Price please
MIS300_Assessment_1_Brief_Requirements Analysis_Module 3.1 Page 1 of 8 Task Summary ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MIS300 – Systems Analysis & Design Assessment Requirements Analysis Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words (± 10%) Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: a) Analyse and explain how systems analysis techniques can enhance the ability of the organisation to address their information systems’ needs. b) Develop requirements for a variety of organisation information systems’ needs and communicate how these can secure the success of system design. Submission Due by 11:55 pm AEST last Sunday of Module 3.1. Weighting 30% Total Marks 100 marks MIS300_Assessment_1_Brief_Requirements Analysis_Module 3.1 Page 2 of 8 For this assignment, students need to individually write a 1500-word business report in response to the provided case study. There are two components: 1. Conceptual questions about the role of business analysts and the tasks they undertake to support the systems analysis and design process. 2. Practical questions in response to the provided case study: MIS300 AssessmentCase Study. Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task. Context Requirements analysis is one of the primary roles of a business analyst; the business analyst helps stakeholders identify their needs. You will be expected to support users by eliciting their requirements of a system that is being built or modified and document these requirements in a way that is clear to stakeholders, ensuring user needs can be understood and met. Task Instructions To complete this task, you must: 1. Carefully review the attached MIS300_ Assessment _Case Study. 2. Review your subject notes, essential readings and learning activities to ensure that you are well prepared for the assignment. 3. Create a report plan and identify all the key components required in your report. 4. Follow the outlined report structure: Note: The report is brief and therefore will not require an executive summary or abstract. Title page: should include subject ID, subject name, assignment title, student’s name, student number and lecturer’s name. Table of contents: include all key components of this assessment. Introduction (75–100 words): This serves as your statement of purpose. You will tell the reader what you are going to cover in your report. You will need to inform the reader about: • your area of research and its context • the key concepts you will be addressing • what the reader can expect to find in the body of the report. Body of the report (800–850 words): Conceptual questions: • What is your understanding of the role of a business analyst? • Why is requirements analysis important for the success of a system build or modification? Practical tasks: • Identify the stakeholders for this project • Identify the actors in this system? • Identify and list 2 major functional requirements for the system. MIS300_Assessment_1_Brief_Requirements Analysis_Module 3.1 Page 3 of 8 • Identify and list 4 non-functional requirements of the system. Include the reasons why you identified these particular requirements. • Build a set of use case diagrams for the system using Lucidchart or any other diagramming app, such as app.diagrams.net. • Based on the use case diagrams, develop and document two elaborated use cases. Each use case documentation must include: – use case name – ID – priority – actor – description – trigger – precondition – normal course – alternative courses – post conditions – exceptions. Layout: • The report should use Arial or Calibri 11-point font and should have 1.5 line spacing for ease of reading. A page number must be inserted on the bottom of each page. • With the required diagrams, due attention should be given to pagination to avoid loss of meaning and continuity by unnecessarily splitting information over two pages. Diagrams must carry the appropriate captioning. Conclusion (75–100 words): summarise any findings or recommendations that the report puts forward regarding the concepts covered in the report. Referencing It is essential that you use appropriate APA 6 style for citing and referencing sources. Please see more information on referencing here: http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing. Submission Instructions Please submit ONE Word document (.doc or .docx) via the Assessment 1 section located in the main navigation menu of the subject’s Blackboard site. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Academic Integrity Declaration I declare that, except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure, viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms. I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and drafts, and I will do so accordingly. http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms MIS300_Assessment_1_Brief_Report_Module Due3.1 Page 4 of 8 Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0–49% Pass (Functional) 50–64% Credit (Proficient) 65–74% Distinction (Advanced) 75–84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85–100% Knowledge and understanding Understanding of the key concepts of business and requirements analysis. 25% • Lack of understanding of the required concepts and knowledge. • Key components of the assignment are not addressed. • Lack of application and analysis of information to provide clear recommendations. • Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge. • Some of the key components of the assignment are not addressed. • Limited application and analysis to provide clear recommendations. • Adequate knowledge or understanding of the required concepts. • A reasonable capacity to explain and apply key concepts. • Supports opinion and information is substantiated by evidence from research to provide recommendations. • Thorough understanding of the required concepts. • Discriminates between assertion of opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. • Well-demonstrated capacity to apply and analyse relevant information to provide clear recommendations. • Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. • Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. • Recommendations are clearly justified, based on the application and analysis of information. Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge. Demonstrates a sound application of requirements analysis • Limited synthesis and analysis. • Limited application and/or recommendations based upon analysis. • Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new knowledge with application. • Shows the ability to interpret relevant • Well-developed analysis and synthesis with application of recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. • Thoroughly developed and sound analysis and synthesis. Application of pretested models and/or independently developed models and justified recommendations • Highly sophisticated and creative analysis with synthesis of new knowledge. • Strong application of pretested models and/or independently MIS300_Assessment_1_Brief_Report_Module Due3.1 Page 5 of 8 Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0–49% Pass (Functional) 50–64% Credit (Proficient) 65–74% Distinction (Advanced) 75–84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85–100% concepts and techniques. 35% information and literature. linked to analysis/synthesis. developed models. Recommendations are clearly justified, based on the analysis/synthesis. Knowledge is applied to new situations/other cases. Effective Communication (Written). 20% • Presents information. • Specialised language and terminology are rarely or inaccurately employed. • Meaning is repeatedly obscured by errors in the communication of ideas, including errors in structure, sequence, spelling, grammar, punctuation and/or the acknowledgment of sources. • Communicates in a readable manner that largely adheres to the given format. • Generally employs specialised language and terminology with accuracy. • Meaning is sometimes difficult to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is not always clear and logical. • Communicates in a coherent and readable manner that adheres to the given format. • Accurately employs specialised language and terminology. • Meaning is easy to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and logical. • Communicates coherently and concisely in a manner that adheres to the given format. • Accurately employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology. • Engages audience’s interest. Information, arguments, and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and persuasive. • Communicates eloquently. Expresses meaning coherently, concisely and