Hi,
NSG2TCD: Assessment 1 Instructions NSG2TCD: Assessment 1 Instructions2022 Assessment 1: Reflection on Barbara’s story (1000 words equivalent, 25%) Due Date: Monday 14 March 2022 at 2300. Context At the bottom of this page you will see three videos about Barbara, who has dementia, as she struggles with the health care system, particularly with the staff. Please watch all three videos prior to attempting this assignment before Task Using Gibbs (1988) Reflective Cycle, write a reflection on Barbara’s experiences in both the Dentist appointment and the Cardiologist appointment videos. Detailed Instructions 1. Your reflection should include the following: a. Introduction (approx. 100 words) · introduce topic, (what your assessment is all about), the situation & Gibb’s Framework b. Description (approx. 150 words) · location · context · what happened · the result c. Feelings (approx. 150 words) · Your feelings while watching the 2 videos, · Your feelings about the outcome · what internal (e.g., your beliefs, etc.) and external (e.g., other people’s beliefs) influenced/caused your feelings; d. Evaluation (approx. 150 words) · what was positive and negative about the experience for you? e. Analysis (approx. 150 words) · what contributed to unplanned outcomes for the event · what knowledge or theory was helpful for understanding this situation? f. Conclusion (approx. 150 words) · identify what you have learned from this experience g. Action Plan (approx. 150 words) · discuss what you would have done in these situations. 2. Language & style: · Use first person (I felt, I noticed, I thought…) · Use full sentences and paragraphs. Do not use dot points. · Do not use abbreviations or slang. · Tense: · Use past tense for previous events. · Use present tense when relating a previous incident to current practice, making general comments, or referring to literature. · Use future conditional (I would) when speculating about what you might do in the future. 3. Use APA 6 formatting & citation style (go to http://www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/referencing-tool/apa-6) 4. Use 12 font and double spacing. 5. Your proposal should include reference to at least 6 recent (past 5 years) and credible peer-reviewed references. 6. Submit your work via Turnitin using the submission template provided. General Information Please refer to the Subject Learning Guide for information about: · Word count inclusions · Academic Integrity/Originality · Turnitin · Extensions · Penalties, etc Links to the video’s on Barbara’s story 1. The whole story – 33 minute video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtA2sMAjU_Y&t=1077s 1. Dentist appointment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnPUq00UA8c&t=43s 1. Cardiology appointment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFXirEnjfTI&t=42s College of SHE School of Nursing and Midwifery NSG2TCD: Template and Marking Rubric - Assessment One Student ID: Date of submission: Word count: TOPIC: Reflection on experiences with people with dementia (1000 words, 25%) The aim of a formative assessment is for the lecturer to provide comprehensive feedback that helps students develop a stronger understanding of their own academic strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, it is important that you read and take note of the feedback provided, to help you improve your academic writing. Criteria Excellent ( A) 80-100% Very Good (B) 70-79% Good (C) 60-69% Fair (D) 50-59% Poor ( N < 50 % ) introduction (10 marks) provides a clear, concise description of the aim of the assignment, the situation and the aspects of the reflective cycle to be discussed. 10 marks provides a good description of the aim of the assignment, the situation and the aspects of the reflective cycle to be discussed. 8 marks provides most of the relevant aspects of an introduction. 6 marks provides only some of the relevant aspects of an introduction. 4 marks provides few or no information required for an introduction. 2 marks description of event (10 marks) provides a thorough description of the event (what happened), including the context & location, role played by self & others, & outcome. 10 marks provides a good description of the event. 8 marks provides most of the key elements of the event. at times the discussion of the event may be unclear. 6 marks provides a simplistic description of the event or a limited ability to describe most of the key elements of the event. 4 marks the description of the event is unclear, and some required aspects are missing. 2 marks description of feelings (10 marks) excellent, clear reflection of feelings experienced during the event, feelings about the outcome and any changes in feelings on current reflection. identifies both the internal and external factors underlying these feelings. 10 marks a good reflection of feelings about the event. identifies either internal or external factors underlying these feelings. 8 marks provides some of the required feelings about the event. 6 marks provides a simplistic a reflection of the feelings about the event. 4 marks the reflection of the feelings experienced is unclear and some required aspects are missing. 2 marks evaluation (10 marks) excellent, clear reflection on the positive and negative aspects of the whole experience for you. 10 marks a good reflection on the positive and negative aspects of the whole experience for you. 8 marks provides some reflection on the positive and negative aspects of the whole experience for you. 6 marks provides a simplistic reflection on the positive and negative aspects of the whole experience for you. 4 marks the reflection on the positive and negative aspects is unclear, and some required aspects are missing. 2 marks analysis & critical appraisal (10 marks) an excellent analysis of the whole experience, including incorporation of knowledge and theory to help in understanding of the situation. 10 marks a good analysis of the whole experience, including incorporation of either knowledge and theory to help in understanding of the situation. 8 marks provides some analysis of the whole experience. 6 marks provides a simplistic analysis of some aspects of the event. 4 marks the analysis of the event is unclear, and some required aspects are missing. 2 marks conclusion (10 marks) excellent identification of learning opportunities from the whole experience and what you could have done differently. 10 marks a good identification of learning opportunities from the whole experience and what you could have done differently. 8 marks provides some identification of learning opportunities from the whole experience and some information on what you could have done differently. 6 marks provides a simplistic discussion of learning opportunities and what you could have done differently. 4 marks the section is missing or is unclear. 2 marks action plan (10 marks) a clear, excellent description of what would be done if this situation arises again. 10 marks a good description of what would be done if this situation arises again. 8 marks provides some information on what would be done if this situation arises again. 6 marks provides a simplistic discussion of what would be done if this situation arises again. 4 marks the section is missing or is unclear. 2 marks use of the research literature (15 marks) inclusion of an appropriate number of relevant and credible (peer-reviewed), references (journal articles, text books, credible websites, no lecture notes and including gibbs (1988). all reference material is seamlessly integrated with effective paraphrasing & minimal use of direct quotes. accurate use of apa6 for in-text citations & reference list. 15 marks a good attempt at including an appropriate number of relevant and credible references including gibbs (1988). a good attempt at seamlessly integrating them into the text. good use of apa6 for in-text citations & reference list. 12 marks inclusion of an appropriate number of references but includes some that are not peer-reviewed or uses lecture notes or is missing the reference to gibbs (1988). shows reasonable attempt to integrate literature with mostly adequate paraphrasing. good use of apa6 for in-text citations & reference list. 9 marks poor use of research literature by including most that are not peer-reviewed or uses lecture notes or is missing the reference to gibbs (1988). poor integration of literature with poor paraphrasing or overuse of quotes. poor use of apa6 for in-text citations & reference list. 6 marks uses no- credible references throughout paper e.g. wikipedia, better health channel or uses all lecture notes and missing the reference to gibbs (1988). incorrect or missing integration of literature with poor paraphrasing or overuse of quotes. does not adhere to apa6 format. 3 marks academic writing (15 marks) information is well organised; there is a clear introduction & logical organisation of ideas within and between paragraphs expression is clear & precise & uses an appropriate narrative style. there are no noticeable errors in vocabulary, grammar, spelling, or punctuation. appropriate word count for each section. the provided template with marking rubric has been used. used. 15 marks expression is clear & uses an appropriate narrative style. occasional minor errors may occur in grammar, spelling, punctuation or vocab choice. appropriate word count for each section. the provided template with marking rubric has been used. used. 12 marks expression is clear but there may be occasional problems with style (e.g., idiomatic language). errors in grammar, vocab, spelling or punctuation are not intrusive & do not interfere with understanding. appropriate word count for each section. the provided template with marking rubric has been used. used. 9 marks errors in grammar, vocabulary, spelling or punctuation sometimes interfere with understanding. inappropriate word count for each section. the provided template with marking rubric was not used. 6 marks style is not appropriate for academic work expression may be limited using a restricted range of vocabulary. errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or word choice are intrusive & frequently interfere with understanding. inappropriate word count for each section. the provided template with marking rubric was not used. 3 marks total marks out of 100, then divided by 4 to give final mark out of 25. 5 start typing your assignment here – please remove this statement once you commence writing below. 50="" %="" )="" introduction="" (10="" marks)="" provides="" a="" clear,="" concise="" description="" of="" the="" aim="" of="" the="" assignment,="" the="" situation="" and="" the="" aspects="" of="" the="" reflective="" cycle="" to="" be="" discussed.="" 10="" marks="" provides="" a="" good="" description="" of="" the="" aim="" of="" the="" assignment,="" the="" situation="" and="" the="" aspects="" of="" the="" reflective="" cycle="" to="" be="" discussed.="" 8="" marks="" provides="" most="" of="" the="" relevant="" aspects="" of="" an="" introduction.="" 6="" marks="" provides="" only="" some="" of="" the="" relevant="" aspects="" of="" an="" introduction.="" 4="" marks="" provides="" few="" or="" no="" information="" required="" for="" an="" introduction.="" 2="" marks="" description="" of="" event="" (10="" marks)="" provides="" a="" thorough="" description="" of="" the="" event="" (what="" happened),="" including="" the="" context="" &="" location,="" role="" played="" by="" self="" &="" others,="" &="" outcome.="" 10="" marks="" provides="" a="" good="" description="" of="" the="" event.="" 8="" marks="" provides="" most="" of="" the="" key="" elements="" of="" the="" event.="" at="" times="" the="" discussion="" of="" the="" event="" may="" be="" unclear.="" 6="" marks="" provides="" a="" simplistic="" description="" of="" the="" event="" or="" a="" limited="" ability="" to="" describe="" most="" of="" the="" key="" elements="" of="" the="" event.="" 4="" marks="" the="" description="" of="" the="" event="" is="" unclear,="" and="" some="" required="" aspects="" are="" missing.="" 2="" marks="" description="" of="" feelings="" (10="" marks)="" excellent,="" clear="" reflection="" of="" feelings="" experienced="" during="" the="" event,="" feelings="" about="" the="" outcome="" and="" any="" changes="" in="" feelings="" on="" current="" reflection.="" identifies="" both="" the="" internal="" and="" external="" factors="" underlying="" these="" feelings.="" 10="" marks="" a="" good="" reflection="" of="" feelings="" about="" the="" event.="" identifies="" either="" internal="" or="" external="" factors="" underlying="" these="" feelings.="" 8="" marks="" provides="" some="" of="" the="" required="" feelings="" about="" the="" event.="" 6="" marks="" provides="" a="" simplistic="" a="" reflection="" of="" the="" feelings="" about="" the="" event.="" 4="" marks="" the="" reflection="" of="" the="" feelings="" experienced="" is="" unclear="" and="" some="" required="" aspects="" are="" missing.="" 2="" marks="" evaluation="" (10="" marks)="" excellent,="" clear="" reflection="" on="" the="" positive="" and="" negative="" aspects="" of="" the="" whole="" experience="" for="" you.="" 10="" marks="" a="" good="" reflection="" on="" the="" positive="" and="" negative="" aspects="" of="" the="" whole="" experience="" for="" you.="" 8="" marks="" provides="" some="" reflection="" on="" the="" positive="" and="" negative="" aspects="" of="" the="" whole="" experience="" for="" you.="" 6="" marks="" provides="" a="" simplistic="" reflection="" on="" the="" positive="" and="" negative="" aspects="" of="" the="" whole="" experience="" for="" you.="" 4="" marks="" the="" reflection="" on="" the="" positive="" and="" negative="" aspects="" is="" unclear,="" and="" some="" required="" aspects="" are="" missing.="" 2="" marks="" analysis="" &="" critical="" appraisal="" (10="" marks)="" an="" excellent="" analysis="" of="" the="" whole="" experience,="" including="" incorporation="" of="" knowledge="" and="" theory="" to="" help="" in="" understanding="" of="" the="" situation.="" 10="" marks="" a="" good="" analysis="" of="" the="" whole="" experience,="" including="" incorporation="" of="" either="" knowledge="" and="" theory="" to="" help="" in="" understanding="" of="" the="" situation.="" 8="" marks="" provides="" some="" analysis="" of="" the="" whole="" experience.="" 6="" marks="" provides="" a="" simplistic="" analysis="" of="" some="" aspects="" of="" the="" event.="" 4="" marks="" the="" analysis="" of="" the="" event="" is="" unclear,="" and="" some="" required="" aspects="" are="" missing.="" 2="" marks="" conclusion="" (10="" marks)="" excellent="" identification="" of="" learning="" opportunities="" from="" the="" whole="" experience="" and="" what="" you="" could="" have="" done="" differently.="" 10="" marks="" a="" good="" identification="" of="" learning="" opportunities="" from="" the="" whole="" experience="" and="" what="" you="" could="" have="" done="" differently.="" 8="" marks="" provides="" some="" identification="" of="" learning="" opportunities="" from="" the="" whole="" experience="" and="" some="" information="" on="" what="" you="" could="" have="" done="" differently.="" 6="" marks="" provides="" a="" simplistic="" discussion="" of="" learning="" opportunities="" and="" what="" you="" could="" have="" done="" differently.="" 4="" marks="" the="" section="" is="" missing="" or="" is="" unclear.="" 2="" marks="" action="" plan="" (10="" marks)="" a="" clear,="" excellent="" description="" of="" what="" would="" be="" done="" if="" this="" situation="" arises="" again.="" 10="" marks="" a="" good="" description="" of="" what="" would="" be="" done="" if="" this="" situation="" arises="" again.="" 8="" marks="" provides="" some="" information="" on="" what="" would="" be="" done="" if="" this="" situation="" arises="" again.="" 6="" marks="" provides="" a="" simplistic="" discussion="" of="" what="" would="" be="" done="" if="" this="" situation="" arises="" again.="" 4="" marks="" the="" section="" is="" missing="" or="" is="" unclear.="" 2="" marks="" use="" of="" the="" research="" literature="" (15="" marks)="" inclusion="" of="" an="" appropriate="" number="" of="" relevant="" and="" credible="" (peer-reviewed),="" references="" (journal="" articles,="" text="" books,="" credible="" websites,="" no="" lecture="" notes="" and="" including="" gibbs="" (1988).="" all="" reference="" material="" is="" seamlessly="" integrated="" with="" effective="" paraphrasing="" &="" minimal="" use="" of="" direct="" quotes.="" accurate="" use="" of="" apa6="" for="" in-text="" citations="" &="" reference="" list.="" 15="" marks="" a="" good="" attempt="" at="" including="" an="" appropriate="" number="" of="" relevant="" and="" credible="" references="" including="" gibbs="" (1988).="" a="" good="" attempt="" at="" seamlessly="" integrating="" them="" into="" the="" text.="" good="" use="" of="" apa6="" for="" in-text="" citations="" &="" reference="" list.="" 12="" marks="" inclusion="" of="" an="" appropriate="" number="" of="" references="" but="" includes="" some="" that="" are="" not="" peer-reviewed="" or="" uses="" lecture="" notes="" or="" is="" missing="" the="" reference="" to="" gibbs="" (1988).="" shows="" reasonable="" attempt="" to="" integrate="" literature="" with="" mostly="" adequate="" paraphrasing.="" good="" use="" of="" apa6="" for="" in-text="" citations="" &="" reference="" list.="" 9="" marks="" poor="" use="" of="" research="" literature="" by="" including="" most="" that="" are="" not="" peer-reviewed="" or="" uses="" lecture="" notes="" or="" is="" missing="" the="" reference="" to="" gibbs="" (1988).="" poor="" integration="" of="" literature="" with="" poor="" paraphrasing="" or="" overuse="" of="" quotes.="" poor="" use="" of="" apa6="" for="" in-text="" citations="" &="" reference="" list.="" 6="" marks="" uses="" no-="" credible="" references="" throughout="" paper="" e.g.="" wikipedia,="" better="" health="" channel="" or="" uses="" all="" lecture="" notes="" and="" missing="" the="" reference="" to="" gibbs="" (1988).="" incorrect="" or="" missing="" integration="" of="" literature="" with="" poor="" paraphrasing="" or="" overuse="" of="" quotes.="" does="" not="" adhere="" to="" apa6="" format.="" 3="" marks="" academic="" writing="" (15="" marks)="" information="" is="" well="" organised;="" there="" is="" a="" clear="" introduction="" &="" logical="" organisation="" of="" ideas="" within="" and="" between="" paragraphs="" expression="" is="" clear="" &="" precise="" &="" uses="" an="" appropriate="" narrative="" style.="" there="" are="" no="" noticeable="" errors="" in="" vocabulary,="" grammar,="" spelling,="" or="" punctuation.="" appropriate="" word="" count="" for="" each="" section.="" the="" provided="" template="" with="" marking="" rubric="" has="" been="" used.="" used.="" 15="" marks="" expression="" is="" clear="" &="" uses="" an="" appropriate="" narrative="" style.="" occasional="" minor="" errors="" may="" occur="" in="" grammar,="" spelling,="" punctuation="" or="" vocab="" choice.="" appropriate="" word="" count="" for="" each="" section.="" the="" provided="" template="" with="" marking="" rubric="" has="" been="" used.="" used.="" 12="" marks="" expression="" is="" clear="" but="" there="" may="" be="" occasional="" problems="" with="" style="" (e.g.,="" idiomatic="" language).="" errors="" in="" grammar,="" vocab,="" spelling="" or="" punctuation="" are="" not="" intrusive="" &="" do="" not="" interfere="" with="" understanding.="" appropriate="" word="" count="" for="" each="" section.="" the="" provided="" template="" with="" marking="" rubric="" has="" been="" used.="" used.="" 9="" marks="" errors="" in="" grammar,="" vocabulary,="" spelling="" or="" punctuation="" sometimes="" interfere="" with="" understanding.="" inappropriate="" word="" count="" for="" each="" section.="" the="" provided="" template="" with="" marking="" rubric="" was="" not="" used.="" 6="" marks="" style="" is="" not="" appropriate="" for="" academic="" work="" expression="" may="" be="" limited="" using="" a="" restricted="" range="" of="" vocabulary.="" errors="" in="" grammar,="" spelling,="" punctuation,="" and/or="" word="" choice="" are="" intrusive="" &="" frequently="" interfere="" with="" understanding.="" inappropriate="" word="" count="" for="" each="" section.="" the="" provided="" template="" with="" marking="" rubric="" was="" not="" used.="" 3="" marks="" total="" marks="" out="" of="" 100,="" then="" divided="" by="" 4="" to="" give="" final="" mark="" out="" of="" 25.="" 5="" start="" typing="" your="" assignment="" here="" –="" please="" remove="" this="" statement="" once="" you="" commence="" writing="">