ACBUS201A/202A-ChrisFergus Version:1 –Created XXXXXXXXXX fergus_usb:01_bac:law_abbreviations.docx Legalcitations,andsavingyourwordcount...

1 answer below »
need to do task a and b total word count 1500


ACBUS201A/202A-ChrisFergus Version:1–Created2.5.2020 fergus_usb:01_bac:law_abbreviations.docx Legalcitations,andsavingyourwordcount ThisistohelpyouwithyourwordcountinAssessment#3inACBUS201A/202ACommercialLaw HarvardAGPS:LegalCitations LinkstotheTAFENSWLibraryGuidetoHarvardAGPSreferencingareavailableonyoursubject Moodles,withpp17-18showingushowtoreferencecasesandlegislation. Lawcasesandlegislationcanhaveverylongnames.CorrectAGPSreferencingincludesthecase/ legislationname,ineachcitation.Thesecanquicklyuseupyourworkcount[referencelistsare excludedfromwordcounts,howeverin-textcitationsareincluded]. Anacceptableapproachtoabbreviationwouldbetousethefullnamethefirsttimeyoucitethat case/legislationinyourassignment,andtointroduceanabbreviationthatyoucanthenuseasa citationfortheremainderofyourassignment.Ofcourseinthereferencelistattheend,thefull namewouldbeused. Example:Casein-textabbreviatedcitation Firstcitation: Theissueofwhethercommunityreligiousleadersare‘employed’ wasconsideredbytheHighCourtinErmogenousvGreekOrthodox CommunityofSAInc[2002]209CLR95(‘Ermogenous’). Subsequentcitations: …KirbyJproposedthatapplyingconceptsofemploymentcontracts toArchbishopswould‘challengecommonnotions’aboutsuch religiouspositionsinthecommunity(Ermogenous,at48). Example:Legislationin-textabbreviatedcitation Firstcitation: AspartofthewiderangeoflegislationthatintroducedGSTto Australia,thedefinitionof‘taxablesupplies’isinDivision9ofANew TaxSystem(GoodsandServicesTax)Act1999(Cth)(‘GSTAct’). Subsequentcitations: …ataxrateof10%,basedonthevalueofthetaxablesupply,is payablebysellersoftaxablesupplies(GSTAct,ss9.70–9.99). ACBUS201A – S2 2021 Assessment 31/8/2020 ACBUS201A – Commercial Law I Assessment 3 - CASE STUDY/RESEARCH REPORT - Due Week 11 – 30% weighting PART A – Case Study – 1000 words (20 marks) Audrey is employed as the Events Manager for NSW Wealth Managers Association headquartered in Sydney and she has the responsibility for arranging the annual member’s conference. The theme of this year’s conference is ‘investment and superannuation’ and Audrey’s role is to ensure that all of the delegate’s requirements are met including accommodation, food, clothing, and travel. The annual conference will be held in Surfers Paradise, QLD this year and Audrey has to organise everything. Audrey starts by looking up the website of XYZ Tours in order to book a bus for the purpose of the delegate’s travel to and from the hotel to the conference centre during the 5 day visit to Surfers Paradise. The website clearly states that all bookings must be online. Audrey telephones the company on 1 February 2020 and has a general discussion with Tommy, the company representative, about the availability of a bus, the dates and prices. She does not specifically confirm a booking or pay a deposit in that conversation. A week later on 8 February 2020, Audrey posts a letter to XYZ Tours’ office in Surfers Paradise stating that she wishes to proceed with her booking as discussed with Tommy. In addition to the ‘booking’ that she makes with XYZ Tours, Audrey books all the accommodation and other conference and travel activities through ‘A Class Travel’ a travel agency. In August, Audrey realises that she has not yet organised any of the specially made jackets which the delegates will wear during the conference. She goes to ‘DEX Outfitters” to make these arrangements. She orders the jackets to be made with ‘NSW Wealth Managers Association – Annual Conference 2020’ embroidered on the pocket. Audrey agrees to buy the jackets for $275 each after the shop owner says “Trust me, I have been in business for 20 years and my clothing is made from the finest quality cotton and workmanship. You will have no problems with the clothing. Look at this quality. I promise you that nothing will go wrong.” Audrey is so stressed that she has left things to the last minute and tells the shop owner that if he does not provide the clothing within 14 days she will destroy him and his business. When the clothing finally arrives Audrey discovers the jackets are not made from cotton and the logo says “2010” rather than “2020”. One week before the delegation is due to travel from Sydney to Surfers Paradise, the QLD Premier declares a state of emergency as a result of the worsening coronavirus pandemic and spreading infections, and decides to close all the borders. All flights are cancelled and all roads into QLD are closed. As a result, all event gatherings are prohibited until further notice. ACBUS201A – S2 2021 Assessment 31/8/2020 Required: Based on the above information and your knowledge of Australian contract and consumer law, answer the following questions. 1. Outline and describe any legal contractual issues in relation to Audrey’s booking with “XYZ Tours” and whether or not she/NSW Wealth Managers Association has/have a contractual arrangement with them. Use relevant cases to support your answer. 2. Outline and describe whether or not Audrey’s conduct towards the shop owner at ‘DEX Outfitters” has any impact on the contract she has agreed to for the manufacture of the delegate’s jackets. Use relevant cases to support your answer. 3. Advise Audrey if her contract with ‘A Class Travel’ is enforceable, given the state of emergency declaration, worsening coronavirus pandemic and the subsequent cancellation of all event gatherings. Use relevant cases to support your answer. 4. Due to great disappointment following the cancellation of their annual conference in Surfers Paradise, the NSW Wealth Managers Association decides to reschedule the conference to Katoomba in the Blue Mountains region of NSW. Unfortunately this trip is a complete disaster, as the travel agent Audrey used failed to make bookings adequately to accommodate the whole delegation, didn’t book enough tickets to the scenic mountains tour and failed to adequately cater for all attendees at the closing dinner. With reference to this additional information, outline whether or not Audrey and/or the NSW Wealth Managers Association may sue for damages? Fully explain your answer and use relevant cases to support your answer. 5. For the purposes of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) discuss whether or not Audrey would be a Consumer in her dealings with ‘DEX Outfitters’. 6. Has the shop owner of ‘DEX Outfitters’ committed a breach of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) in relation to his statement “Trust me, I have been in business for 20 years and my clothing is made from the finest quality cotton and workmanship. You will have no problems with the clothing. Look at this quality. I promise that nothing will go wrong” and the circumstances surrounding the jackets received by Audrey? Use relevant cases to support your answer. PART B – Research Task – 500 words (10 marks) Is common law and precedent still useful in regulating modern business practices or should we simply use legislation? Discuss this statement by:- (a) comparing the characteristics of common law and legislation and the role of the courts and legislature in relation to the regulation and facilitation of business conduct; and (b) contrasting the role of precedent and judges in dispute resolution, in civil law systems. • All citations & referencing must comply with the Harvard AGPS referencing style. • Students should note the word limits for each question, and the need to write concisely. Responses must be within 10% +/- of each word limit. Students must clearly state the word count for each of their responses, on their cover page. Note that the reference list does not form part of the word count.
Answered Same DayOct 21, 2021

Answer To: ACBUS201A/202A-ChrisFergus Version:1 –Created XXXXXXXXXX...

Preeti answered on Oct 23 2021
129 Votes
Case Questions
Part A
Question 1
There seems legal contract between Audrey’s and XYZ Tours, along with Audrey and NSW Wealth Managers. There is employer-employee relationship between Audrey and NSW Wealth Managers Association, this contractual relationship makes Audrey responsible for making necessary planning and other arrangements of the event or annual conference planned
to be held in Surfers Paradise this year. Audrey is legally obliged to fulfil this duty effectively by carefully planning and organising everything. Any deviation in this arrangement makes Audrey responsible for compensating damages and other losses.
Audrey used XYZ Tours website for making necessary booking and other arrangements. There is implied contract between both entities as Audrey agreed to proceed with the booking in the manner specified by XYZ Tours. In that case, legal issue arising in both contracts make the parties responsible for compensating damages and other losses. There is clear intention to create legal relations between two entities thereby implying formation of valid and legal contract (Action against the manufacturer: Legal services commission of South Australia, 2018).
In a contract case, ‘Air Great Lakes Pty Ltd Vs KS Easter (Holdings) Pty Ltd, Supreme Court of NSW (1989) 2 NSWLR 309’ based on proposed sale of an airline to Easter by Air Great Lakes, which is subsequently refused to honour by Easter. The court held that Air Great Lakes is not responsible for claiming damages from Easter as there is no intention to create legally binding agreement between the two; it was just a proposal (Air Great Lakes Pty Ltd vs KS Easter (Holdings) Pty Ltd, Supreme Court of NSW (1989) 2 NSWLR 309).
Question 2
Audrey’s conduct could not be said to have serious impact on shop owner and manufacturing process of delegate’s jackets. It is found that Audrey has used aggressive words in order to create pressure upon shop owner at DEX Outfitters for manufacturing delegate’s jackets. This is not the case of undue influence therefore contract between the two can be said as valid and legally enforceable (ACCC: Consumers' rights & obligations, 2018).
In a famous case law, ‘Johnson v Buttress (1936) 56 CLR 113 at 126’, Johnson looked after the deceased, Buttress who was an illiterate and unsophisticated in business affairs (Johnson v Buttress: High Court of Australia (1936) 56 CLR 113). Buttress has transferred ownership of a piece of land to Johnson without receiving any independent legal advice, later on; this decision was challenged by his son. The ownership transfer is set aside by the court, even though there is no evidence proving that Buttress has made the transfer under pressure. The relationship between Johnson and Buttress is based on trust and confidence which create burden on Johnson for proving that she has not taken advantage of that position. But, inability on the part of Johnson will not execute land ownership agreement (Johnson v Buttress: High Court of Australia (1936) 56 CLR 113).
In light of this case finding, Audrey has not attempted to unduly influence shop owner at DEX outfitters. She emphasised on quality work on quality claims and assurance made by the owner.
Question 3
In light of the recent outbreak of Coronavirus and emergency alert declaration by the state, the concept of ‘Force majeure’ is delved into for testing enforceability of contract with ‘A Class Travel’. ‘Force Majeure’ concept states that a contractual obligation might be delayed or not performed due to events beyond either party’s control. Coronavirus is a pandemic that constitute ‘Force Majeure’ as it is beyond the reasonable control of either party, and, consequences could not be foreseen or avoided. The outbreak of pandemic makes the performance of contract impossible,...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here