company was increased to 33% in 2020 compared to 28% in 2019. This was a positive factor for the company in the recent year. On the other hand, the net income of the company declined to -5% in 2020 compared to 21% observed in 2019. This decline in the net income was basically due to a rise in the unusual expense to 35% in 2020 against just 4% in 2019.
The vertical analysis of the balance sheet of PPL states that the total current asset of the company is stable and constant at 3%. On the other hand the total current liabilities of the company was at 6% in 2020 compared to just 4% in 2019. This difference in the current liabilities states that there was enhancement in the current liabilities of the company which gets reflected with an increase in the short term debt and current portion of long term debt.
Financial Ratio Analysis
CNRL
As per the financial ratio analysis of CNRL it can be stated that the liquidity of the company illustrated through current ratio is at 0.86 in 2020 compared to 0.68 in 2019. The ideal current ratio must be within 1.2 to 2.0. Although the present ratio stands at 0.86 it is far better and can be stated that the company is performing well presently. The working capital on the other hand is negative at -$717 million in 2020 compared to -$2150 million in 2019. This states that the company is trying to overcome from negativity in the present year.
The solvency ratio is illustrated through debt ratio in which both the years debt ratio looks similar at 0.57. The ideal debt ratio must be within 0.3 to 0.6. We can find that it is within the specified limits. A higher amount of debt makes the company difficult to borrow. The equity ratio on the other hand is at 0.67 in 2020 against 0.58 in 2019. The ideal equity ratio must be within 2:1. Although the ratio is slightly lower than the standards but the present year’s performance is better than the previous year.
The profitability ratio states the return on asset to be at -1% in 2020 compared to 7% in 2019. The more positive is the return on asset the better it is for the company. Hence we can find that the company has not performed well in this year. Also, for the return on equity we can find that the present year percentage is at -1% compared to a prudent percentage of 15% in 2019. Here also the company has failed in terms of profitability.
PPL
For PPL the current ratio has declined in the present year and is at 0.56 in 2020 compared to the previous year at 0.68. The working capital negativity i.e. the increase in current liabilities is more than the increase in current assets in 2020 against 2019.
In terms of solvency, the debt ratio of the company is at 0.52 in 2020 against 0.49 in 2019. This signifies that the debt has increased for PPL in the present year compared to the previous year. The equity ratio on the other hand states that the ratio is at 0.73 in 2020 compared to 0.64 in 2019. This signifies that the equity ratio of the company is improving in 2020 which is a prudent indicator for PPL.
The profitability based on the return on asset and return on equity has both declined to -1% and -2% respectively in 2020 compared to 5% and 9% respectively in 2019. This signifies that the company is not performing well in terms of profitability.
Recommendation
As per the analysis it can be stated that the performance of Canadian Natural Resources Limited is much better in terms of profitability and the earnings than Pembina Pipelines Corporations. This is because CNRL is dealing with huge amount of capital than Pembina and is expected to grow in the future. CNRL is utilizing its liquidity and the solvency prudently which can be observed from the ratio analysis. Further, in terms of net profits it can be stated that CNRL is performing better than PPL as the percentage of net loss in the financial year 2020 for CNRL was -108% compared to PPL’s -121%. Thus from the investors point of view it can be stated that investing in CNRL is a good opportunity and is prospective.
Conclusion
Thus based on the analysis it can be stated that CNRL is a much bigger and expanding company than PPL. There are enough growth prospects for the company which can be observed from the ratios of the company. It was due to global slowdown combined with covid-19 that CNRL suffered huge losses in FY-2020. Hence, there is tremendous scope for growth for CNRL with the recovery of the economy.
Reference
Pembina Pipeline Corporation; https://www.pembina.com/
Canadian Natural; https://www.cnrl.com/
Cenovus energy; https://www.cenovus.com/
CFI; What is Equity Ratio? https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/finance/equity-ratio/
WSJ Markets; Canadian Natural Resources Ltd; https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/CA/XTSE/CNQ/financials
WSJ Markets; Pembina Pipeline Corp; https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/CA/XTSE/PPL/financials/annual/income-statement
Appendix
CNRL Horizontal Income Statement:
    CNRL - Income Statement
    2020
    2019
    Amt
    %
    2018
    Amt
    %
    2017
    Amt
    %
    2016
    Amt
    %
    Sales/Revenue
    16,893
    22,871
    -5,978
    -26%
    21,027
    1,844
    9%
    17,342
    3,685
    21%
    10,523
    6,819
    65%
    Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) incl. D&A
    17,029
    16,712
    317
    2%
    16,000
    712
    4%
    14,554
    1,446
    10%
    11,102
    3,452
    31%
    COGS excluding D&A
    -
    10,976
     
     
    10,653
    323
    3%
    9,204
    1,449
    16%
    6,102
    3,102
    51%
    Depreciation & Amortization...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here