Subject Title Value Chain Management Subject Code MGT804 Lecturer / Tutor Dr Hadi Rezaei Vandchali Semester July 2020 Assessment Title Research Report Learning Outcome/s LO2, LO3 and LO4 Assessment...

mgt


Subject Title Value Chain Management Subject Code MGT804 Lecturer / Tutor Dr Hadi Rezaei Vandchali Semester July 2020 Assessment Title Research Report Learning Outcome/s LO2, LO3 and LO4 Assessment type (group or individual) Individual Weighting 35% Word count 2000 words Due date Sunday 1st November 2020 Class submission Lecture☐Tutorial X Submission type Paper copy☐Turnitin X Format / Layout of Assessment (details of what to include) (cross the appropriate check boxes) Report: ICMS Cover Page Table of Contents Synopsis / Executive Summary Introduction Findings Conclusion Recommendations Reference List Appendices X X X X X X X X X X Essay: ICMS Cover Page Abstract Introduction Body Conclusion Recommendations Reference List Appendices Oral Presentation: Paper submission PowerPoint submission Peer review (group presentation) Reference List ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Other: (outline specific details here – use check boxes) Assessment instructions (clear, succinct, without repetition) CSR and Value Chain Research Report: Using a variety of academic research and industry sourced materials: 1) Examine the key challenges facing organisations whose value chains incorporate operations in developing economies. ASSESSMENT TEMPLATE Page 2 of 2 2) Discuss what are the CSR practices that organisations use to manage CSR issues in their supply chain actors within the developing countries to overcome those challenges? Readings for the assessment (instructions where they can be found e.g. MyAthens database, Moodle etc.) Lectures Materials, further readings at the end of each lecture’s slides, MyAthens for credible journals articles Peer Review Evaluation (group work – optional) Assessment Criteria HD (High distinction) DN (Distinction) CR (Credit) PP (Pass) NN (Fail) Examine the key challenges facing organisations whose value chains incorporate operations in developing economies in the global scale (35%) Challenges well discussed with evidence thoroughly researched, and effective use of practical examples in the global scale. Challenges well discussed with evidence well researched, and appropriate use of practical examples in the global scale. Challenges well discussed with evidence competently researched and good use of practical examples in the global scale. Challenges discussed with limited relevant evidence and inappropriate use of practical examples in the global scale. Challenges discussed with irrelevant evidence and lack of practical examples in the global scale. Discuss the CSR practices that organisations use to manage CSR issues in their supply chain actors that are working in the developing countries (50%) The CSR practices are comprehensively discussed. The CSR practices are clearly discussed. The CSR practices are reasonably discussed. The CSR practices is partly unclear and inaccurate. The CSR practices is mostly unclear and inaccurate. Presentation, style & formatting (10%) · Identified the key report elements (i.e. introduction, body, conclusion) · Given each section/paragraph a clear focus and line of thought · Provided a writing style that is appropriate to the task · Used writing that is fluent and grammatically correct, with appropriate punctuation. · No spelling or typing errors and given due regard to the rules of capitalization and abbreviation etc. Follows all requirements. Follows most requirements. Basic, essential requirements followed. Significantly deviation from requirements. Requirements largely ignored. Referencing (5%) · Used a minimum of 12 academic references, including textbooks and journal articles · Applied the APA referencing system using the correct technique More than 12 academic/industry-based references used. Professionally and apply referencing style faultlessly 10-11 academic/industry based references used. Mostly accurate referencing 8-9 academic/industry based references used. Reasonably accurate referencing 6-7 academic/industry based references used. Significantly inconsistent referencing Less than 6 academic/industry based references used . Incorrect referencing style Grading rubric