Link https://jade.io/article/76580Requirement : Written Assignment:Discuss the legal arguments...

Question

Link		https://jade.io/article/76580Requirement :						Written Assignment:Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case			All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed, and there is a synthesis with the relevant law.			All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed.			Most of legal arguments are clearly and accurately summarised.			Some of the legal arguments are clearly and accurately outlined in brief.			The legal arguments are clearly or accurately outlined.							Written Assignment:Summarise the judgement of the case			The decision of the judge is accurately detailed with reference to any dissenting judgements or precedents.			The decision of the judge is accurately detailed.			The decision of the judge is accurately summarised in summary format.			The decision of the judge is accurately outlined in brief.			The decision of the judge is inaccurate or incomplete.							Written Assignment:Illustrate the role, purpose and scope of the relevant court, or tribunal.			The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.			The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.			The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were very clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.			The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were fairly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.			The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were absent.			Follwing this method	http://www.law.uwa.edu.au/students/Wellbeing/survival-guide/irac-guideApplication	Explain in detail why the Plaintiff’s claims are (or are not) justified, based on the body of law pertaining to the case.	How will this law be used by each party to argue their case?	Use relevant precedent cases or Legal Principles to support each answer.	You may also choose to use Legislation, when applicable.	There are often several Plaintiffs involved. Take the time to examine each case individually and analyse why their claims are (or are not) valid.	Legal Principals and precedent cases are used in each analysis, even if there is overlap among Plaintiffs (the same precedent can be applied to both parties, if appropriate. See example 2).	It is acceptable to refer the reader to another point in the paper, rather than rewriting it word for word, if the situation calls for the same legal recommendation. (See example 1 and 2)Note:Take time to discuss the contentious aspects of the case rather than the ones that are most comfortable or obvious.ConclusionCase: ASIC v PFS Business Development Group Pty Ltd (2006)1200 -1500 words			Link		https://jade.io/article/76580Requirement :						Written Assignment:Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case						All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed, and there is a synthesis with the relevant law.						All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed.						Most of legal arguments are clearly and accurately summarised.						Some of the legal arguments are clearly and accurately outlined in brief.						The legal arguments are clearly or accurately outlined.										Written Assignment:Summarise the judgement of the case						The decision of the judge is accurately detailed with reference to any dissenting judgements or precedents.			The decision of the judge is accurately detailed.			The decision of the judge is accurately summarised in summary format.			The decision of the judge is accurately outlined in brief.			The decision of the judge is inaccurate or incomplete.							Written Assignment:Illustrate the role, purpose and scope of the relevant court, or tribunal.			The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.						The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.						The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were very clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.						The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were fairly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.						The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were absent.						Follwing this method	http://www.law.uwa.edu.au/students/Wellbeing/survival-guide/irac-guideApplication	Explain in detail why the Plaintiff’s claims are (or are not) justified, based on the body of law pertaining to the case.	How will this law be used by each party to argue their case?	Use relevant precedent cases or Legal Principles to support each answer.	You may also choose to use Legislation, when applicable.	There are often several Plaintiffs involved. Take the time to examine each case individually and analyse why their claims are (or are not) valid.	Legal Principals and precedent cases are used in each analysis, even if there is overlap among Plaintiffs (the same precedent can be applied to both parties, if appropriate. See example 2).	It is acceptable to refer the reader to another point in the paper, rather than rewriting it word for word, if the situation calls for the same legal recommendation. (See example 1 and 2)Note:Take time to discuss the contentious aspects of the case rather than the ones that are most comfortable or obvious.Conclusion	Stand back and play ‘the judge.’	Choose the argument you think is the strongest and articulate what you believe to be the appropriate answer.	State who is liable for what and to what extent.	Consider how parties could have acted to better manage their risks in order to avoid this legal problem.

David · Accepted Answer

Plaintiff’s Claim:  
 When any person feel that another person disrupted their human or legal rights which are 
associated with the country and its lead to the loss of that person, or a person trusts that some 
other person owe his money, so that a person can sue on other person.  Plaintiff’s claims are 
justified or not justified, it is based on the judge decisions, after hearing the both the parties who 
has appeared in the court, the judge has right to give the final decision on the plaintiff’s claims. It 
is depend on the judge that is he rules for plaintiff or the defendant, it could be possibilities that 
judge decision for award something to both the parties. If the judge give decision on the favor of 
the plaintiff then it should be stated that the justified or if it is discarded than plaintiff would not 
justified. So in the legal word it could say that the notion is that the defendant would be 
responsible to the plaintiff due to the defendant is responsible for the injury of the plaintiff when 
it was justified and when it was not then the defendant would not liable for the plaintiff.
Uses of Law of both parties for argue:  
 The legal representative could say that lawyer of the plaintiff start the proceeding of the 
injury. He/ She inform the juridical court for the issues arises, which could be in agreement or 
that could be dispute among the different parties. Lawyer will state the plaintiff’s case. 
Afterward the legal representative (lawyer) of the Defendant has a chance to show the 
defendant’s case explanation. 
 The lawyer of the plaintiff will ask the Plaintiff and the witnesses of the Plaintiff who 
would justify the Plaintiff arguments. Both the Plaintiff and the witnesses called separately for 
the rectification. All question asked by the plaintiff’s lawyers are open ended, which means that 
questions which cannot be answered in yes or no. All answers need to be given in detail by the 
witnesses. After the Plaintiff’s lawyer asked the questions, defendant’s lawyer examined the 
witnesses and it is called the “Cross- examined”. Now that cross questions should be leading 
questions so that the witnesses could give answers in “Yes” or “No”.  The main aims of the cross 
examinations are:

Link https://jade.io/article/76580 Requirement : Written Assignment: Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed, and there is...

Answer To: Link https://jade.io/article/76580 Requirement : Written Assignment: Discuss the legal arguments...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Written Assignment: Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case	All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed, and there is a synthesis with the relevant law.	All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed.	Most of legal arguments are clearly and accurately summarised.	Some of the legal arguments are clearly and accurately outlined in brief.	The legal arguments are clearly or accurately outlined.
Written Assignment: Summarise the judgement of the case	The decision of the judge is accurately detailed with reference to any dissenting judgements or precedents.	The decision of the judge is accurately detailed.	The decision of the judge is accurately summarised in summary format.	The decision of the judge is accurately outlined in brief.	The decision of the judge is inaccurate or incomplete.
Written Assignment: Illustrate the role, purpose and scope of the relevant court, or tribunal.	The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.	The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.	The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were very clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.	The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were fairly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.	The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were absent.