OBHR Comparative Case Study (20%) XXXXXXXXXXIndividual assignment Due: Week 11 Prepare a 1500-word comparative case study. Adhere to the following format while preparing the case study. · Choose two...

1 answer below »
Avoid plagiarism


OBHR Comparative Case Study (20%) Individual assignment Due: Week 11 Prepare a 1500-word comparative case study. Adhere to the following format while preparing the case study.     · Choose two well documented case studies of different organizations.  · One case study should be based on success story like Apple, Google, Microsoft. · Other case study should focus on organizational failure/project failure etc. like Blueberry, Nokia, Yahoo. · Analyze the organizational structure and culture for both organizations.    · What is the mode of communication adopted by both organizations? How do employees interact with each other?  · What kind of leadership style these organizations prefer/follow? What is the management style of both organizations?  · Explain how the organizational culture, structure and management style effects/relates to the success and failure of the organization? · What is the HR Strategic planning, recruitment and selection strategy, performance/ talent management strategy of both the organizations?   · Based on the analysis performed propose suggestions and recommendations (5-6) based on the OBHR concepts learned in the course for both organizations.    Report Requirements   · The report must include a title page, table of contents, introduction, multiple supporting body paragraphs, conclusion and list of references.   · Students must use a minimum of 10 references. All references must come from peer-reviewed academic journals (UCW University Library); additional references may be from trade and practitioner publications or online search engines.   · Students must use APA format when citing literature.  · Students are encouraged to use Grammarly to avoid plagiarism. If plagiarism is identified in the paper, the student will receive a zero for the assignment.   · Do not exceed the word-limit. Marks will be deducted for excessive length.   APA writing conventions should be followed in the report with a minimum of ten (10) sources referenced and cited including in-text citations (if you are presenting another author’s ideas in your own language you still have to provide the in-text citation of that author), references in APA format, the report must demonstrate analysis of the material and its application to the workplace. Title of the company cannot be your report title due to copyright reasons. The submission date is mentioned in the course schedule (i.e., week 11) in course syllabus. All submissions will be made on Moodle. Please note that assignment submissions are ONLY accepted on Moodle and NOT on email. Kindly rename your assignment file by your respective name before you upload. For example, if John Smith is submitting his assignment his assignment file name should be “Johnsmith”. The report will be graded from 20% as per the rubric mentioned below. Appendix – A Assessment Rubric for OBHR Comparative Case Study 1-4 Scale   1 2 3 4 Percentage Score Weight 0-59 60-67 68-71 72-75 76-79 80-84 85-89 90-100 Grades F C B- B B+ A- A A+ Mastery Level Beginning Developing Competent Mastery Standard Level Below Standard Approaching Standard At Standard Exceeds Standard Executive Summary/ Abstract 5 Executive summary or Abstract missing or poorly constructed Executive summary or Abstract inadequate Executive Summary or Abstract Executed Adequately Executive Summary or Abstract Executed in Superior Fashion Problem Identification & Scope 10 Shows little understanding of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Shows some understanding of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Shows adequate knowledge of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Shows superior knowledge of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Content 10 Does not address the case question with little relevant evidence (e.g., details, examples, facts, and expert opinions) Central idea and clarity of purpose are absent or incompletely expressed and maintained Lacks most of the necessary case parts Does not comments on (/evaluates) the differences Not all the major similarities and / or differences have been a (e.g., details, examples, facts, and expert opinions) Includes only a few of the necessary case parts Central idea and clarity of purpose are expressed though perhaps too vaguely or broadly Only minimally comments on (/evaluates) the differences Generally, addresses the case question by providing most major similarities and / or differences but loses focus at times by focusing on minor details Uses a few details, examples, facts, and expert opinions to elaborate on similarities and / or differences Includes most of the necessary case parts Comments on (/evaluates) some of the differences Addresses the case question by providing all major similarities and / or differences Uses some details, examples, facts, and expert opinions) to elaborate on the similarities and / or differences Includes all the case parts Comments on (/evaluates) the differences Case Analysis 15 Analysis of case poor analysis of issues of the case, supporting detail is incorrect or missing. No use of material from the textbook and course. Analysis of case shows inadequate levels of analysis of issues of the case, provides little supporting detail. Some material from the textbook and course was used. Analysis of case shows adequate levels of analysis of issues of the case, provides supporting details. Good use of material from the textbook and course. Analysis of case shows superior levels of analysis of underlying issues that are not necessarily readily apparent, uses appropriate levels of supporting detail. Substantial use of material from the textbook, library, and course. Recommendation and Conclusions 10 Recommendations and/or plans of action provided that are mostly incorrect or absent. No use of material from the textbook and course. Recommendations and/or plans of action provided that are partially correct, alternate viewpoints not considered. Some material from the textbook and course was used. Specific recommendations and/or plans of action provided that are substantially correct, alternate viewpoints may be considered. Good use of material from the textbook and course. Specific recommendations and/or plans of action provided that go beyond the expected scope of the case fully supported by data, alternate viewpoints fully considered. Substantial use of material from the textbook, library, and course. Organization & Critical Thinking     Coherence, Cohesion, organization, demonstration of thought process, analysis of problem using own thoughts and ideas 20 Similarities and differences have been clearly organized using either the block or thematic method. Very clear relationship between ideas Accurate use of connectors Accurate use of pronouns Clear match between the topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence in each body paragraph Similarities and differences are organized generally clearly using the block or thematic method but one of the paragraphs may cover more than one main idea Generally clear relationship between ideas Mostly correct use of connectors. Mostly correct use of pronouns The topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence (if any) support one main idea. Similarities and differences are organized generally clearly using the block or thematic method but one of the paragraphs may cover more than one main idea Generally clear relationship between ideas Mostly correct use of connectors. Mostly correct use of pronouns The topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence (if any) support one main idea. Similarities and differences have been clearly organized using either the block or thematic method. Very clear relationship between ideas Accurate use of connectors Accurate use of pronouns Clear match between the topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence in each body paragraph Style & Mechanics     APA Application of the requirements of the 7th APA manual to create a standardized formatted presentation 10 7th Ed. APA Manual is not followed or there are significant errors in: title page & references pages. In-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are quite inadequate but do not rise to the level of plagiarism 7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with significant errors in: title page & references pages. In-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are lacking but do not rise to the level of plagiarism 7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with minor errors in: formatted title page, formatted references pages, in-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are adequately used in the correct context 7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with no errors including: properly formatted title page, properly formatted references pages, in-text citations are correctly used, paraphrasing and direct quotes are properly used in the correct context Grammar/Punctuation/Spelling Use of proper English language grammar, spelling and punctuation to create a readable presentation. 10 Grammar and sentence structure has major problems following standard English rules and reads with difficulty with major errors in punctuation and spelling Grammar and sentence structure has problems following standard English rules and reads with some difficulty with errors in punctuation and spelling Grammar and sentence structure mostly follows standard English rules and reads reasonably well with few errors in punctuation and spelling Grammar and sentence structure follows standard English rules and reads well with excellent punctuation and spelling Readability & Style Clarity of thought and appropriate level of language use that brings the author's thoughts and ideas to the reader. 10 Sentences are lacking in completeness, clearness, conciseness and are not well-structured. Transitions do not maintain flow of thought. Words are ambiguous. Tone is inappropriate to audience/assessment. Colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing is used. Sentences need to be more complete, clear, concise and well-constructed. Transitions do not maintain flow of thought well. Words are not precise and have some ambiguity. Tone is not appropriate to audience/assessment. Colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing is used too much. Sentences are mostly complete, clear, concise and well-constructed. Transitions mostly maintain flow of thought. Words are mostly precise with little ambiguity. Tone is mostly appropriate to audience/assessment. Colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing is used sparingly. Sentences are consistently complete, clear, concise and well-constructed with strong, varied structure. Transitions consistently maintain flow of thought. Words are quite precise and unambiguous. Tone is completely appropriate to audience/assessment. No colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing used. Marks 100 Additional Comments
Answered 4 days AfterAug 23, 2022

Answer To: OBHR Comparative Case Study (20%) XXXXXXXXXXIndividual assignment Due: Week 11 Prepare a 1500-word...

Bidusha answered on Aug 28 2022
61 Votes
Google and Nokia        4
GOOGLE AND NOKIA
Executive Summary
In this paper, Google and Nokia, two huge organizations, will have their authoritative way of behaving and HR dissected. It looks at the channels of correspondence and connections with their staff and what those have a mean for on the inventiveness of the organization. The hierarchical construction of the associations, as well as the administrat
ion and authority methods of reasoning that affect their prosperity or disappointment, are analyzed in this exploration. It inspects the association's human asset methodology for filling positions and splitting them between groups and divisions. At the finish of the paper, the scientist makes a couple of suggestions for use from now on.
Table of Contents
Executive Summary    3
Introduction    3
Analyzing Organizational Structure And Culture For The Companies    4
Identifying The Mode Of Communication Of The Companies    4
Modes Of The Interaction Of Employees    5
Identification Of The Management And Leadership Style    6
Analyzing The Effects Of Organizational Culture, Structure And Management Style On An Organization    7
Analyzing The Strategic HR Plan    8
Conclusion And Recommendations    8
References    10
Introduction
The authoritative way of behaving and HR of two critical enterprises were inspected for this paper. The scientist really tried to differentiate the assessment of Google's prosperity stories with Nokia's disappointment stories. This paper analyzes the two associations' authoritative designs and societies. The specialist has really tried to pinpoint the two firms' methods of commitment and correspondence in the following segment of this review. The administration and initiative ways of thinking of Google and Nokia are recognized, and the effect of hierarchical culture, design, and the board style on an organization is inspected. This report's investigation of the essential techniques utilized by the two associations' HR might be tracked down in the last area. In view of an assessment of the Google and Nokia stories, the specialist has given a couple of suggestions at the finish of this paper.
Analyzing Organizational Structure And Culture For The Companies
The hierarchical construction of Google LLC is a plan of various assets and components of the general plan of the organization. Google's hierarchical construction strays from the standard since it puts major areas of strength for an on levelness. Furthermore, it features inner associations inside the organization and is versatile to new turns of events (Guo et al. 2017). Google's hierarchical design is cross-useful. It puts areas of strength for an on worker fulfillment notwithstanding other pivotal areas of concern. As per speculations, Google's business structure and corporate culture are firmly adjusted, which encourages advancement and achievement.
Due to its flat person and level of adaptability, Nokia's authoritative design is notable. Its areas of expertise can discuss rapidly with each other. At the point when Nokia's cell phones associate with the web, the organization's administration division is accountable for creating and planning the internet providers that will further develop the client experience for its clients. The Nokia corporate improvement group looks for possibilities for future extension and administers the procedures that will be set in motion. The NAVTEQ division is viewed as a wellspring of computerized information route and navigational guides for it. Due of its highlights, for example, downloadable guides that further develop the client experience, this part is viewed as fundamental. Board individuals frequently settle on critical and significant choices for the association.
Identifying The Mode Of Communication Of The Companies
Due to its level person and level of adaptability, Nokia's hierarchical design is notable. Its specialties can discuss rapidly with each other. At the point when Nokia's cell phones associate with the web, the organization's administration division is responsible for...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here