Module Title: Economic and Financial ManagementPlease she wants 60% upward and follow instructions please and use all recommened text books and souces
chosen organsation should be Uk based organsation and there years finanical statement and five ratio for each year and explain any move or trend within three years as the share holder you look into the stablility of the organsation
word count is very important please -/+ 2500
Table of content/structure
Executive summaryintroduction1 SWAT analysis2 consideration of major features3 Ratio analysis- (subheading)3.1 profitability3.2 Efficiency3.3 liquidation3.4 Investment3.5 Gearing- Growth4 Evaluation of financial performance5 management of financial risk6 strategies decision7 stake holders8 conclusion9. recommendation
Assessment Brief *This document is for CU Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module and should not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. Any infringements of this rule should be reported to
[email protected] Module Title: Economic and Financial Management Module Code: 216MANSC/216MANEL Assessment Type: Coursework Assessment Number: 2 Study Mode: Full-time Weighting: 60% Submission Date: 21/02/2020 Submission Time: 18:00 2,500 Word Report Introduction: Financial statements provide information about the health of an organisation. They offer a wealth of information to a wide variety of internal and external stakeholders to assess its position and performance. You should obtain the published financial statements for three consecutive years’ trading to assess the financial activity of your chosen organisation. Completion of this assignment will address the following learning outcomes: 1 Identify and evaluate the impact the economy has on business organisations. 4 Evaluate financial information in a range of organisational contexts. 5 Interpret key financial information to aid decision making and performance monitoring. 6 Appraise and propose courses of action informed by accounting tools and concepts. Task: Title: An analysis and evaluation of financial performance You should produce a 2,500 analysis in the format of a report, which uses key accounting ratios to evaluate the financial performance and position of your chosen organisation. You should produce comparative numerical ratios for each of the three years and analyse and explain any trends within these ratios. Your report should also identify, explain and justify three key strategic decisions which you believe the organisation should take as a result of the financial analysis you have carried out. Choose an external stakeholder of your chosen organisation to be your audience. Your analysis and report should cover learning outcomes 1, 4, 5 and 6. Your choice of organisation should be agreed with your tutor in a tutorial. mailto:
[email protected] Guidance notes and considerations Late Submission If you are not able to complete your coursework on time due to extenuating circumstances, the ONLY way to receive an extension (up to 5 working days) or a deferral (anything longer than 5 working days) is to contact a Registry team member located at your specific CU site. CU Coventry –
[email protected] CU London –
[email protected] CU Scarborough –
[email protected] * Extenuating circumstances are defined by CU as ‘genuine circumstances beyond your control or ability to foresee, and which seriously impair your assessed work’. * Please note that you will need to provide third party evidence to support your reasoning for requiring an extension or deferral. * Your course tutor is NOT able to approve an extension or a deferral, if you have not completed the official forms and had your request approved your work will count as not submitted and receive a zero mark. Plagiarism and Malpractice * You are encouraged to check the originality of your work by using the draft Turnitin links on your Moodle Web. * Collusion between students (where sections of your work are similar to the work submitted by other students in this or previous module cohorts) is taken extremely seriously and will be reported to the academic conduct panel. This applies to all coursework and exam answers. * A marked difference between your writing style, knowledge and skill level demonstrated in class discussion, any test conditions and that demonstrated in a coursework assignment may result in you having to undertake a Viva Voce in order to prove the coursework assignment is entirely your own work. * If you make use of the services of a proof reader in your work you must keep your original version and make it available as a demonstration of your written efforts. * You must not submit work for assessment that you have already submitted (partially or in full), either for your current course or for another qualification of this university, unless this is specifically provided for in your assignment brief or specific course or module information. Where earlier work by you is citable, ie. it has already been published/submitted, you must reference it clearly. Identical pieces of work submitted concurrently will also be considered to be self-plagiarism. Submission Guidelines There should be a title page which clearly identifies the following; * Student number * Name of the module mailto:
[email protected] mailto:
[email protected] mailto:
[email protected] * Title of the Assessment * Assessment number * Word count The word count identified includes quotations, but excludes the bibliography and unless specifically stated, encompasses a discrepancy of + or – 10%. Banding Knowledge and Understanding (30%) Analysis, Evaluation and Application of Theory (30%) Quality of Research (20%) Academic Writing (20%) 90-100% Exceptional knowledge base exploring, analysing and evaluating the discipline and its theory with extraordinary originality and autonomy. Demonstrates an exceptional grasp of relevant analytical techniques, and the ability to apply these to new and/or abstract information and situations. Shows a highly developed appreciation of the limits and/or appropriate uses of particular analytical and evaluative approaches. Knowledge and understanding of theory, where relevant, is highly detailed. Exceptional appreciation of the limits of theory demonstrated throughout all assessment outcomes. Approach to assessment task is theoretically informed to an exceptional standard. Exceptional exploration of wider academic sources with a high degree of independent learning which exceeds the assessment brief. Sources have been accurately interpreted and integrated with flawless synthesis, leading to innovative and interesting ideas. With some adjustments, work may be considered for internal publication. Exceptional answer with coherent and logical presentation of ideas. The answer exhibits a clear argument/line of reasoning with flair and originality. Discipline specific vocabulary used with precision and academic style applied well throughout. No language errors present and referencing in the CU version of Harvard has been employed in an accurate manner. With some adjustments, work may be considered for internal publication. 80-89% Outstanding knowledge base exploring, analysing and evaluating the discipline and its theory with clear originality and autonomy. Demonstrates an outstanding grasp of relevant analytical and/or evaluative techniques. Shows a developed appreciation of the limits and/or appropriate uses of particular analytical and/or evaluative approaches. Knowledge and understanding of theory, where Outstanding exploration of wider academic sources with a high degree of independent learning which exceeds the assignment brief. Sources have been accurately interpreted and integrated with a high degree of Outstanding answer with coherent and logical presentation of ideas. The answer exhibits a clear argument/line of reasoning with flair and originality. Discipline specific vocabulary used with precision and academic style applied throughout. No language errors present. Referencing in the CU version relevant, is detailed and sophisticated. Appreciation of the limits of theory demonstrated throughout the work. Approach to assessment task is clearly and appropriately theoretically informed. synthesis, leading to innovative and interesting ideas. of Harvard has been employed in an accurate manner. 70-79% Excellent knowledge base that supports analysis and/or evaluation and problem- solving in theory and/or practice within the discipline, with considerable originality. Demonstrates a detailed, accurate, theoretical understanding. Appropriately selected theoretical knowledge is applied to the individual learning outcomes. Makes excellent use of established techniques of analysis and/or evaluation relevant to the discipline and applies these effectively. Shows developed ability to appraise alternative theories and/or analytic approaches, where relevant. Excellent exploration of wider academic sources with evidence of independent learning which may exceed the assignment brief. Sources have been accurately interpreted and integrated with an attempt made at synthesis, leading to interesting ideas. Excellent answer with coherent and logical presentation of ideas. The answer is entirely relevant and focused with a clear argument/line of reasoning throughout. Discipline specific vocabulary used with precision and academic writing style applied throughout. No language errors present. Referencing in the CU version of Harvard has been employed in an accurate manner. 60-69% Very good knowledge base that supports analysis and/or evaluation and problem- solving in theory and/or practice within the discipline, with some originality displayed. Makes very good use of established techniques of analysis and/or evaluation relevant to the discipline. Shows developing ability to compare alternative theories and/or analytic approaches, where relevant. Very good evidence of wider academic reading and independent learning. Sources have been accurately interpreted and integrated with some evidence of synthesis. Very good answer with coherent and logical presentation of ideas. The answer is relevant and focused. Discipline specific vocabulary is used and academic writing style applied. Minimal language errors may be present but do not impact on clarity of expression. Referencing in the CU version of Harvard is accurate. 50-59% Good knowledge base that supports some analysis and/or evaluation and problem-solving in theory and/or practice within the discipline. Makes good use of established techniques of analysis and/or evaluation, relevant to the discipline. Sound descriptive knowledge of key theories with some appropriate application. Good evidence of academic reading, with attempt at moving beyond the recommended texts. Interpretation of sources is acceptable with evidence of integration. Good answer with coherent and logical presentation. The answer is largely relevant but lacks focus at points. There is an attempt at using discipline specific vocabulary and academic writing style. Some language errors are present which impacts on clarity at times. Referencing in the CU version of Harvard is mostly accurate. 40-49% Satisfactory knowledge base demonstrating comprehension and formulation of basic knowledge with some omissions at the level of theoretical understanding. Limited ability to discuss theory and solve problems