Microsoft Word - MNG91002_Assignment_1_Scaffold Basic REPORT Structure for MNG91002 Assignment 1 (Adapted from Davies 2011, p. 208) Cover sheet Title page Executive Summary NB:Ex.SummisNOT...

please see the attached file for all the detail information. I need to get good marks to pass this unit so please do it as per the criteria.


Microsoft Word - MNG91002_Assignment_1_Scaffold Basic REPORT Structure for MNG91002 Assignment 1 (Adapted from Davies 2011, p. 208) Cover sheet Title page Executive Summary NB:Ex.SummisNOT includedinwordcount Introduction No more than 10% 1200-1500 word report = 120-150 words Body #1 80%ofreport=1000-1100words KeypointCaseStudyQuestion1 See Detailed Marking Guide (500-550 words) Body #2 Key point Case Study Question 2 See Detailed Marking Guide (500-550 words) Conclusion Nomorethan10%ofreport = 100-150 words Reference list Front matter – check requirements (Separate pages) Beginning of report: Introduce topic – give brief background, note (briefly) core entrepreneurial traits that are relevant to the Fairphone founder and first CEO Bas van Abel. Provide scope ofreportandcoreconcepts.Tellthe readerwhatthereportwillcover(e.g. Thisreport will first analyse core traits often foundwithinentrepreneurs. Specifically, these traitswillbediscussed and analysedbyexamining the actions of Bas van Abel, a social entrepreneur…) Section 1 – Key point Case Study Question 1: Giveexamplesofentrepreneurialtraits; explainthesetraitsusingsoundacademic references; explain how these traits are linked toBas van Abel,akeyfigure inthe casestudy. Section 2 – Key point Case Study Question 2: Outline three major boundariesorchallengesrelatedtothe social entrepreneurship movement or runningasocialenterprisegenerally, supportedbyacademicresearchusing references. Conclusion–sumupkeypointsfromeach bodyofreport;nonewinformationinthe conclusion!(5marks) Adapted from S. Ashton-Hay, Academic Skills 2014 – Updated 2019 Microsoft Word - Session 1 2019 Assignment 1 Instructions_Final_Version Page 1 of 7 MNG91002 – Entrepreneurship Session 1, 2019 Assignment 1: Case Analysis – Fairphone Core Information: Due: Before 11:00 pm, Monday 8th April 2019 Weighting: 20% Individual/Group Individual Assignment Word limit: 1200-1500 words in total (plus or minus 10%) Parts of the following article/case was published on https://studybreaks.com/tvfilm/is-fairphone- changing-the-future-of-smartphones/ - June 2018. Fairphone, the Ethical Cell Phone, Wants to Change the Future of Smartphones You may not have heard of Fairphone, a Netherlands-based smartphone start-up, but it could be changing the dynamics of the mobile phone industry. Unlike the leading brands, Fairphone is committed to producing ethically manufactured smartphones. Fairphone promote the phone on their website with the following claim; ‘The modular phone that’s built to last. We’ve created the world’s first ethical, modular smartphone. You shouldn’t have to choose between a great phone and a fair supply chain’ (https://www.fairphone.com/en/). That last statement ‘a fair supply chain’ relates to the fact that most of the raw materials – especially metallic-based components – obtained to manufacture the essential components of electronic devices, and in particular smartphones, come from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Although this Central African area has a vast supply of rich minerals, it has experienced devastating civil conflict due to mineral exploitation. Thus, minerals mined for smartphones (including gold, tin, tantalum and tungsten), are often referred to as ‘conflict minerals’. Peter van der Mark, a public relations (PR) expert, and Bas van Abel, an industrial designer, were passionate about letting the public know about the mineral exploitation by major smart phone companies. The pair collaborated to create an awareness raising campaign explaining the relationship between the supply of minerals for smartphones and the conflict in the DRC. Their campaign was called ‘Fairphone’. At the time of launching their campaign in September 2009, neither Peter nor Bas intended to make a commercial product. Indeed, they did not have the necessary expertise to do so. They assumed a prototype would be a concept device that wasn’t functional and at best hoped it would be accepted as an exhibit at a local museum. Fairphone was thus started as a not-for-profit organisation and established as a campaign, with the mission of raising awareness of the major supply chain for electronic goods and its role in creating conflict minerals. However, as the campaign gained momentum people started asking how they could buy a ‘Fairphone’. Page 2 of 7 This unexpected demand heralded the launch of Fairphone as a ‘social enterprise’ in January 2013. Van Abel took on the role of founder/CEO with the aim to: ‘produce a cool phone that puts human values first’. However, despite the enquiries about a Fairphone from people who had watched the campaign, at this time the company essentially had no solid customer base, no employees who has any industry experience, limited working capital and no mobile phone prototype. Nevertheless, Van Abel and six staff launched a crowdfunding campaign in mid-2013 through their website, with the aim of pre-selling a maximum of 5,000 fair smartphones. Instead, by November 2013, Fairphone had pre- sold 25,000 non-existent smartphones for 325 Euros each. By February 2014, Fairphone staff had produced and delivered 25,000 ‘fair’ smartphones to customers in 32 countries. As a social enterprise, Fairphone aims to profit from making a smart phone (enterprise), whilst assisting marginalised communities, and reducing the impact on the environment (social). Thus Fairphone aims to: (1) produce an aesthetically pleasing, mid-range competitively-priced smartphone; (2) produce phones in a manner that supported people in the supply chain, rather than exacerbating the conflict minerals associated with the mobile phone industry; 3) establish good, long lasting relationships and fair working conditions in East Asian factories, and 4) reduce electronic (e)-waste by designing and building phones in a modular format that are as easy to repair as possible. These goals are summarised in the illustration on Fairphone’s website, as shown below: Source: https://www.fairphone.com/en/ The Fairphone 3 was set to release later this year (2019), but in May 2018, the company announced that the new model had been cancelled. Instead, there will be big improvements to the Fairphone 2, starting with improved outer casing and a new version of Android. The company has explicitly stated that this recent move is because they want their phones to last much longer than others. The Fairphone 2, which the company markets as ‘“ethical, open and built to last’ is getting a remake. Unlike companies such as Apple, Fairphone doesn’t actually want people upgrading to a new model. This is a pretty radical stance for a smartphone company. It’s odd, then, that the Fairphone isn’t a bigger deal right now, given that it occupies a wholly unique space within the market. Page 3 of 7 While it’s certainly making a splash — the company’s CEO just won the Global Economy Prize 2018 — the company isn’t making any huge leaps in sales and cancelling a new release might harm it further, despite its reasons being very much in line with its unique voice in the tech market. Fairphone uses eco-friendly and recycled products, and the company checks that the production of the phone is as free from exploitation as it can be on every step of the manufacturing chain. Factory workers are paid fairer wages and raw materials are mined using local companies that employ safer conditions and benefit the community. This doesn’t mean they’re perfect, though. Most companies source cobalt, an essential material for cell phone batteries, from the Democratic Republic of Congo, where it is mined by children. Fairphone is not exempt from this practice; it also sources its cobalt from mines in the DRC, but it uses small-scale mines where there can be transparency and some progress. On their blog, the company has stated that ‘actions to improve the mining sector are…urgent.’ This approach might seem like the bare minimum, but considering what is prevalent now, it’s a big deal. Apple, Sony and Blackberry manufacture their products at Foxconn factories in China, where working conditions have been called into question. Samsung Factories, also in China, have also been reported for poor working conditions. Fairphone still manufactures in China, using a Singapore company called Hi-P, which has generally better conditions. However, their own research found that many Hi-P factory workers sometimes worked over 60 hours a week and that they get one — occasionally zero — days off per week. This practice is far from fair trade and it’s something the company needs to improve upon if they’re to fully commit to their vision of ethical manufacturing. At least Fairphone’s own investigations and studies means these problems are being noticed and addressed, not swept under the rug. Fairphone also aims to give a better experience to the consumer. iPhones, in particular, are infamous for being intentionally difficult to fix. It’s challenging to get an iPhone repaired by anyone who isn’t an official Apple technician — you can’t even remove the phone’s back without using tools and risking losing your phone’s warranty. It often seems that companies such as Apple modify their products strategically, such as removing the headphone jack, to generate extra profit. To counteract this frustrating situation, Fairphone aims to make their phones long-lasting and easy to repair, even selling spare parts so you can do it yourself. Page 4 of 7 Unlike most smartphone companies, Fairphone has a modular construction, with key components of the phone coming apart in sections. For example, a removable battery, and screen that can be replaced by the user, as well as potentially upgradable camera and audio components. Spare parts for the Fairphone are thus much more user friendly, not requiring a skilled technician. This lowers repair costs, allows consumers to upgrade components as technology improvements occur and potentially significantly increases the life of the phone beyond more conventional smart phones. The decision to cancel the new model and release improvements to the current one, instead, reflects Fairphone’s user-friendly stance and could be seen as a turning point: If people realise that there’s no reason to replace their phones as often as they do, phone companies can’t be as ruthless, and the market will become more sustainable and eco-friendly. In our current climate of increased concern for the environment, awareness of global human rights abuses and widespread frustration towards Apple’s policies and design choices, Fairphone could be doing just the right things to make it become the next big thing in smartphones. It’s a breath
Apr 06, 2021MNG91002Southern Cross University
SOLUTION.PDF

Get Answer To This Question

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here