Reviewing a Paper Due: 11:59 p.m. EST, Sunday of Unit 4 Points: 100 Overview: This week, you will have a chance to review a paper and provide feedback with an interactive drag and drop assignment....

1 answer below »
Part one, you have to see the comments on the right of the papers will match to the left of the papers.
Part two you will have to critique the paper that is on the left of the comments. All directions are sent.Since you are not able to drag and drop the comments type in the number on the left side which where the comment matches up


Reviewing a Paper Due: 11:59 p.m. EST, Sunday of Unit 4 Points: 100 Overview: This week, you will have a chance to review a paper and provide feedback with an interactive drag and drop assignment. Instructions: This week, you will have a chance to review a paper and provide feedback with an interactive drag and drop assignment. For this assignment, you will be presented with a paper and a bank of comments for you to utilize to provide input to the writer. You will utilize the link below to access the paper and “drag and drop” your comments onto the paper. Please note, to submit your work, you will need to take a print screen of your work and upload it for my review. Here is a link to guide you on the print screen process for your submission: How to create a screen shot Drag and Drop Assignment ACC501: Research and Writing Unit 4 Assignment https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2475902,00.asp http://www.coursematerials.net/acc501/unit4/draganddrop/index.html CRITERIA Proficient Competent Apprentice Novice (36-40 Points) (32-35 Points) (28-31 Points) (0-27 Points) Integration of Knowledge and Critical Analysis Excels in responding to assignment and demonstrates mastery and has applied course concepts and materials learned in the course. Presents a clear, focused, and compelling argument. Responds appropriately to the assignment, demonstrates clear understanding of course concepts and materials learned in the course. Presents a good argument that is clearly articulated though might need refining. Does not fully respond to the assignment, demonstrates some misunderstanding of course concepts and materials learned in the course. Presents a weak argument Does not respond to the assignment. Does not demonstrate an understanding of course concepts and materials learned in the course. (27-30 Points) (24-26 Points) (21-23 Points) (0-20 Points) Evidence and Support Responses are thoroughly supported by strong, specific and appropriate evidence. All areas of the assignment have been addressed using relevant and recent research and information available including but not limited to standard auditing textbook, the “Statements on Auditing Standards” issued by the Auditing Standards Board, or any other relevant authoritative pronouncements produced by the Responses are supported by relevant evidence, though not always the strongest or most relevant. Major areas of the assignment have been addressed using relevant and recent research and information available including but not limited to standard auditing textbook, the “Statements on Auditing Standards” issued by the Auditing Standards Board, or any other relevant authoritative pronouncements produced by the Responses are supported by limited evidence with minimal relevance. Some areas of the assignment have been addressed using relevant and recent research and information available including but not limited to standard auditing textbook, the “Statements on Auditing Standards” issued by the Auditing Standards Board, or any other relevant authoritative pronouncements produced by the AICPA and the PCAOB Responses are not supported by relevant evidence. AICPA and the PCAOB AICPA and the PCAOB (14-15 Points) (12-13 Points) (10-11 Points) (0-9 Points) Organization and Structure Responses flow logically to craft a cohesive argument. Paragraphs clearly guide the reader through a progression of ideas. Most responses form well- constructed flow of ideas. Paragraphs are ordered thoughtfully; most paragraphs relate to a central argument. Some responses form well- constructed flow of ideas. Paragraphs are somewhat ordered thoughtfully, with a few paragraphs related to the central argument. Responses lack a clear structure with information not together. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationships. (14-15 Points) (12-13 Points) (10-11 Points) (0-9 Points) Style, Mechanics and Citations The writing is clear and concise and almost entirely free from spelling, grammar and punctuation errors. As applicable in the assignment, all sources are cited correctly and completely following the APA format. The writing is clear and concise with a few spelling, grammar or punctuation errors but does not impede understanding. As applicable in the assignment, most sources are cited correctly and completely. The writing is somewhat clear and concise with a several spelling, grammar or punctuation errors Understanding is somewhat impeded. As applicable in the assignment, some sources are cited correctly. The writing is unclear with unacceptable number of spelling, grammar or punctuation errors. As applicable in the assignment, sources are not cited or are cited incorrectly. May, C. and May, G. (2019). Effective Writing. A Handbook for Accountants (11th edition). New Your, NY: Pearson.
Answered Same DayMay 29, 2021

Answer To: Reviewing a Paper Due: 11:59 p.m. EST, Sunday of Unit 4 Points: 100 Overview: This week, you will...

Neenisha answered on May 29 2021
142 Votes
The paper could have been presented in a more professional and understandable manner. Currently if anyone reads it, we do not get any idea about what the paper is about unless we read it whole. There are several parameters on which paper could have been better. These parameters are as follows:
1. Formatting
2. Grammar and Language
3. Structure / Presentation
4. Content
5. Referencing
Formatting
Currently there is no formatting in the paper which makes in not readable and understandable. It could have been better formatted, as Calibri font could have been used for more clarity, font size could have been slightly bigger for visibility. The spacing between line could have been better. 1.5 line spacing could have been used. Also, the use of features or option like Bold, Italic or underline could have been done to improve the understandability and to highlight the important things.
Grammar and Language
Language used in the paper is not at all professional....
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here