The topic isexplore the challenges in building the brand image of consultancy firms in australiaplease give this assn on 5th of august as my lecture is on 6th august and i have to give 3 minutes presentation on it in class.please assign soumi as expert to this because last time she made same kind of assn of my firnds.they scored very good in this unitthyanklyou
Running Head: GENDER DIVERSITY IN LEADERSHIP MANAGEMENT1 GENDER DIVERSITY IN LEADERSHIP MANAGEMENT 2 Table of Contents 1. Field of Research3 2. Source of Secondary Data3 3. Research Questions3 4. Search Terms3 5. Information from Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Articles to be used in Literature Review3 References3 1. Field of Research Workplace management is a challenging task, especially when it involves the allocation of job responsibilities to different individuals. However, according to the data of Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012), if an organisation consists of management personnel mostly from only one type of gender, then it might limit the variety of ideas that emerge from managerial decision-making. Therefore, maintaining gender diversity in management teams is presently a core concern for many organisations (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2012). 2. Source of Secondary Data Two publically accessible sources where specific data can be found for the current topic are https://exchange.telstra.com.au/proud-among-world-leaders-gender-equality/, where gender diversity in Telstra has been illustrated with their success stories also report for past years are also available on there website and https://www.woolworthsgroup.com.au/icms_docs/195396_annual-report-2018.pdf, (P-3-11)where the 2018 annual report of Woolworths has been presented to give evidence of success of implementing gender diversity in their workplace. Both these sources can be used for examples to highlight the benefits of gender diversity in leadership management. 3. Research Questions i. What are the possible impacts of promoting gender diversity in the work culture on the company’s innovative thoughts and development? ii. What are the factors hindering the management team from implementing a gender diverse environment in the atmosphere of the company? Specific Research Question: What is the impact of gender diversity in leadership management? Variables: Gender diversity, Leadership management 4. Search Terms Gender diversity, leadership management, innovation in company, development of organisation environment 5. Information from Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Articles to be used in Literature Review According to Henry, Foss, Fayolle, Walker and Duffy (2015) and Ho, Li, Tam and Zhang (2015), gender diversity at any function of an organisation proves to be useful due to the division of labour and responsibilities of work between both the genders. Therefore, as suggested by Ruiz-Jimenez, del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes and Ruiz-Arroyo (2016), if people, from both masculine and feminine genders, are included in equal number into the management team, a pool of ideas can be brainstormed, which, as supported by Kelan and Wratil (2018), in turn, would lead to developing a better work culture and innovative thinking from all managers. References Australian Bureau of Statistics, (2012) 4102.0 - Australian Social Trends, Dec 2012 Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/
[email protected]/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features30Dec+2012 Australian Bureau of Statistics, (2012)MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/
[email protected]/Lookup/by%20Subject/1001.0~2016-17~Main%20Features~Management%20of%20Human%20Resources~5 Fuller, K. (2017) Proud among World Leaders Gender Equality—Telstra. Retrieved from https://exchange.telstra.com.au/proud-among-world-leaders-gender-equality/ Henry, C., Foss, L., Fayolle, A., Walker, E., & Duffy, S. (2015). Entrepreneurial leadership and gender: Exploring theory and practice in global contexts. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(3), 581-586 Ho, S. S., Li, A. Y., Tam, K., & Zhang, F. (2015).CEO gender, ethical leadership, and accounting conservatism. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 351-370 Kelan, E. K., & Wratil, P. (2018). Post‐heroic leadership, tempered radicalism and senior leaders as change agents for gender equality. European Management Review, 15(1), 5-18 Ruiz-Jimenez, J. M., del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, M., & Ruiz-Arroyo, M. (2016). Knowledge combination capability and innovation: The effects of gender diversity on top management teams in technology-based firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 503-515 Woolworths, (2018) Annual Report .Retrieved from https://www.woolworthsgroup.com.au/icms_docs/195396_annual-report-2018.pdf BUSN20019 ASSESSMENT 1 Step 1 – MARKING RUBRIC In case of high Turnitin similarity scores, markers analyse the similarity score on a case by case basis and you will see relevant comments in your assignment, if necessary. Late submission penalties are being applied to this assignment as per the university regulations. Any students deemed to have conducted Academic Misconduct are being reported and will be informed of the outcome of the investigation and any related penalties via their student email address. Each student must complete the 3 minutes tutorial presentation in either week 2 or 4, before submitting this assessment to receive a feedback on assessment 1.1. Criteria 0 (Not Shown) 1 (Poor) 2 (Unsatisfactory) 3 (Satisfactory) 4 (Good) 5 (Very Good) 6 (Excellent) 1. Clarity and suitability of statement of 'field of research' 10% No field of research included or inappropriate field of research and /or no mention of the profession. Field of research statement is highly unclear and/or entirely unsuitable and/or no mention of the profession. Field of research statement is unclear and/or unsuitable and/or no mention of the profession. Reasonable field of research statement that is, however, not entirely clear and/or suitable. Profession may be implied rather than clear. Generally good field of research statement but may lack consistency, clarity and/or suitability. Relevance to the profession is mentioned. Very clear field of research statement with suitable relevance to the profession explained. Field of research statement is entirely clear and suitable with faultless and integrated explanation of relevance to the profession. 2. Suitability of data sources (raw publicly available secondary data sources/links) 20% No data sources included or attempt to use academic literature as data. Highly unclear or highly unsuitable data sources included and/or very poorly explained. Unclear or unsuitable data sources included and/or poorly explained. Based on the explanation, this project may contain suitable data sources but this requires further explanation to be fully clear. Suitable data sources although more clarity and/or better explanation is required. Suitable data sources included although some minor inconsistencies and/or unclear areas. Highly suitable data sources included and well explained. 3. Research questions 20% Entirely unsuitable or irrelevant RQs or missing. Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Effective presentation of RQs; may be inconsistent or somewhat unclear Convincing presentation of RQs; may be slightly inconsistent or unclear Highly competent presentation of RQs; consistent and clear Superior presentation of RQs; entirely consistent and clear 4. Search terms 10% Missing or entirely unsuitable or irrelevant. Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Effective search terms; may be somewhat inconsistent or unclear. Convincing search terms; may be slightly inconsistent or unclear. Very good search terms; consistent and clear. Excellent search terms; well thought through and logical; fully consistent and clear. 5. Ability to integrate sources into academic writing 20% No academic sources used or no appropriate sentences written or no reference list included. Less than 3 academic sources used and/or very poor integration into sentences and/or very poor reference list. Less than 3 academic sources used and/or poor integration into sentences and/or poor reference list. 3 academic sources placed into reasonable sentences although not well integrated; satisfactory referencing skills. 3 academic sources placed into well written sentences although not well integrated; good referencing skills. 3 academic sources reasonably well integrated into well-written sentences; very good referencing skills. 3 (or more) academic sources integrated very well into sophisticated sentences with faultless referencing. 6. Professional presentation and accuracy of work 20% Highly unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing and/or referencing. Inaccurate. Unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing and/or referencing. Inaccurate. Unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing or referencing. Inaccurate. Satisfactory and reasonably accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. More professionalism is required. Generally professional and accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. Some mistakes and/or omissions may be present. Very professional and accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. Minor errors and/or omissions are acceptable. Highly professional work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. Faultlessly accurate. BUSN20019 ASSESSMENT 1 Step 1 – MARKING RUBRIC In case of high Turnitin similarity scores, m arkers analyse the similarity score on a case by case basis and you will see relevant comments in your assignment, if necessary. Late submission penalties are being applied to this assignment as per the university regulations. Any students deemed to have conducted Academic Misconduct are being reported and will be informed of the outcome of the inves tigation and any related penalties via their student email addr ess. Each student must complete the 3 minutes tutorial presentation in either week 2 or 4, before submitting this assessment to receive a feedback on assessment 1.1 . Criteria 0 (Not Shown) 1 (Poor) 2 (Unsatisfactory) 3 (Satisfactory) 4 ( Good ) 5 ( Very Good) 6 (Excellent ) 1. Clarity and suitability of statement of 'field of research' 1 0% No field of research included or inappropriate field of research and /or no mention of the profession. Field of research statement is highly unclear and/or entirely unsuitable and/or no mention of the profession. Field of research statement is unclear and/or unsuitable and/or no mention of the profession. Reasonable field of research statement that is, however, not entirely clear and/or suitable. Profession may be imp lied rather than clear. Generally good field of research statement but may lack consistency, clarity and/or suitability. Relevance to the profession is mentioned. Very clear field of research statement with suitable relevance to the profession explained. Field of research statement is entirely clear and suitable with faultless and integrated explanation of relevance to the profession. 2. Suitability of data sources ( raw publicly available secondary data sources/links ) 2 0% No data sources included or attempt to use academic literature as data. Highly unclear or highly unsuitable data sources included and/or very poorly explained. Unclear or unsuitable data sources included and/or poorly explained. Based on the explanation, this project may contain suitable data sources but this requires further explana tion to be fully clear. Suitable data sources although more clarity and/or better explanation is required. Suitable data sources included although