Mohammed-constructionthis assignment is two parts 10 minutes presentation and 2000 word essay please...

Question

Mohammed-constructionthis assignment is two parts 10 minutes presentation and 2000 word essay please follow all learning outcome and student want plagiarism report. RESULT ...

Mohammed-constructionthis assignment is two parts 10 minutes presentation and 2000 word essay please follow all learning outcome and student want plagiarism report.

RESULT

BACHELORS DEGREE ASSIGNMENT SPECIFICATION

Student name:		Student P number:
Programme:	Built Environment Programmes – Level 4. BSc (Hons) Construction Management; BSc (Hons) Quantity Surveying; BSc (Hons) Building Surveying; BSc (Hons) Civil Engineering. HNC and HND pathways.
Module:	Construction Technology - Past and Present	Module Level (4, 5, 6):	4
Module code:	ACBA4010	Contribution to Overall Module Assessment (%):	100%
Lecturer:	Dr Jamiu Dauda & Sheila Holmes	Internal Verifier:	Dr Deborah Hughes
Assignment Title:	Domestic Building Components and their Functional Requirements	Assignment No (x of x):	1of 1
Hand Out Date:	Week Commencing 15^th March, 2021	Submission deadline:	7^th May, 2021

Referencing:

In the main body of your submission, you must give credit to authors on whose research your work is based. Append to your submission a reference list that indicates the books, articles, etc. that you have read or quoted in order to complete this assignment (e.g., for books: surname of author and initials, year of publication, title of book, edition, publisher: place of publication).

Disclosure:

I declare that this assignment is all my own work and that I have acknowledged all materials used from the published or unpublished works of other people. All references have been duly cited.

Student’s Signature:

Assignments will not be accepted without a signature here

Date:

Turnitin: Lecturer to tick to indicate if an electronic version of the assignment must be submitted to Turnitin. Note: the Turnitin version is the primary submission and acts as a receipt for the student. Both electronic and paper versions MUST be submitted by the same deadline. No marks will be released until both submissions are received. Late submission of either the electronic or paper version will result in a late penalty mark. Penalties for late submission: Up to one week late, maximum mark of 40%. Over one week late, Refer. Only Year Tutors and the Programme Director may grant an extension.	YES	√
	NO

Learning Outcomes tested

(from module syllabus)

Assessment Criteria. To achieve each outcome a student must demonstrate the ability to:

Explain the various types, methods, and performances of traditional domestic construction from heritage to present day.

Describe commonly available modern methods of domestic construction and off-site manufacturing techniques

Identify the components of low-rise domestic building.

Understand the construction process of specific building components.

Produceneatly drawn and suitably annotated sections and sketchesof building elements.

·
Please submit the assignment parts in a suitable report folder– not in poly-pockets.

·
This form (ALL PAGES) MUST be at the front of the paper submission. Assignments will not be accepted without this form as it is a requirement that you sign the disclosure regarding referencing convention.

·
DO NOT put this form into Turnitin or it will match many similarities with other students’ submissions.

TASK DESCRIPTION

Coursework

Essay (2000 words)

The essay can incorporate the use of sketches, diagrams and figures to illustrate the text.

Scenario:

You have been approached by your uncle, a banker who is considering building a three-bedroom bungalow building. He has requested for your professional advice trying to understand the construction processes for the different parts of the building and their functions. Provide a report that clearly explains the different components of building and the construction processes to your uncle who is unfamiliar with building construction.

Write 2000 words report on
ONE
of the two options below.

Option 1:

1- Describe the different components of the proposed building and their respective functional requirements.

2- Choose one of the building components and explain in detail the construction process of your chosen component.

(N.B the two parts to be considered for the essay are to be approached in equal weighting).

Option 2:

1- Explain briefly to your uncle some of the available new low energy solution/material that he can use for the construction of his building.

2- Explain how the introduction of new low energy solutions has affected the construction industry in general.

(N.B the two parts to be considered for the essay are to be approached in equal weighting).

GUIDANCE FOR Students IN THE COMPLETION OF TASKS

Requirements

1. You are required to widely research the topic area, reviewing course notes and power-points; and content resulting from attendance at lectures and tutorials.

2. There is much guidance written on this topic and you should read widely, seeking out appropriate sources.

3. Tables, spreadsheets or flowcharts must be clearly identified and referenced within the text and must be your own work, applied to the case study context and
must not
simply be scans of standard text books and internet images.

You will be assessed against the five common assessment criteria as follows:

1. Research Informed Literature

· This will be assessed via the quality of the literature sourced and reviewed. You need to show an understanding of underlying concepts, practices and construction of low-rise domestic buildings. The Moodle content outlines some of the core reading material. The Construction Information Service (CIS) located on the Swansea On-line Library electronic database (see the IHS database entry) contains a wealth of more detailed information that can be researched, and which is produced by expert organisations such as the Construction Industry Training Board (CITB).

2. Knowledge and Understanding of subject

· This will be assessed by the depth and awareness of a professional context. You need to show you know the construction process for low-rise domestic building.

3. Analysis

· This will be assessed by the quality of your evaluation and conclusions. You need to show that you understand the construction process of building, the components and their functional requirements.

4. Practical Application and Deployment

· This will be assessed via the simulation. You need to show you can identify some suitable construction materials and methods

5. Skills for Professional Practice

· This will be assessed via the written and presentational quality of your report.

marking criteria and Student FEEDBACK

Common Assessment Criteria Applied	Marks available	Marks awarded
1. Research-informed Literature Extent of research and/or own reading, selection of credible sources, application of appropriate referencing conventions.
	10

2. Knowledge and Understanding of Subject Extent of knowledge and understanding of concepts and underlying principles associated with the discipline.
	30

3. Analysis Analysis, evaluation and synthesis; logic, argument and judgement; analytical reflection; organisation of ideas and evidence
	20

4. Practical Application and Deployment Deployment of methods, materials, tools and techniques; application of concepts; formulation of innovative and creative solutions to solve problems.

	30
5. Skills for Professional Practice Attributes in professional practice: individual and collaborative working; deployment of appropriate media; presentation and organisation.
	10

Assignment Mark (Assessment marks are subject to ratification at the Exam Board. These comments and marks are to give feedback on module work and are for guidance only until they are confirmed. )	Late Submission Penalties (tick if appropriate)	%
	Up to one-week late
	Over one week late

COMMON ASSESSMENT AND MARKING CRITERIA

	OUTRIGHT FAIL	UNSATISFACTORY	SATISFACTORY	GOOD	VERY GOOD	EXCELLENT	EXCEPTIONAL
Assessment Criteria	0-29%	30-39%*	40-49%	50-59%	60-69%	70-79%	80-100%
1. Research-informed Literature Extent of research and/or own reading, selection of credible sources, application of appropriate referencing conventions	Little or no evidence of reading. Views and findings unsupported and non-authoritative. Referencing conventions largely ignored.	Poor evidence of reading and/or of reliance on inappropriate sources, and/or indiscriminate use of sources. Referencing conventions used inconsistently.	References to a limited range of mostly relevant sources. Some omissions and minor errors. Referencing conventions evident though not always applied consistently.	Inclusion of a range of research-informed literature, including sources retrieved independently. Referencing conventions mostly consistently applied.	Inclusion of a wide range of research-informed literature, including sources retrieved independently. Selection of relevant and credible sources. Very good use of referencing conventions, consistently applied.	A comprehensive range of research informed literature embedded in the work. Excellent selection of relevant and credible sources. High-level referencing skills, consistently applied.	Outstanding knowledge of research-informed literature embedded in the work. Outstanding selection of relevant and credible sources. High-level referencing skills consistently and professionally applied.
2. Knowledge and Understanding of Subject Extent of knowledge and understanding of concepts and underlying principles associated with the discipline.	Major gaps in knowledge and understanding of material at this level. Substantial inaccuracies.	Gaps in knowledge, with only superficial understanding. Some significant inaccuracies.	Evidence of basic knowledge and understanding of the relevant concepts and underlying principles.	Knowledge is accurate with a good understanding of the field of study.	Knowledge is extensive. Exhibits understanding of the breadth and depth of established views.	Excellent knowledge and understanding of the main concepts and key theories. Clear awareness of challenges to established views and the limitations of the knowledge base.	Highly detailed knowledge and understanding of the main theories/concepts, and a critical awareness of the ambiguities and limitations of knowledge.
3. Analysis Analysis, evaluation and synthesis; logic, argument and judgement; analytical reflection; organisation of ideas and evidence	Unsubstantiated generalisations, made without use of any credible evidence. Lack of logic, leading to unsupportable/ missing conclusions. Lack of any attempt to analyse, synthesise or evaluate.	Some evidence of analytical intellectual skills, but for the most part descriptive. Ideas/findings sometimes illogical and contradictory. Generalised statements made with scant evidence. Conclusions lack relevance.	Evidence of some logical, analytical thinking and some attempts to synthesise, albeit with some weaknesses. Some evidence to support findings/ views, but evidence not consistently interpreted. Some relevant conclusions and recommendations, where relevant	Evidence of some logical, analytical thinking and synthesis. Can analyse new and/or abstract data and situations without guidance. An emerging awareness of different stances and ability to use evidence to support the argument. Valid conclusions and recommendations, where relevant	Sound, logical, analytical thinking; synthesis and evaluation. Ability to devise and sustain persuasive arguments, and to review the reliability, validity & significance of evidence. Ability to communicate ideas and evidence accurately and convincingly. Sound, convincing conclusions / recommendations.	Thoroughly logical work, supported by evaluated evidence. High quality analysis, developed independently or through effective collaboration. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Strong, persuasive, conclusions, justifiable recommendations.	Exceptional work; judiciously selected and evaluated evidence. Very high quality analysis, developed independently or through effective collaboration. Ability to investigate contradictory information and identify reasons for contradictions. Highly persuasive conclusions
4. Practical Application and Deployment Effective deployment of appropriate methods, materials, tools and techniques; extent of skill demonstrated in the application of concepts to a variety of processes and/or contexts; formulation of innovative and creative solutions to solve problems.	Limited or no use of methods, materials, tools and/or techniques. Little or no appreciation of the context of the application.	Rudimentary application of methods, materials, tools and/or techniques but without consideration and competence. Flawed appreciation of the context of the application.	An adequate awareness and mostly appropriate application of well established methods, materials, tools and/or techniques. Basic appreciation of the context of the application.	A good and appropriate application of standard methods, materials, tools and/or techniques. Good appreciation of the context of the application, with some use of examples, where relevant.	A very good application of a range of methods, materials, tools and/or techniques. Very good consideration of the context of the application, with perceptive use of examples, where relevant. Evidence of some innovation and creativity.	An advanced application of a range of methods, materials, tools and/or techniques. The context of the application is well considered, with extensive use of relevant examples. Application and deployment extend beyond established conventions. Innovation and creativity evident throughout.	Outstanding levels of application and deployment skills. Assimilation and development of cutting edge processes and techniques.
5. Skills for Professional Practice Demonstrates attributes expected in professional practice including: individual initiative and collaborative working; deployment of appropriate media to communicate (including written and oral); clarity and effectiveness in presentation and organisation.	Communication media is inappropriate or misapplied. Little or no evidence of autonomy in the completion of tasks. Work is poorly structured and/or largely incoherent.	Media is poorly designed and/or not suitable for the audience. Poor independent or collaborative initiative. Work lacks structure, organisation, and/or coherence	Can communicate in a suitable format but with some room for improvement. Can work as part of a team, but with limited involvement in group activities. Work lacks coherence in places and could be better structured.	Can communicate effectively in a suitable format, but may have minor errors. Can work effectively as part of a team, with clear contribution to group activities. Mostly coherent work and is in a suitable structure.	Can communicate well, confidently and consistently in a suitable format. Can work very well as part of a team, with very good contribution to group activities. Work is coherent and fluent and is well structured and organised.	Can communicate professionally and, confidently in a suitable format. Can work professionally within a team, showing leadership skills as appropriate, managing conflict and meeting obligations. Work is coherent, very fluent and is presented professionally.	Can communicate with an exceptionally high level of professionalism. Can work exceptionally well and professionally within a team, showing advanced leadership skills. Work is exceptionally coherent, very fluent and is presented professionally.

This section details the assessment criteria. The
extent
to which these are demonstrated by you determines your mark. The marks available for each criterion are shown. Lecturers will use the space provided to comment on the achievement of the task(s), including those areas in which you have performed well and areas that would benefit from development/improvement

Student Self Evaluation Form
Student name:		Student P number:
Programme:		Year of programme
Assignment Title:

This section repeats in brief the common assessment criteria detailed on previous pages. The
extent
to which these are demonstrated by you determines your mark. Using these criteria, tick the box that best indicates the level of achievement you feel you have achieved with regard to each of them.

APPENDIX GA36a

LEVEL 4 ASSESSMENT SPECIFICATION

Student name:		Student ID number:
Programme:	Cert HE Construction, Digital, Computing & Engineering
Module:	Integrating Projects
Module code:	ACHA4008	Contribution to Overall Module Assessment (%):	40%
Lecturer:	Dr Jacob Gwa	Internal Verifier:	Richard Sutton
Assignment Title:	Research/Project Proposal Essay Writing	Word count (or equivalent):	PowerPoint Presentation
Submission deadline:	10^th January 2022	Return date of provisional marks & written feedback:	20 January 2022
Submission method:	All written assessments, where practical and possible, must be submitted via Turnitin unless otherwise instructed by the Lecturer. (Please DO NOT put this assessment specification into Turnitin or it will match many similarities with other students’ submissions.) Alternative submission method (if applicable): Late submission of the assessment will result in a late penalty mark. Penalties for late submission: Up to one week late, maximum mark of 40%. Over one week late, 0%. Only the Extenuating Circumstances Panel may approve a change to submission dates.
Academic honesty / referencing:	Academic honesty is required. In the main body of your submission you must give credit to authors on whose research and ideas your work is based. Append to your submission a reference list that indicates the books, articles, etc. that you have used, cited or quoted in order to complete this assessment.

Module Learning Outcomes

(from module syllabus)

AIM(S)

· To enable students to apply the knowledge they have gained through the modules they have studied, in the development of project. The product of the project will take the form of a subject related application which may be a software application, electronics application, design, etc.

LEARNING OUTCOMES

Upon the successful completion of this module, the student should be able to:

· Implement an application/design synthesizing their knowledge from a number of modules

· Analyse a well-defined scenario, establish the requirements, and develop an appropriate solution

TASK DESCRIPTION

With the aid of development of documentation of a project work, produce a presentation of approximately 10 minutes on the processes and procedures for executing a project.

The expectations are:

1.

Develop a good PowerPoint which clearly showcases your understanding or ideas of documentation in a project work.

2.

The student should do a presentation video recording of approximately 10 minutes and upload the video with the PowerPoint.

Good references are required in the accepted format.

Mode of assessment	Volume	Weighting
Presentation or Demonstration	Presentation for Approximate 10 Minutes	40%

Deadline is Monday 10^th
January 2022 by 23:59.

GUIDANCE FOR Students IN THE COMPLETION OF TASKS

NOTE: The guidance offered below is linked to the five generic assessment criteria overleaf.

1.

Engagement with Literature Skills

Your work must be informed and supported by scholarly material that is
relevant
to and
focused
on the task(s) set. You should provide evidence that you have accessed an appropriate
range
of sources, which may be academic, governmental and industrial; these sources may include academic journal articles, textbooks, current news articles, organisational documents, and websites. You should consider the
credibility
of your sources; academic journals are normally highly credible sources while websites require careful consideration/selection and should be used sparingly. Any sources you use should be current and up-to-date, mostly published within the last five years or so, though seminal/important works in the field may be older. You must provide
evidence
of your research/own reading throughout your work, using a suitable referencing system, including in-text citations in the main body of your work and a reference list at the end of your work.