Microsoft Word - MGT811 A1 Critical Incident Report.docx Page 1 of 4 Subject Title Contemporary Management Capabilities Subject Code MGT 811 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Critical Incident Report...

1 answer below »
assignment


Microsoft Word - MGT811 A1 Critical Incident Report.docx Page 1 of 4 Subject Title Contemporary Management Capabilities Subject Code MGT 811 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Critical Incident Report Learning Outcome/s (found in the Subject Outline) 1, 2 & 3 Assessment type Individual Weighting % 30% Word count 1,500 words (+/- 10%) Due day & date Friday of Week 6 (before 11.55pm) Class submission Lecture ☐ Tutorial ☐ Submission type Paper copy ☐ Turnitin ☒ Format / Layout of Assessment Report: ICMS Cover Page Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction Findings Conclusion Recommendations Reference List Appendices ☒ ☒ ☐ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☐ Assessment instructions Critical Incident Report Students will be provided (below) with a critical incident scenario which focuses on the analysis of the business manager's skills, capabilities, and behaviour to addressing a management problem in their organisation. Prepare a 1500-word critical incident report for senior management which outlines the key personal competencies required to address the management problem in the future. CRITICAL INCIDENT SCENARIO: Your company CEO has just been credibly accused of sexual harassment by two previous subordinates in his previous position as COO of another company. The stories of these accusations are gaining ‘virality’ in the media and online. The CEO adamantly denies harassing these two ex-employees; however, their stories were separately given, without knowledge of each other, and had details that were unique and consistent. You have been asked by the company board to assess the situation and produce recommendations from a ‘key personal competencies’ leadership perspective. This report will then help the board to assess whether or not the current CEO meets these Page 2 of 4 recommendations, and, if not, the report will inform the recruitment of the replacement CEO. Present your findings as a research report (1500 words) using the following structure: • Cover page: Your name, MGT811 and the title of the report: this should be a concise description of your report • Table of contents: list all major sections with page numbers • Introduction: Cover the Background (what has come before the report to make it necessary for you to write it?), Aim(s) (what is the main aim(s) of the report?) and Scope (how will you cover this aim(s), discuss sections and what will and won’t be covered). • Main body: This should be your response to the incident detailed above. You will need to assess the situation, using the theory covered in the unit. You will need to then make empirically supported recommendations for the board. There need to be regular in-text referencing to support your writing. • Conclusion: Using the literature write a short summary of your findings as well as some concise and practical recommendations for further research on the subject matter discussed in your report. • Reference list: use the APA referencing system. Please note the following important points: • The report should be in a clear, easy to read font, 12- point size, with 1.15 spacing. Overall presentation should reflect the appropriate business format. • Unreferenced reports, or those that do not include a minimum of five (5) references, will receive a grade of 50% or less. The quality of your references will impact your grade (at least three (3) of your sources should be scholarly, i.e. peer-reviewed academic journal articles) • Descriptive papers (i.e. not critical) will receive a grade of 50% or less Readings for the assessment The text and all relevant journals found through the Academic Databases (found via the ICMS Library and MyAthens (EBSCOHost). Grading Criteria / Rubric See below ASSESSMENT BRIEF___________________________________________________ Page 3 of 4 Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75 -84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% (Grading Scheme) Fail grade will be awarded if a student is unable to demonstrate satisfactory academic performance in the subject or has failed to complete required assessment points in accordance with the subject’s required assessment points. Pass is awarded for work showing a satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and an adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. A consistent academic referencing system is used, and sources are appropriately acknowledged. Credit is awarded for work showing a more than satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and a more than adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. A consistent academic referencing system is used, and sources are appropriately acknowledged. Distinction is awarded for work of superior quality in achieving all learning outcomes and a superior integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of in-depth research, reading, analysis and evaluation is demonstrated. A consistent academic referencing system is used, and sources are appropriately acknowledged. High Distinction is awarded for work of outstanding quality in achieving all learning outcomes together with outstanding integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of in-depth research, reading, analysis, and original/creative thought is demonstrated. A consistent academic referencing system is used, and sources are appropriately acknowledged. Knowledge and Understanding 50% Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge. Key components of the assignment are not sufficiently addressed. Adequate knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Often confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Thorough knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning. Content and Purpose 20% Does not meet minimum standard. Lacks a clear focus with large sections of unnecessary or irrelevant Meets minimum standard. Adequately defined focus and content with alignment to the Tourism and Progressing beyond minimum standard. Broad focus with most content clearly aligned to the Tourism and Hospitality industries. Mostly Significantly exceeds minimum standard. Clear focus with minimal unnecessary or irrelevant information included. All content is clearly Outstanding standard and exhibits high levels of application. Consistently demonstrates a systematic and critical ASSESSMENT BRIEF___________________________________________________ Page 4 of 4 information included. Content is disjointed and does not align to distribution in the Tourism and Hospitality industries. Hospitality industries. relevant academic sources used. aligned to the Tourism and Hospitality industries. All academic sources used are relevant understanding of content and purpose of the assignment. All academic sources used, showing depth of content and purpose. Structure 10% Discussion points do not flow smoothly or logically, no connection between ideas. Paragraphs not well used or lacking structure. Minimal structure evident however applicable points loosely connected. Limited use of paragraphs. Good structure evident with some applicable points presented in a logical order. Paragraph structure used throughout. Very good structure evident with most applicable points presented in a clear and logical order. All paragraphs are well organised. Excellent structure evident with all applicable points presented in a clear and logical order. Paragraphs well defined and organised to a very high quality. Research & Referencing 10% Insufficient evidence of research. Insufficient academic sources used. Sources of information not
Answered 3 days AfterMar 17, 2021MGT811ICMS (International College of Management Sydney)

Answer To: Microsoft Word - MGT811 A1 Critical Incident Report.docx Page 1 of 4 Subject Title Contemporary...

Divya answered on Mar 21 2021
140 Votes
Running Head: PASTE HERE YOUR TITLE OF ASSIGNMENT    1
TITLE OF THE ASSIGNMENT         3
CONTEMPORARY MANAGEMENT CAPABILITIES
MGT 811
ASSESSMENT 1 – CRITICAL INCIDENT REPORT
Executive Summary
Management of any entity is exceptionally vital, whether it could be a little entity or a huge entity. It requires a number of individual competencies such as the capacity to un
ravel issues, make brief choices, be dependable and be committed to the key perspectives of the entity. Organisational pioneers tend to enter into embarrassments, which at times go viral, posing the chance of diminishing their prestige as well as that of the entity they serve. An assessment meet will be conducted with the direct of these suggestions on the CEO to decide his individual capabilities.
Table of Contents
Executive Summary    2
Introduction    4
Incident that took place    4
Key Personal Competencies as a leader    4
Recommendations from Leadership Perspective    5
Way of Recruitment of Replacement    6
Conclusion    6
References    7
Introduction
For the chosen case, a CEO, who was a previous COO, in another company has been denounced as of now, of sexually annoying two of his ex-employees. The stories have spread so much to the open through the media and other online stages. Within the stories, it appears that the two casualties do not know each other and their contentions are exceptionally unique but reliable. In any case, the CEO resolvedly denies such stories. In this manner, this piece of work aims at giving suggestions to the company board of executives that will be utilised to survey this CEO. The recommendations will be based on experimental investigate prove, appearing different discoveries on the key individual competencies that this CEO ought to have.
Incident that took place
Giving the brief about the scenario, this case is about a CEO (Chief Executive Officer) of the company. He is accused by the two ex-subordinates of the company. He was a COO (Chief Operating Officer) in that company. Nevertheless, their stories were independently given, without information of each other and had details that were distinct and reliable. This case is getting high headlines and covering a number of newspapers. These rumours are going viral in the media and on the internet. Now, he is the most talk about person in the social media. There was no reason of not covering the most crucial topic in the country that is sexual harassment.
As suggested by McLaughlin, Uggen and Blackstone (2017), sexual harassment is the use of explicit or implied sexual overtones, as well as the unwanted or improper offer of incentives in return for sexual favours, constitutes sexual assault. Sexual harassment can take several forms, ranging from minor infractions to sexual violence or assault. As introduced by Cai (2018), the CEO is confident that he did not threaten these two ex-employees. CEO denies it openly that these allegations are false and he has nothing to do about the allegations made on him by the ex-subordinates. In this case, it is important to deeply assess the situation and come out with the findings for the justice.
Key Personal Competencies as a leader
 Leadership is about tuning in, caring and acting with integrity as well as honour with the fellow employees. It is about directing individuals to contribute something of remarkable esteem and getting to be their best selves within the process. As criticised by Rios et al. (2018), the cure to harmful culture, whether that is over-the-top competition, harassment, or segregation, is realising that workers are individuals and acting accordingly. This may fly within the confrontation of obsolete...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here