I've uploaded 2 pdf. 1 pdf is checking criteria and requirements
PROJ6000_assessment 4 brief_November 2018.docx Page 1 of 4 ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title PROJ 6000: Principles of Project Management Assessment Assessment 4 – Personal Reflection Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes Successful completion of this assignment will result in achievement of the following subject learning outcomes: 1. Understand PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups and their role, relevance and impact on project management best practice and PMI’s Code of Ethics. 2. Critically compare and contrast project management approaches and their appropriateness for managing a variety of project types. 3. Apply appropriate project management tools and techniques, paying particular attention to risk management. 4. Critically reflect on the leadership styles necessary to succeed in a range of project management situations, and their personal capacity to succeed in those situations. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday First Half of Module 6 Weighting 20% Total Marks 20 marks Context: At the beginning of your learning journey on this subject, you were encouraged to reflect on your learning experience and knowledge obtained from the learning modules through discussions and participation. This assessment will provide an opportunity for you to reflect on your learning, document lessons learned, identify global project management practices you hope to adopt in your career. In short, your reflection is a tool for developing knowledge and professionalism in all matters relevant to you as a project manager and leader. PROJ6000_assessment 4 brief_November 2018.docx Page 2 of 4 Instructions: By the first half of Module 6, you will be required to submit a 1500-word reflection of your learning throughout the subject using the given/approved case study. Your reflection should include project management knowledge you have gained throughout the previous learning modules in this subject and appropriate use of additional resources related to this assessment. Based on what you have learnt in this subject, describe project management practices, implementation and competencies of the project team that result in success and/or failure in the given project. Critically analyse how you could do to enhance or improve success rate of the project. Include references to readings and additional resources discovered. Output and Submission: Submit your completed assessment at the first half of Module 6. Assessment Criteria This assessment will be graded using the Learning Rubric below. It is worth 20% of the marks available for this subject. PROJ6000_assessment 4 brief_November 2018.docx Page 3 of 4 Learning Rubrics Assessment Attributes Fail (0-49) Pass (50-64) Credit (65-74) Distinction (75-84) High Distinction (85-100) Effective communication 25% Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence. No effort is made to keep audience engaged, audience cannot follow the line of reasoning. Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Attempts are made to keep the audience engaged, but not always successful. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. The audience is mostly engaged. Line of reasoning is easy to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented, the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence. Engages the audience, demonstrates cultural sensitivity. Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments. Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic, demonstrates high levels of cultural sensitivity. Knowledge and understanding 25% Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information Thorough knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course PROJ6000_assessment 4 brief_November 2018.docx Page 4 of 4 substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. materials and extended reading. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning. Reflection 50% No attempt to demonstrate connections to previous learning or experience. Little to no attempt to demonstrate connections between learning experience and material. Analysis is defensive or lack of depth. Inconsistently draws connections between the experience and materials. Sometimes defensive or one- sided in analysis. The reflection demonstrates connections between the experience and materials. Demonstrates a non- defensive ability to critically appraise and discuss on the topics. The reflection demonstrates connections between the experience and material from other courses; past experiences; and/or personal goals. Demonstrates an open, non-defensive ability to critically appraise and discuss on the topics. Reflection Journal Guidelines What is Reflective Learning? For students, the pursuit of learning and knowledge growth demands a methodological approach in order to verify actual understanding of the theory and relevance of the problems being addressed within the context of a specific topic or subject. Knowledge as such is not gained passively but is in essence the combination of both experience and theory, which as a consequence, promotes deeper learning. Importantly, the process necessitates consciously thinking about a question or problem and in turn, analysing and including what you have accomplished or learned previously. Notably, this provides a framework for developing life-long learning and indeed, enhancing your knowledge and commitment to learning. Reflective learning also provides us with a process of being able to internally examine issues of concern. New or different experiences initiate inquiry which result in a changed conceptual perspective, either positively or negatively. The implications of which impact you personally manifestly through change and knowledge growth. So why use a Reflection Journal? One of the most potent means to learn, reflect and make sense of our learning is by maintaining a journal. In both academic and professional life Reflection Journals provide an effective vehicle for us to organise, prioritise and record our experiences and expectations in order to foster insight and assist our creative thinking. In simple terms, a reflection journal allows you to write about and reflect on your experiences as they relate to the course content and theoretical concepts and frameworks discussed. Journals are also crucial for developing problem-solving skills, time management and importantly, to facilitate an efficient means of summarizing observations and changes which impact on your current perspectives. Based on questions posed for each topic throughout this course, you will be able to build on and record, what you have learned. This will form the basis of your Reflection Journal (RJ). Importantly, as a discipline, you should copy and paste your online submissions week by week – ready for submission at the end of the course. The Process Rational As alluded to learning is stimulated by the reflective integration of theory with experience; simply reading about various concepts and techniques does not cause learning to occur. The process of reflective learning encourages ‘active learning’ in as much as the documentation of significant issues in a reflection journal are used to formalize and summarize your critical and reflective thinking in a written format. This in turn, demonstrates and cements your knowledge and understanding of the course materials, by documenting the lessons learned. There are generally three major facets of a Reflection Journal, these include: a) Theory: You need to be able to demonstrate that you have understood the theoretical elements of the question or problem posed. Notably, you can derive this from the prescribed readings and from the course material (or indeed, from references/text you may have personally sourced). b) Practice: Based on the theoretical concepts learned from the course, you need to be able to demonstrate how you can apply this theory in a practical work-related sense. c) Reflection: The reflection component is the 'personal insight' part of your response and as such, documents the lessons learned. © 2014 Torrens University Australia Page 1 of 2 The following expands upon