Please follow the instructions i attach
Section 1 case: https://sk.sagepub.com/cases/emotional-intelligence-leadership-roman-army-tacitus-agricola Section 2 case: https://sk.sagepub.com/cases/mr-mehtas-dilemma-a-case-of-performance-appraisal-politics ion Instruction: 2022/4/9 20:44 Preview Rubric: Assessment 3 Investigation of organisational systems - (BMO6506) Work and Organisation Systems - SY - Victoria University https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=1292193&rubricId=451749&originTool=quicklinks 1/8 Assessment 3 Investigation of organisational systems Course: (BMO6506) Work and Organisation Systems - SY SECTIO N 1: Individu al input and process; Group dynamic s in the contem porary workpla ce Full marks (100%) HD (80- 99%) D (70- 79%) C (60-69%) P (50-59%) Not satisfactor y (<50%) not="" shown="" (0%)="" criterion="" score="" 2022/4/9="" 20:44="" preview="" rubric:="" assessment="" 3="" investigation="" of="" organisational="" systems="" -="" (bmo6506)="" work="" and="" organisation="" systems="" -="" sy="" -="" victoria="" university="" https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou="1292193&rubricId=451749&originTool=quicklinks" 2/8="" quality,="" correctn="" ess,="" and="" appropri="" ateness="" of="" the="" theory="" with="" coverag="" e="" of="" main="" issues="" of="" the="" case="" study;="" and="" persuasi="" veness="" of="" the="" argume="" nts="" present="" ed.="" 12="" originali="" ty="" and="" insightf="" ulness="" of="" critical="" analysis="" reflectin="" g="" the="" practical="" organisa="" tional="" context="" and="" manager="" ial="" implicati="" ons="" 12="" 12="" points="" full="" marks,="" exceeding="" the="" expectatio="" ns="" of="" a="" hd.="" 10.5="" points="" accurately="" identifies="" and="" succinctly="" describes="" all="" key="" ob="" issues="" and/or="" themes="" in="" the="" case="" study.="" critical="" and="" insightful="" analysis="" of="" the="" issues/the="" mes="" indicates="" rigorous="" understand="" ing="" of="" key="" theory.="" 9="" points="" clearly="" identifies="" and="" describes="" all="" key="" ob="" issues="" and/or="" themes="" in="" the="" case="" study.="" critical="" analysis="" of="" the="" issues/the="" mes="" indicates="" understand="" ing="" of="" key="" theory.="" 8="" points="" provides="" a="" description="" of="" most="" key="" ob="" issues="" and/or="" themes="" in="" the="" case="" study.="" analysis="" of="" the="" issues/the="" mes="" indicates="" understand="" ing="" of="" key="" theory.="" 6.5="" points="" some="" description="" s="" of="" ob="" issues="" are="" unclear,="" inaccurate="" or="" incomplete="" .="" discusses="" the="" relevance="" of="" issues/the="" mes="" with="" some="" reference="" to="" the="" theory.="" 4="" points="" descriptio="" ns="" of="" ob="" issues="" are="" unclear,="" inaccurate="" or="" incomplete="" .="" superficiall="" y="" discusses="" relevance="" of="" issues/the="" mes,="" with="" little="" reference="" to="" the="" theory.="" 0="" points="" criteria="" not="" addressed,="" no="" marks="" given="" 12="" points="" full="" marks,="" exceeding="" the="" expectatio="" ns="" of="" a="" hd.="" 10.5="" points="" an="" innovative="" evaluation="" of="" practical="" implication="" s="" in="" the="" context="" of="" the="" case="" theory,="" making="" insightful="" connection="" s="" to="" experience="" s="" and="" future="" opportuniti="" es.="" 9="" points="" a="" logical="" evaluation="" of="" practical="" implication="" s="" in="" the="" context="" of="" the="" case="" theory,="" making="" connection="" s="" to="" experience="" s="" and="" future="" opportuniti="" es.="" 8="" points="" a="" reasonable="" evaluation="" of="" practical="" implication="" s,="" providing="" some="" context="" to="" the="" case="" theory.="" makes="" some="" connection="" s="" to="" experience="" s="" or="" future="" opportuniti="" es.="" 6.5="" points="" a="" simplistic="" evaluation="" of="" the="" practical="" implication="" s,="" making="" few="" connection="" s="" to="" experience="" s="" or="" future="" opportuniti="" es.="" 4="" points="" evaluation="" of="" practical="" implication="" s="" is="" superficial="" or="" incorrect.="" 0="" points="" criteria="" not="" addressed,="" no="" marks="" given="" 2022/4/9="" 20:44="" preview="" rubric:="" assessment="" 3="" investigation="" of="" organisational="" systems="" -="" (bmo6506)="" work="" and="" organisation="" systems="" -="" sy="" -="" victoria="" university="" https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou="1292193&rubricId=451749&originTool=quicklinks" 3/8="" originali="" ty="" and="" insightf="" ulness="" in="" personal="" reflectio="" ns="" and="" providin="" g="" recomm="" endatio="" ns="" on="" improvi="" ng="" manager="" ial="" and="" organisa="" tional="" outcom="" es.="" 1212="" points="" full="" marks,="" exceeding="" the="" expectatio="" ns="" of="" a="" hd.="" 10.5="" points="" innovative="" suggestion="" s="" for="" organisatio="" n="" improveme="" nt,="" including="" evidence-="" based="" evaluation="" of="" alternative="" ob="" solutions="" and/or="" options.="" 9="" points="" logical="" suggestion="" s="" for="" organisatio="" n="" improveme="" nt,="" including="" evidence-="" based="" evaluation="" of="" alternative="" ob="" solutions="" and/or="" options.="" 8="" points="" reasonable="" suggestion="" s="" for="" organisatio="" n="" improveme="" nt,="" including="" evaluation="" of="" alternative="" ob="" solutions="" and/or="" options.="" 6.5="" points="" a="" simplistic="" discussion="" of="" organisatio="" n="" improveme="" nt,="" with="" one="" alternative="" ob="" solution="" mentioned.="" 4="" points="" suggestion="" s="" for="" improveme="" nt="" in="" organisatio="" n="" performan="" ce="" are="" superficial="" or="" illogical.="" 0="" points="" criteria="" not="" addressed,="" no="" marks="" given="" sectio="" n="" 2:="" organis="" ational="" leadersh="" ip,="" process="" and="" outcom="" es.="" full="" marks="" (100%)="" hd="" (80-="" 99%)="" d="" (70-="" 79%)="" c="" (60-69%)="" p="" (50-59%)="" not="" satisfactor="" y=""><50%) not="" shown="" (0%)="" criterion="" score="" 2022/4/9="" 20:44="" preview="" rubric:="" assessment="" 3="" investigation="" of="" organisational="" systems="" -="" (bmo6506)="" work="" and="" organisation="" systems="" -="" sy="" -="" victoria="" university="" https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou="1292193&rubricId=451749&originTool=quicklinks" 4/8="" sectio="" n="" 2:="" organis="" ational="" leadersh="" ip,="" process="" and="" outcom="" es.="" full="" marks="" (100%)="" hd="" (80-="" 99%)="" d="" (70-="" 79%)="" c="" (60-69%)="" p="" (50-59%)="" not="" satisfactor="" y=""><50%) not="" shown="" (0%)="" criterion="" score="" quality,="" correctn="" ess,="" and="" appropri="" ateness="" of="" the="" theory="" with="" coverag="" e="" of="" main="" issues="" of="" the="" case="" study;="" and="" persuasi="" veness="" of="" the="" argume="" nts="" present="" ed.="" 1212="" points="" full="" marks,="" exceeding="" the="" expectatio="" ns="" of="" a="" hd.="" 10.5="" points="" accurately="" identifies="" and="" succinctly="" describes="" all="" key="" ob="" issues="" and/or="" themes="" in="" the="" case="" study.="" critical="" and="" insightful="" analysis="" of="" the="" issues/the="" mes="" indicates="" rigorous="" understand="" ing="" of="" key="" theory.="" 9="" points="" clearly="" identifies="" and="" describes="" all="" key="" ob="" issues="" and/or="" themes="" in="" the="" case="" study.="" critical="" analysis="" of="" the="" issues/the="" mes="" indicates="" understand="" ing="" of="" key="" theory.="" 8="" points="" provides="" a="" description="" of="" most="" key="" ob="" issues="" and/or="" themes="" in="" the="" case="" study.="" analysis="" of="" the="" issues/the="" mes="" indicates="" understand="" ing="" of="" key="" theory.="" 6.5="" points="" some="" description="" s="" of="" ob="" issues="" are="" unclear,="" inaccurate="" or="" incomplete="" .="" discusses="" the="" relevance="" of="" issues/the="" mes="" with="" some="" reference="" to="" the="" theory.="" 4="" points="" descriptio="" ns="" of="" ob="" issues="" are="" unclear,="" inaccurate="" or="" incomplete="" .="" superficiall="" y="" discusses="" relevance="" of="" issues/the="" mes,="" with="" little="" reference="" to="" the="" theory.="" 0="" points="" criteria="" not="" addressed,="" no="" marks="" given="" 2022/4/9="" 20:44="" preview="" rubric:="" assessment="" 3="" investigation="" of="" organisational="" systems="" -="" (bmo6506)="" work="" and="" organisation="" systems="" -="" sy="" -="" victoria="" university="" https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou="1292193&rubricId=451749&originTool=quicklinks" 5/8="" sectio="" n="" 2:="" organis="" ational="" leadersh="" ip,="" process="" and="" outcom="" es.="" full="" marks="" (100%)="" hd="" (80-="" 99%)="" d="" (70-="" 79%)="" c="" (60-69%)="" p="" (50-59%)="" not="" satisfactor="" y=""><50%) not="" shown="" (0%)="" criterion="" score="" originali="" ty="" and="" insightf="" ulness="" of="" critical="" analysis="" reflectin="" g="" the="" practical="" organisa="" tional="" context="" and="" manager="" ial="" implicati="" ons="" 1212="" points="" full="" marks,="" exceeding="" the="" expectatio="" ns="" of="" a="" hd.="" 10.5="" points="" an="" innovative="" evaluation="" of="" practical="" implication="" s="" in="" the="" context="" of="" the="" case="" theory,="" making="" insightful="" connection="" s="" to="" experience="" s="" and="" future="" opportuniti="" es.="" 9="" points="" a="" logical="" evaluation="" of="" practical="" implication="" s="" in="" the="" context="" of="" the="" case="" theory,="" making="" connection="" s="" to="" experience="" s="" and="" future="" opportuniti="" es.="" 8="" points="" a="" reasonable="" evaluation="" of="" practical="" implication="" s,="" providing="" some="" context="" to="" the="" case="" theory.="" makes="" some="" connection="" s="" to="" experience="" s="" or="" future="" opportuniti="" es.="" 6.5="" points="" a="" simplistic="" evaluation="" of="" the="" practical="" implication="" s,="" making="" few="" connection="" s="" to="" experience="" s="" or="" future="" opportuniti="" es.="" 4="" points="" evaluation="" of="" practical="" implication="" s="" is="" superficial="" or="" incorrect.="" 0="" points="" criteria="" not="" addressed,="" no="" marks="" given="" 2022/4/9="" 20:44="" preview="" rubric:="" assessment="" 3="" investigation="" of="" organisational="" systems="" -="" (bmo6506)="" work="" and="" organisation="" systems="" -="" sy="" -="" victoria="" university="" https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou="1292193&rubricId=451749&originTool=quicklinks" 6/8="" sectio="" n="" 2:="" organis="" ational="" leadersh="" ip,="" process="" and="" outcom="" es.="" full="" marks="" (100%)="" hd="" (80-="" 99%)="" d="" (70-="" 79%)="" c="" (60-69%)="" p="" (50-59%)="" not="" satisfactor="" y=""><50%) not="" shown="" (0%)="" criterion="" score="" originali="" ty="" and="" insightf="" ulness="" in="" personal="" reflectio="" ns="" and="" providin="" g="" recomm="" endatio="" ns="" on="" improvi="" ng="" manager="" ial="" and="" organisa="" tional="" outcom="" es.="" 1212="" points="" full="" marks,="" exceeding="" the="" expectatio="" ns="" of="" a="" hd.="" 10.5="" points="" innovative="" suggestion="" s="" for="" organisatio="" n="" improveme="" nt,="" including="" evidence-="" based="" evaluation="" of="" alternative="" ob="" solutions="" and/or="" options.="" 9="" points="" logical="" suggestion="" s="" for="" organisatio="" n="" improveme="" nt,="" including="" evidence-="" based="" evaluation="" of="" alternative="" ob="" solutions="" and/or="" options.="" 8="" points="" reasonable="" suggestion="" s="" for="" organisatio="" n="" improveme="" nt,="" including="" evaluation="" of="" alternative="" ob="" solutions="" and/or="" options.="" 6.5="" points="" a="" simplistic="" discussion="" of="" organisatio="" n="" improveme="" nt,="" with="" one="" alternative="" ob="" solution="" mentioned.="" 4="" points="" suggestion="" s="" for="" improveme="" nt="" in="" organisatio="" n="" performan="" ce="" are="" superficial="" or="" illogical.="" 0="" points="" criteria="" not="" addressed,="" no="" marks="" given="" 2022/4/9="" 20:44="" preview="" rubric:="" assessment="" 3="" investigation="" of="" organisational="" systems="" -="" (bmo6506)="" work="" and="" organisation="" systems="" -="" sy="" -="" victoria="" university="" https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou="1292193&rubricId=451749&originTool=quicklinks" 7/8="" gener="" al="" full="" marks="" (100%)="" hd="" (80-="" 99%)="" d="" (70-79%)="" c="" (60-69%)="" p="" (50-59%)="" not="" satisfactor="" y=""><50%) not="" shown="" (0%)="" criterion="" score="" evidenc="" e="" of="" research="" scholars="" hip,="" use="" of="" recent="" quality="" literatur="" e="" and="" referenc="" es="" 2020="" points="" full="" marks,="" exceeding="" the="" expectatio="" ns="" of="" a="" hd.="" 18="" points="" exemplary="" research="" with="" clearly="" documente="" d="" association="" s="" between="" the="" case="" study,="" key="" theory="" and="" contempor="" ary="" ob="" issues.="" all="" references="" are="" recent="" (less="" than="" 5="" years="" old).="" more="" than="" 15="" references="" are="" used.="" complete="" reference="" list,="" correctly="" formatted="" in="" harvard="" style.="" 15="" points="" excellent="" research="" with="" clearly="" documente="" d="" association="" s="" between="" the="" case="" study,="" key="" theory="" and="" contempor="" ary="" ob="" issues.="" most="" references="" (~90%)="" are="" recent.="" 12-="" 15="" references="" are="" used.="" complete="" reference="" list,="" some="" errors="" in="" formatting="" harvard="" style.="" 13="" points="" good="" research="" and="" documente="" d="" association="" s="" between="" the="" case="" study,="" key="" theory="" and="" contempor="" ary="" ob="" issues.="" some="" references="" (~70%)="" are="" recent.="" 12="" references="" are="" used.="" mostly="" complete="" reference="" list,="" some="" errors="" in="" formatting="" harvard="" style.="" 11="" points="" limited="" research="" and="" association="" s="" between="" the="" case="" study,="" key="" theory="" and="" contempor="" ary="" ob="" issues.="" half="" the="" references="" (~50%)="" are="" recent.="" 10="" references="" are="" used.="" incomplete="" reference="" list,="" errors="" in="" formatting="" harvard="" style="" .="" 8="" points="" incomplete="" research="" and="" association="" s="" between="" the="" case="" study,="" key="" theory="" and="" contempor="" ary="" ob="" issues.="" less="" than="" half="" (~0-="" 40%)="" the="" references="" are="" recent.="" less="" than="" 10="" references="" are="" used.="" no="" reference="" list.="" 0="" points="" criteria="" not="" addressed,="" no="" marks="" given="" 2022/4/9="" 20:44="" preview="" rubric:="" assessment="" 3="" investigation="" of="" organisational="" systems="" -="" (bmo6506)="" work="" and="" organisation="" systems="" -="" sy="" -="" victoria="" university="" https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou="1292193&rubricId=451749&originTool=quicklinks" 8/8="" total="" 100="" overall="" score="" gener="" al="" full="" marks="" (100%)="" hd="" (80-="" 99%)="" d="" (70-79%)="" c="" (60-69%)="" p="" (50-59%)="" not="" satisfactor="" y=""><50%) not shown (0%) criterion score professi onalism in report writing: writing skills, organisa tion, structur e and logical flow of present ation of content items / 88 points full marks, exceeding the expectatio ns of a hd. 7 points writing is free of errors. clear, concise and creative presentatio n of ideas. the introductor y paragraph is engaging, clearly states the purpose of investigati on, and previews the structure of the paper 6 points few errors. idea s are clearly presented. the introductor y paragraph is somewhat inviting, clearly states the purpose of the investigati on, and previews the structure of the paper. 5 points some errors. most ideas are clearly presented. the introductor y paragraph states the main idea/purpo se, and attempts to preview the structure of the paper. 4.5 points several errors. some ideas are clearly presented. the introductor y paragraph states the main idea/purpo se, but does not adequately preview not="" shown="" (0%)="" criterion="" score="" professi="" onalism="" in="" report="" writing:="" writing="" skills,="" organisa="" tion,="" structur="" e="" and="" logical="" flow="" of="" present="" ation="" of="" content="" items="" 88="" points="" full="" marks,="" exceeding="" the="" expectatio="" ns="" of="" a="" hd.="" 7="" points="" writing="" is="" free="" of="" errors.="" clear,="" concise="" and="" creative="" presentatio="" n="" of="" ideas.="" the="" introductor="" y="" paragraph="" is="" engaging,="" clearly="" states="" the="" purpose="" of="" investigati="" on,="" and="" previews="" the="" structure="" of="" the="" paper="" 6="" points="" few="" errors.="" idea="" s="" are="" clearly="" presented.="" the="" introductor="" y="" paragraph="" is="" somewhat="" inviting,="" clearly="" states="" the="" purpose="" of="" the="" investigati="" on,="" and="" previews="" the="" structure="" of="" the="" paper.="" 5="" points="" some="" errors.="" most="" ideas="" are="" clearly="" presented.="" the="" introductor="" y="" paragraph="" states="" the="" main="" idea/purpo="" se,="" and="" attempts="" to="" preview="" the="" structure="" of="" the="" paper.="" 4.5="" points="" several="" errors.="" some="" ideas="" are="" clearly="" presented.="" the="" introductor="" y="" paragraph="" states="" the="" main="" idea/purpo="" se,="" but="" does="" not="" adequately="">