Please check this file.

Please check this file.


Supp Assessment_Brief final SUPPLEMENTARY ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title Dynamic Leadership Assessment Supplementary Assessment Individual/Group Individual Length Up to 1,500 words Learning Outcomes a) Explore and reflect on self- development as a leader to build self-awareness b) Demonstrate the technique of reflective and reflexive practice as a means of continuous learning and self- development. c) Analyse and develop the capacity to influence, motivate and inspire others in your workplace and/or community organisations. d) Implement and practice coaching others to enhance self-awareness and core communication skills for emotional intelligence, with emphasis on active listening, building empathy, giving and receiving feedback. e) Demonstrate the technique of reflective and reflexive practice as a means of continuous learning and self- development. Submission Weighting 50% Supplementary Pass/Fail Total Marks Not applicable. This supplementary assessment will not be awarded a mark but will be graded against the marking rubric or criteria as a supplementary Pass of 50% or Fail. Assessment Task Use the specific directions below to identify issues and opportunities that led to poor academic performance, and suggest how these issues might be overcome in future classes. Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task. Context The Examination Committee recently met to review the assessment results and academic progress of all students. During the review process, it was identified that you had not achieved a final pass grade this study period. To enable you to make satisfactory progress in your subject and ultimately your course, the Examination Committee has granted you a second opportunity to demonstrate your knowledge. Should you be successful in this assessment you will receive a 'Supplementary Pass' not a pass. Students don't see feedback for a supplementary assignment marking. Students will see the end of trimester result in Banner for the subject but the score and feedback for the supp assignment will not be provided. Instructions Using only theories and frameworks presented in the modules of this subject, reflect on the personal factors that led to poor academic performance and how you could ensure greater success in your studies in future. Specifically, refer to theories from three of the following topic areas and explore how they can be used to inform and guide your way forward: 1. Your authentic values 2. Organisational culture 3. Influencing others 4. Emotional intelligence 5. Scenario thinking 6. Motivation Ensure that the Supplementary Assessment is original and does not self-plagiarise any previous content written for the assessments. The submission must be in Word document format. 1. Assessment Rubric Assessment Attributes Fail Pass Knowledge and understanding (technical and Limited understanding of required concepts and Knowledge or understanding of the field or theoretical knowledge) knowledge Key components of the assignment discipline. Resembles a recall or summary of key Understands theoretical models and concepts are not addressed. ideas. Avoids stating personal opinion instead providing information substantiated by evidence Percentage for this criterion 25% from the research/course materials Application of knowledge to practice Little alignment with theories and frameworks Vaguely identifies the internal and external Shows a clear understanding of the practical from the subject when discussing the internal personal orientations defining their performance and external personal orientations defining including intrinsic and extrinsic factors. application and implications of key concepts performance. and principles Some detail in recommendations for improving Percentage for this criterion 30% Little or missing detail in recommendations for future performance. improving future performance. Effective Communication Difficult to understand for audience, no Information, arguments and evidence are Well-structured report with clear flow of ideas logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, presented in a way that is largely clear and logical. argument lacks supporting evidence. Audience Line of reasoning preferably straightforward to cannot follow the line of reasoning. follow. Percentage for this criterion 30% Correct citation of key resources and evidence Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, Demonstrates use of credible and relevant Percentage for this criterion credible and relevant resources to support and resources to support and develop ideas, but these develop ideas. are not always explicit or well developed. 15%