SUBJECT: RESEARCH IN BUSINESSI UPLOAD ASSIGNMENT 1 FILEAND MAKE ASSIGNMENT 3 AS PER ASSIGNMENT 1...

Question

SUBJECT: RESEARCH IN BUSINESSI UPLOAD ASSIGNMENT 1 FILEAND MAKE ASSIGNMENT 3 AS PER ASSIGNMENT 1 TOPIC
I UPLOAD 2 FILE FOR SAMPLE ASSIGNMENTMAKE ASSIGNMENT AS PER SAMPLE FILE
1 FILE FOR GUIDLINE What contain need in assignment pls open lecture ppt fileall infomation mention so pls open ppt and read instruction and after make assignment
pls make sure don't put ANY GENERAL WORD
REF USE PROPLElY AND IN METHODOLOGY DONT USE GENERAL WORDPLS MENTION PROPER SURVEY FIGER WITH PLACE

1 BUSN20016 RESEARCH IN BUSINESS, T2, 2017 ASSESSMENT 3 Project Title: Comparative analysis on impact of adopting design thinking on four chosen Australian banks NAME OF THE STUDENT: Student ID: Tutor’s name: Campus: ASSESSMENT SHEET Criteria Total marks Marks obtained Overall comments A statement of the problem, research aim, objectives and research questions 10 Justification and potential output of the research 10 Conceptual framework 10 Methodology, organisation of the study, project budget and schedule 10 Accurate referencing, use of correct English and logical sequences between sentences and paragraphs and a good introduction 10 Total = 50 Mark reduction for Turnitin similarity (It's up to the markers and unit coordinator's judgement) Mark reduction for late submission(5% mark reduction for each day of late submission) Grand Total= 50 Key to grading and corresponding marking scale: HD (42.5 and above out of 50 marks): Student demonstrates outstanding understanding and interpretation of all aspects of the criteria. D (37.25 to 42.24 out of 50 marks): Student demonstrates excellence in understanding and interpretation of almost all aspects of the criteria with some minor corrections or additions needed. C (32.25 to 37.24 marks out of 50 marks): Student demonstrates very good understanding and interpretation of most aspects of the criteria with some need for additional work, additions or improvement. P (24.75% to 32.24% marks): Student demonstrates good understanding and interpretation of the criteria to warrant the award of a Pass but requires considerable additional work, additions or improvement. F (below 24.7%): Student demonstrates an unsatisfactory understanding and interpretation of the criteria and requires major additional work, additions or improvement to achieve a passing grade. (Month), (Year) 2 Table of Contents 1.0. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0. Problem statement ............................................................................................................................... 3 3.0. Aim and objectives/research questions .............................................................................................. 3 4.0. Justification and potential output of the research ............................................................................ 4 5.0. Conceptual framework and hypothesis development ....................................................................... 4 5.1. Design thinking definition and use ................................................................................................ 4 5.2. Impact of design thinking .............................................................................................................. 4 5.3. Design thinking in the banking sector ............................................................................................ 5 5.4. Hypothesis development ................................................................................................................ 5 6.0. Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 6 6.1. Research Approach and sources of data ............................................................................................ 6 6.2. Proposed data collection and analysis techniques .............................................................................. 6 6.3 Organisation of the study .................................................................................................................... 6 6.4. Budget, Project Activities and Gantt chart ......................................................................................... 7 7. References ..........................................................................

unifolks_636733110572436513_121806_1.pdf unifolks_636733110572436513_121806_2.pdf unifolks_636733110572436513_121806_3.docx unifolks_636733110572436513_121806_4.pdf unifolks_636733110572436513_121806_5.docx

Kuldeep · Accepted Answer

Running head: Research Proposal
Research Proposal
Research Proposal
Student Name
University Name
Contents
Section 1	3
Introduction	3
Problem statement	3
Research Questions	4
Research Aim and Objectives	4
Justification of the Project	4
Expected Research Outcome/Output	5
Section 2	6
Conceptual framework and research & Hypothesis	6
Methodology	7
A brief methodology	7
Comprehensive literature review	8
Mixed methodology	11
Survey research – self-administered questionnaire	11
Section 3	12
Organisation of the study	12
Gantt chart	13
Project budget and budget Justification	14
References	15
Section 1
Introduction 
Discounts are offered in most of their best supermarkets, but as shoppers reach this typical treatment, they should probably think about the fact that farmers, not supermarkets, pay generous discounts. Farmers may have no profit at all, no pricing, little or no idea, and how much he will get when farmers pick and ship products (Renton, 2011). Or the package will be paid by the farm, but it will be done by a company selected by the supermarket, which costs twice as much as the individual packaging. Despite the endless price wars in supermarkets, it is mainly achieved by allowing suppliers to lower prices. Despite the high cost, most agricultural sectors, from eggs to fruits, vegetables and pork, have seen farm prices fall in the past year. The supermarket has returned the risk to us: they charge an increasing mark-up, forcing us to participate in the promotion, and a Welsh vegetable and dairy farmer tells the observer. Farmers bear all the risks, pay all the fees, and there is hardly anything higher than the production price (Renton, 2011). 
Problem statement
Woolworths and Coles are two of the most famous brands in the Australian retail industry. They are fierce competitors and are usually addicted to price wars. It plays a negative role in aggressive pricing strategy and large discount market monopoly and keeping customer stock stable. However, this deeper wage war has severely harmed local farmers and producers. This strategy is not very sustainable for them because the farmers find themselves in dangerous condition and the costs they generate do not fall, but because of the fierce price war, they reluctantly forced them to sell at a lower cost is done (Gottschalk & Leistner, 2012). Earned crop The ethical capital of these celebrity chefs has been deployed minimize the importance of animal welfare (the organizations of two supermarket strong organizations, organizations that associate associations with leading animal welfare groups) and ethical models of local issues by these corporate participants. Food Source This ethical (re-branding) effort is especially important for the Australian context as its grocery market is much focused and the powerful Woolworth/Coles duo dominates the vast majority. The important thing is that these celebrity chefs/supermarket alliances are happening when these big companies are being examined rapidly due to lack of media and other places (commercial) ethics. However, as we will see, ethical issues have been compromised in the supermarket space in a number of different ways, it has happened in a particular complex relationship, in which a chain of non-state actors attempts to interfere in Australian food ethics in the future. For example, in Australia, various workers, producers and consumer-led campaigns are improving about a range of food issues, including health and animal welfare and food sovereignty (Lewis, & Huber, 2015). 
As we all know, different industries are mutually dependent and lack adequate milk and vegetables. Fruit production will have a negative impact on the food processing industry and ultimately domino effect will be on all other subsidiary industries. Therefore, the sustainability of the farmers is not only a serious problem for the farmers, but the entire economy (Gunarathne, 2015). Although several researches have been done on different aspect of the sustainability of famer, there is almost no research which can show investing on the sustainability of famer at stake: Deep Discount Wars Woolworths Vs Coles. Therefore, this project aims to find out does the sustainability of famer at stake: Deep Discount Wars Woolworths Vs Coles.
Research Questions
1. What are the possible solutions to how farmers and supermarket giants can maintain a healthy balance?
2. How much damage does Coles and Woolworths have to farmers?
3. How to bridge the growing gap between the two, what new rules and regulations should be adopted?
Research Aim and Objectives
The purpose of the study was to provide an in-depth assessment and analysis of the problems faced by Australian farmers due to the existing duopoly of the supermarkets Woolworths as well as Coles and how it affects the sustainability of the local farmers along with producers. 
Justification of the Project
On the basis of collected information, Queensland farmers are said to be less interested in maintaining commercial operations because they do not see any significant monetary and economic benefits. Often, these farmers are forced to sell milk for less than $ 1, a lower price which many small businesses have to withdraw from the industry. It should be noted that this paradigm shift, which changes the economic preferences of farmers and producers, will have a great impact on other sectors of the economy. In this case, here are the advantages of preparing this research proposal:
i. It will help those who want to completely understand the sustainability of fame: Deep Discount Wars Woolworths Vs Coles.
ii. This research proposal will also help to expand understanding of the sustainability of famous people: Deep Discount Wars Woolworths Vs Coles.
iii. The research program will help or support them to identify the correct areas of focus for sustainable development.
Expected Research Outcome/Output
This study results will provide a deep analytical framework for farmers. This research study will help farmers the different results obtained from the research proposal surely useful for farmers and also for the decision makers. The proposal is very useful for new farmers because they can easily understand or determine the causes, impacts of sustainability. This research will help farmers to deeply evaluate and analyze the problems they face in Australia face due to existing duopoly of Woolworths and Coles and how it affects sustainability of local farmers and producers. These research study outputs will be simply viewed as a significant academic work for a problem that has properly been identified for the research proposal. 
Section 2
Conceptual framework & research & Hypothesis
This is a fight, Australian dairy farmers are fighting for five years, and there is almost no indication of any relief, Aaron Claves said that it is time to take action (Conway-Dodd, 2016). Mark Gibles understands how the dairy supply industry works; and this uncertain future knows that it has to face. They have been working in Davis for many years,

1 BUSN20016 RESEARCH IN BUSINESS, T2, 2017 ASSESSMENT 3 Project Title: Comparative analysis on impact of adopting design thinking on four chosen Australian banks NAME OF THE STUDENT: Student ID:...

Answer To: 1 BUSN20016 RESEARCH IN BUSINESS, T2, 2017 ASSESSMENT 3 Project Title: Comparative analysis on...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment