SPORTS SUPPLEMENTS: MEDICINE OR FOOD? Should the Therapeutic Goods Administration regulate to reduce the impact of sports supplements on the community? Currently in Australia, both the Therapeutic...

1 answer below »


Should the Therapeutic Goods Administration regulate to reduce the impact of sports supplements on the community?




SPORTS SUPPLEMENTS: MEDICINE OR FOOD? Should the Therapeutic Goods Administration regulate to reduce the impact of sports supplements on the community? Currently in Australia, both the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), a federal regulatory body, and the Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ) are reviewing the regulations regulating sports supplements. This review had been prompted by unfortunate incidences and also due to a regulatory grey area as both the TGA and FSANZ are able to regulate the sports supplements industry. There have been two cases within in Australia which resulted in the death of young adults after consuming products regulated as sport supplements and may have been one of the reasons to have prompted the review by the TGA and the FSANZ. A 21-year-old passed away in 2018 after ingesting too much pure caffeine with his protein shake, the caffeine was not purchased by the individual however it was found that the caffeine was given to him with none of the regulatory warnings on any packaging. The year before another individual passed away from a rare genetic condition. Her aspiration to become a body builder meant that along with exercise she was also prescribed a high protein diet by her personal trainer. The genetic condition was unknown to her, her family and her trainer which ultimately led to her body poisoning herself as the high levels of protein could not be processed. The aim of this research paper is to ascertain whether all sports supplements should be regulated by the TGA as proposed in the Consultation Paper released in November last year. If the TGA were to regulate all sports supplements, should the evidence requirements be more stringent than complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) so that they are more similar to the evidence requirements placed on all therapeutic goods? This could potentially assist with reducing the impact on consumers of any potential false advertising, misleading and/or deceptive conduct. This paper will be broken down into who and how the current regulatory bodies for sports supplements currently regulate sports supplements, CAMs and their evidence requirements in comparison to evidence requirements for sports supplements, determining where the line is to be drawn for regulatory requirements to assist consumers with their purchases and balancing that against personal responsibility and the potential effects on the market if the TGA were to become the regulatory body solely responsible for the sports supplements industry. Who are the TGA? The TGA is a part of the Australian Government’s Department of Health. They are responsible for the regulation of therapeutic goods. Therapeutic goods are defined within the Therapeutic Goods Act (TGA Act)[footnoteRef:1] in section X as “goods that are represented in any way to be, or that are, whether because of the way in which goods are presented or for any other reason, likely to be taken for therapeutic use”. Therapeutic use is defined in the TGA Act in section X as “use in connection with influencing, inhibiting or modifying a physiological process in a person”. A therapeutic good can include prescription medicines, complementary and alternative medicines such as vitamins and supplements, medical devices, blood and also blood products. [1: TGA Act] TGA Regulatory Scheme For a therapeutic good to be available to the public, the manufacturer/sponsor will need to apply for the product to be assessed. A sponsor can be the manufacturer or the importer of the product. The information that is to be provided with the application includes the ingredients on the product, evidence which supports the claims of the product, all proposed labelling (which is to adhere to the TGA rules regarding certain ingredients), advertising material for the product and after-market care facilities (this includes any complaints about advertising, defects of the product or any adverse event stemming from the use of the product). Once approved and the relevant fees have been paid, the product is given either an AUST L or AUST R number and listed on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG). The AUST L number is given to products which are considered to be low risk and readily available on the shelves for consumers. Products which are given an AUST R number are considered to be a higher risk product and are not available on the shelves for consumers to purchase, they are usually over the counter medications or prescription medications. Who are the FSANZ? The FSANZ is a statutory body that develops regulation regarding the food standard in Australia which are enforced by state and territory bodies. The FSANZ is responsible for the development of standards for the manufacturing of food products, labelling of food products, safety of food products and any claims that food products make. The standards developed by the FSANZ are contained within the Food Standards Code (the Code). Regulation of sports supplements prior to the TGA’s consultation paper Prior to the consultation paper that was released by the TGA late last year, sport supplements have generally been regulated by the FSANZ. Sports supplements are regulated by food standard 2.9.4 “Formulated Supplementary Sport Foods”. The composition of the supplement, labelling requirements for the packaging, nutritional, vitamin and mineral claims are all contained within this standard. All sports supplements have to include that the product was only meant to be a supplement rather than a replacement or be the main source of nutrition. Recommended dosage and warnings about the unsuitability of the product for children under 15 and pregnant women also had to be listed on the labelling. Choice of regulatory body Though sports supplements are primarily regulated by the FSANZ’s Code, the manufacturer/importer may have a choice to select which regulatory body they would prefer their product to be regulated by. This grey area is known as the “food medicine interface”. A guide was released by the TGA to assist with the choosing the appropriate regulatory bodies however this does allow the manufacturer/importer the opportunity to tailor their product to fit within the constraints of either regulatory framework. One of the areas discussed within the TGA’s consultation paper is trying to reduce this overlap/grey area for sport supplements. Another grey area that sports supplements could fall under for regulation by the TGA would be complementary and alternative medicines. What are CAMs? CAMs are a low risk medicine which are able to make claims regarding the enhancement of health and for health maintenance. To make any further claims would require these medicines to follow the same pathway for the approval of being classified as a therapeutic good. CAMs usually contain low risk ingredients which have an established use. These established uses of the low risk ingredients mean that the TGA adopts a less stringent approach towards the evidence requirements of the claims made by the CAMs. Evidence requirements CAMs are much harder to gather scientific evidence to show that each claim made has the relevant evidence required. CAMs are alternate therapies based on ingredients that have established uses however the effect t of the CAM may not have the same effect on every human that consumes the product. Sometimes the only evidence that is able to be obtained for a CAM is evidence from an expert within that field of complementary and alternative medicine practise. For therapeutic goods, by way of TGA regulation, scientific evidence is required to substantiate the claims made by the medication. Scientific evidence includes clinical trials in humans, epidemiological evidence, animal studies and any other evidence of biological activity. This scientific evidence can be used to ascertain the efficiency of the product. Other types of scientific evidence can include peer-reviewed clinical research, systematic reviews and some unpublished studies. Sports supplements which are regulated by the FSANZ, allow the use of words such as “boosting”, “improving” and “promoting” for claims made by their products. The level of evidence required to prove that these products do in fact deliver on the claims that the products are making is… Who regulates false, misleading or deceptive conduct? The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is a regulatory body which aims to encourage the accuracy of the information in the consumer domain with regards to purchases and commercial transactions. The ACCC is a federal regulatory body with the Competition and Consumer Act (CCA) being the predominant source of law and within the CCA is the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). The ACL regulates misleading and deceptive conduct in relation to commercial transactions. It is defined in s18 of the ACL as “a person must not, in trade or commerce, engage in conduct at is misleading or deceptive”. s29 of the ACL regulates false and misleading claims, it is defined as “… What is misleading and/or deceptive conduct? Conduct that leads or induces one into error is usually found to be deemed as misleading conduct[footnoteRef:2]. The conduct must take place in trade or commerce[footnoteRef:3]. However clear identification of what the conduct consists of[footnoteRef:4] will be necessary to determine if a course of action can be taken against the defendant. At the time of determining whether the conduct should or should not be determined to be misleading or deceptive, it would be best not to apply hindsight to the situation[footnoteRef:5]. Rather determining whether the conduct led the consumer into making an error because of the representation that was provided when the choice to purchase was being made. [2: Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592 [111]] [3: Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 [604]] [4: Miller and Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 357 [5]] [5: Auswest Timbers Pty Ltd v Secretary to the Department of Sustainability & Environment [2010] VSC 389 [47], [48]] Within trade and commerce, it is necessary in situations for future representations to be made. Such as the purchase of a business, the buyer would be interested in the past performance of the company and also representations of any future earning potential of the company. Reliance on professionals for an accurate opinion of future earning potential and providing that representation to a buyer would be reasonable grounds for the buyer to rely on the opinions and that they weren’t providing misleading or deceptive representations to the buyer[footnoteRef:6]. [6: Lake Koala Pty Ltd v Walker [1992] 2 Qd R 49, p58] There may be situations where the seller had no genuine intention to mislead or deceive a consumer with their claims however this does not bear weight with the courts[footnoteRef:7]. In a recent case of ACCC v TPG Internet[footnoteRef:8] where the telecommunications company advertised that an internet connection was for a fixed fee however the consumer would have to scour the entire advertisement to discover that they would also be signing up for a telephone line at an additional cost. By requiring the consumer to scour the entire advertisement, this created a tendency for the information to be misleading. The tendency to mislead a consumer was sufficient to find that TPG
Answered Same DayFeb 15, 2021RMIT University

Answer To: SPORTS SUPPLEMENTS: MEDICINE OR FOOD? Should the Therapeutic Goods Administration regulate to reduce...

Ishika answered on Feb 17 2021
134 Votes
SPORTS SUPPLEMENTS: MEDICINE OR FOOD
SPORTS SUPPLEMENTS: MEDICINE OR FOOD
Should the Therapeutic Goods Administration regulate to reduce the impact of sports supplements on the community?
(
[Date]
[Company name]
[Company address]
)
Table of Contents
Regulation of sports supplements prior to the TGA’s consultation paper    4
Formulated Supplemental Sports Nutrition:    4
Sport supplement action plan:    4
Choice of regulatory body    5
What are CAMs?    5
Evidence requirements    6
Who regulates false, misleading or deceptive conduct?    6
What is misleading and/or deceptive conduct?    7
Results: The food-medicine interface    8
Discussion    9
Impact on industry and consumers:    10
Collaborative approach:    10
Market Risk:    10
Black market:    10
Conclusion    11
Recommendation    12
SPORTS SUPPLEMENTS: MEDICINE OR FOOD?
Should the Therapeutic Goods Administration regulate to reduce the impact of sports supplements on the community?
Introduction
Currently, the Federal Regulatory Body, the TGA, and the Australian and New Zealand Food Standards (FSANZ) r
eview the regulations on sport complements in Australia. This investigation was attributable to regrettable events as well as to a regulatory gray area, as both Sport supplements sector can be governed by the TGA and FSANZ.
There were two cases in Australia where young adults died after consuming products that were regulated as sport supplements and this could be one of the reasons for the TGA and FSANZ review. A 21-year-old was not acquired by the individual in 2018 after he had consumed too much pure caffeine with his protein shake, but he found it was given no regulatory notices on any packaging. The year before another person died of a rare disease. Her desire to build up her body meant that, together with exercise, her personal trainer always prescribed her a high protein diet. Her family and her trainer were not aware of the genetic conditions and ultimately caused her to become intoxicated as high protein levels could not be treated.
This paper is designed to ascertain whether the TGA should regulate all sport supplements, as proposed by the November last year consultation paper. Should the evidence requirements be stronger than complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) if TGA were to regulate all sports supplements, so as to be more similar to the evidence requirements of all therapeutic products? This could help to reduce the effect of any perceived deceptive, misleading or frustrating behaviour on customers. The paper will be divided into who and how the current regulatory bodies for sport supplements actually control sport supplements, CAMs and their evidentiary requirements relative to the evidentiary requirements for sport supplements, defining where the regulatory requirements are to be drawn to assist customers with their purchases and balancing them against personal responsibility
Who are the TGA?
The TGA is a part of Health Department of the Australian government. We are responsible for Therapeutic Goods Control. Therapeutic goods are defined in section 3(1) of the Therapeutic Goods Act (TGA Act)[footnoteRef:1] as "goods that are or are likely to be used for therapeutic purposes, whether because of the manner in which goods are presented or for any other reason." In section 3(1) of the TGA Act, therapeutic use is defined as "use in relation to influencing, inhibiting or modifying a person's physiological process." Prescription medicines, complementary and natural medications such as vitamins and supplements, medical devices, blood and also blood products can be a therapeutic goods. [1: TGA Act]
TGA Regulatory Scheme
The approaches used to control sport supplements in Australia are being examined and this could lead to significant improvements in the design, distribution and commercialization of these products. The Therapeutic Goods Authority (TGA) seeks comments from interested parties regarding an order made pursuant to section 7(1) of the Therapeutic Goods Law 1989 to declare certain sports supplements, when used, advertised or submitted for delivery in a particular form, therapeutic products. The statement would be known as Therapeutic Goods (Declared Goods) Order 2020.
To be available to the public for a therapeutic good, the manufacturer / sponsor will have to apply for an assessment of the product. One sponsor may be the product's supplier or importer. The information to be provided with the application includes the ingredients on the product, evidence supporting the product's claims, any proposed labelling (for adherence to the TGA rules on certain ingredients), and product advertising material and aftermarket care facilities (including any complaints about advertising, product defects or any adverse events).
A variety of industry codes of practice dealing with pharmaceutical, off-counter and CAM medical goods also provide specific guidelines including admissible and complementary to TGA rules, grievances and compliance procedures. The obligation to regulate the limited industry focuses on the commonwealth law with regard to regulating therapeutic goods and controlling therapeutic manufacturers. While the Constitution allows the Commonwealth to be related to areas in which its competition with the States is controlled, in some cases it may not be willing to cover a whole field of conduct if national laws are necessary. One example is medicinal goods. The Commonwealth may wish to regulate this as an obvious field given the domestic trade of such goods. The scope of the Commonwealth only applies to the exchange and trade of these goods between countries, Australia or other countries or producers with jurisdiction over international, commercial, or financial companies. Although section 4 of TGA does apply to a national therapeutic product scheme, this objective is only partially achieved due to the constitutional restriction, since there is not a TGA-driven mirror rule in Queensland and Western Australia. The power to pre-approve or deny additional pharmaceutical ads and revoke authorisation has been assigned to the CHC and to the ASMI pursuant to Regulation 5Q. It is limited to conventional print advertising for supplementary drugs that CHC is able to approve the publicity. ASMI's power extends to allow non-prescription (including additional) drugs ads including a non-scheduled or schedule 2.
TGAC advertising is broadly defined to mean any statement, pictorial representation or design made, however made which is intended to promote either directly or indirectly the use or delivery of the goods. TGAC does not permit advertising claims for the treatment of grave health conditions. (Pharmacy-only) ingredients to appear in any given media including radio and TV. There is currently a review of the advertising regulatory framework. The gap in abilities to prevent consumers being exposed to advertising for therapeutical products which contain misleading claims is one of the critics of the current pre-approval system. Such requirements apply only to certain goods and advertising outlets. The requirement for pre-approval does not currently extend to ads on websites which, in marketing, pay television or related medical devices, would certainly play a main role. Mooted TGA changes aim to start a process of pre-approval for listed goods. Instead of being able to write their own statements in a free text format, advertisers are requested to choose pre-approved indications for ingredients from a drop-down list.
Who are the FSANZ?
The FSANZ is a statutory authority that governs the food quality in Australia and is established by national and regional authorities. FSANZ will develop standards for the production of food products, food products labeling, food products safety and all claims made by food products. “The FSANZ standards are covered by the Code of Food Standards (code). FSANZ is responsible for the packaging, including compulsory (legally necessary) signs or labels, of both packaged and unpackaged products.”
FSANZ sets the primary standards and residue limits for agricultural and veterinary chemicals in Australia. The Ministry of Primary Industry of New Zealand is conducting these activities in New Zealand. Whether or not amendments to the Food Standard Code will be approved by the FSANZ Board. “The Ministers responsible for food regulation (Australia and the New Zealand Ministerial Committee on Food Regulation) are informed of these decisions. The Forum can adopt, change, or dismiss standards and recommend that FSANZ review its decisions.”
Regulation of sports supplements prior to the TGA’s consultation paper
Formulated Supplemental Sports Nutrition:
Generally speaking, the FSANZ controlled the sports supplements prior to the TGA consultation paper published at the end of last year. "Formulated Supplemental Sport Nutrition." This standard includes the dietary structure, product labelling instructions, nutritional requirements, the vitamin and mineral statements. Sport supplements under the Health Regulation 2.9.4. The drugs were to become merely a full complement or the primary source of food rather than a substitute for all sports products. The recommended dosage and warning signs of drug inappropriateness were also to be stated on the label for children under 15 and pregnant women. The Code defines and tracks the structure and labelling of foodstuffs designed specifically to help sportsmen meet their diet or performance goals. Such products are not intended as the primary or main nutrient source as a dietary supplement. This clause calls for the addition of certain micronutrients and other ingredients which, due to sportsmen unique physiological needs, do not need to be added to other foods in the form of formulated additional sports foods. Such goods are therefore not appropriate for children's use. The production, labelling and selling of food for specific medical purposes are regulated by rule “2.9.5 of the Food Safety Code”. Because most of those goods are produced and imported into Australia and New Zealand, the standard is as compliant as possible with relevant EU and US legislation.
Sport supplement action plan:
On 24 July 2018, the “Australian Government Department of Health” arranged a round table on Sports supplements on behalf of the “Standing Committee for Food Regulation (FRSC)”. The roundtable was comprised of consumer groups, additional sporting sectors, healthcare professionals and Australia's government, state and territories....
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here