requirements:- A full report- FirstRate5 report must be attached to the report
- The Baseline file must be sent after adjustments (.frate)
ENE2021 Energy and the Environment | Year 2022 Assignment #2 briefing: Building envelope and its impact on the thermal performance Last edited on 1 Mar 2022 Assignment #2 briefing: Building envelope and its impact on the thermal performance Individual Assignment Weighting: 20% Due date for report submission: Week 8, Friday, 4:30 pm TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND3 PROJECT AIM3 CASE STUDY BUILDING AND BASELINE3 GENERAL ADVICE ON REPORT WRITING4 Title-page5 Executive summary5 Table of Contents5 Introduction5 Method5 Result and Discussion5 Conclusion6 References6 Appendix6 FORMATTING REQUIREMENT6 MARKING GUIDELINE6 BACKGROUND Around 40% of the world’s energy resources are used in our buildings. An energy-efficient building envelope leads to less reliance on energy-hungry active systems to maintain comfortable internal temperatures. Good building design decreases power consumption, saves money, and reduces the effects of climate change. On the other hand, poor building design is uneconomical and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. There are several design parameters that determine the thermal performance of the building shell, and all of them can be optimised in the design stage of the building. Also, contextual information, such as local climate and orientation, is an important factor; the design of the building shell should be adjusted accordingly. PROJECT AIM The aim of this assignment is 1. to quantify the impact of building envelope components (e.g. external walls, floors, ceilings, and windows), climate region, and building orientation on the thermal load. 2. to improve the envelope design to achieve the minimum requirement of NatHERS star rating. To test ideas and support arguments, a simulation tool, FirstRate5, will be used to estimate the thermal performance of a case study building. The individual student will propose scenarios to be tested, analyze and interpret modeling data from FirstRate5, and prepare a formal report to achieve the objectives of this project. CASE STUDY BUILDING AND BASELINE To save students time and effort on the FirstRate5 simulation, a baseline model is provided. Students can construct alternative scenarios by modifying the settings of the baseline model. As illustrated in Figure 1, The baseline design has an entry door facing south. It has 3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, 2 living/dining spaces, and multiple services rooms on a single floor. Table 1 compiles some essential settings in the baseline design and it achieves 0.8-star according to the Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS). The baseline model, together with FirstRate5 Manual, and the instruction videos, has been uploaded to the “FirstRate5” tile on Moodle site. Below are some requirements that may affect your envelope redesign. · Do not make any changes to the internal construction (FR5-Int wall type) · If ceiling insulation is needed, the installation has to be on the roof level. Also, insulation with R>5 is not preferred because of cost and roof space concerns · The alternative climate regions that must be included in your testing are Darwin #1, Canberra #24; Mascot airport #56 · The alternative window types that must be included in your testing are ATB-004-03 B, ALM-002-02 A, PVC-002-01 W, and FIB-001-02 W Figure 1. Floor plan of the case study dwelling. House dimensions in mm; window and door dimensions in m. Room height 2.4 m. Table 1. Climate zone and construction material setting in baseline model Components Item in FirstRate5 standard library NatHERS climate zone Climate region 5 Townsville Aeroport (Queensland) External walls FR5-BV Floor FR5-Tim Roof/Ceiling Roof foil & insulation: R0.0 None Window ALM-001-03 A (R 5.4, SHGC 0.49) GENERAL ADVICE ON REPORT WRITING A good report has a clear structure and is written in sections, with subheadings. The structure generally follows the conventions of engineering reports but has been tailored to fit the scope and purpose of this assignment. Title-page You can use the University's assessment cover sheet as the title page. You can download the cover sheet template from the Moodle page, “Assessments” tile. Executive summary It is a paragraph that provides the reader with a quick overview of the entire report, including its purpose, methods, major findings, and conclusions. Don’t treat your summary as an introduction; it should act as a stand-alone document. This is placed on a separate page between the title page and the table of contents. Table of Contents It lists the sections (headings) of the report and the page on which each begins. It helps your reader quickly and easily find what they are looking for by using informative headings and careful numbering of your sections and subsections. Introduction To fit the purpose of this assignment, this introduction should clarify the following questions: · What is the building envelope, and why is it important to the energy efficiency of a building? · How does Australia/Victoria assess the performance of the envelope of a residential building (Hint: NatHERS and accredited simulation tools)? · What does the reader need to know about the FirstRate5 simulation, especially the variables characterizing the building envelope property (Hint: NatHERS climate zones, FirstRate5 libraries for different envelope components, the definition of R-value/U-value/SHGC)? · What are the research questions to be addressed in this project? (Hint: rephrasing assignment aims) Method It is a detailed description of your research process that supports your findings by explaining your research techniques and creating a roadmap of how you reached your conclusions. For this project, you should cover the following components in the method section: 1) describe the case study building and its baseline setting, 2) define the alternative scenarios (e.g. the variables you'll test and the other conditions you're controlling or assuming are equal), 3) explain how the scenarios and comparison you proposed can directly lead to answers to the questions you raised in your introduction. Result and Discussion This section is where you present the simulation results and report the findings of your study based upon the comparison of simulation results between baseline and scenarios you defined in the method. Relate your findings to the research questions of the report and arrange your points logically. It should be a mixture of text and visuals (e.g. tables, figures, etc.). Consider how you can present the information best for your reader. Conclusion The conclusion section is to summarise the main points of your finding, outline important limitations of your study and the cause of unexpected results, and recommend improvements to overcome the limitations. References This must contain all the material cited in the report. It must be accurate and consistent with APA 7th referencing style. Appendix It contains material that is too detailed to include in the main report. You are expected to attach the simulation reports exported from FirstRate 5 for baseline and alternative scenarios. The simulation reports should be clearly set out and named in a logical way. FORMATTING REQUIREMENT Please plan the report format and layout carefully. Below are some general requirements · Body text Arial, 11pt, single-spaced, no indent · 1 blank line between new paragraphs · Page numbers in bottom right corner · Recommended length: Max 7 pages for Introduction, Method, Result and Discussion, and Conclusion (but ultimately it will depend on your layout, figures, tables, etc.). Try to be concise and succinct rather than long-winded. · Submit only 1 pdf file. You are required to use the following file naming convention: ENE2021-{Surname}-{StudentID}-CA2-Report.pdf MARKING GUIDELINE Excellent (80-100%)) Good (70-79%) Need Improvement (60-69%) Marginal (D) (50-59%) Unacceptable (<=49%) executive="" summary="" (2mk)="" is="" compact="">=49%)><=250 words); address all required components, with a thought-out progression; is informative and self-contained – met all descriptors in excellent, but the progression of components may not be in its best term – 1 or more components missing, or the articulation does not flow coherently, without an intelligible ordering or progression introduction (2mks) articulate all required items, all with great clarity, insight, exactitude; includes a good number of clear and helpful transition/ organizational guiding phrases throughout the introduction articulate all required items with relative clarity and accuracy; includes several relatively clear transition/ organizational guiding phrases. articulate all required items, but suffer from some vagueness, ambiguity, or imprecision. 1 item missing, but no significant issues in accuracy and progression missing multiple items and/or articulation is inaccurate or unclear method (5mks) describe all required components and add extra relevant details, all with great clarity, insight, exactitude; good use of transition/ organizational guiding phrases throughout the method; comparison design can directly lead to answers to the questions and is presented explicitly. describe all required components and add extra relevant details, all with relative clarity and accuracy; presentation and progression are not in their best terms. describe all required items, but suffer from some vagueness, ambiguity, or imprecision. 1 item missing, but no significant issues in accuracy and progression missing multiple items and/or articulation is inaccurate or unclear result and discussion (5mks) data and findings are presented in an orderly and logical sequence, using both text and illustrative materials; correctly explain why you observed the data/finding you have; appropriate design of figures/tables and they are clear and well presented; new design can meet the requirement data and findings are presented in an orderly and logical sequence, using both text and illustrative materials; make good efforts in explaining why, albeit misinterpretation being detected; all appropriate figures/tables are included, clear, and well presented; new design can meet the requirement data and findings are presented in an orderly and logical sequence, using both text and illustrative materials; efforts in explaining why is limited. all appropriate figures/tables are included, clear, and well presented; new design can meet the requirement present all data and findings, but suffer from vagueness, ambiguity, or imprecision; little efforts in explaining the observation; attempts in designing appropriate figures and tables are not recognized; new design cannot meet the requirement data are incomplete or biassed; findings cannot address all research questions; a very unorganized section, with a structure that altogether hampers the perspicuity, clarity, and intelligibility of the author’s attempted discussion; new design can not meet the requirement conclusion (2mks) it is to the point & without excess frill and fluff; capture the focus of this project and summarise the main points (aspects) of the results; includes an ending comment that inspires the reader to continue thinking about your topic – it is relatively on point; limitation and recommendation are not precisely summarised. – conclusion is missing or off-topic. reference (1mks) information sources properly cited in the text and in the reference list; selection of sources is appropriate. 1 or 2 minor errors in referencing style; the majority of sources are appropriate. many errors in referencing style; the majority of sources are appropriate. many errors in referencing style; more than half of sources are inappropriate. does not attempt to follow reference requirement appendix (2mks) contain all simulation reports; files are organized and named in a logical way – contain all simulation reports, but organization and naming not in the best term – 1 or more report missing words);="" address="" all="" required="" components,="" with="" a="" thought-out="" progression;="" is="" informative="" and="" self-contained="" –="" met="" all="" descriptors="" in="" excellent,="" but="" the="" progression="" of="" components="" may="" not="" be="" in="" its="" best="" term="" –="" 1="" or="" more="" components="" missing,="" or="" the="" articulation="" does="" not="" flow="" coherently,="" without="" an="" intelligible="" ordering="" or="" progression="" introduction="" (2mks)="" articulate="" all="" required="" items,="" all="" with="" great="" clarity,="" insight,="" exactitude;="" includes="" a="" good="" number="" of="" clear="" and="" helpful="" transition/="" organizational="" guiding="" phrases="" throughout="" the="" introduction="" articulate="" all="" required="" items="" with="" relative="" clarity="" and="" accuracy;="" includes="" several="" relatively="" clear="" transition/="" organizational="" guiding="" phrases.="" articulate="" all="" required="" items,="" but="" suffer="" from="" some="" vagueness,="" ambiguity,="" or="" imprecision.="" 1="" item="" missing,="" but="" no="" significant="" issues="" in="" accuracy="" and="" progression="" missing="" multiple="" items="" and/or="" articulation="" is="" inaccurate="" or="" unclear="" method="" (5mks)="" describe="" all="" required="" components="" and="" add="" extra="" relevant="" details,="" all="" with="" great="" clarity,="" insight,="" exactitude;="" good="" use="" of="" transition/="" organizational="" guiding="" phrases="" throughout="" the="" method;="" comparison="" design="" can="" directly="" lead="" to="" answers="" to="" the="" questions="" and="" is="" presented="" explicitly.="" describe="" all="" required="" components="" and="" add="" extra="" relevant="" details,="" all="" with="" relative="" clarity="" and="" accuracy;="" presentation="" and="" progression="" are="" not="" in="" their="" best="" terms.="" describe="" all="" required="" items,="" but="" suffer="" from="" some="" vagueness,="" ambiguity,="" or="" imprecision.="" 1="" item="" missing,="" but="" no="" significant="" issues="" in="" accuracy="" and="" progression="" missing="" multiple="" items="" and/or="" articulation="" is="" inaccurate="" or="" unclear="" result="" and="" discussion="" (5mks)="" data="" and="" findings="" are="" presented="" in="" an="" orderly="" and="" logical="" sequence,="" using="" both="" text="" and="" illustrative="" materials;="" correctly="" explain="" why="" you="" observed="" the="" data/finding="" you="" have;="" appropriate="" design="" of="" figures/tables="" and="" they="" are="" clear="" and="" well="" presented;="" new="" design="" can="" meet="" the="" requirement="" data="" and="" findings="" are="" presented="" in="" an="" orderly="" and="" logical="" sequence,="" using="" both="" text="" and="" illustrative="" materials;="" make="" good="" efforts="" in="" explaining="" why,="" albeit="" misinterpretation="" being="" detected;="" all="" appropriate="" figures/tables="" are="" included,="" clear,="" and="" well="" presented;="" new="" design="" can="" meet="" the="" requirement="" data="" and="" findings="" are="" presented="" in="" an="" orderly="" and="" logical="" sequence,="" using="" both="" text="" and="" illustrative="" materials;="" efforts="" in="" explaining="" why="" is="" limited.="" all="" appropriate="" figures/tables="" are="" included,="" clear,="" and="" well="" presented;="" new="" design="" can="" meet="" the="" requirement="" present="" all="" data="" and="" findings,="" but="" suffer="" from="" vagueness,="" ambiguity,="" or="" imprecision;="" little="" efforts="" in="" explaining="" the="" observation;="" attempts="" in="" designing="" appropriate="" figures="" and="" tables="" are="" not="" recognized;="" new="" design="" cannot="" meet="" the="" requirement="" data="" are="" incomplete="" or="" biassed;="" findings="" cannot="" address="" all="" research="" questions;="" a="" very="" unorganized="" section,="" with="" a="" structure="" that="" altogether="" hampers="" the="" perspicuity,="" clarity,="" and="" intelligibility="" of="" the="" author’s="" attempted="" discussion;="" new="" design="" can="" not="" meet="" the="" requirement="" conclusion="" (2mks)="" it="" is="" to="" the="" point="" &="" without="" excess="" frill="" and="" fluff;="" capture="" the="" focus="" of="" this="" project="" and="" summarise="" the="" main="" points="" (aspects)="" of="" the="" results;="" includes="" an="" ending="" comment="" that="" inspires="" the="" reader="" to="" continue="" thinking="" about="" your="" topic="" –="" it="" is="" relatively="" on="" point;="" limitation="" and="" recommendation="" are="" not="" precisely="" summarised.="" –="" conclusion="" is="" missing="" or="" off-topic.="" reference="" (1mks)="" information="" sources="" properly="" cited="" in="" the="" text="" and="" in="" the="" reference="" list;="" selection="" of="" sources="" is="" appropriate.="" 1="" or="" 2="" minor="" errors="" in="" referencing="" style;="" the="" majority="" of="" sources="" are="" appropriate.="" many="" errors="" in="" referencing="" style;="" the="" majority="" of="" sources="" are="" appropriate.="" many="" errors="" in="" referencing="" style;="" more="" than="" half="" of="" sources="" are="" inappropriate.="" does="" not="" attempt="" to="" follow="" reference="" requirement="" appendix="" (2mks)="" contain="" all="" simulation="" reports;="" files="" are="" organized="" and="" named="" in="" a="" logical="" way="" –="" contain="" all="" simulation="" reports,="" but="" organization="" and="" naming="" not="" in="" the="" best="" term="" –="" 1="" or="" more="" report="">=250 words); address all required components, with a thought-out progression; is informative and self-contained – met all descriptors in excellent, but the progression of components may not be in its best term – 1 or more components missing, or the articulation does not flow coherently, without an intelligible ordering or progression introduction (2mks) articulate all required items, all with great clarity, insight, exactitude; includes a good number of clear and helpful transition/ organizational guiding phrases throughout the introduction articulate all required items with relative clarity and accuracy; includes several relatively clear transition/ organizational guiding phrases. articulate all required items, but suffer from some vagueness, ambiguity, or imprecision. 1 item missing, but no significant issues in accuracy and progression missing multiple items and/or articulation is inaccurate or unclear method (5mks) describe all required components and add extra relevant details, all with great clarity, insight, exactitude; good use of transition/ organizational guiding phrases throughout the method; comparison design can directly lead to answers to the questions and is presented explicitly. describe all required components and add extra relevant details, all with relative clarity and accuracy; presentation and progression are not in their best terms. describe all required items, but suffer from some vagueness, ambiguity, or imprecision. 1 item missing, but no significant issues in accuracy and progression missing multiple items and/or articulation is inaccurate or unclear result and discussion (5mks) data and findings are presented in an orderly and logical sequence, using both text and illustrative materials; correctly explain why you observed the data/finding you have; appropriate design of figures/tables and they are clear and well presented; new design can meet the requirement data and findings are presented in an orderly and logical sequence, using both text and illustrative materials; make good efforts in explaining why, albeit misinterpretation being detected; all appropriate figures/tables are included, clear, and well presented; new design can meet the requirement data and findings are presented in an orderly and logical sequence, using both text and illustrative materials; efforts in explaining why is limited. all appropriate figures/tables are included, clear, and well presented; new design can meet the requirement present all data and findings, but suffer from vagueness, ambiguity, or imprecision; little efforts in explaining the observation; attempts in designing appropriate figures and tables are not recognized; new design cannot meet the requirement data are incomplete or biassed; findings cannot address all research questions; a very unorganized section, with a structure that altogether hampers the perspicuity, clarity, and intelligibility of the author’s attempted discussion; new design can not meet the requirement conclusion (2mks) it is to the point & without excess frill and fluff; capture the focus of this project and summarise the main points (aspects) of the results; includes an ending comment that inspires the reader to continue thinking about your topic – it is relatively on point; limitation and recommendation are not precisely summarised. – conclusion is missing or off-topic. reference (1mks) information sources properly cited in the text and in the reference list; selection of sources is appropriate. 1 or 2 minor errors in referencing style; the majority of sources are appropriate. many errors in referencing style; the majority of sources are appropriate. many errors in referencing style; more than half of sources are inappropriate. does not attempt to follow reference requirement appendix (2mks) contain all simulation reports; files are organized and named in a logical way – contain all simulation reports, but organization and naming not in the best term – 1 or more report missing>