its about my internship in Australia Post as a delivery driver
ASSESSMENT BRIEF & MARKING RUBRIC Page 1 of 2 Subject Title Work-integrated Learning -1 Subject Code WIL801 Lecturer / Tutor Your Academic Supervisor (MEM, MIB, MOM, MMTH) Assessment 2 Title Journal Entry 2 (Application) Learning Outcome/s d) Succinctly communicate work-related issues and outcomes to a range of organisational stakeholders e) Critically reflect and generate insights on workplace culture, relevant professional expectations and career aspirations. Assessment type (group or individual) Individual Weighting 25% Word count 800 words per journal entry Due date Week 8 Class submission On-line Submission type Turnitin Format / Layout of Assessment (details of what to include) Moodle Journal Assessment instructions 25% Journal 2 (800 words) - Week 8 Employability means the ability to find, create and sustain meaningful work across the career lifespan. Employability skills facilitate your employability and can include communication, teamwork, adaptability, initiative and leadership; and can extend to industry/discipline technical skills such as specific IT platforms and systems knowledge. The purpose of Assessment 2 is to provide the opportunity for students to reflect upon and examine their placement environment and the employability skills they expect to develop and how employability skills are utilised within their placement. This will be assessed via Journal 2 (Application). You are settling into your placement and beginning to contribute more to the organisation. This represents a significant learning experience worthy of reflection. Refer to the framework, instructions and prompt questions below to help guide your Journal Entry: Introduction - 200 words. With your increasing awareness of your role, explain and expand upon your placement role, the duties and requirements and how your role contributes to the vision / mission of the broader organisation. Identify and Reflect - 400 words. Identify two employability skills that are required in your role (these could be the same or different skills identified in Journal Entry 1). For each employability skill, describe a ASSESSMENT BRIEF & MARKING RUBRIC Page 2 of 2 placement situation in which the skill was applied. Reflect upon whether you felt prepared for the situation and reflect upon the outcome. Draw upon these two experiences and identify what you might do better in future. For example, you might take more time over planning something, ask more questions, ask the right questions, ask the right person or only slightly adjust some things if it went well. Conclusion - 200 words. Conclude your application of employability skills. Explain how the application of employability skills in the placement situations you described affected you. This could be positive or negative. You may have felt highly competent and in- control, unprepared or unsupported. What have you learnt that will help you in future? Acknowledge all used sources in accordance with ICMS 2021 Style Guide (APA Style 7th Edition). Readings for the Assessment Recommended textbook, journal or other reading: Auerbach, M. P. (2015). Cross-Cultural Relations . Research Starters: Business (Online Edition), .Call Number: Available on EBSCO Discovery Service. Login via MyAthens Avery, G., & Bergsteiner, H. (2011). Sustainable Leadership: Honeybee and Locust Approaches. Routledge. Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2013). Business Research Methods. (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN: 9780073521503 Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2017). Leadership Communication: Reflecting, Engaging, and Innovating. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(1), 3-11. Call Number: Available on EBSCO Discovery Service. Login via MyAthens Rook, S. (2015). Work Experience, Placements and Internships. Palgrave MacMillan. ISBN: 9781137462015 Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research Methods for Business Students . (6th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson. ISBN: 9780273750758 Call Number: 650.072 SAU Tanaka, A., & Kleiner, B. (2015). Cross-Cultural Business Etiquette. Culture & Religion Review Journal, 2015(1), 9-19. Call Number: Available on EBSCO Discovery Service. Login via MyAthens Zikmund, W. & Quinlan, C. (2015). Business Research Methods. (1st ed.). Cengage. ISBN: 9781473704855 Grading Criteria / Rubric This assessment will be monitored and marked by the students’ academic supervisors. The academic supervisors will also instruct their students to complete the Individual Report based on their ideas posted in their journals. Peer Review Evaluation N/A https://lms.icms.edu.au/pluginfile.php/169288/mod_resource/content/3/Style%20Guide%202021%202nd%20ed.pdf https://lms.icms.edu.au/pluginfile.php/169288/mod_resource/content/3/Style%20Guide%202021%202nd%20ed.pdf ASSESSMENT BRIEF & MARKING RUBRIC Criteria HD (85-100) D (75-84) CR (65-74) PASS (50-64) FAIL (0-49) Context (20%) The purpose of the report is expertly explained. Outstanding context provided and analysed. Context is clear and main points outlined succinctly. Presented with significant clarity and logical flow. The purpose of the report is strongly explained. Appropriate context is well described. Context is clear and most main points covered. Presented with clarity and logical flow. The purpose of the report is explained. Generally appropriate context provided. Context is evident and some main points covered. Presented with appropriate clarity and flow. An average description of the purpose of the report is provided. Some context provided. Context is understood, limited points covered. The meaning is apparent but lacking some clarity and/or focus. The purpose of the report is not clearly described or may be missing completely. Provides little or no relevant context. Context is not clear and nearly all main points not covered. Lacks clarity and relevant information. Principle and Application (60%) Clearly identifies and discusses important issues and offers thoughtful insights. Expertly uses references to succinctly define and reflect on the relevant employability skills. In- depth analysis demonstrates exceptional knowledge of theoretical concepts and the application or otherwise to practice. Consistently reflective and insightful. Discussion of key issues with detailed insights. Draws on literature to define and reflect on the relevant employability skills Analysis demonstrates detailed knowledge of theoretical concepts and the application or otherwise to practice. Demonstrates capacity for independent, insightful reflection, but not consistently. Discussion and insights are understandable. Uses literature to explain relevant employability skills. Analysis may lack some depth of knowledge in theoretical concepts and the application or otherwise to practice. Consistent attempts to reflect on experiences but tends to lack insight Limited discussion and insights. Employability skills are loosely defined. Analysis may describe theoretical concepts and practice, with gaps in understanding and/or connection. Some attempts at reflection but tends to be superficial and lacking insight or reflection. Limited with no clarity or depth about issues. Employability skills are not clearly theoretically defined. Analysis is lacking in detail and may not demonstrate knowledge of theoretical concepts and the application or otherwise to practice. Lacks insightful reflections or provides superficial and/or purely descriptive details. Presentation and Writing (10%) Excellently written and clearly organised and essentially free from grammar, punctuation and spelling errors. Very well written and logically organised with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Above average writing style and logically organised with some errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Average and/or casual writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Work may look as though it is in draft form. Poor writing style lacking in clarity with errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Research and Referencing skills (10%) Demonstrates a wide range of in-depth research. Referencing is consistently accurate and compliant with ICMS Style Guide. Demonstrates evidence of in- depth research. Referencing is essentially accurate and compliant with ICMS Style Guide. Demonstrates evidence of research. Referencing is mainly accurate and compliant with ICMS Style Guide. Demonstrates some evidence of research. Some attempt at referencing but not always compliant with ICMS Style Guide. Unable to demonstrate evidence of research. Referencing is unsystematic and not compliant with ICMS Style Guide