Submit two files. Submit the persuasive speech preparation outline in Microsoft Word using the SPCH275 Speech Preparation Outline Template with a References list in APA format on the last page. Your...


Submit two files.



  1. Submit the persuasive speech preparation outline in Microsoft Word using the SPCH275 Speech Preparation Outline Template with a References list in APA format on the last page. Your research for your topic should include a minimum of three to five academic peer-reviewed articles or books from scholarly sources cited within the outline. Research should include opposing viewpoints to your stance and incorporate at least one into your outline, followed by a strong rebuttal. The DeVry Library is the recommended source for your scholarly research. Although reputable website sources are acceptable, they should not replace the required minimum of three to five academicpeer-reviewed articles or books from a scholarly source. Three sources should be parenthetically cited on the outline (Author, Year). Any source listed as a Reference must be cited in the outline. (75 points)

  2. Include a copy of the PowerPoint file and any other visual aids to be used in the presentation. You should have 5-8 slides, plus a title slide at the beginning and a reference slide at the end (in addition to your 5-8 slides of content). Visuals should have a professional quality; not too much written on each slide; pictures should be copyright cleared and have citations on the slide. (75 points)


You will be graded based on the rubric below.


Rubric

LMA.SPCH275.WK6.JAN22LMA.SPCH275.WK6.JAN22








































































CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeech Materials: Critical Thinking










26to >23.0ptsExcellentThe outline includes a strong, central idea for the speech that provides a unified trajectory of inquiry and analysis that is sustained throughout.23to >20.0ptsCompetentThe outline illustrates a central idea for the speech with few tangents and diversions that unifies the main idea but lacks clarity or creativity20to >17.0ptsLimitedThe outline indicates a central idea for the speech, but lacks concrete focus and unification of key components.17to >14.0ptsPoorThe outline does not include a unifying central idea for the speech to link key components of the argument together.14to >0ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe outline does not address this competency.

26pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeech Materials: Communication










16to >13.0ptsExcellentThe outline and presentation slides clearly communicate a central idea through precise use of language, attention to audience, grammar and mechanics, and communication conventions and formats appropriate to the genre.13to >11.0ptsCompetentThe outline and presentation slides communicate a central idea by demonstrating proficient use of language, audience awareness, grammar and mechanics and communication conventions appropriate to the genre.11to >9.0ptsLimitedThe outline and presentation slides attempt to communicate a central idea, but need more proficient use of language, stronger attention to audience, and a more precise utilization of communication conventions. Grammar and mechanics need improvement.9to >7.0ptsPoorThe outline and presentation slides lack a clear understanding of language usage, audience awareness, and communication competence. Grammar and mechanics inhibit understanding7to >0ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe outline and presentation slides do not address this competency.

16pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeech Materials: Information Literacy










21to >19.0ptsExcellentThe outline and presentation slides demonstrate a strong development of central arguments through detailed examples and evidence of appropriate and diverse academic research.19to >16.0ptsCompetentThe outline and presentation slides use key examples from mostly reputable sources to develop a central argument. Evidence could be utilized more efficiently.16to >13.0ptsLimitedThe outline and presentation slides use limited, incomplete, or inappropriate information as vague support for central ideas. Evidence is not cohesively connected to the main idea.13to >11.0ptsPoorThe outline and presentation slides do not provide evidence to help support a clear argument.11to >0ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe outline and presentation slides do not address this competency

21pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeech Materials: Technology Literacy










16to >14.0ptsExcellentThe presentation slides expertly use technology applications, media and electronic resources to develop and achieve assignment goals.14to >12.0ptsCompetentThe presentation slides utilize some features of technology applications, media and electronic resources to develop and support assignment requirements.12to >10.0ptsLimitedThe presentation slides use limited technology features, media and electronic resources superficially for minimal impact.10to >8.0ptsPoorThe presentation slides lack an effective use of technology, media and electronic resources.8to >0ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe presentation does not address this competency

16pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeech Materials: Cultural Competence










21to >18.0ptsExcellentThe presentation slides demonstrate strong evidence of audience awareness.18to >15.0ptsCompetentThe presentation slides demonstrate some evidence of audience awareness.15to >14.0ptsLimitedThe presentation slides demonstrate limited evidence of audience awareness.14to >13.0ptsPoorThe presentation slides lack audience awareness.13to >0ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe presentation slides do not address this competency.

21pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeech Materials: Global Awareness & Civic Engagement










26to >23.0ptsExcellentThe speech materials demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of best practices for speech preparation and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.23to >20.0ptsCompetentThe speech materials demonstrate proficient understanding of best practices for speech preparation and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.20to >16.0ptsLimitedThe speech materials demonstrate a vague understanding of speech preparation and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.16to >13.0ptsPoorThe speech materials lack a clear understanding of speech and research delivery preparation and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.13to >0ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe speech materials do not address this competency.

26pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.SPCH275.A.Critical ThinkingSPCH275 Student Mastery of Critical Thinking skillsthreshold:3.0pts










4ptsExcellent: Student Performance: Strong, original central idea that provides a unified trajectory of inquiry and analysis that is sustained throughout.3ptsCompetent: Student Performance: Central ideas with few tangents and diversions that unifies the argument but lacks clarity or creativity.2ptsLimited: Student Performance: Attempts to form a cohesive idea, but lacks concrete focus and unification of key component1ptsPoor: Student Performance: No unifying central idea to link key components of the argument together.0ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsUnacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.

4pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.SPCH275.B.Communicationthreshold:3.0pts










4ptsExcellent: Communicates a central idea through precise use of language, attention to audience, grammar and mechanics, and communication conventions and formats appropriate to the genre.3ptsCompetent: Communicates a central idea by demonstrating proficient use of language, audience awareness, grammar and mechanics and communication conventions appropriate to the genre.2ptsLimited: Attempts to communicate a central idea, but needs more proficient use of language, stronger attention to audience, and a more precise utilization of communication conventions. Grammar and mechanics need improvement.1ptsPoor: Lacks a clear understanding of language usage, audience awareness, and communication competence. Grammar and mechanics inhibit understanding.0ptsUnacceptable: Does not demonstrate this competency

4pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.SPCH275.C.Information Literacythreshold:3.0pts










4ptsExcellent: Strong development of central arguments through detailed examples and evidence of appropriate and resourceful academic research.3ptsCompetent: Uses key examples from mostly reputable sources to develop a central argument. Evidence could be utilized more efficiently to support claims.2ptsLimited: Uses limited, incomplete, or inappropriate information as vague support for central ideas. Evidence is not cohesively connected to main ideas.1ptsPoor: The central argument is not supported or developed through evidence.0ptsUnacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.

4pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.SPCH275.D.Technology Literacythreshold:3.0pts










4ptsExcellent: Demonstrates clear understanding of the technology for creating presentation materials to support speech making. Utilizes media and electronic resources to achieve assignment goals3ptsCompetent: Demonstrates some knowledge of technology for creating presentation materials to support speech making. Media and electronic resources to support assignment requirements.2ptsLimited: Minimal knowledge of the technology for creating presentation materials to support speech making. Utilizes media and electronic resources superficially for minimal impact.1ptsPoor: Lacks a clear knowledge of the technology for creating presentation materials to support speech making. Does not utilize media and electronic resources effectively.0ptsUnacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.

4pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.SPCH275.E.Cultural Competencethreshold:3.0pts










4ptsExcellent: Strong evidence of audience awareness.3ptsCompetent: Some evidence of audience awareness.2ptsFair: Limited evidence of audience awareness.1ptsPoor: Lacks audience awareness.0ptsUnacceptable: Does not demonstrate this competency

4pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.SPCH275.F.Global Awareness & Civic Engagementthreshold:3.0pts










4ptsExcellent: Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the speech preparation process, and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.3ptsCompetent: Demonstrates proficient understanding of the speech preparation process, and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.2ptsLimited: demonstrates a vague understanding of the speech preparation process and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.1ptsPoor: lack understanding of the speech preparation process and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.0ptsUnacceptable: Does not demonstrate this competency

4pts

Total Points:150
Aug 08, 2022
SOLUTION.PDF
SOLUTION.PDF

Get Answer To This Question

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here
Have files?