Please submit a paper of approximately 2000 words excluding references (about 8 pages double- spaced, one-inch margins with normal font and font size, such as Times New Roman 12 point) in which you...

1 answer below »

Please submit a paper of approximately 2000 words excluding references (about 8 pages double- spaced, one-inch margins with normal font and font size, such as Times New Roman 12 point) in which you apply some of the abstract concepts we have studied so far to a specific intelligence/policy case of your choice. The “nuts and bolts” of your case—i.e. names and dates—are important and should be included, but they should not be the focus of your paper. Of greater interest are the ways in which we can see how intelligence and policy interact—or sometimes don’t interact so well—in the real world. You can choose to take an approach that employs a macro-level approach, a micro-level approach, or anywhere in between. Ideally, your paper will address some of the main issues we are dealing with this semester. Here are some examples, but you are also free to choose your own guiding questions:




Untitled PICT 3012: Intelligence Policy Week 2: March 2, 2020 Case Study Guide Please submit a paper of approximately 2000 words excluding references (about 8 pages double- spaced, one-inch margins with normal font and font size, such as Times New Roman 12 point) in which you apply some of the abstract concepts we have studied so far to a specific intelligence/policy case of your choice. The “nuts and bolts” of your case—i.e. names and dates—are important and should be included, but they should not be the focus of your paper. Of greater interest are the ways in which we can see how intelligence and policy interact—or sometimes don’t interact so well—in the real world. You can choose to take an approach that employs a macro-level approach, a micro-level approach, or anywhere in between. Ideally, your paper will address some of the main issues we are dealing with this semester. Here are some examples, but you are also free to choose your own guiding questions: How did intelligence aid policymakers before and during the crisis/case? How do intelligence officers deal with the huge amount of information that comes in during a crisis and address the policymakers’ need for fast breaking analysis? The timely production of objective analysis and its appropriate use by the policymaker is critical during a crisis. What are some of the obstacles and barriers that led to intelligence and/or policy failures in your case? What could have been done differently—either in intelligence or policy or both—to change the outcome of the case? What would be the impact of the changes? But as long as your paper has a focus on the interaction between intelligence and policy, you will be meeting the requirements of the assignment. The case study is worth 30% of your final grade in the class and will be due no later than Sunday, March 29 at 11:59pm Sydney time. Note: You may work with others on this assignment. You can work with up to two other people if you wish, or you can work alone. If you are working with others, please make sure ALL names are on the assignment at the time of submission. You may hand in one paper, and one grade will be assigned for everyone in the group. Cases may focus on American intelligence or non-American services. Examples of potential topics include (but are not limited to): the Bay of Pigs Cuban Missile Crisis the Venona project Operation CHAOS COINTELPRO Iran-Contra Iraq/WMD aftermath the Berlin tunnel (Operation Gold) the overthrow of Mossadegh (Operation Ajax) Aldrich Ames Robert Hanssen Interrogation/use of black sites Extrajudicial killings (i.e. Awlaki) Tet Offensive, Vietnam, 1968 If you want to do a different case but aren’t sure whether it will work for this assignment, just run it past me. Research Tips: You’re expected to locate the relevant sources yourself. In addition to reading the main secondary sources, you should familiarize yourself with the key primary sources on the case (if applicable, memoirs, major public statements, etc.). Those with non-English language skills might consider choosing a case that allows them to use these skills. • Search for books and articles in the big databases: Google Scholar, JSTOR, EBSCO Host, WorldCat, etc. Lexis-Nexis is a good source for English-language newspaper articles. ProQuest is good for theses and dissertations. • Use the librarians! They are super knowledgeable and happy to help. • To find primary sources, a good place to check is the footnotes/bibliographies of secondary sources. Primary sources can include memoirs, interviews, court transcripts, propaganda videos, documentaries, and declassified documents. Note: you should never use classified documents that have been leaked (as opposed to documents that have been officially declassified, which you can feel free to use). • Some cases have had a LOT written about them. In order to keep yourself from getting overwhelmed by the amount of information, it can help to bound the paper by asking a specific question. Then you can limit your search just to items that inform that question. • By the same token, other cases have had less written about them. In this case, it can be helpful to start by seeing what’s out there, and then asking a question that the available materials can adequately answer. • Email me or come talk to me if you have questions. Good luck! Case Study Grading Rubric Introduction (10) Clear introduction of the case and approach (5) Clear outline of core argument and structure (5) Analysis (30) Quality and consistency of dealing with core arguments and handling of counterarguments (10) Critical reading of sources (i.e. demonstrating understanding of underlying assumptions, concepts, and methods) (10) Logical progression of argument and supporting thesis statement (10) Quality of Research (25) Appropriate diversity and number of sources (10) Proper citations (10) Works cited page (5) Structure and Expression (25) Clarity of writing, including sentence structure, grammar, spelling, and appropriate paragraphing (25) Presentation (10) Adheres to word count, +/- 10% (References do not count towards word count) (5) Meets requirements in unit guide (5) Total points: 100
Answered Same DayMar 11, 2021PICT3012Macquaire University

Answer To: Please submit a paper of approximately 2000 words excluding references (about 8 pages double-...

Moumita answered on Mar 12 2021
133 Votes
Running Head: INTELLIGENCE POLICY
INTELLIGENCE POLICY
NTELLIGENCE POLICY
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Intelligence aiding Policy makers before and during a crisis or case    3
Intelligence Officers dealing with the huge amount of information that comes in during a crisis and addressing the policymaker’s need for fast breaking analysis    4
Obstacles and barriers that led to intelligence and/or policy failures    5
Changes that could have been made to avoi
d the failures. The impact of these changes.    6
Conclusion    7
Reference    8
Introduction
Intelligence agencies have been in existence for ages in the real world. Most countries have their own versions that help the government maintain power and sovereignty. Policy makers heavily depend on such agencies to determine the big trends and information of the world. Policies are made keeping these trends in mind, while implementing strategies. However, the working of these two communities is not smooth and can witness a lot of issues. This paper will have an elaborate discussion of the importance and role of intelligence and their relationship with policy makers. The Bay of Pigs (1961) is taken as a case to analyse the roles, aids and failures of intelligence and policy makers.
Intelligence aiding Policy makers before and during a crisis or case
Intelligence is defined as the collection and analysis of information after investigation and that is not publicly available. This information concerns foreign countries about their status in terms of security and stability in the global environment. Policy makers are symbiotically linked to intelligence (Hopkins and Hughes, 2019). Often failed policies are blamed on bad intelligence, due to the lack of frameworks in the strategies. Good intelligence is the foundation of good policies and sovereignty. Intelligence can warn policy makers of upcoming threats like terrorism and potential wars. Often crises can also be avoided by good intelligence, due to the already developed strategies. The role of such intelligence becomes even more important right before crises and during such crises. This is the source of information for the government during any type of serious crisis. The government cannot trust other sources of information and the only information that can be used as a warning or source of preparation comes from the well analysed hands of the intelligence agencies (Gentry, 2017). The role of the US intelligence and that of the intelligence of the Soviet Union was heightened during the cold war era. Many intelligence agents worked for either sides and collected information for their country.
It is the duty of intelligence to provide crucial information before a crisis and continue this even during the crisis. The cold war era witnessed many such crises like the Bay of pigs and the tet offensive Vietnam. The Bay of pigs incident took place in 1961 and marked an important event in history. It was a covert operation that found its origin in Operation Mongoose, where President Eisenhower signed this. Bay of Pigs was a massive failure for the successive President, John. F. Kennedy. This operation was the result of the information gathered during Operation Mongoose. Sanctioned CIA officers led the operation and Cuban exiled to invade the southwest part of the state and start a revolution against the Cuban government Fidel Castro. The CIA was vital in collecting relevant information and also for locating counter revolutionaries during the Cuba revolution that was won by Castro. This was one of the first times the CIA was acting more actively and openly rather than just acting secretly. They funded and aided the brigade. They also helped supply some US military during this crisis. However they failed to provide appropriate and relevant information during the very significant moments of the crises (Carroll, 2018). They had also failed to prevent the leakage of information by spotting the leaking sources. An efficient intelligence would have been able to gather relevant information about Castro and his intelligence as well. The CIA collected all the relevant information before the crises but failed to operate effectively during it possibly due to their extreme active involvement.
Intelligence Officers dealing with the huge amount of information that comes in during a crisis and addressing the policymaker’s need for fast breaking analysis
The intelligence agency gathers tons of information regarding the world, in terms of intelligence. They are highly trained and qualified to separate the relevant information from the irrelevant ones. The intelligence...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here