Thanks
RS211 Assessment item 3- Clinical Presentation Report Case Study of ‘Margaret Law’ Use the Task Description and Marking Criteria provided in your Subject Outline to construct your Clinical Presentation Report. The following is a guide only. You are required to use the task description and marking criteria provided in your Subject Outline to construct your paper. Remember to include: An introduction (approximately 250 words) This should orientate the reader to the purpose of the paper and how your paper will be set out. Remember you are introducing your paper, not repeating the information from the case study. The body The body of your paper should include the following: Primary Survey (approximately 650 words) Apply the primary survey assessment framework in order to identify the relevant assessment data provided in the case study and identify the additional assessments you would need to conduct in order to complete a comprehensive patient assessment. Your discussion should include interpretation of abnormal assessment findings in the context of the normal or expected findings. You will find the information provided in the case study provides you with some of the information you need to document a primary survey, in this section, you will need to apply the Primary Survey systematically, identifying the relevant data provided throughout the case study. As you progress through the survey, you will need to interpret any abnormal findings in the context of normal or expected findings. Not all of the information you need has been provided in the case study, so you will need to clearly outline in your paper what other assessments you would need to conduct. You do not need to make up any results, you can simply outline the assessment you would undertake and what you would expect to find in the context of the patient’s current condition and what is normal. For example, if the case study didn’t tell you that the patient’s GCS was 15/15, you could have identified in ‘D’ of the Primary Survey that you would conduct a neurological assessment using a neurological assessment tool, and provide a reference. Remember to provide references that support your discussion throughout this section. For example, if you write in your paper that the patient’s airway is patent because she is speaking to you, you would need to provide a reference to support that the ability to speak is an accurate assessment of a patient’s ability to maintain their own airway. Likewise, if you are well practiced in the clinical setting and understand that an Sp02 reading of <87% is="" low="" and="" requires="" oxygen="" supplementation,="" then="" you="" would="" need="" to="" provide="" a="" current="" reference="" that="" supports="" the="" numerical="" figure="" of="">87%><87% as well as a current reference that supports the application of supplemental oxygen for this sp02 reading. this is evidence based practice at work! remember too that this is an academic paper, you will need to construct full sentences when applying the primary survey. short hand is not acceptable, neither are dot points and acronyms that haven’t been spelt out initially. for example: rs211 assessment item 3- clinical presentation report case study of ‘margaret law’ incorrect correct a- the patient’s airway is patent… assessment of the patient’s airway demonstrates that it is patent because… hr 100bpm the patient’s heart rate (hr) is 100 beats per minute (bpm). a- b- c- d- according to (reference) the primary survey commences with the assessment of the patient’s airway… breathing is then assessed. according to (reference), a thorough assessment of breathing should include… underlying pathophysiology (approximately 650 words) explain in detail at the systemic, tissue and cellular levels the disruptions to normal physiology that occur with cardiac ischemia, and explain how these disruptions have resulted in two (2) of the abnormal assessment findings you have identified. your learning from bms192 and bms291, as well as your medical-surgical text books will be valuable in this section of your paper. some questions that may help you complete this section include: systemic- what happens to the cardiovascular system and associated organs during acute coronary syndrome? explain in detail. tissue- what is happening to the myocardium during acute coronary syndrome? explain in detail. cellular- what is happening to cardiomyocytes during acute coronary syndrome? explain in detail. remember to use the correct terminology and to reference throughout your explanation. it can really help to be able to explain in your own words using the correct terminology by reading pathophysiological explanations from a range of sources. it will also help to have a thorough understanding of normal cardiac physiology before trying to understand the disruptions that occur. use your explanation of the disruptions above to explain two of the abnormal assessment findings you identified in the primary survey section. make sure all of your explanations link in with margaret’s case, it can be easy to head off track in this part! this section demonstrates your ability to link assessment findings to underlying pathophysiological processes. for example, if you were to identify a high blood pressure in your primary survey, explain how in acute coronary syndrome, the disrupted processes at the systemic, tissue and cellular levels result in the patient having a high blood. be sure to reference your findings! nursing management (approximately 650 words) rs211 assessment item 3- clinical presentation report case study of ‘margaret law’ utilise national, state and local best practice guidelines to prioritise and rationalise your first five nursing interventions. this care should include nurse-initiated interventions and assessments in addition to any medications that would be prescribed. each intervention, assessment or medication should be supported with a rationale that explains how it relates to, or addresses the underlying pathophysiology of cardiac ischemia. hint: it will help to identify your interventions by first researching the best practice guidelines. remember this section asks you to prioritise the first five nursing interventions. think about additional and ongoing assessments and nurse initiated medications. for example, you may consider that the patient should have education around healthy eating to reduce her risk for cardiovascular disease and complications, however, would this really be one of the first five interventions you undertake for this patient? likewise, you may locate a chest pain pathway that identifies a cxr should be ordered as a priority, is this a nurse initiated intervention? you could instead discuss your role as a registered nurse in advocating for a cxr to be ordered in accordance with the pathway. remember a large part of this section is rationalising your identified nursing intervention. for example, if one of your interventions is to advocate for analgesia to be prescribed, explain how this relates to, or addresses the underlying pathophysiology of acute coronary syndrome. likewise, if you advocate for a cxr to be ordered, explain why this relates to the underlying pathophysiology of acute coronary syndrome. local pathways are helpful in this section, remember to consider the type of facility and resources available to you that are outlined in the case study. remember not to limit yourself to local pathways and procedure guidelines, research broadly to identify current evidence based practice and utilise primary and secondary sources of information. for example, a chest pain pathway may direct the clinician to apply supplemental oxygen therapy to all patients presenting with chest pain. is this what the current evidence tells us to do? look at the references the pathway refers to and conduct your own journal article search to ensure this is what the best practice guidelines currently advise. a conclusion this should summarise the key points made throughout your paper. it is helpful to use the marking criteria and ask description here to ensure you have addressed all elements of the assessment. you must support your paper with a minimum of 15 recent (less than 7 years old) and credible sources. you should support your paper with a combination of the following credible sources: peer-reviewed journal articles (these are the highest quality sources) textbooks (including, but not limited to your prescribed texts for this subject) best practice guidelines government documents health facility clinical practice guidelines, pathways, policies and protocols (use less) case study- margaret law 202030.pdf as="" well="" as="" a="" current="" reference="" that="" supports="" the="" application="" of="" supplemental="" oxygen="" for="" this="" sp02="" reading.="" this="" is="" evidence="" based="" practice="" at="" work!="" remember="" too="" that="" this="" is="" an="" academic="" paper,="" you="" will="" need="" to="" construct="" full="" sentences="" when="" applying="" the="" primary="" survey.="" short="" hand="" is="" not="" acceptable,="" neither="" are="" dot="" points="" and="" acronyms="" that="" haven’t="" been="" spelt="" out="" initially.="" for="" example:="" rs211="" assessment="" item="" 3-="" clinical="" presentation="" report="" case="" study="" of="" ‘margaret="" law’="" incorrect="" correct="" a-="" the="" patient’s="" airway="" is="" patent…="" assessment="" of="" the="" patient’s="" airway="" demonstrates="" that="" it="" is="" patent="" because…="" hr="" 100bpm="" the="" patient’s="" heart="" rate="" (hr)="" is="" 100="" beats="" per="" minute="" (bpm).="" a-="" b-="" c-="" d-="" according="" to="" (reference)="" the="" primary="" survey="" commences="" with="" the="" assessment="" of="" the="" patient’s="" airway…="" breathing="" is="" then="" assessed.="" according="" to="" (reference),="" a="" thorough="" assessment="" of="" breathing="" should="" include…="" ="" underlying="" pathophysiology="" (approximately="" 650="" words)="" explain="" in="" detail="" at="" the="" systemic,="" tissue="" and="" cellular="" levels="" the="" disruptions="" to="" normal="" physiology="" that="" occur="" with="" cardiac="" ischemia,="" and="" explain="" how="" these="" disruptions="" have="" resulted="" in="" two="" (2)="" of="" the="" abnormal="" assessment="" findings="" you="" have="" identified.="" your="" learning="" from="" bms192="" and="" bms291,="" as="" well="" as="" your="" medical-surgical="" text="" books="" will="" be="" valuable="" in="" this="" section="" of="" your="" paper.="" some="" questions="" that="" may="" help="" you="" complete="" this="" section="" include:="" systemic-="" what="" happens="" to="" the="" cardiovascular="" system="" and="" associated="" organs="" during="" acute="" coronary="" syndrome?="" explain="" in="" detail.="" tissue-="" what="" is="" happening="" to="" the="" myocardium="" during="" acute="" coronary="" syndrome?="" explain="" in="" detail.="" cellular-="" what="" is="" happening="" to="" cardiomyocytes="" during="" acute="" coronary="" syndrome?="" explain="" in="" detail.="" remember="" to="" use="" the="" correct="" terminology="" and="" to="" reference="" throughout="" your="" explanation.="" it="" can="" really="" help="" to="" be="" able="" to="" explain="" in="" your="" own="" words="" using="" the="" correct="" terminology="" by="" reading="" pathophysiological="" explanations="" from="" a="" range="" of="" sources.="" it="" will="" also="" help="" to="" have="" a="" thorough="" understanding="" of="" normal="" cardiac="" physiology="" before="" trying="" to="" understand="" the="" disruptions="" that="" occur.="" use="" your="" explanation="" of="" the="" disruptions="" above="" to="" explain="" two="" of="" the="" abnormal="" assessment="" findings="" you="" identified="" in="" the="" primary="" survey="" section.="" make="" sure="" all="" of="" your="" explanations="" link="" in="" with="" margaret’s="" case,="" it="" can="" be="" easy="" to="" head="" off="" track="" in="" this="" part!="" this="" section="" demonstrates="" your="" ability="" to="" link="" assessment="" findings="" to="" underlying="" pathophysiological="" processes.="" for="" example,="" if="" you="" were="" to="" identify="" a="" high="" blood="" pressure="" in="" your="" primary="" survey,="" explain="" how="" in="" acute="" coronary="" syndrome,="" the="" disrupted="" processes="" at="" the="" systemic,="" tissue="" and="" cellular="" levels="" result="" in="" the="" patient="" having="" a="" high="" blood.="" be="" sure="" to="" reference="" your="" findings!="" ="" nursing="" management="" (approximately="" 650="" words)="" rs211="" assessment="" item="" 3-="" clinical="" presentation="" report="" case="" study="" of="" ‘margaret="" law’="" utilise="" national,="" state="" and="" local="" best="" practice="" guidelines="" to="" prioritise="" and="" rationalise="" your="" first="" five="" nursing="" interventions.="" this="" care="" should="" include="" nurse-initiated="" interventions="" and="" assessments="" in="" addition="" to="" any="" medications="" that="" would="" be="" prescribed.="" each="" intervention,="" assessment="" or="" medication="" should="" be="" supported="" with="" a="" rationale="" that="" explains="" how="" it="" relates="" to,="" or="" addresses="" the="" underlying="" pathophysiology="" of="" cardiac="" ischemia.="" hint:="" it="" will="" help="" to="" identify="" your="" interventions="" by="" first="" researching="" the="" best="" practice="" guidelines.="" remember="" this="" section="" asks="" you="" to="" prioritise="" the="" first="" five="" nursing="" interventions.="" think="" about="" additional="" and="" ongoing="" assessments="" and="" nurse="" initiated="" medications.="" for="" example,="" you="" may="" consider="" that="" the="" patient="" should="" have="" education="" around="" healthy="" eating="" to="" reduce="" her="" risk="" for="" cardiovascular="" disease="" and="" complications,="" however,="" would="" this="" really="" be="" one="" of="" the="" first="" five="" interventions="" you="" undertake="" for="" this="" patient?="" likewise,="" you="" may="" locate="" a="" chest="" pain="" pathway="" that="" identifies="" a="" cxr="" should="" be="" ordered="" as="" a="" priority,="" is="" this="" a="" nurse="" initiated="" intervention?="" you="" could="" instead="" discuss="" your="" role="" as="" a="" registered="" nurse="" in="" advocating="" for="" a="" cxr="" to="" be="" ordered="" in="" accordance="" with="" the="" pathway.="" remember="" a="" large="" part="" of="" this="" section="" is="" rationalising="" your="" identified="" nursing="" intervention.="" for="" example,="" if="" one="" of="" your="" interventions="" is="" to="" advocate="" for="" analgesia="" to="" be="" prescribed,="" explain="" how="" this="" relates="" to,="" or="" addresses="" the="" underlying="" pathophysiology="" of="" acute="" coronary="" syndrome.="" likewise,="" if="" you="" advocate="" for="" a="" cxr="" to="" be="" ordered,="" explain="" why="" this="" relates="" to="" the="" underlying="" pathophysiology="" of="" acute="" coronary="" syndrome.="" local="" pathways="" are="" helpful="" in="" this="" section,="" remember="" to="" consider="" the="" type="" of="" facility="" and="" resources="" available="" to="" you="" that="" are="" outlined="" in="" the="" case="" study.="" remember="" not="" to="" limit="" yourself="" to="" local="" pathways="" and="" procedure="" guidelines,="" research="" broadly="" to="" identify="" current="" evidence="" based="" practice="" and="" utilise="" primary="" and="" secondary="" sources="" of="" information.="" for="" example,="" a="" chest="" pain="" pathway="" may="" direct="" the="" clinician="" to="" apply="" supplemental="" oxygen="" therapy="" to="" all="" patients="" presenting="" with="" chest="" pain.="" is="" this="" what="" the="" current="" evidence="" tells="" us="" to="" do?="" look="" at="" the="" references="" the="" pathway="" refers="" to="" and="" conduct="" your="" own="" journal="" article="" search="" to="" ensure="" this="" is="" what="" the="" best="" practice="" guidelines="" currently="" advise.="" a="" conclusion="" this="" should="" summarise="" the="" key="" points="" made="" throughout="" your="" paper.="" it="" is="" helpful="" to="" use="" the="" marking="" criteria="" and="" ask="" description="" here="" to="" ensure="" you="" have="" addressed="" all="" elements="" of="" the="" assessment.="" you="" must="" support="" your="" paper="" with="" a="" minimum="" of="" 15="" recent="" (less="" than="" 7="" years="" old)="" and="" credible="" sources.="" you="" should="" support="" your="" paper="" with="" a="" combination="" of="" the="" following="" credible="" sources:="" ="" peer-reviewed="" journal="" articles="" (these="" are="" the="" highest="" quality="" sources)="" ="" textbooks="" (including,="" but="" not="" limited="" to="" your="" prescribed="" texts="" for="" this="" subject)="" ="" best="" practice="" guidelines="" ="" government="" documents="" ="" health="" facility="" clinical="" practice="" guidelines,="" pathways,="" policies="" and="" protocols="" (use="" less)="" case="" study-="" margaret="" law="">87% as well as a current reference that supports the application of supplemental oxygen for this sp02 reading. this is evidence based practice at work! remember too that this is an academic paper, you will need to construct full sentences when applying the primary survey. short hand is not acceptable, neither are dot points and acronyms that haven’t been spelt out initially. for example: rs211 assessment item 3- clinical presentation report case study of ‘margaret law’ incorrect correct a- the patient’s airway is patent… assessment of the patient’s airway demonstrates that it is patent because… hr 100bpm the patient’s heart rate (hr) is 100 beats per minute (bpm). a- b- c- d- according to (reference) the primary survey commences with the assessment of the patient’s airway… breathing is then assessed. according to (reference), a thorough assessment of breathing should include… underlying pathophysiology (approximately 650 words) explain in detail at the systemic, tissue and cellular levels the disruptions to normal physiology that occur with cardiac ischemia, and explain how these disruptions have resulted in two (2) of the abnormal assessment findings you have identified. your learning from bms192 and bms291, as well as your medical-surgical text books will be valuable in this section of your paper. some questions that may help you complete this section include: systemic- what happens to the cardiovascular system and associated organs during acute coronary syndrome? explain in detail. tissue- what is happening to the myocardium during acute coronary syndrome? explain in detail. cellular- what is happening to cardiomyocytes during acute coronary syndrome? explain in detail. remember to use the correct terminology and to reference throughout your explanation. it can really help to be able to explain in your own words using the correct terminology by reading pathophysiological explanations from a range of sources. it will also help to have a thorough understanding of normal cardiac physiology before trying to understand the disruptions that occur. use your explanation of the disruptions above to explain two of the abnormal assessment findings you identified in the primary survey section. make sure all of your explanations link in with margaret’s case, it can be easy to head off track in this part! this section demonstrates your ability to link assessment findings to underlying pathophysiological processes. for example, if you were to identify a high blood pressure in your primary survey, explain how in acute coronary syndrome, the disrupted processes at the systemic, tissue and cellular levels result in the patient having a high blood. be sure to reference your findings! nursing management (approximately 650 words) rs211 assessment item 3- clinical presentation report case study of ‘margaret law’ utilise national, state and local best practice guidelines to prioritise and rationalise your first five nursing interventions. this care should include nurse-initiated interventions and assessments in addition to any medications that would be prescribed. each intervention, assessment or medication should be supported with a rationale that explains how it relates to, or addresses the underlying pathophysiology of cardiac ischemia. hint: it will help to identify your interventions by first researching the best practice guidelines. remember this section asks you to prioritise the first five nursing interventions. think about additional and ongoing assessments and nurse initiated medications. for example, you may consider that the patient should have education around healthy eating to reduce her risk for cardiovascular disease and complications, however, would this really be one of the first five interventions you undertake for this patient? likewise, you may locate a chest pain pathway that identifies a cxr should be ordered as a priority, is this a nurse initiated intervention? you could instead discuss your role as a registered nurse in advocating for a cxr to be ordered in accordance with the pathway. remember a large part of this section is rationalising your identified nursing intervention. for example, if one of your interventions is to advocate for analgesia to be prescribed, explain how this relates to, or addresses the underlying pathophysiology of acute coronary syndrome. likewise, if you advocate for a cxr to be ordered, explain why this relates to the underlying pathophysiology of acute coronary syndrome. local pathways are helpful in this section, remember to consider the type of facility and resources available to you that are outlined in the case study. remember not to limit yourself to local pathways and procedure guidelines, research broadly to identify current evidence based practice and utilise primary and secondary sources of information. for example, a chest pain pathway may direct the clinician to apply supplemental oxygen therapy to all patients presenting with chest pain. is this what the current evidence tells us to do? look at the references the pathway refers to and conduct your own journal article search to ensure this is what the best practice guidelines currently advise. a conclusion this should summarise the key points made throughout your paper. it is helpful to use the marking criteria and ask description here to ensure you have addressed all elements of the assessment. you must support your paper with a minimum of 15 recent (less than 7 years old) and credible sources. you should support your paper with a combination of the following credible sources: peer-reviewed journal articles (these are the highest quality sources) textbooks (including, but not limited to your prescribed texts for this subject) best practice guidelines government documents health facility clinical practice guidelines, pathways, policies and protocols (use less) case study- margaret law 202030.pdf>