student must provide to their learning facilitator a brief review of the literature on their chosen topic. (What are the determinants of Poly-cystic disorder among South Asian women?)The literature...

1 answer below »
student must provide to their learning facilitator a brief review of the literature on their chosen topic. (What are the determinants of Poly-cystic disorder among South Asian women?)The literature review must contain key references/theorists/researchers for the public health topic chosen. The literature review assignment must be designed to address the following questions: • Who are the key theorists/researchers in your public health topic? • What are the key issues? • What are the gaps in the existing body of knowledge? The literature review should provide a basis for justifying a clear research question or hypothesis to be explored further. You must also indicate the search strategy used for your literature review. For example, what were the key words you searched for, and which key databases or other sources did you use to conduct your literature review? (e.g. CINAHL, Proquest Public Health, Informit, Medline, Google Scholar).


ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title PUBH6008: Capstone A: Applied Research Project in Public Health Assessment Assessment 2: Literature review Individual/Group Individual Length 4,000 words Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes: 2. Integrate and apply their knowledge and skills in public health 3. Develop research skills and apply these to a public health issue 4. Conduct a small literature review which critically analyses key issues on a public health research topic 5. Define and justify a research question, based on the literature/public health issue, and outline its significance Submission Due Sunday following the end of Module 4 at 11:55pm AEST/AEDT* Weighting 40% Total Marks 100 marks *Please Note: This time is Sydney time (AEST or AEDT). Please convert to your own time zone (eg. Adelaide = 11:25pm). PUBH6008_Assessment Brief 2 Page 1 of 6 Instructions: By the end of module 3, student must provide to their learning facilitator a brief review of the literature on their chosen topic. The literature review must contain key references/theorists/researchers for the public health topic chosen. The literature review assignment must be designed to address the following questions: • Who are the key theorists/researchers in your public health topic? • What are the key issues? • What are the gaps in the existing body of knowledge? The literature review should provide a basis for justifying a clear research question or hypothesis to be explored further. You must also indicate the search strategy used for your literature review. For example, what were the key words you searched for, and which key databases or other sources did you use to conduct your literature review? (e.g. CINAHL, Proquest Public Health, Informit, Medline, Google Scholar). Assessment Criteria: • Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%) General assessment criteria (20%): o Provides a lucid introduction o Shows a sophisticated understanding of the key issues o Shows ability to interpret relevant information and literature in relation to chosen topic o Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts o Shows evidence of reading beyond the required readings o Justifies any conclusions reached with well-formed arguments and not merely assertions o Provides a conclusion or summary o Correctly uses academic writing, presentation and grammar: ▪ Complies with academic standards of legibility, referencing and bibliographical details (including reference list) ▪ Writes clearly, with accurate spelling and grammar as well as proper sentence and paragraph construction ▪ Uses appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research PUBH6008_Assessment Brief 2 Page 2 of 6 Page 4 8 Marking Rubric: Assessment Attributes 0-34 (Fail 2 – F2) Unaccept able 35-49 (Fail 1 – F1) Poor 50-64 (Pass -P) Functional 65-74 (Credit - CR) Proficient 75-84 (Distinction – DN) Advanced 85-100 (High Distinction – HD) Exceptional Grade Description (Grading Scheme) Evidence of unsatisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning objectives of the subject, insufficient understanding of the subject content and/or unsatisfactory level of skill development. Evidence of satisfactory achievement of subject learning objectives, the development of relevant skills to a competent level, and adequate interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a good level of understanding, knowledge and skill development in relation to the content of the subject or work of a superior quality on the majority of the learning objectives of the subject. Demonstration of a high level of interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a high level of achievement of the learning objectives of the subject demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, use of methodology and communication skills. Evidence of an exceptional level of achievement of learning objectives across the entire content of the course demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, creativity, originality, use of methodology and communication skills. Knowledge and understanding Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Knowledge/understa nding of the field or discipline. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Often Thorough knowledge/understandi ng of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by PUBH6008_Assessment Brief 2 of http://www.tua.edu.au/media/50742/a240_grading-scheme.pdf http://www.tua.edu.au/media/50742/a240_grading-scheme.pdf PUBH6008_Assessment Brief 2 Page 5 of 8 conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. from the research/course materials and extended reading. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning. Critical reasoning, presentation and defence of an argument and/or position Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%) Specific position (perspective or argument) fails to take into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Makes assertions that are not justified. Specific position (perspective or argument) begins to take into account the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Justifies any conclusions reached with arguments not merely assertion. Specific position (perspective or argument) takes into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Others’ points of view are acknowledged. Justifies any conclusions reached with wellformed arguments not merely assertion. Specific position (perspective or argument) is expertly presented and accurately takes into account the complexities of the issue(s) and scope of the assignment. Justifies any conclusions reached with welldeveloped arguments. Specific position (perspective or argument) is presented expertly, authoritatively and imaginatively, accurately taking into account the complexities of the issue(s) and scope of the assignment. Limits of position are acknowledged. Justifies any conclusions reached with sophisticated arguments. PUBH6008_Assessment Brief 2 Page 6 of 8 Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Limited synthesis and analysis. Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new Well-developed analysis and synthesis with application of Thoroughly developed and creative analysis Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%) Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%) Limited application/recommendatio ns based upon analysis. knowledge with application. Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature. recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. and synthesis with application of pretested models and / or independently developed models and justified recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. existing knowledge. Strong application by way of pretested models and / or independently developed models. Recommendations are clearly justified based on the analysis/synthesis. Applying knowledge to new situations/other cases. PUBH6008_Assessment Brief 2 Page 7 of 8 Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence Use of academic conventions including appropriate resources and referencing (20%) *General assessment criteria shown below Poorly written with errors in spelling, grammar. Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are mistakes in using the APA style. Is written according to academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary) and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence and paragraph construction. Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or Is well-written and adheres to the academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary). Demonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. Is very well-written and adheres to the academic genre. Consistently demonstrates
Answered Same DayNov 08, 2021

Answer To: student must provide to their learning facilitator a brief review of the literature on their chosen...

Azra S answered on Nov 10 2021
139 Votes
Title Page
Title- Determinants of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in South Asian Women
Student Name-
Student Number-
Name of University-
Name of degree-
Name of Principal supervisor-
Date of Submission-
Table of Content
Table of Contents
Title Page    1
Table of Content    2
Abstract    3
Introduction    4
The Background of the study    4
The Significance of the study    5
Statement of the Problem    5
Hypothesis    5
Definitions of Terms    5
Method Used    6
Overview of PCOs in South Asian women    6
What are PCOs?    7
Theories guiding research    9
Review of the Literature    10
Treatment of PCOS in South Asian women in literature    13
Recommended treatment    14
Gaps in literature    15
Discussion and Conclusion    16
References    18
Abstract
Polycystic ovarian syndrome is a condition that affects the hormonal secretion of women from their early teens to their late fifties, tha
t is, their child-bearing age. In this condition, women have increased level of androgen hormones and their ovaries become incapable of ovulation. Tiny cysts grow on the ovaries in the form of follicles. Studies have been conducted to determine the determinants of PCOS. These determinants have been classified using genetic and nongenetic theories. In South Asian women, the determinants of PCOS have been found to be both hereditary, genetic, environmental and biological.
Further studies can be conducted in order to determine the exact determinants of PCOS in South Asian women and their implications for treatment.
Introduction
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a condition that affects a woman’s hormone secretion glands impacting their hormone levels. As a result, women with PCOS end up producing more than needed amounts of male hormones. This imbalance results in them skipping menstrual periods and creating issues in getting pregnant. PCOS also cause abnormal hair growth in various areas of the body, and male pattern baldness. It can also act as a contributing factor to other to long-term health problems like heart disease and diabetes (Azziz, 2016).
The exact cause of PCOS remains unknown even today (Dumesic et al, 2015). Some researchers attribute it to genetics while others hold environmental factors responsible. This literature review seeks to find the main determinants of PCOS in women in South Asia. An extensive search has been performed to understand this question in order to provide better health outcomes for women of South Asian descent.
The Background of the study
Studies show that 5 to 15 percent of women in the world are diagnosed with PCOS (Azziz, 2016). This number is especially high among certain women, like the South Asian women. South Asian women are said to have several factors that contribute to PCOS including lifestyle and diet (Allahbadia & Merchant, 2008). However, there is a gap in that real causes of PCOS among South Asian woman remain unknown. Most conclusions are drawn based on general findings and research and there needs to be a wider study to notice PCOS and their impact on a women’s life.
The Significance of the study
This study is designed to assess the most significant literature related to PCOS. The study will provide a definite guideline on the determinants of PCOS in South Asian women. It will help in creating an outline of determinants to watch out for, as well as find the dominant causative factor for PCOS in this area. This research will help in finding treatment and preventive measures for PCOS in South Asian women where the condition is on the rise.
Statement of the Problem
Poly-cystic disorder is prevalent at a high rate among women in South Asia. There are several determinants of PCOS known clinically. In order to contain and remedy PCOS in South Asian women, it is important to understand which of these are specific to them.
Research Question
What are the determinants of Poly-cystic ovarian syndrome disorder among South Asian women?
Hypothesis
Obesity and Diabetes along with Genetic factors are the main determinants of PCOS in South Asian women.
Definitions of Terms
PCOS- Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
FSH- Follicle-stimulating hormone
LH- luteinizing hormone
Cysts- It refers to blisters-like growth on top of the ovaries. Several cysts usually occur together. They are actually little eggs that haven’t matured.
Estrogen and progesterone- Female hormones
BMI- Body Mass Index
Hyperandrogenaemia- High level of androgens in women
Hirsutism- Excess hair growth on body
Hyperlipidaemia- Elevated levels of lipids
Endometrial pathology- Abnormal endometrium
Method Used
The method used in this study was an online research of the most recent articles relevant to the topic. The main key words were inserted in the Google Scholar search bar with the search criteria limited to the last 20 years of research. The most relevant research was then selected and reviewed for best result.
The main keywords used were “Determinants of PCOS in South Asian Women”, “Determinants of PCOS”, “Theories of PCO research”, “Genetic causes of PCOS” and “Environmental causes of PCOS”.
After careful investigation and selection, the most relevant, peer-reviewed research articles were chosen for the literature review.
Overview of PCOs in South Asian women
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome or PCOS are a relatively common endocrinal system disorder in women of the reproductive age. In India, 1 in every 10 women is said to be inflicted with this disorder and out of these 10 women, 6 would be teenagers. PCOS have been an object of study ever since they were discovered in 1935. However, the lack of awareness about such a common condition is prevalent even today. A simple fact, that PCOS remain undetected for many years is proof of this fact (Kudesia, Illions & Lieman, 2013).
A recent study shows that about 20-25 per cent of women in India of the childbearing age suffer from PCOS. The study relates that “While 60 per cent of women with PCOS are obese, 35-50 per cent have a fatty liver. About 70 per cent have insulin resistance, 60-70 per cent have high level of androgen and 40-60 per cent have glucose intolerance”
In spite of its common occurrence, several aspects of the disorder remain a mystery. The symptoms and severity of this condition vary greatly from woman to woman. Studies have shown that women with PCOS often have higher levels of insulin than normal. Insulin is a hormone secreted by the pancreas that helps to convert sugar (glucose) into energy in the body cells.
Very high levels of insulin may result in ovaries producing more androgens, like testosterone. People have higher levels of Insulin if they have a higher BMI. Insulin resistance makes weight loss hard and is a common issue in women with PCOS (Dumesic et al, 2015).
What are PCOs?
PCOS is a hormonal health problem that impacts women in their childbearing years that is from ages 15 to 44 year of age. Studies show that nearly 26.7 percent of women of this group have PCOS. In spite of the commonality of this condition, it remains undetected (March et al, 2010). PCOS affect a woman’s ovaries. This is because these organs are responsible for release of hormones estrogen and progesterone responsible for regulating the menstrual cycle. Ovaries are also responsible for production of male hormones called androgens.
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) are incharge for ovulation. While FSH stimulates the release of a follicle, LH is responsible for triggering the ovary to release a mature egg (Dumesic et al, 2015).
PCOS is characterized by three main features. These are, the appearance of cysts in ovaries, increased levels of androgens and irregular periods. Cysts that grow on ovaries are follicles of immature eggs that can never trigger an ovulation. In the absence of ovulation, all hormones produced by the ovaries is altered including estrogen, progesterone, FSH, and LH. Estrogen and progesterone levels decrease while androgen levels increase (Dumesic et al, 2015).
Causes of PCOS haven’t been determined for certain. Studies show that genes, insulin resistance, and inflammation are the dominant causes for increased androgen production. It has been found that PCOS are influenced by genetics and occur in families. Studies have also determined that up to 70 percent of women with PCOS show insulin resistance. Increased insulin in the body triggers the production of male hormones. Another cause of insulin resistance is obesity. Obesity and insulin are also known causes of type 2 diabetes. Studies in women with PCOS has also shown that they have more inflammation in their body compared to those who don’t have PCOs. Inflammation has...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here