please follow the assignment guideline and rubric strictly. As this assignment worth half of the unit need to be done perfectly.
Applied Bioscience 264 – Case Study Working Document 1 Faculty of Health Science School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine Applied Bioscience for Complex Conditions GMED3008 REPORT – S1, 2020 Due: Week: 6. Friday 3rd, April, 2020 @ 0900 hours WST This is an individual assignment that contributes to 30% of the grade for the unit. Please use short answer format to demonstrate understanding (do not use essay format). The word count for the report is 2000 words, with referencing as per APA 7th referencing guidelines (available on the Curtin University library website). Use credible scholarly sources for your information Where possible use recent, original, peer-reviewed, reputable published research (Textbooks are also acceptable). You are expected to use reputable references sources beyond the lecture/tutorial notes A minimum of 10 scholarly sources is required Word count DOES NOT include the reference list or the contents page. Word count DOES include in-text citations, tables and quotes. Report Please provide a report for a person with Bipolar I Disorder Format Please format your report in short answer style (i.e. headings as per the rubric with your answer underneath). Each report to include the following; 1. Introduction (what is covered in your report) (1.5 marks) 2. Description of the disorder (common facts and figures, prevalence etc.) (1.5 Marks) 3. Signs and Symptoms of the disorder (what does a person with this disorder experience?) (5 marks) 4. Pathophysiology of the disorder (5 marks) 5. Contemporary treatment o Pharmacological (5 marks) o Non-pharmacological (5 marks) 6. Nursing management within the multidisciplinary care team (2.5 Marks) 7. Expected treatment outcomes (Will it resolve or not, how will the disorder be managed over time?) (2.5 marks) 8. Academic presentation, writing, formatting and referencing (2 marks) The report will be assessed using the marking guide below 2 Faculty of Health Science School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine Applied Bioscience for Complex Conditions GMED3008 - Report – Marking Rubric Marks Exceptional Proficient Satisfactory Needs improvement Unacceptable 1.5 1 0.75 0.5 0 Introduction 1.5 marks Clear and precise introduction Clear introduction could be more informative Good introduction but a little more information needed Adequate introduction but lacks detail Unclear or absent introduction Description of the disorder 1.5 marks Clear and precise description of the disorder Clear description of the disorder – could be more precise Good description of the disorder, more information needed Adequate description of the disorder, but lacking in detail Unclear or incorrect description of the disorder 5 – 4.5 4 – 3.5 3- 2.5 2– 1..5 1-0 Signs and Symptoms 5 marks Clear and precise description of the typical signs and symptoms of the disorder Generally clear and adequate description of typical signs and symptoms of the disorder Typical signs and symptoms of the disorder described in general terms Some inaccuracies or unclear description of the typical signs and symptoms of the disorder. Unclear or incorrect description. Pathophysiology 5 marks Clear and precise description of the pathophysiology the disorder Clear description of the pathophysiology of the disorder – could be more precise Good description of the pathophysiology of the disorder, more information needed Adequate description of the pathophysiology of the disorder, but lacking in detail Unclear or incorrect description of the pathophysiology of the disorder, Treatment – Pharmacological 5 marks Accurate and clear description of pharmacological treatment Good description of pharmacological treatment Adequate description of pharmacological treatment Some inaccuracies regarding pharmacological treatment Inaccurate or absent description of pharmacological treatment Treatment – non Pharmacological 5 marks Accurate and clear description of non- pharmacological treatment Good description of non- pharmacological treatment Adequate description of non-pharmacological treatment Some inaccuracies regarding non- pharmacological treatment Inaccurate or absent description of non- pharmacological treatment 2.5 – 2.25 2 -1.75 1.5- 1.25 1 – 0.75 0.5- 0 Nursing management 2.5 marks Clear and precise description of the routine clinical nursing care and interventions Generally clear and accurate description of the routine clinical nursing care and interventions Routine clinical nursing care and interventions described in general terms Some inaccuracies or unclear description of the routine clinical nursing care and interventions Unclear or incorrect description of the routine clinical nursing care and interventions Treatment outcomes 2.5 marks Clear and precise discussion relating to treatment outcomes. Good discussion relating to treatment outcomes. Discussion relating to treatment outcomes described in general terms Some inaccuracies or unclear discussion relating to treatment outcomes Unclear or incorrect discussion relating to treatment outcomes 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Academic presentation and referencing 2 marks All academic presentation and referencing correct according to APA. Within word count. Minimum number of scholarly references sourced. Minor errors with academic presentation and referencing according to APA. Within word count. Minimum number of scholarly references sourced. Some errors with academic presentation and referencing c according to APA. Minimum number of scholarly references sourced. Major referencing and format errors. Word count >/< 10%.="" minimum="" number="" of="" scholarly="" references="" not="" sourced.="" 20%="" correct="" incorrect="" or="" insufficient="" referencing,="" formatting="" or="" word="" count="">/< 10%. minimum number of scholarly references not sourced. applied bioscience 264 – case study working document 1 faculty of health science school of nursing, midwifery and paramedicine applied bioscience for complex conditions gmed3008 report – s1, 2020 due: week: 6. friday 3rd, april, 2020 @ 0900 hours wst this is an individual assignment that contributes to 30% of the grade for the unit. please use short answer format to demonstrate understanding (do not use essay format). the word count for the report is 2000 words, with referencing as per apa 7th referencing guidelines (available on the curtin university library website). use credible scholarly sources for your information where possible use recent, original, peer-reviewed, reputable published research (textbooks are also acceptable). you are expected to use reputable references sources beyond the lecture/tutorial notes a minimum of 10 scholarly sources is required word count does not include the reference list or the contents page. word count does include in-text citations, tables and quotes. report please provide a report for a person with bipolar i disorder format please format your report in short answer style (i.e. headings as per the rubric with your answer underneath). each report to include the following; 1. introduction (what is covered in your report) (1.5 marks) 2. description of the disorder (common facts and figures, prevalence etc.) (1.5 marks) 3. signs and symptoms of the disorder (what does a person with this disorder experience?) (5 marks) 4. pathophysiology of the disorder (5 marks) 5. contemporary treatment o pharmacological (5 marks) o non-pharmacological (5 marks) 6. nursing management within the multidisciplinary care team (2.5 marks) 7. expected treatment outcomes (will it resolve or not, how will the disorder be managed over time?) (2.5 marks) 8. academic presentation, writing, formatting and referencing (2 marks) the report will be assessed using the marking guide below 2 faculty of health science school of nursing, midwifery and paramedicine applied bioscience for complex conditions gmed3008 - report – marking rubric marks exceptional proficient satisfactory needs improvement unacceptable 1.5 1 0.75 0.5 0 introduction 1.5 marks clear and precise introduction clear introduction could be more informative good introduction but a little more information needed adequate introduction but lacks detail unclear or absent introduction description of the disorder 1.5 marks clear and precise description of the disorder clear description of the disorder – could be more precise good description of the disorder, more information needed adequate description of the disorder, but lacking in detail unclear or incorrect description of the disorder 5 – 4.5 4 – 3.5 3- 2.5 2– 1..5 1-0 signs and symptoms 5 marks clear and precise description of the typical signs and symptoms of the disorder generally clear and adequate description of typical signs and symptoms of the disorder typical signs and symptoms of the disorder described in general terms some inaccuracies or unclear description of the typical signs and symptoms of the disorder. unclear or incorrect description. pathophysiology 5 marks clear and precise description of the pathophysiology the disorder clear description of the pathophysiology of the disorder – could be more precise good description of the pathophysiology of the disorder, more information needed adequate description of the pathophysiology of the disorder, but lacking in detail unclear or incorrect description of the pathophysiology of the disorder, treatment – pharmacological 5 marks accurate and clear description of pharmacological treatment good description of pharmacological treatment adequate description of pharmacological treatment some inaccuracies regarding pharmacological treatment inaccurate or absent description of pharmacological treatment treatment – non pharmacological 5 marks accurate and clear description 10%.="" minimum="" number="" of="" scholarly="" references="" not="" sourced.="" applied="" bioscience="" 264="" –="" case="" study="" working="" document="" 1="" faculty="" of="" health="" science="" school="" of="" nursing,="" midwifery="" and="" paramedicine="" applied="" bioscience="" for="" complex="" conditions="" gmed3008="" report="" –="" s1,="" 2020="" due:="" week:="" 6.="" friday="" 3rd,="" april,="" 2020="" @="" 0900="" hours="" wst="" this="" is="" an="" individual="" assignment="" that="" contributes="" to="" 30%="" of="" the="" grade="" for="" the="" unit.="" please="" use="" short="" answer="" format="" to="" demonstrate="" understanding="" (do="" not="" use="" essay="" format).="" the="" word="" count="" for="" the="" report="" is="" 2000="" words,="" with="" referencing="" as="" per="" apa="" 7th="" referencing="" guidelines="" (available="" on="" the="" curtin="" university="" library="" website).="" ="" use="" credible="" scholarly="" sources="" for="" your="" information="" ="" where="" possible="" use="" recent,="" original,="" peer-reviewed,="" reputable="" published="" research="" (textbooks="" are="" also="" acceptable).="" ="" you="" are="" expected="" to="" use="" reputable="" references="" sources="" beyond="" the="" lecture/tutorial="" notes="" ="" a="" minimum="" of="" 10="" scholarly="" sources="" is="" required="" ="" word="" count="" does="" not="" include="" the="" reference="" list="" or="" the="" contents="" page.="" ="" word="" count="" does="" include="" in-text="" citations,="" tables="" and="" quotes.="" report="" please="" provide="" a="" report="" for="" a="" person="" with="" bipolar="" i="" disorder="" format="" please="" format="" your="" report="" in="" short="" answer="" style="" (i.e.="" headings="" as="" per="" the="" rubric="" with="" your="" answer="" underneath).="" each="" report="" to="" include="" the="" following;="" 1.="" introduction="" (what="" is="" covered="" in="" your="" report)="" (1.5="" marks)="" 2.="" description="" of="" the="" disorder="" (common="" facts="" and="" figures,="" prevalence="" etc.)="" (1.5="" marks)="" 3.="" signs="" and="" symptoms="" of="" the="" disorder="" (what="" does="" a="" person="" with="" this="" disorder="" experience?)="" (5="" marks)="" 4.="" pathophysiology="" of="" the="" disorder="" (5="" marks)="" 5.="" contemporary="" treatment="" o="" pharmacological="" (5="" marks)="" o="" non-pharmacological="" (5="" marks)="" 6.="" nursing="" management="" within="" the="" multidisciplinary="" care="" team="" (2.5="" marks)="" 7.="" expected="" treatment="" outcomes="" (will="" it="" resolve="" or="" not,="" how="" will="" the="" disorder="" be="" managed="" over="" time?)="" (2.5="" marks)="" 8.="" academic="" presentation,="" writing,="" formatting="" and="" referencing="" (2="" marks)="" the="" report="" will="" be="" assessed="" using="" the="" marking="" guide="" below="" 2="" faculty="" of="" health="" science="" school="" of="" nursing,="" midwifery="" and="" paramedicine="" applied="" bioscience="" for="" complex="" conditions="" gmed3008="" -="" report="" –="" marking="" rubric="" marks="" exceptional="" proficient="" satisfactory="" needs="" improvement="" unacceptable="" 1.5="" 1="" 0.75="" 0.5="" 0="" introduction="" 1.5="" marks="" clear="" and="" precise="" introduction="" clear="" introduction="" could="" be="" more="" informative="" good="" introduction="" but="" a="" little="" more="" information="" needed="" adequate="" introduction="" but="" lacks="" detail="" unclear="" or="" absent="" introduction="" description="" of="" the="" disorder="" 1.5="" marks="" clear="" and="" precise="" description="" of="" the="" disorder="" clear="" description="" of="" the="" disorder="" –="" could="" be="" more="" precise="" good="" description="" of="" the="" disorder,="" more="" information="" needed="" adequate="" description="" of="" the="" disorder,="" but="" lacking="" in="" detail="" unclear="" or="" incorrect="" description="" of="" the="" disorder="" 5="" –="" 4.5="" 4="" –="" 3.5="" 3-="" 2.5="" 2–="" 1..5="" 1-0="" signs="" and="" symptoms="" 5="" marks="" clear="" and="" precise="" description="" of="" the="" typical="" signs="" and="" symptoms="" of="" the="" disorder="" generally="" clear="" and="" adequate="" description="" of="" typical="" signs="" and="" symptoms="" of="" the="" disorder="" typical="" signs="" and="" symptoms="" of="" the="" disorder="" described="" in="" general="" terms="" some="" inaccuracies="" or="" unclear="" description="" of="" the="" typical="" signs="" and="" symptoms="" of="" the="" disorder.="" unclear="" or="" incorrect="" description.="" pathophysiology="" 5="" marks="" clear="" and="" precise="" description="" of="" the="" pathophysiology="" the="" disorder="" clear="" description="" of="" the="" pathophysiology="" of="" the="" disorder="" –="" could="" be="" more="" precise="" good="" description="" of="" the="" pathophysiology="" of="" the="" disorder,="" more="" information="" needed="" adequate="" description="" of="" the="" pathophysiology="" of="" the="" disorder,="" but="" lacking="" in="" detail="" unclear="" or="" incorrect="" description="" of="" the="" pathophysiology="" of="" the="" disorder,="" treatment="" –="" pharmacological="" 5="" marks="" accurate="" and="" clear="" description="" of="" pharmacological="" treatment="" good="" description="" of="" pharmacological="" treatment="" adequate="" description="" of="" pharmacological="" treatment="" some="" inaccuracies="" regarding="" pharmacological="" treatment="" inaccurate="" or="" absent="" description="" of="" pharmacological="" treatment="" treatment="" –="" non="" pharmacological="" 5="" marks="" accurate="" and="" clear=""> 10%. minimum number of scholarly references not sourced. applied bioscience 264 – case study working document 1 faculty of health science school of nursing, midwifery and paramedicine applied bioscience for complex conditions gmed3008 report – s1, 2020 due: week: 6. friday 3rd, april, 2020 @ 0900 hours wst this is an individual assignment that contributes to 30% of the grade for the unit. please use short answer format to demonstrate understanding (do not use essay format). the word count for the report is 2000 words, with referencing as per apa 7th referencing guidelines (available on the curtin university library website). use credible scholarly sources for your information where possible use recent, original, peer-reviewed, reputable published research (textbooks are also acceptable). you are expected to use reputable references sources beyond the lecture/tutorial notes a minimum of 10 scholarly sources is required word count does not include the reference list or the contents page. word count does include in-text citations, tables and quotes. report please provide a report for a person with bipolar i disorder format please format your report in short answer style (i.e. headings as per the rubric with your answer underneath). each report to include the following; 1. introduction (what is covered in your report) (1.5 marks) 2. description of the disorder (common facts and figures, prevalence etc.) (1.5 marks) 3. signs and symptoms of the disorder (what does a person with this disorder experience?) (5 marks) 4. pathophysiology of the disorder (5 marks) 5. contemporary treatment o pharmacological (5 marks) o non-pharmacological (5 marks) 6. nursing management within the multidisciplinary care team (2.5 marks) 7. expected treatment outcomes (will it resolve or not, how will the disorder be managed over time?) (2.5 marks) 8. academic presentation, writing, formatting and referencing (2 marks) the report will be assessed using the marking guide below 2 faculty of health science school of nursing, midwifery and paramedicine applied bioscience for complex conditions gmed3008 - report – marking rubric marks exceptional proficient satisfactory needs improvement unacceptable 1.5 1 0.75 0.5 0 introduction 1.5 marks clear and precise introduction clear introduction could be more informative good introduction but a little more information needed adequate introduction but lacks detail unclear or absent introduction description of the disorder 1.5 marks clear and precise description of the disorder clear description of the disorder – could be more precise good description of the disorder, more information needed adequate description of the disorder, but lacking in detail unclear or incorrect description of the disorder 5 – 4.5 4 – 3.5 3- 2.5 2– 1..5 1-0 signs and symptoms 5 marks clear and precise description of the typical signs and symptoms of the disorder generally clear and adequate description of typical signs and symptoms of the disorder typical signs and symptoms of the disorder described in general terms some inaccuracies or unclear description of the typical signs and symptoms of the disorder. unclear or incorrect description. pathophysiology 5 marks clear and precise description of the pathophysiology the disorder clear description of the pathophysiology of the disorder – could be more precise good description of the pathophysiology of the disorder, more information needed adequate description of the pathophysiology of the disorder, but lacking in detail unclear or incorrect description of the pathophysiology of the disorder, treatment – pharmacological 5 marks accurate and clear description of pharmacological treatment good description of pharmacological treatment adequate description of pharmacological treatment some inaccuracies regarding pharmacological treatment inaccurate or absent description of pharmacological treatment treatment – non pharmacological 5 marks accurate and clear description>