Sheet1 Does the acquisition of the sublicense by Nature’s Beverage to distribute Herbal T meet the definition of a business? YES or NO Support your by explaining briefly, and citing appropriate ASC...

1 answer below »
Please reference the correct ASC reference.


Sheet1 Does the acquisition of the sublicense by Nature’s Beverage to distribute Herbal T meet the definition of a business? YES or NO Support your by explaining briefly, and citing appropriate ASC text [Text will wrap] SUPPORTING STATEMENT(s)ASC(s) INPUTS PROCESSES Copyright 2018 Deloitte Development LLC All Rights Reserved. Case 18-1 Coffee Co. Coffee Co. (the “Company”) is a global distributor of organic coffee beans and teas that is registered with the SEC in the United States. The Company’s operations are primarily located in the United States, Canada, and South America. In March 20X8, Coffee Co., looking to refocus efforts to only produce coffee products, entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) with Nature’s Beverage, a food distributor in the United States looking to expand its international footprint (the “Transaction”). Nature’s Beverage is registered with the SEC in the United States. Pursuant to the Agreement, Coffee Co. provided a sublicense to Nature’s Beverage for the distribution rights of Coffee Co.’s South American local tea brand, Herbal T, whereby Nature’s Beverage will distribute Herbal T in South America. Under the Agreement, Coffee Co. transferred the existing customer contracts in South America to Nature’s Beverage and an at-market supply contract with the producer of Herbal T. Coffee Co. retained all of its employees and distribution capabilities. The Transaction closed on March 1, 20X8 (the “Closing”). Additional Facts: • Nature’s Beverage incurred certain costs to acquire the sublicense of the distribution rights and a license to use the Herbal T brand. The costs included legal, accounting, and other professional or consulting fees totaling $50,000. • Nature’s Beverage agreed to transfer to Coffee Co. $3 million for the sublicense of the distribution rights of Herbal T. • Assume both companies have adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. Required: 1. Does the acquisition of the sublicense by Nature’s Beverage to distribute Herbal T meet the definition of a business? 2. How should Nature’s Beverage account for the acquisition, including the treatment of the transaction costs? (Note that the response will be dependent on the response to Question 1.)
Answered Same DayApr 23, 2021

Answer To: Sheet1 Does the acquisition of the sublicense by Nature’s Beverage to distribute Herbal T meet the...

Suvrat answered on Apr 24 2021
132 Votes
Sheet1
        Does the acquisition of the sublicense by Nature’s Beverage to distribute Herbal T
        meet
the definition of a business?
            NO        YES or NO
        Support your by explaining briefly, and citing appropriate ASC text
                [Text will wrap]
                    SUPPORTING STATEMENT(s)                    ASC(s)
    INPUTS    The Company Nature's Beverage acquired three identifiable assets, i.e. license to distribute herbal tea, customer contracts and supply agreement. The license and the customer contracts both have fair values assigned to them and neither of them represents value of gross assets. Both license and custmer contracts are in different major classes of identifiable intagible assets,and as per ASC...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers