Imagine that you are employed by a politician who is considering introducing a private member's bill to Parliament on the topic in the article that follows. He or she wants to know whether the ideas in this article could be used to advance the cause. You must be clear,therefore, on the article's
Example text to show kinda how “French connection” should be written how to go about finishing Assignment 2: · We are interested in your views on Bolt’s writing techniques – how he goes about trying to convince readers, and how well (or poorly – it’s your call) he achieves his objective. We am NOT interested in your views on the topic of defence, French contracts and so. Avoid slipping into a debate with Bolt about his chosen topic. · Assignment 2 is not a summary assignment. You do not need to summarise every key point in the way you did in Assignment 1. However, still use your paraphrasing skills to avoid plagiarising. · Because Assignment 2 is not a summary assignment, you may quote Bolt (or other sources). However, remember the advice to quote with care, for maximum impact. · Opinion pieces by definition seek to be arguments. So what are the essential features in an opinion piece that make it convincing? The reader or hearer must be ready to accept all these three elements: • The line of reasoning. Is a claim backed up by evidence that leads to a logical conclusion? • The claim or conclusion. Is the claim or conclusion reasonable? • The evidence. Are the facts, observations or information the writer offers in support of the claim true in all respects? · While it is necessary to identify and explain appeals to reason (logos), emotion (pathos), and authority (ethos), you will ideally go further by identifying examples of more specific writing techniques, including 'using language to effect', 'unacceptable evidence', and 'false arguments' (as detailed in Week 7, 'Writing Critically', in the Study Guide/Reader). You do not need to cover every technique. Aim to find three or four key points, and use your introduction to tell the reader what you are doing and what you are NOT doing. Another useful source is Hay et al. Making the Grade (4th edn). It’s in the library, and you can also download the ebook from the library catalogue. Make sure you use the 4th edition, not an earlier edition. · Remember, again, that this is an assignment about Bolt’s writing techniques. Avoid slipping into the trap (it’s easily done) of arguing about the topic itself. · We welcome you using other sources if you choose to, but ensure you do so in the context of Bolt’s writing techniques (not as a way of arguing with Bolt about his chosen topic). · Critically, remember to give examples and offer supporting evidence. · Aim to write clearly and concisely, remembering the work we’ve done so far on grammar, punctuation, and eliminating unnecessary wordiness. Do several drafts. If you have time, set the draft aside for some time before you do your final draft – fresh eyes will help you. Do a careful proofread when you have finished, by this stage focusing not on the content but looking purely for errors and typos.