Please follow all the documents I have given and make sure you mention theories from workshop slides as well. There is separate documents attached later for Instructions to follow, template to use, theories to mention, references to use and write from there. Please follow everything.
MBA641_T2_2021_Assessment_02_v1_Strategic_Project_Management Assessment Information COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. Assessment 2 Information Subject Code: MBA641 Subject Name: Strategic Project Management Assessment Title: Statement of Work (SOW) Assessment Type: Length: Individual written analysis 2000 words (+/- 10% allowable range) Weighting: 30% Total Marks: Submission: 100 Online Due Date: Week 8 Your task Individually, you are required to prepare a Statement of Work (SOW) based on your tender for the Lot Fourteen project that you have prepared in the first assessment. Assessment Description The purpose of this assessment is to foster students’ ability to evaluate and determine project viability, including the analysis required in the selection process. Students will also be given an opportunity to demonstrate the necessary evaluative criteria for the success of projects based on an organisation’s goals, strategy and standards. Assessment Instructions Presume that the project stakeholders accepted your tender from Assessment 1. Now you are required to prepare the Statement of Work (SOW) submission based on the information contained in the case study and the details in the first assessment. As the Lot Fourteen project is a real-life case study, you are expected to complement your work with additional research on the project and its site. Your Statement of Work submission must contain all the required elements, including an introduction, scope, location, main tasks, milestones, deliverables, schedule, standards, success criteria, requirements, budget outlines, any other relevant information, and a closing statement. Please ensure that you attend the live assessment webinar, as your subject coordinator will provide you with an SOW template that you must use in this assessment. While this is a written analysis, you can include any tables, analysis or diagrammatical elements you deem appropriate. You will be required to use a minimum of 15 sources in your Statement of Work, 5 of which must come from academic journals or textbooks. These sources must be presented as in-text citations and a reference list adhering to the Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style. Wikipedia and other ‘popular’ sites are not to be used. Assessment Information COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. Assessment Submission This file must be submitted as a ‘Word’ document to avoid any technical issues that may occur from incorrect file format upload. Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered as a legitimate submission. MyKBS will notify you if there is an issue with the submitted file. In this case, you must contact your workshop facilitator via email and provide a brief description of the problem and a screenshot of the MyKBS error message. You are also encouraged to submit your work well before the deadline to avoid any possible delay with the Turnitin similarity report or any other technical difficulties. Late assignment submission penalties Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business School “late assignment submission penalties” Policy. Number of days Penalty 1* - 9 days 5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks available 10 - 14 days 50% deducted from the total marks available. After 14 days Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after the due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive a mark of zero for the assignment(s). Note Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have been returned to students *Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to be one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty For more information, please read the full policy via https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies Assessment Information COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. Important Study Information Academic Integrity Policy KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy. What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties? How can I appeal my grade? Click here for answers to these questions: https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies Word Limits for Written Assessments Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded. Study Assistance Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information. https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481 COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. MBA641 Assessment 2 Marking Rubric – Statement of Work (SOW) 30% Marking Criteria (__/100) F (Fail) 0-49% P (Pass) 50-64% C (Credit) 65-74% D (Distinction) 75 - 84% HD (High Distinction) 85-100% SOW Overall __/20 marks You have written an SOW that is unclear and/or vague. It does not cover the significant elements of the case study. Your research lacks focus and/or you have chosen unsuitable or bogus sources, which do not link to the required assessment task. You have written a basic SOW demonstrating a basic level of research, which is supported by a reasonable selection of primary and/or secondary sources that partially cover some of the significant elements of the case study. You have written an enhanced SOW that demonstrates substantial research, which is supported by a reasonable selection of primary and secondary sources and covers most of the significant elements of the case study. You have written a clear SOW that covers all of the significant elements of the case study by demonstrating substantial research, which is supported by an appropriate selection and range of primary and secondary sources. You have written a comprehensive SOW with extensive research, which is supported by an appropriate selection and range of primary and secondary sources that cover all of the significant elements of the case study. Project Overall __/30 marks You have proposed a project that has applied minimal or none of the relevant MBA641 theories and concepts, not clear, unstructured and/or relevant to the assessment task. You have proposed a basic project that has applied some of the relevant MBA641 theories and concepts., although further detail and structure would improve its quality. You have proposed a project that has applied many relevant MBA641 theories and concepts, which are clear, although further detail and structure would enhance its quality. You have proposed a detailed and structured project with the application of most of the relevant MBA641 theories and concepts. You have proposed a project that has comprehensively applied all of the relevant MBA641 theories and concepts and did so convincingly. and well structured. Alignment/Misalignment __10 marks Your SOW is not aligned to assessment 1. Findings lack depth, and/or your interpretation is not relevant to the assessment task. Your SOW is somewhat aligned to assessment 1, although further depth and interpretation would improve its quality. Your SOW is mainly aligned to assessment 1, although further interpretation would enhance its quality. Your SOW is aligned to assessment 1, and your interpretation is clear. Your SOW is comprehensively aligned to assessment 1, and your interpretation is clear and well structured. SOW Content __/20 marks You did not identify and/or describe specific project task within each project phase - Work requirements not separated into project phases. Understanding of project life cycle phases and chronology of specific project tasks within project phases not demonstrated. You have identified and described specific project tasks within each