ITECH2250_A2_S2_2018_Critique_of_PMP.pdf School of Science, Engineering and Information Technology ITECH2250 – IT Project Management Techniques CRICOS Provider No. 00103D...

1 answer below »
for how much it can be done???


ITECH2250_A2_S2_2018_Critique_of_PMP.pdf School of Science, Engineering and Information Technology ITECH2250 – IT Project Management Techniques CRICOS Provider No. 00103D ITECH2250_A2_S2_2018_Critique_of_PMP Page 1 of 12 Assignment 2 – PMP Critique Overview The aim of this assignment is to gain understanding and insight into what is contained within a useful and best practice Project Management Plan (PMP). You are asked to complete a report detailing your critical analysis of a provided Project Management Plan. Timelines and Expectations Marks: Assignment will be assessed based on a mark out of 50 Percentage Value of Task: 20% of the course marks Due: Week 7, Sunday 11:55pm Minimum time expectation: 16 hours This is an individual assignment. There is an expectation that no two submissions will be the same. Learning Outcomes Assessed The following course learning outcomes are assessed by completing this assessment:  K2 - describe project management methodologies, such as the project management body of knowledge;  K3 - acquire a theoretical knowledge of the project management process groups model;  K4 - explain the basic components of a project management plan and its importance in improving the success of information technology projects;  S3 - employ a systems thinking approach to identify critical roles and stakeholders in information technology projects;  S4 - demonstrate decision-making processes to solve a range of information technology project issues;  S5 - utilise a range of organizational and self-management skills, emulating real world practice of information technology project managers; School of Science, Engineering and Information Technology ITECH2250 – IT Project Management Techniques Assignment 2 – PMP Critique CRICOS Provider No. 00103D ITECH2250_A2_S2_2018_Critique_of_PMP Page 2 of 12  A1 - adopt a project management framework to write (review) a project management plan, for a simulated real world contemporary information technology project; Assessment Details Background A critique or critical analysis is a review or appraisal based on careful analytical evaluation. Writing a critical analysis requires you to read the selected document in detail and to also read other related texts so that you can present a fair and reasonable evaluation of the selected document. In this assignment, you are required to undertake a critical analysis of a fundamental document of the PMBOK – the PMP. Critical thinking and analysis are important components of being a professional. If you do not think critically you will only have a superficial view. To be a successful project manager you need to sort out what's accurate and what's not, and you need to identify a solid, factual base for solving problems and addressing issues on your project. For assistance in critical writing techniques, see Federation University’s General Guide to Writing and Study Skills, in particular pp. 27 – 29 on Critical Thinking. For another example, try http://www2.le.ac.uk/offices/careers/ld/resources/writing/writing- resources/critical-writing/ The purpose of this PMP critique is to prepare you for developing your own PMP. After this PMP critique, you should understand and appreciate the structure and content required for a good PMP so that you are able to complete the construction of a PMP for assignment 3. An electronic copy of the PMP for you to evaluate and critique - ITECH_2250_A2_S2_2018_PMP_for_Critique – as well as this assignment, are contained in the zip file - ITECH2250_A2_S2_2018_PMP_Critique.zip in the Assessment section of your Moodle shell. School of Science, Engineering and Information Technology ITECH2250 – IT Project Management Techniques Assignment 2 – PMP Critique CRICOS Provider No. 00103D ITECH2250_A2_S2_2018_Critique_of_PMP Page 3 of 12 Assessable Tasks/Requirements Your critical analysis will understand (interpret and summarise), analyse and evaluate (judge) key aspects of the assigned PMP. You should adopt Schwalbe1 (2010, pp.151-154; 2014, pp.161-164; 2016, pp. 158-161) and the PMI’s (2013, p.77) PMBOK Guide as frameworks for comparison and evaluation. In the Topic 3 section of your Moodle shell, under the Week 3: Additional Learning Resources section you will find a copy of the Schwalbe 2010 layout - Week 3: Reading 1 (Schwalbe, 2010) and the PMI PMBOK Guide PMP contents – Week 3: Reading 4 (PMI, 2013). You may also like to review Appendix A - PMP Critique Guide at the end of this document for some suggestions or interpretations of Schwalbe’s understanding of what should be in a PMP. When reviewing the PMP think about the following: 1. The common techniques and tools used in PMP presentation; 2. The most effective or the best techniques and tools for each component of the PMP; 3. the layout and usability of the given PMP; 4. The structure and components of the given PMP; 5. The content of the given PMP - how and why the particular information is used; 6. How each section and the overall content is presented, especially the conciseness, format, and style; 7. what planning tools the authors have used; 8. any content that has been omitted; 9. any additional content that has been included – is it necessary? does it suit the purpose?; 10. the language and form of expression used; 11. the overall quality and professionalism of the PMP; 12. The usefulness of the PMP for guiding the project Your PMP critique report should be presented in a business or management style and structured as follows:  title page;  executive summary;  table of contents;  introduction; 1 Schwalbe, K. (2016). Information Technology Project Management (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning School of Science, Engineering and Information Technology ITECH2250 – IT Project Management Techniques Assignment 2 – PMP Critique CRICOS Provider No. 00103D ITECH2250_A2_S2_2018_Critique_of_PMP Page 4 of 12  critical analysis of PMP: o introduction; o organisation; o management and technical approach; o work to perform; o schedule; and o budget  conclusions  references; and  appendices (if needed) Support your analysis with concepts and references from the work of others. Gather these references from various sources including the assigned text books and references, Course readings and reputable and reliable internet sites. Submission An electronic copy of your PMP Critique r epo r t mus t be subm i t t e d via Moodle. Partner students please refer to your course lecturer for submission instructions. Please refer to the Course Description for information regarding late assignments, extensions, special consideration and plagiarism. For further clarification you may consult the academic regulations which can be accessed via the university’s website, see: http://federation.edu.au/staff/governance/legal/feduni-legislation/feduni- statutes-and-regulations Plagiarism Plagiarism is the presentation of the expressed thought or work of another person as though it is one's own without properly acknowledging that person. You must not allow other students to copy your work and you must take care to safeguard against this happening. More information about the plagiarism policy and procedure for the university can be found at http://federation.edu.au/students/learning-and-study/online-help-with/plagiarism. School of Science, Engineering and Information Technology ITECH2250 – IT Project Management Techniques Assignment 2 – PMP Critique CRICOS Provider No. 00103D ITECH2250_A2_S2_2018_Critique_of_PMP Page 5 of 12 Assessment Criteria Your work will need to comply with the following:  A report of a minimum of 2000 words that provides evidence of critical analysis of the provided PMP and that satisfies items within the marking rubric. You must include: o a description of your understanding of the PMP’s purpose; o a written interpretation and synthesis of key components; o analysis and evaluation of key aspects of the PMP and the strengths and weaknesses identified; o your assessment of the usefulness of the PMP to guide the project  In your discussion you must identify and analyse key issues. This must reference the content of the various theoretical frameworks such as Schwalbe (2010; 2014) and the PMI (2013) PMBOK guide, and must be supported by judgements based on sound academic reasoning.  Multiple references (at least nine appropriate references are expected) should be used. These must be acknowledged through the use of in-text citation and a Reference List. The citations and References List must comply with the APA citation style (see Federation University’s General Guide to Referencing). In-text references should be used in such a way as to provide support for the work and these references should come from a wide variety of sources such as books, journals and reputable and reliable websites.  Your report should be presented as a business or management style report that adheres to academic writing presentation standards. It must contain high quality academic presentation, expression and features as outlined in: o The University’s Assignment Layout and Appearance Guidelines; o the University style guide - https://federation.edu.au/current-students/learning-and- study/online-help-with/study-skills-and-writing-guides - which covers Federation University’s General Guide to Writing and Study Skills (above), General Guide to Referencing (above); and o Features of Academic Writing (from UEfAP.com) School of Science, Engineering and Information Technology ITECH2250 – IT Project Management Techniques Assignment 2 – PMP Critique CRICOS Provider No. 00103D ITECH2250_A2_S2_2018_Critique_of_PMP Page 6 of 12 Marking Rubric/Assessment Feedback Student No: Student Name: Criteria Maximum Marks Poor Excellent 0 ................ 5 Student Report Layout, Executive Summary, Table of Contents and Introduction 5.0 PMP Critical Analysis – Introduction 5.0 – Organisation 5.0 – Management & Technical Approach 5.0 – Work To Perform 5.0 – Schedule 5.0 – Budget 5.0 Quality of Discussion and Conclusions 5.0 Academic Writing Standards 5.0 Reference List and In-Text Referencing 5.0 Total Mark [50 marks] Total Worth [20%] School of Science, Engineering and Information Technology ITECH2250 – IT Project Management Techniques Assignment 2 – PMP Critique CRICOS Provider No. 00103D ITECH2250_A2_S2_2018_Critique_of_PMP Page 7 of 12 Comments Marked by Date Feedback Feedback will occur through Moodle within two weeks of the submission date. School of Science, Engineering and Information Technology ITECH2250 – IT Project Management Techniques Assignment 2 – PMP Critique CRICOS Provider No. 00103D ITECH2250_A2_S2_2018_Critique_of_PMP Page 8 of 12 Appendix A - PMP Critique Guide The following details are designed to assist ITECH2250 IT Project Management Techniques students in identifying and evaluating content and quality aspects of Project Management Plans (PMP) as outlined by Schwalbe (2010, pp.151-154; 2014, pp.161-164; 2016, pp. 158-161). This is a guide and is not a template. Students are expected to use additional resources to help with their critique. PMP Introduction Section The introduction should indicate the scope of the report, set aims/objectives and present an overview of what is to follow. Name- This section should provide a discussion about the project name. For example: Is it meaningful? Does it reflect the nature of project? Description This section should provide a
Answered Same DaySep 13, 2020ITECH2250

Answer To: ITECH2250_A2_S2_2018_Critique_of_PMP.pdf School of Science, Engineering and Information Technology...

Kuldeep answered on Sep 15 2020
136 Votes
PMP Critical analysis
PMP Critique
PMP Critique
Student Name
University Name
Unit Name
Unit Code
Executive Summary
The project management professional certification is the industry recognition certificate of the project manager. PMP demonstrates the experience, education, skills and abilities required to lead and mentor projects. The report will analyze and attempt to identify errors or threats in the documentation to make it easier for the project to achieve its intended goals. In this report, PMP aims to develop an educational game with the project name Inspiring Games
Project, which aims to improve children's social and language skills and improve computing power and will follow the waterfall SDLC method to complete the project. This report covers different aspects of the PMP document, provides recommendations from the introduction to the conclusions, points out the missing parts, and suggests the correct way to complete the project within the design framework.
Contents
Introduction    4
Project    4
Project details    5
Project Sponsor details    5
Project manager and team details    5
Deliverables    5
Reference details    5
Definition    6
Organization Section    6
Organizational charts    6
Project responsibilities    6
Management and Technical Approach Section    6
Management objectives    6
Project controls    7
Risk management    7
Risk Register    10
Project staffing    13
Technical Process    13
Work to Perform Section    14
Major work packages    14
Key deliverables    14
Other    15
Schedule    15
Summary    15
Detailed    15
Other    15
Budget    15
Conclusion    16
Appendices    17
Introduction
Project management professionals are essential in every industry. Demand is based on skill requirements between different industries and regions. According to PMI's 2014 survey report, project management practitioners will have tremendous opportunities. As a business recruit people from the different cultural background, demand for the project manager with a standardized skill is also increasing. This project manager is expected to undertake a system reorganization project that translates the strategic visions into ensuring effective, tangible goals and agreed results while balancing the project constraint. PMP of ADRC Ltd. aims to coordinate the entire project planning document and help guide the implementation and control of the project. ADRC Ltd. is destined to develop two educational games under the project name Inspiring Games Project, one to improve children's social and language, and the other to improve computing power. The main purpose of the PMP is to make the project complete within the allotted time and cost-effective and effective. The analysis of the PMP provided will be conducted in this report to check the efficiency and planning of the project to achieve the best results.
Project
The name of the project clearly gives the “stimulus game project” on the PMP. This illustrates the intellectual guidance for the game, which will be a stepping stone for children's future. It differs from most project names in that they can withstand it and omits confusion between related project names (Acharyya & Brady, 2014).
Project details
The project is dedicated to the development of two educational games, one designed to improve children's social and language, and the other to improve computing power. Expected results in the allocated budget within the estimated time frame. The company has provided the project for six months with a budget of $615,000. This seems to be good enough for the project (Altunel, 2017).
Project Sponsor details
There is no appropriate information for the sponsor. Only the sponsors, John Smith, and Bob Wilson provide two data, but each PMP should provide detailed information about the sponsor, such as name, contact information and title must be given in the introduction section. But it is missing here (Berzisa & Grabis, 2012).
Project manager and team details
The project manager should always keep in touch with the team members to get better project results, but the details submitted to the team members will keep the projects away from each other, which may be the cause of the project failure. this project (Davidson Frame, 2014).
Deliverables
It is divided into two columns, titled Project Management Related Deliverables and Product Related Deliverables. Most deliverables are placed in two columns, which makes it difficult to get the correct results from the table, which can be expressed in a better way so that you can easily understand the product, software, hardware or product packaging. Part of the project.
Reference details
Information about the references is not available; each knowledge area includes some planning areas. But we missed it. It should provide relevant references in APA format. This will reduce the quality of the document because it does not tell where the information came from (Dionne, 2013).
Definition
It involves many terms that are specific to a particular project, or techniques that provide definitions and abbreviations that help avoid confusion, but documents lacking documentation that can lead to a drop in project quality.
Organization Section
Organizational charts
Provide a clear project model. A layered model of organizing chats has been used. Here, employees are grouped with each employee, and each employee has a clear supervisor that makes the project easier and divides the tasks accordingly. From this point, it is easy to grasp the information of the chart holder name and its location contained in the project (Galandere-Zīle, 2009).
Project responsibilities
The appropriate roles and responsibilities have been expressed and the role of members in project development can be understood. However, there is a lack of contact in the partial responsibility allocation matrix. There should be RAM to outline who should accompany who...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here