MNG00785 Assessment Task 3 Rubric Criteria Weight Scale 1 Scale 2 Scale 3 Scale 4 Scale 5 Description of situation 20% Description inadequate Description attempted, but lacks clarity or is verbose...

1 answer below »
please refer to order 29882 for project assignment 2 task.Also, please focus onWBS,schedulingproject,qualitymanagement and projectclosure,projectclosein this assignment


MNG00785 Assessment Task 3 Rubric Criteria Weight Scale 1 Scale 2 Scale 3 Scale 4 Scale 5 Description of situation 20% Description inadequate Description attempted, but lacks clarity or is verbose Description attempted but lacks clear Description is succinct and quite clear Description is succinct, clear and sophisticated Integration with theory 45% No connection to theory Connection to theory attempted but inadequate Demonstrates a basic understanding of how the theory relates to the situation Uses theory in a competent way to analyse the situation Uses theory in a sophisticated way to analyse the situation Logical reflective essay structure 20% No reflective structure; may focus more upon description than reflection; may not use theory Uses some semblance of a reflective structure Uses a basic reflective structure that connects experience with theory Uses a competent reflective structure that connects experience with at three theoretical resources Uses a sophisticated reflective structure that connects experience with at five or more theoretical resources References 15% References absent Some references present, but are not relevant (possible sham referencing) Some references present and relevant, and focus upon the Textbook, the PMBoK, and/or the MyReadings, but may contain significant errors References present and relevant, and focus upon the Textbook, the PMBoK, and/or the MyReadings, but may contain errors References accurate, present and relevant, and focus upon the Textbook, the PMBoK, and/or the MyReadings. MNG00785 Assessment Task 3 Rubric Criteria Weight Scale 1 Scale 2 Scale 3 Scale 4 Scale 5 Description of situation 20% Description inadequate Description attempted, but lacks clarity or is verbose Description attempted but lacks clear Description is succinct and quite clear Description is succinct, clear and sophisticated Integration with theory 45% No connection to theory Connection to theory attempted but inadequate Demonstrates a basic understanding of how the theory relates to the situation Uses theory in a competent way to analyse the situation Uses theory in a sophisticated way to analyse the situation Logical reflective essay structure 20% No reflective structure; may focus more upon description than reflection; may not use theory Uses some semblance of a reflective structure Uses a basic reflective structure that connects experience with theory Uses a competent reflective structure that connects experience with at three theoretical resources Uses a sophisticated reflective structure that connects experience with at five or more theoretical resources References 15% References absent Some references present, but are not relevant (possible sham referencing) Some references present and relevant, and focus upon the Textbook, the PMBoK, and/or the MyReadings, but may contain significant errors References present and relevant, and focus upon the Textbook, the PMBoK, and/or the MyReadings, but may contain errors References accurate, present and relevant, and focus upon the Textbook, the PMBoK, and/or the MyReadings.
Answered Same DayMay 19, 2020MNG00785Southern Cross University

Answer To: MNG00785 Assessment Task 3 Rubric Criteria Weight Scale 1 Scale 2 Scale 3 Scale 4 Scale 5...

Abr Writing answered on May 23 2020
140 Votes
Contents
Work Breakdown Structure    2
Project Schedule    4
Quality management    9
Quality tools    9
Project close    10
Transition plan    11
Close procurements    12
Knowledge management    12
Lesson learned    12
References    13
Work Breakdown Structure
The work breakdown structure (“WBS”) is one of the very important and critical tool that is undertaken as one of the preliminary project planning activities (Kerzner & Kerzner, 2017; Harrison & Lock, 2017; Meredith et al., 2016). Th
e same aids in breaking down the scope of the project into easily manageable parts (Kerzner & Kerzner, 2017; Harrison & Lock, 2017; Meredith et al., 2016).
The WBS for this project is presented as follows –
Product Enhancement Project
1. Charter signed off
2. Project Planning Undertaking
2.1. Development, and, Finalization of the Project Scope as well as Charter
2.2. Assessment as well as Review of the Project Planning
2.3. Planning the Project Schedule
2.4. Planning the Project Budget
2.5. Acquisition of the Team Members as well as Assignment of Roles to the Team Members
2.6. Planning of Various Relevant Project Processes like Quality, Risk, Communication, HR, etc.
2.7. Development, Documentation & Finalization of Project Management Plan
2.8. Relevant Approvals from the Sponsor
3. Product Requirements Assessment & Documentation
3.1. Business Requirement Analysis & Suitable Planning
3.2. Contract Requirement Analysis & Suitable Planning
3.3. Discussion with Client for finalization of Product Requirement & Specification
3.4. Clients Requirements Review & Assessment
3.5. Consent & Sign-off to Lock Product Requirement with Client & Other Stakeholders
3.6. Consumer Requirements Review
3.7. Product Requirements and Internal Capacity / Capability Assessment for Competency Delivery
3.8. Product Requirements Documentation
3.9. Relevant Approvals from the Sponsor
4. Product Enhancement Design Approval
4.1. Assessment of the Product Enhancement Design Specifications Based on Finalized Product Requirement
4.2. Review of the Product Design Specifications Finalized
4.3. Product Enhancement Design - Design Team Meetings, Internal / External Research & Reviews Phase I
4.4. Product Enhancement Design - Design Team Meetings, Internal / External Research & Reviews Phase II
4.5. Product Enhancement Design - Design Team Meetings, Internal / External Research & Reviews Phase III
4.6. Based on the Notes / Guidance on Design Finalized, Final Product Enhancement Design to be Developed
4.7. Alternate Design Review
4.8. Assessments / Feasibility Study concerning Various Alternate Designs
4.9. Finalization of the Optimal / Effective Design Based on Comparative Assessment
4.10. Documentation of the Overall Design Finalized for Product Enhancement
4.11. Relevant Approvals from the Sponsor
5. Procurement Receipt
5.1. Material / Facility / Equipment Resource Planning for Pilot Enhanced Product Development
5.2. Resource Procurement Planning
5.3. Internal Assets / Resources Assessment
5.4. External Assets / Resources Assessment
5.5. Procurement Source Finalization
5.6. Purchasing Orders Issuance
5.7. Payment Undertaking
5.8. Product Receipt
5.9. Relevant Approvals from the Sponsor
6. Pilot Production
6.1. Material / Equipment Setup and the Facility Arrangement for the Pilot Enhanced Product Development
6.2. Development Planning of the Pilot Product
6.3. Undertaking the Pilot Production Process
6.4. Initial Review of the Pilot Product
6.5. Detailed Form of Testing, Reviews & Assessment
6.6. Identification & Solution Determination for ant Specification Gaps, Quality Variance and Other Issues
6.7. Re-review of the Enhancement Design as well as in case of necessity undertake suitable Changes
6.8. Re-iteration of the Pilot Process in case significant form of changes required for the product design)
6.9. Final Assessment & Review for feasibility of Enhanced Product
6.10. Sponsor / Steering Committee Review & Approval
7. Testing Approvals    
7.1. Suitable Testing Process Planning & Design
7.2. Testing Process Undertaking
7.3. All Specifications Testing & Review
7.4. Testing Outcome Documentation
7.5. Sign off by All concerned Parties
8. Product Approval
8.1. Final product Approval Documentation Undertaking
8.2. Senior Management Approval
8.3. Board Approval
9. Project Close-Out
9.1. Performance Evaluation
9.2. Learning Documentation
9.3. Sign-off
9.4. Roll-out
Project Schedule
The project schedule is a natural continuation of the WBS allocation timeline with specific start date and end date for each of the activity developed in the WBS (Kerzner & Kerzner, 2017; Harrison & Lock, 2017; Meredith et al., 2016).
The project schedule is presented as follows –
    WBS ID
    Work...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here