Week 14 Discussion Instructions Here we discuss the Chi-square goodness of fit and Chi-square test of independence. This will be a detailed discussion worth 15 points so plan accordingly. Please use...

1 answer below »
Please see instructions in both files



Week 14 Discussion Instructions Here we discuss the Chi-square goodness of fit and Chi-square test of independence. This will be a detailed discussion worth 15 points so plan accordingly.  Please use the following Instructions to write your reply. Please follow the videos at · Stats 3e Screencast 17.3 · Stats 3e Screencast 17.9 The Chapter 18 videos are optional.  For your reply, please: 1. Describe a scenario where you could use the Chi-square goodness of fit test OR the Chi-square test of independence. 2. Set up your test in SPSS and find out at what sample size the differences between groups become significant or at what counts per cell in the Chi-square test of independence the results become significant.  1. The point here is to get practice running one of the Chi-square methods and to see what relationship there is between sample size and the proportions you are comparing.  For example, if we go into a typical online classroom of 20 people and ask people whether they prefer one of three pizza toppings (cheese only, vegetables only, meat only), we might propose to expect an even distribution of scores, so 33% per category.  2. At 20 people, this is just over 6 people per group, so we might expect frequencies of Cheese (6 people), Vegetable (6 people), and Meat (8 people).  We would then compare our actual distribution of people's responses to these expectations using SPSS or an online Chi-square goodness of fit calculator to see if the counts per cell (frequencies or proportions) do or don't match the expected distribution of responses.  If our observed data is Cheese(n=3), Vegetable (n=3), and Meat (n=14), the Chi-square value is:  The Chi^2 value is 7.5. The p-value is .02352. The result is significant at p < .05.="" 3.="" try="" out="" a="" few="" of="" your="" own="" calculations="" to="" see="" what="" size="" difference="" between="" the="" observed="" and="" expected="" frequencies="" you="" need="" before="" the="" results="" are="" statistically="" significant. ="" use="" samples="" of="" 20-30="" people="" and="" list="" your="" expected="" frequencies,="" observed="" frequencies="" and="" chi-square="" values. ="" list="" one="" example="" of="" a="" non-significant="" result="" and="" one="" example="" of="" a="" significant="" result.="" 4.="" please="" attach="" your="" spss="" data="" and="" viewer="" files="" with="" your="" response="" 5.="" discuss="" your="" observations="" or="" questions="" with="" classmates="" -="" how="" could="" you="" use="" this,="" what="" was="" clear,="" what="" was="" unclear.="" you="" may="" also="" want="" to="" try="" out="" these="" calculators="" in="" addition="" to="" spss="" 1.="" https://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/goodnessoffit/default2.aspx="" 2.="" https://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/chisquare2/default2.aspx="" the="" main="" post="" should="" be="" about="" 300-500="" words="" and="" replies="" to="" classmates="" should="" be="" at="" least="" 100="" words. ="" please="" post="" at="" least="" 1="" reply="" to="" classmates. ="" help="" each="" other="" out="" as="" much="" as="" possible.="" classmate="" to="" respond="" to="" below:="" kristina="" mccormick="" week="" 14="" spss="" top="" of="" form="" describe="" a="" scenario="" where="" you="" could="" use="" the="" chi-square="" goodness="" of="" fit="" test="" or="" the="" chi-square="" test="" of="" independence.="" a="" teacher="" wants="" to="" see="" which="" of="" his="" sections="" has="" the="" most="" students="" in="" class="" that="" are="" very="" interested="" in="" a="" math="" club="" and="" not="" interested="" in="" a="" math="" club.="" i="" will="" try="" to="" use="" the="" chi-square="" test="" to="" calculate="" this="" problem.="" i="" also="" labeled="" the="" number="" of="" students="" with="" "1"="" for="" very="" interested="" and="" "2"="" for="" not="" interested.="" i="" tried="" to="" mirror="" the="" screencast="" video="" with="" my="" own="" question="" and="" data="" as="" i="" wanted="" to="" make="" sure="" that="" i="" was="" doing="" the="" correct="" steps="" for="" the="" question.=""  ="" set="" up="" your="" test="" in="" spss="" and="" find="" out="" at="" what="" sample="" size="" the="" differences="" between="" groups="" become="" significant="" or="" at="" what="" counts="" per="" cell="" in="" the="" chi-square="" test="" of="" independence="" the="" results="" become="" significant. ="" the="" point="" where="" i="" had="" difficulty="" here="" was="" trying="" to="" find="" the="" differences="" between="" each="" group.="" i="" suppose="" if="" i="" used="" better="" numbers="" it="" might="" have="" been="" easier="" but="" since="" i="" was="" working="" with="" a="" few="" sections="" of="" class,="" i="" found="" this="" part="" hard="" to="" do="" and="" do="" not="" know="" where="" i="" went="" wrong.=""  =""  ="" try="" out="" a="" few="" of="" your="" own="" calculations="" to="" see="" what="" size="" difference="" between="" the="" observed="" and="" expected="" frequencies="" you="" need="" before="" the="" results="" are="" statistically="" significant. ="" i="" think="" in="" the="" chi="" square="" test,="" i="" did="" not="" conclude="" the="" correct="" numbers="" for="" the="" values="" column="" because="" that="" is="" where="" i="" got="" stumped.="" when="" i="" look="" back="" on="" the="" screen="" cast,="" he="" did="" it="" with="" ease="" but="" for="" some="" reason="" i="" was="" unable="" to="" figure="" that="" part="" out="" so="" i="" think="" it="" impacted="" my="" results.="" when="" i="" look="" at="" his="" chi="" square="" test="" results="" and="" mine,="" i="" am="" missing="" some="" of="" the="" data="" that="" he="" had.="" i="" think="" that="" they="" chi="" square="" test="" can="" be="" used="" in="" many="" ways="" and="" to="" compute="" a="" lot="" of="" samples="" of="" data.="" however,="" i="" do="" think="" that="" spss="" is="" hard="" for="" me="" to="" figure="" out.="" the="" program="" itself="" has="" become="" much="" easier="" to="" us="" but="" it="" is="" the="" finding="" the="" correct="" data="" question="" that="" completly="" stumps="" me.="" i="" try="" to="" come="" up="" with="" examples="" that="" are="" similar="" to="" what="" we="" see="" in="" the="" screen="" cast="" videos="" but="" even="" when="" i="" do,="" some="" part="" of="" my="" data="" goes="" wrong="" and="" i="" do="" not="" know="" how="" to="" continue.="" when="" i="" compare="" my="" data="" to="" the="" screen="" cast="" data="" or="" the="" data="" that="" some="" of="" my="" classmates="" post,="" it="" looks="" different.="" i="" understand="" most="" of="" what="" we="" are="" learning="" and="" reading="" about="" but="" when="" it="" comes="" to="" putting="" my="" own="" data="" into="" spss,="" i="" fail="" at="" coming="" up="" with="" questions="" that="" work="" 100%.="" i="" do="" think="" that="" since="" the="" chi="" square="" test="" measures="" how="" expectations="" compare="" to="" actual="" observed="" data,="" it="" is="" a="" really="" good="" tool="" for="" people="" to="" use.="" i="" can="" see="" it="" being="" used="" alot="" in="" a="" small="" business="" or="" even="" by="" many="" teachers="" who="" are="" trying="" to="" figure="" out="" a="" specific="" question="" based="" on="" the="" amounts="" of="" data="" that="" is="" in="" their="" classrooms.="" new="" file.="" dataset="" name="" dataset1="" window="FRONT." weight="" by="" frequency.="" npar="" tests="" chisquare="dream" expected="64" 8="" 8="" missing="" analysis.="" npar="" tests="" notes="" output="" created="" 06-may-2020="" 08:38:43="" comments="" input="" active="" dataset="" dataset1="" filter=""> Weight frequency Split File N of Rows in Working Data File 3 Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated as missing. Cases Used Statistics for each test are based on all cases with valid data for the variable(s) used in that test. Syntax NPAR TESTS /CHISQUARE=dream /EXPECTED=64 8 8 /MISSING ANALYSIS. Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00 Elapsed Time 00:00:00.00 Number of Cases Alloweda 196608 a. Based on availability of workspace memory. [DataSet1] Chi-Square Test Frequencies dream Observed N Expected N Residual did reacall 58 64.0 -6.0 did not recall 12 8.0 4.0 unsure 10 8.0 2.0 Total 80 Test Statistics dream Chi-Square 3.063a df 2 Asymp. Sig. .216 a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum expected cell frequency is 8.0. WEIGHT BY frequency. CROSSTABS /TABLES=row BY column /FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES /STATISTICS=CHISQ PHI /CELLS=COUNT /COUNT ROUND CELL. Crosstabs Notes Output Created 06-MAY-2020 08:42:38 Comments Input Active Dataset DataSet1 Filter Weight frequency Split File N of Rows in Working Data File 4 Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated as missing. Cases Used Statistics for each table are based on all the cases with valid data in the specified range(s) for all variables in each table. Syntax CROSSTABS /TABLES=row BY column /FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES /STATISTICS=CHISQ PHI /CELLS=COUNT /COUNT ROUND CELL. Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00 Elapsed Time 00:00:00.00 Dimensions Requested 2 Cells Available 174734 Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent row * column 110 100.0% 0 0.0% 110 100.0% row * column Crosstabulation Count column Total completion premature termination row family 22 12 34 individual 31 45 76 Total 53 57 110 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 5.382a 1 .020 Continuity Correctionb 4.466 1 .035 Likelihood Ratio 5.433 1 .020 Fisher's Exact Test .024 .017 Linear-by-Linear Association 5.333 1 .021 N of Valid Cases 110 a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.38. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig. Nominal by Nominal Phi .221 .020 Cramer's V .221 .020 N of Valid Cases 110 NEW FILE. DATASET NAME DataSet2 WINDOW=FRONT. WEIGHT BY number_of_students. NPAR TESTS /CHISQUARE=number_of_students /EXPECTED=EQUAL /MISSING ANALYSIS. NPar Tests Notes Output Created 06-MAY-2020 08:51:19 Comments Input Active Dataset DataSet2 Filter Weight number_of_students Split File N of Rows in Working Data File 5 Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated as missing. Cases Used Statistics for each test are based on all cases with valid data for the variable(s) used in that test. Syntax NPAR TESTS /CHISQUARE=number_of_students /EXPECTED=EQUAL /MISSING ANALYSIS. Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00 Elapsed Time 00:00:00.00 Number of Cases Alloweda 196608 a. Based on availability of workspace memory. [DataSet2] Chi-Square Test Frequencies number_of_students Observed N Expected N Residual 17 17 25.3 -8.3 19 19 25.3 -6.3 20 40 25.3 14.8 25 25 25.3 -.3 Total 101 Test Statistics number_of_students Chi-Square 12.861a df 3 Asymp. Sig. .005 a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum expected cell frequency is 25.3. Bottom of Form Week 14 Discussion Instructions Here we discuss non-parametric analyses and statistics in your daily life or work. This will be a detailed discussion worth 10 points so plan accordingly.  Please use the following Instructions to write your reply.  1. Which of the non-parametric tests in our chapter is most interesting to you and why?  How would you describe the test, its uses, and its interpretation to others? 2. Now that you've been wrestling with statistics, calculations, reading journal articles, and writing up results in a variety of formats, what statistics might you use at work or in personal life?  Please list and explain at least two.  Next, are there any questions you would like to know how to analyze?   3. How would you describe your ability to use statistical thinking, developed in this class, to analyze claims in the media or any other forum? ** The main post should be at least 200 words.  Please reply to at least 2 classmates and each
Answered Same DayMay 06, 2021

Answer To: Week 14 Discussion Instructions Here we discuss the Chi-square goodness of fit and Chi-square test...

Pooja answered on May 09 2021
138 Votes
Week 14 Discussion Instructions
Here we discuss the Chi-square goodness of fit and Chi-square test of independence. This will be a detailed discussion worth 15 points so plan accordingly.  Please use the following Instructions to write your reply.
Please follow the videos at
· Stats 3e Screencast 17.3
· Stats 3e Screencast 17.9
The Chapter 18 videos are optional.  For your reply, please:
1. Describe a scenario where y
ou could use the Chi-square goodness of fit test OR the Chi-square test of independence.
Suppose I want to test if gender is associated with a high salary group. A Chi-square test of Independence can be applied in this case. The two variables of concern are Gender and salary. Gender is categorized as male and female. The salary group is categorized as low level, average level, and high-level salary. The null hypothesis would be, that Gender and level of salary are independent of each other. And alternative hypothesis is that Gender and level of salary are dependent on each other.
2. Set up your test in SPSS and find out at what sample size the differences between groups become significant or at what counts per cell in the Chi-square test of independence the results become significant.
1. The point here is to get practice running one of the Chi-square methods and to see what relationship there is between sample size and the proportions you are comparing.  For example, if we go into a typical online classroom of 20 people and ask people whether they prefer one of three pizza toppings (cheese only, vegetables only, meat only), we might propose to expect an even distribution of scores, so 33% per category.
Suppose I want to test if 4 categories of colors in M&M packet are equally likely. The null hypothesis is that all 4 colors are equally likely. V/s alternative hypothesis that at least one of the colors differs significantly. The scene 1 consists of a sample size is 101 with observed frequencies of 17 for Orange, 19 for Pink, 40 for yellow and 25 for red. The results are significant in scene 1 with Chi square (3) = 12.86, p=.004 (less than 5%). The scene 2 consists of sample size is 50 with observed frequencies of 10 for Orange, 15 for Pink, 10 for yellow and 15 for red. The results are not significant in scene 2 with Chi square (3) = 2, p=.57 (greater than 5%).
Reference calculations:
Scene 1: Statistically significant results.
ho: all 4 colors are equally likely. V/s h1: at least one of the colors differs significantly.     
     
    Oi
    pi = 1/4
    Ei = pi*N
    (Oi-ei)^2/Ei
    
    17
    0.2500
    25.25
    2.70
    
    19
    0.2500
    25.25
    1.55
    
    40
    0.2500
    25.25
    8.62
    
    25
    0.2500
    25.25
    0.00
    SUM
    101
    1
    101
    12.86
Test Statistic, chisq=    12.861     = sum(Oi-Ei)^2/Ei    
Alpha=    0.05        
k=    4.00        
critical value = CHISQ.INV.RT(0.05,4-1) = 7.815    
p-value = 0.004946159 = CHISQ.TEST(B2:B4,D2:D4)    
Reject Ho as Chisq > critical value and p<5%. Conclude that all 4 colors are equally likely.
                
Scene 2: Statistically in-significant results.
ho: all colors are equally likely. V/s h1: at least one of the colors differs significantly            
     
    Oi
    pi = 1/4
    Ei = pi*N
    (Oi-ei)^2/Ei
    
    10
    0.2500
    12.5
    0.50
    
    15
    0.2500
    12.5
    0.50
    
    10
    0.2500
    12.5
    0.50
    
    15
    0.2500
    12.5
    0.50
    SUM
    50
    1
    50
    2.00
chisq=    2.000     = sum(Oi-Ei)^2/Ei    
Alpha=    0.05        
k = 4.00        
critical value = CHISQ.INV.RT(0.05,4-1) = 7.815    
p-value = 0.572406704 = CHISQ.TEST(B2:B4,D2:D4)    
Fail to reject Ho as Chisq < critical value and p-value>5%. And conclude that at least one of the colors differs significantly
                
2. At 20 people, this is just over 6 people per group, so we might expect frequencies of Cheese (6 people), Vegetable (6 people), and Meat (8 people).  We would then compare our actual distribution of people's responses to these expectations using SPSS or an online Chi-square goodness of fit calculator to see if the counts per cell (frequencies or proportions) do or don't match the expected distribution of responses.  If our observed data is Cheese(n=3), Vegetable (n=3), and Meat (n=14), the Chi-square value is:  The Chi^2 value is 7.5. The p-value is .02352. The result is significant at p < .05.
Suppose I want to test if gender and favorite color of M&M...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here