only need5 annotationsfor topic: What are the factors that affect mental health? A Quantitative...

Question

only need5 annotationsfor topic:		What are the factors that affect mental health? A Quantitative Review						[Type text]	[Type text]	[Type text] STAT 4010 Annotated Bibliography Rubric 	APA References /20 	References are in APA format – all necessary elements are present. (authors names, date, title of article, title of journal, volume and issue numbers, page numbers, DOI). References are recent (within the last five years) – if a reference is older, the student must explain why it was chosen. References are all academic journal articles. Journal article references must follow the format: Author, A.A. (Year). Title of journal article. Title of Journal, Issue(Volume), pp-pp. DOI: when available. 	Summary /20 	The student has summarized the article in their own words, providing information on the main arguments and/or main points. 	Assessment /20 	The student has assessed the strengths and weaknesses of the article. The student compared this source to other sources in the Bibliography. 	Reflection /20 	The student has discussed how this source will help their research report, how they plan to use the source, and how it has changed the way they think about their topic. 	Overall Presentation /20 	The Bibliography is in alphabetical order. There are no (or very few) spelling and grammatical errors. The writing is clear and concise. *Please note that this assignment is to be submitted on Turnitin. Only one submission required per group.   Annotated Bibliography Worksheet Step 1: Provide the full APA reference for the article Step 2: Read through your article and take notes Step 3: Summarize, Assess, and Reflect Summarize: What are the main arguments? What is the point of the book/article? What topics are covered? If someone asked you about this article/book, what would you say? Reflect:  Was this source helpful to you? How does it help you shape your argument? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic? Assess: Is this a useful source? How does it compare to the other source in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Why or why not? Is this source biased or objective?  	 Step 4: Put it all together into paragraph format: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 Example of two completed annotations: Ahadzaden, A. S., Sharif, S. P., & Ong, F. S. (2017). Self-schema and self-discrepancy mediate the influence of Instagram usage on body image satisfaction among youth. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 8-16. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.011 Research performed by Ahadzaden and Sharif explored the relationship of Instagram use on an individual’s body satisfaction. There are three key variables that are the focus of this study: self esteem, self-schema, and self discrepancy. Findings explain that a low self esteem contributes to the negative body satisfaction that is experienced from the comparison behaviour facilitated on the social media platform Instagram. Additionally, an individual’s self-schema and self discrepancy can either worsen the negative effects or help to mediate negative effects. Individuals that are aschematic about their body image are more susceptible to body dissatisfaction from comparing behaviour. Similarly having a high self discrepancy can also increase body dissatisfaction from being on Instagram because of a disconnect of one’s actual self and ideal self. The quantitative research performed was well executed. A survey was created and distributed to two different universities where a total of 273 people completed the survey. All survey findings were included with summary tables within the article. However, the ethnicity of the individuals that were surveyed did not represent the world population accurately, with the majority having a Chinese background. Terminology and theories in this report were from a psychology background, which made understanding the content more difficult. This source compared to the article in Social Media + Society provided findings that were more scientifically sound and resulted from a completely quantitative approach to answer the research question. Unfortunately, the research was conduct on university students, which is older than the 13-18 years old youth whom we are focusing our research on. The most useful finding from this article for our future research is that social media sites can create negative body satisfaction in its users.  Battle, K. (2007). Child poverty: The evolution and impact of child benefits. In Covell, K., & Howe, R. B. (Eds.), A question of commitment: Children's rights in Canada (pp. 21-44). Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press. 	 Ken Battle draws on his research as an extensively-published policy analyst, and a close study of some government documents, to explain child benefits in Canada. He outlines some fundamental assumptions supporting the belief that all society members should contribute to the upbringing of children. His comparison of Canadian child poverty rates to those in other countries provides a useful wake-up call to anyone assuming Canadian society is doing a good job of protecting children from want.  He pays particular attention to the National Child Benefit (NCB), arguing that it did not deserve the criticism it received from politicians and journalists. He outlines the NCB’s development, costs, and benefits, including its dollar contribution to a typical recipient’s income. He laments that the Conservative government scaled back the program in favour of the Universal Child Care Benefit (UCCB), and clearly explains why it is inferior. However, Battle relies too heavily on his own work; he is the sole or primary author of almost half the sources in his bibliography. He could make this work stronger by drawing from the perspectives of others' analyses. However, Battle does offer a valuable source for this essay, because the chapter provides a concise overview of government-funded assistance currently available to parents. This offers context for analyzing the scope and financial reality of child poverty in Canada. Step 5: Put all of your annotations together in one document. Annotations should be alphabetical order, based on the first author’s last name. Remember: Submit only one annotated bibliography per group; remember to include all group member names. Each group member must prepare 5 annotations (i.e., a group of 3 should have 15 unique annotations); Make sure that there is no overlap in sources.  Sources should be related to your research project – this is the first step in your research report. You will be using these sources to write the next assignment – the literature review; so, make sure that you are familiar with your sources.   	STAT 4010: Literature Review Grading Rubric 	 	4 (Excellent) 	3 	2 	1 (Poor) 	Introduction:  Narrative hook and discussion of problem to be addressed. 	Topic is clearly introduced, and presented along with supporting evidence/justification for why this topic is important (narrative hook). Introduces relevant theories and/or concepts that underpin the research.  All relevant terminology is introduced with clear definitions. 	Topic is clearly introduced but there is a lack of support/justification for why the topic is important. Introduction of relevant theories and/or terminology is not clear or not well presented. 	A topic is introduced, but it is very broad or vague; lacking detail. The relevance of theory and/or terminology is not immediately clear. 	It is unclear what the topic of the research is; there is a lack of information/context. It is unclear why certain theories or terminology is being discussed. 	Organization:  Organized progression of literature review. 	The report goes from general to specific; transitions relate to sections and/or themes. There is a logical flow to the presentation of content. 	The report goes from general to specific. Transitions between paragraphs are not always logical. 	There is a basic flow of ideas but not all sections follow a logical order, which makes it difficult to follow. 	Report has no clear direction and subtopics/themes are not connected. 	Content:  Coverage of previous literature. 	Appropriate sources are examined and covered in depth; the author exhibits a deep understanding of the material. 	Appropriate sources are included but are not covered in adequate depth; the author exhibits a basic understanding of the material. 	The author demonstrates a basic understanding of the material. 	The selected sources are not appropriate for the research topic/problem statement OR the selected sources do not meet criteria for scholarly literature. The author does not demonstrate understanding of the material. 	Ideas:  Synthesis of ideas  	The author(s) present information in a way that highlights connections amongst sources. The author(s) discuss the topic in the context of the broader literature. 	The author(s) attempt to highlight connections amongst sources, although these connections are not always clear to the audience. 	Did not attempt to synthesize the information or discuss the topic in the broader context of the scholarly literature. There are no connections made amongst the sources. 	The author lacks insight into the problem.  Connections across sources are lacking. Discussions lack relevance to the topic. 	 	4 (Excellent) 	3 	2 	1 (Poor) 	Conclusion:  Conclusion and segue into Method 	A clear statement is made of why the current research proposal is important. The author restates the research question and/or hypothesis in light of the previous literature. There is a clear statement of how the current research proposal is different from what has already been done (i.e., identifies gaps in the literature) 	One of the following elements are missing: A clear statement is made of why the current research proposal is important. The author restates the research question and/or hypothesis in light of the previous literature. There is a clear statement of how the current research proposal is different from what has already been done (i.e., identifies gaps in the literature) 	Two of the following elements are missing: A clear statement is made of why the current research proposal is important. The author restates the research question and/or hypothesis in light of the previous literature. There is a clear statement of how the current research proposal is different from what has already been done. 	All of the following elements are missing: A clear statement is made of why the current research proposal is important. The author restates the research question and/or hypothesis in light of the previous literature. There is a clear statement of how the current research proposal is different from what has already been done. 	APA Format  	In-text citations and reference list citations were complete and properly formatted in APA style. The report was formatted according to APA style (section headers, page #s, fonts, etc.) 	In-text citations and corresponding reference list items were included with some formatting problems. The overall report was formatted according to APA style. 	Citations and references were either missing or consistently incorrect. The overall report had some APA formatting issues. 	There is no APA formatting. Citations and references are missing. 	Writing: Clarity of writing 	Writing is clear and concise; ideas are well-developed and coherent. There is no unnecessary repetition or rambling. 	Writing is clear but not concise; there is some repetition or rambling.  Paragraph or sentence structure is sometimes repetitive or awkward. 	The writing lacks clarity in some areas. Clarity could be improved with some work on paragraph

Bhawna · Accepted Answer

Annotated Bibliography and Literature
Jenny:
Alipour Z, Kheirabadi GR, Kazemi A, & Fooladi M. (2018). The most important risk 
	factors affecting mental health during pregnancy: a systematic review. Eastern 
	Mediterranean Health Journal, 24(6), 549-559. doi:10.26719/2018.24.6.549
This fundamental survey provided a rundown of contributing factors for antenatal emotional well-being issues, including the absence of social help, sort of relationship with spouse, conjugal fulfillment, accidental pregnancy, distressing life-altering situations, and aggressive behaviour at home. The study has found that relationship with the partner have a positive correlational with mental health during the time of pregnancy. The research also suggests that women whose spouse does not support their pregnancy experienced are more prone to condition of psychological illnesses. The lack of statistical representation of data is a major limitation of the paper. I think that the paper has not analysed the study with a larger sample size. In my opinion, the review could include the comparison of this these risk factors in different areas.
Bremner J.D., Moazzami K., Wittbrodt M.T., Nye J.A., Lima B.B., Gillespie C.F., 
	Rapaport M.H., Pearce B.D., Shah A.J., & Vaccarino V. (2020). Diet, stress and 
	mental health. Nutrients, 12(8), 2428. doi:10.3390/nu12082428
This systemic review shows a very close relationship between a person's diet and stress, both of which can significantly impact overall mental health. Results have found that eating different kinds of food can affect a person’s mental health, just as changes in food and diet can affect the overall physical wellbeing of an individual. Therefore,

[Type text][Type text][Type text] STAT 4010 Annotated Bibliography Rubric APA References /20 References are in APA format – all necessary elements are present. (authors names, date, title of...

Answer To: [Type text][Type text][Type text] STAT 4010 Annotated Bibliography Rubric APA References /20...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment