Unit outline BMSC303: Marking rubric for new chemical entity – assignment 2 Below expected standard Standard developing Expected standard Above expected standard Score The report has addressed the...

1 answer below »
Unit outline

BMSC303: Marking rubric for new chemical entity – assignment 2
Below expected
standard
Standard
developing
Expected
standard
Above expected
standard
Score
The report has
addressed the
‘boxed questions’
that lead to
either approval
or rejection of
the new drug
entity.

Many errors of
key facts or
concepts.

Key ‘boxed’
questions not
addressed or
misinterpreted.



XXXXXXXXXX0-6
Generally
accurate but
some errors of
fact or
misinterpretations
of key concepts.

Some key ‘boxed’
questions were
addressed.

XXXXXXXXXX-12
Depth of content
adequate and few
misinterpretations
of key concepts.

All key ‘boxed
questions’ were
addressed



XXXXXXXXXX
In-depth
consideration of
response

Depth of content
appropriate

All key ‘boxed
questions’ were
addressed

19-25











/25
Decision to either
approve or reject
new drug entity
including
justification
No justification or
justification does
not support
decision
XXXXXXXXXX
Decision but
limited
justification

XXXXXXXXXX-6
Decision with
some justification


4-10
Decision with
comprehensive
justification

XXXXXXXXXX14




/14
Written English
language
Difficult to read
and interpret

Significant errors
in grammar and
/or spelling (8 or
more)

Incorrect use of
scientific
terminology



0-1.5
Generally clear

Some material
logically
sequenced

Some errors in
grammar and /or
spelling (4-7).

Scientific
terminology
mostly correct

XXXXXXXXXX
Clear and
understandable.

Logically
sequenced

Few errors in
grammar and/or
spelling (3 or less)

Scientific
terminology
correct

XXXXXXXXXX5-5
Clear and
understandable

Logically
sequenced

Correct spelling
and grammar

Correct use of
scientific
terminology


XXXXXXXXXX5-7









/7
Referencing
No evidence of
Vancouver
referencing style




0
Some evidence of
Vancouver
referencing style

All sources were
credible

XXXXXXXXXX
Adequate use of
Vancouver
referencing style

All sources were
credible

XXXXXXXXXX2-3
Good use of
Vancouver
referencing style

All sources were
credible

XXXXXXXXXX4
/4
TOTAL
/50 marks total
(converted to 30%)
Comments
Answered 8 days AfterMay 11, 2021BMSC303Australian Catholic University

Solution

Vidya Biju answered on May 18 2021
18 Votes

PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY PRODUCT SUBMISSION SEEKING REGISTRATION AS A NEW CHEMICAL ENTITY
Page 8:
Comment on necessity of on-going pharmacovigilance requirements to monitor bacterial resistance...

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here