kindly find the attachment and please do go with the each content required. We did the project on CEVA and its impact in the Covid 19. In this report we are doing the reflective of what we have learned in MBA and this subject in terms of the how we find the subject in due coarse of time. I need 20 genuine references please . very authentic references as no marks must be lost in this section of references. We can talk about our finding of supply chain .. why we did this project.. what the future in this project and how about the career. Please do read the topic requirment before we start. its should be very easy.
MGT605 Assignment 3 Page 1 of 4 ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT605 Business Capstone Project Assessment Assignment 3 – Reflective Report and Activity Journal Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Subject Learning Outcomes SLO b. Demonstrate collaborative leadership and ownership in the preparation of a significant original body of practical or theoretical work. SLO d. Synthesise concepts from a broad range of previous subjects studied (e.g. finance, marketing, operations), simplifying into a holistic big picture. SLO e. Reflect on application of theory, processes, ethical practice and standards and how these are represented and lived through their decision-making. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Week 12 Weighting 20% Total Marks 20 marks Context: This subject allows the student to synthesise the knowledge and skills gained from all other subjects studied up to that point. The main deliverable in the subject is a major project. In this assessment, students will reflect on their individual experience. Instructions: Throughout the course of the subject, you developed a substantial project that assimilates the learning from your MBA subjects. In addition, you have recorded your journey in the form of journal entries. This final report is about reflecting on the process and experiences of putting your business capstone project together. Before you can attempt this assessment, it is essential that you understand clearly what reflective writing/thinking is. To help you with that, please read your learning resources in Module 6 in Blackboard. MGT605 Assignment 3 Page 2 of 4 In 1500 words or less, present a reflection on changes to your understanding as you applied theory from your MBA journey and the process of producing your project. Below are some suggested questions that you can use to help guide your reflective thinking. What did you learn and how useful it is in future for you? What was challenging and what was easy? Compared to the beginning of your capstone project, has your thinking changed? If so in what ways? Please note that these are guiding questions only. They are not intended to be all and everything about your reflection. It is advisable to do more research about reflective writing models and questions before you attempt this assessment. Present the report as your way of demonstrating the wider implications of your learning. That means your reflection should also look how your learning has impacted your future. Though reflective and written in the first person, the report still must observe academic writing conventions and be logically structured. The reflective report must use at least 20 references most of which must relate to reflection on theory and application. Submission Submit a written capstone project proposal that uses an academic style of writing including references and the recommended structure (above). Please refer to the Academic Integrity policy and the Assessment policy for more information. Use Assessment 3 link in Blackboard to submit your capstone project proposal. Give your file a name of this format – Your name_Subject and code_Assessment number – before submission. MGT605 Assignment 3 Page 3 of 4 Learning Rubrics Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) Pass (Functional) Credit (Proficient) Distinction (Advanced) High Distinction (Exceptional) Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge 5 marks Limited synthesis and analysis. Limited application/recommendations based upon analysis. Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new knowledge with application. Shows the ability to interpret relevant information. Well-developed analysis and synthesis with application of recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. Thoroughly developed and creative analysis and synthesis with application of pretested models and / or independently developed models and justified recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with existing knowledge. Recommendations are clearly justified based on the analysis/synthesis. Applying knowledge to new situations/other cases. Critical reasoning, effective Communication - Well-structured report with clear flow of ideas 5 marks Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence. Audience cannot follow the line of reasoning. Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. Line of reasoning is easy to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence. Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments. Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic. MGT605 Assignment 3 Page 4 of 4 Demonstrate authentic reflective practice. 10 marks Inadequate activity journal lacking consistent record of progress. Reflection not commensurate with the experiences. Reasonable information recorded in the activity journal but more detail necessary to show the breadth of the activities. Reflection shows limited understanding and fails to draw out major points of learning. Well-presented activity journal with relevant evidence of progress and limited breadth of project activities undertaken. Reflection shows sound understanding but lacks flow and cohesiveness in terms of the major lessons learnt. A consistent activity journal with relevant evidence of progress and a wider breadth of project activities undertaken. Reflection shows strong understanding and draws out major points of learning. Excellent and consistent step by step record of project activities undertaken covering a comprehensive breadth of activities undertaken and supported with relevant evidence. Reflection shows comprehensive understanding of reflective practice and changed behaviour.