PPMP20010 Assessment 3 (Written Report) - Marking Sheet.xlsx PPMP20010: Executing and Closing Projects Assessment 3 - Critical Analysis Report (Total Marks - 30) Student ID & Name: Description Marking...

1 answer below »
its on chandrayaan 2 failure project


PPMP20010 Assessment 3 (Written Report) - Marking Sheet.xlsx PPMP20010: Executing and Closing Projects Assessment 3 - Critical Analysis Report (Total Marks - 30) Student ID & Name: Description Marking Criteria Marks Allocated Marks Awarded Marker's Comments 1. Project Information: Is the project snapshot appropriate? 2 2. Introduction: Is the introduction of the chosen failed project appropriate? 5 3. Major Issues: Are the issues and problems described about the project failure appropriate? 8 4. Control Systems: Is the explanation of the range of control systems used for cost, schedule, quality and scope reasonable? 15 5. Analysis of cost and/or schedule overruns: Are the reasons given for the cost and/or time overruns encountered during the project appropriate? 10 6. Analysis of the project execution team: Is the analysis of the extent to which the project execution team could be held responsible of the incurred time and/or cost overrun appropriate? 10 7. Analysis of relationship between overruns and the stakeholders: Is the analysis of the relationship between the problems you identified in cost and/or time overruns and the stakeholders expectations appropriate? 10 8. Analysis of possible actions for success: Are the analysis of the project management actions that could have been taken to better control the project and stakeholders in order to increase the chance for successful delivery appropriate? 10 9. Conclusion: Is the conclusion which identifies the key lessons that project management can learn from the experience of the project appropriate? 10 Appropriate and well structured, concise and clear understanding of project management arguments in response to the assessment task? (10%) Does the report contain substantial evidence of the use of project management concepts, principles, theories and arguments about the execution phase, particularly application, analysis and arguments about the type of control systems that will enable better or worse project outcomes? 10 Clarity of expression, language, format, presentation, references? (10%) Clarity of expression, language, format and presentation of the written report, Are the references provided correctly in an academic manner? 10 Total marks 100 0 Scaled marks 30% 0 Familiarity with the failed project context, issues and applicable control systems (30%) Critical evaluation of the effectiveness of applied control systems and stakeholders' management (50%) Late Penalty 5% (-5 marks) for each calendar day (either full or part day). Critical Analysis Presentation on chandrayaan -2 Critical Analysis Presentation on chandrayaan -2 Student name student id Patel vishalkumar dineshklumar 12133315 Patel mayankkumar ashokbhai 12136272 Patel vishalkumar bharatbhai 12133005 Patel maulik vinodkumar 12139012 Project information Mission type : Lunar orbiter lander rover Operator : Indian space research organisation (ISRO) Design complete: August 2009 Mission duration : 2011 to 2019 (8 years) Manufacturer: ISRO Project information Total weight :3850kg Launch date : 22 July 2019 Rocket : GSLV Mark ||| M1 Launch site : Satish Dhawan space center second Launch Pad Landing date: 7th September 2019 introduction The first Indian planetary mission to the moon, chandrayaan 1 launched on 22nd October 2008 with a suite of Indian and international payloads onboard, collected very significant data over its mission duration of close to one year. Chandryaan 2 the success of chandrayaan 1 orbiter mission provided the impetus to implement the second approved Indian mission to the moon, chandrayaan 2 with an orbiter-Lander-rover configuration. The lander and wanderer were timetables to arrive on the close to the side of the moon, in the south pole district at a scope of around 70 degrees south on sixth September 2019 and lead logical examination for one lunar day. introduction The Lander strayed from its indented direction while going to arrive on 6 September 2019 which caused a hard arriving. As indicated by disappointment examination report submitted to ISRO the accident was brought about by a product glitch. This project was developed for a detailed study of topography seismography, mineral, identification and distribution, surface chemical composition, thermophysical characteristics of topsoil, and composition of the origin and evolution of the south pole of the moon. Major issues Chandrayaan 2 project was lost its radio connection of lander at the last stage of landing. Before 7 days of launch, the fuel tank was broken down and the fuel leaked problem occurred. The capacity of the GSLV MARK III rocket was insufficient to carry more weight with it, so it took less fuel in the tank. Control system 1)Project estimation :- The approx. cost of the project was more than 600 Carore Indian rupees estimated by ISRO Chairman. 2)Project budget :- The Indian government passed the budget for chandrayyan 2 was 425 carore Indian rupees in 2008. Control system 3) EVPM Chandrayaan-2 is an ISRO (Indian Space Research Organization) mission comprising the 'Orbiter Craft' and the 'Lander Craft'. The primary objective of Chandrayaan-2 is to demonstrate the ability to soft-land on the lunar surface and operate a robotic rover on the surface. The scientific goals include studies of lunar topography, mineralogy, elemental abundance, the lunar exosphere, and signatures of hydroxyl and water ice. Control system 4)Performance measurement: For this project it everything goes as planned. Like it was launched at 2:43 pm on Monday and ISRO expects its lander and rover on the moon surface on 7th September and it was completed less than 1000 crore Indian rupees. Analysis of cost Chandrayaan 2 mission cost was around 978 crore Indian rupees which includes 603 crore Indian rupees for the orbiter, lander, Rover, navigation and ground support network and 375 crore for the heavy GSLV rocket with indigenous cryogenic engine Analysis of cost orbiterThe scientific goals of the orbiter are: to study lunar topography, mineralogy, elemental abundance, the lunar exosphere, and signatures of hydroxyl and water ice. landerThe primary objectives of the Chandrayaan-2 lander were to demonstrate the ability to soft-land and operate a robotic rover on the lunar surface. roverRover will carry out experiments to find water on the lunar surface and map for chemicals and topography. Isro has said that extensive mapping of the lunar surface to study variations in surface composition is essential to trace the origin and evolution of the Moon. Analysis of the project execution team Project team work Kailasavadivoo Sivan- ISRO chairmen He was evaluating project cost and providing all details to the government. Dr. S Somanath , Kunhikrishnan, J JayaprakashThey were making GSLV MARK III rocket. Analysis of the project execution team Project teamwork Muthayya Vanitha She was the Chandrayaan-2's Project Director, she was worked on data-handling. Manage all forms of data on the spacecraft. Carry out commands sent from Earth. Prepare data for transmission to Earth. Analysis of relationship between overruns and the stakeholders stakeholdersoverruns Russian federal space agency (RFSA) or RoscosmosThe Indian government and ISRO team were want to purchase Lander, rover, and orbiter from Russia but Russia was declined to give it at the end time and India need to manufactured it and it took a long time for production, so due to the time effect project was overruns. India finance departmentThe Indian government and ISRO team were want to purchase Lander, rover, and orbiter from Russia but Russia was declined to give it at the end time and India need to manufactured it and it took a long time for production, so due to the time effect project overran. Analysis of possible action for success For the success of chandryaan 2 ISRO scientist and Indian government consider the following factors and take possible actions which I describe under like, India was want to purchase lander, rover, and orbiter from Russia but at the end time Russia was declined for it. 2) IT Software was also weak so scientists were lost their connection with chandryaan 2 at last stage, If India take help from other countries for Software maybe they didn't lose their connection with the project. Analysis of possible action for success 3) The budget is also concerned for this project because the Indian government provided very law budget for it so scientists were not able to more experiments and it resulted in the failure of the project. These three points were most important for project and project team take possible action for success conclusion
Answered Same DayJun 08, 2021PPMP20010Central Queensland University

Answer To: PPMP20010 Assessment 3 (Written Report) - Marking Sheet.xlsx PPMP20010: Executing and Closing...

Abhishek answered on Jun 11 2021
123 Votes
CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION ON CHANDRAYAAN -2
STUDENT NAME STUDENT ID
PATEL VISHALKUMAR DINESHKLUMAR 12133315
PATEL MAYANKKUMAR ASHOKBHAI 12136272
PATEL VISHALKUMAR BHARATBHAI 121330
05
PATEL MAULIK VINODKUMAR 12139012
PROJECT INFORMATION
Mission type : Lunar orbiter lander rover
Operator : Indian space research organisation (ISRO)
Design complete: August 2009
Mission duration : 2011 to 2019 (8 years)
Manufacturer: ISRO
PROJECT INFORMATION
Total weight :3850kg
Launch date : 22 July 2019
Rocket : GSLV Mark ||| M1
Launch site : Satish Dhawan space center second Launch Pad
Landing date: 7th September 2019
INTRODUCTION
The first Indian planetary mission to the moon, chandrayaan 1 launched on 22nd October 2008 with a suite of Indian and international payloads onboard, collected very significant data over its mission duration of close to one year. Chandryaan 2 the success of chandrayaan 1 orbiter mission provided the impetus to implement the second approved Indian mission to the moon, chandrayaan 2 with an orbiter-Lander-rover configuration.
The lander and wanderer were timetables to arrive on the close to the side of the moon, in the south pole district at a scope of around 70 degrees south on sixth September 2019 and lead logical examination for one lunar day.
In addition to this it is also very important to mention another most reflective objective of the Chandrayaan 2 that was to map the lunar surface (Kumar, 2019). As said earlier, the main aim of this rocket was to study all the details of the lunar surface, especially the mineralogy and the elemental balance in the lunar atmosphere. In addition to this the objective of mapping the lunar surface atmosphere as it would help the ISRO team to prepare 3D maps of the lunar atmosphere
INTRODUCTION
The Lander strayed from its indented direction while going to arrive on 6 September 2019 which caused a hard arriving. As indicated by disappointment examination report submitted to ISRO the accident was brought about by a product glitch.
This project was developed for a detailed study of topography seismography, mineral, identification and distribution, surface chemical composition, thermophysical characteristics of topsoil, and composition of the origin and evolution of the south pole of the moon.
While describing the Chandrayaan 2, it is very important to step back to the past when the success of the Chandrayaan 1 prompted ISRO to start with the research and the design of the Chandrayaan 2. The first Indian Planetary mission to the moon was the Chandrayaan 1 was officially launched in the year 2008.
However some last minute technical problems lead to the complete failure of the project. However it is very important to mention that in addition to the general technical failure of the project some other reasons are also responsible behind the failure of the project. In this paper all the details factors associated with the project will also be discussed in detail. If all the factors can be discussed in detail then it will be easier to ascertain all the primaries behind the tragic failure of the project (James and Roper, 2018). In addition to all the controlling factors, total costs that are incurred in the project and the team members of the project will also be discussed.
MAJOR ISSUES
Chandrayaan 2 project was lost its radio connection of lander at the last stage of landing.
Before 7 days of launch, the fuel tank was broken down and the fuel leaked problem occurred.
The capacity of the GSLV MARK III rocket was insufficient to carry more weight with it, so it took less fuel in the tank.
The Vikram Lander crash landed on the surface of the moon after its guidance software which was mainly to provide whereabouts about the Chandrayaan went kaput. The most tragic issue was that Vikram Lander lost all the controls just 500m away from the surface of the Lunar Surface and it finally crashed.
As per the narratives of the Scientists it was moving as per plan in the first two phases of deceleration that is known as Rough Braking in the terminology of science. However another issue is very important to mention here is that a leak of helium gas from the bottle in the cryogenic upper stage of the rocket is considered as one of the additional reasons behind the pathetic failure of the...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here