this assignment is a presentation which should be 6-10 slides. i also need a short report of the complete assignment as i have to present in the class based on my assignment. in the assignment brief there is a note that MBIS students should choose from IT projects as i,m a MBIS student i have do it as said in the note. i have also attached other file which shows the requirements and i have to follow group 2&7 as an MBIS student
PROJ6000_assessment 3 brief_08112019.docx Page 1 of 5 ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title PROJ6000 Principles of Project Management Assessment Assessment 3: Visual Presentation: Project Management Processes, Methodologies and Knowledge Areas Individual/Group Individual Length 6 -10 slides Learning Outcomes Successful completion of this assignment will result in achievement of the following subject learning outcomes: 1. Understand PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups and their role, relevance and impact on project management best practice and PMI's Code of Ethics. 2. Apply appropriate project management (including IT project management) tools and techniques, paying particular attention to risk management. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 5 Weighting 30% Total Marks 30 Marks Context: Leading organisations across sectors and geographic borders have been steadily embracing project management as a means of controlling spending and improving project results. These, and other desirable outcomes have been achieved through the application of project management methodologies, standards, and maturity models, which has understandably been embraced by many contemporary organisations in a variety of projects, including IT projects. Project managers of course are an integral part of delivering successful projects, and as such, have many responsibilities to discharge throughout a project’s lifecycle. Like all project managers, IT project managers need an understanding of project scheduling, quality assurance, project management tools, and reporting in order to successfully manage an IT project to meet its goals. PROJ6000_assessment 3 brief_08112019.docx Page 2 of 5 Instructions: Create a visual presentation describing the application of effective project management processes, methodologies and knowledge areas. Describe how project management relates to project success/failure and the possible consequences when project management practices are not effectively implemented in projects. NOTE: Master of Business Information Systems students must use an IT project as an example in this assessment. Your presentation will contain 6 – 10 slides using a technology of your choice (e.g. MS PowerPoint or similar). Please follow the presentation guidelines attached as a PDF to this assessment brief. Output and Submission: Submit your completed assessment by the end of Module 5. Learning Resources: General Guidelines for Successful Presentations. Project Management Institute (2010). The Value of Project Management. Retrieved from http://www.pmi.org/~/media/PDF/Business-Solutions/Value of Project Management_FINAL.ashx Project Management Institute (2015). Capturing the Value of Project Management Through Knowledge Transfer. Retrieved from http://www.pmi.org/~/media/pdf/learning/translations/2015/capture-value- knowledgetransfer-uk.ashx Project Management Institute (n.d.). Real-world risk management. Retrieved from http://www.pmi.org/~/media/PDF/Business-Solutions/Risk Management_FINAL.ashx Project Management Institute. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (5th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: PMI. Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (6th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: PMI. Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective project management: Traditional, agile, extreme (7th ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Wiley. http://www.pmi.org/~/media/PDF/Business-Solutions/Value%20of%20Project%20Management_FINAL.ashx http://www.pmi.org/~/media/PDF/Business-Solutions/Value%20of%20Project%20Management_FINAL.ashx http://www.pmi.org/~/media/pdf/learning/translations/2015/capture-value-knowledgetransfer-uk.ashx http://www.pmi.org/~/media/pdf/learning/translations/2015/capture-value-knowledgetransfer-uk.ashx http://www.pmi.org/~/media/PDF/Business-Solutions/Risk%20Management_FINAL.ashx PROJ6000_assessment 3 brief_08112019.docx Page 3 of 5 Assessment Criteria: The assessment will be graded using the Learning Rubrics below, and is worth 30% of the total for the subject. PROJ6000_assessment 3 brief_08112019.docx Page 4 of 5 Marking Rubrics - Visual Presentation Assessment Criteria Fail Unacceptable Pass (Functional) Credit (Proficient) Distinction (Advanced) High Distinction (Exceptional) % Points 0-49% 50-64% 65-74% 75-84% 85-100% Effective Communication 30% Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence. No effort is made to keep audience engaged, audience cannot follow the line of reasoning. Little use of presentation aids, or the presentation aids and material used are irrelevant. Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Attempts are made to keep the audience engaged, but not always successful. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow. Presentation aids are used more for effect than relevance. Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. The audience is mostly engaged, line of reasoning is easy to follow. Effective use of presentation aids. Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence. Engages the audience, demonstrates cultural sensitivity. Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments. Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic, demonstrates high levels of cultural sensitivity. Knowledge and understanding 40% Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge Knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Thorough knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline/s. Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. Discriminates between assertion of personal A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s. Systematically and critically discriminates PROJ6000_assessment 3 brief_08112019.docx Page 5 of 5 Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning. Presentation Aid 30% Little or no evidence of use of resource guidelines in creation of the presentation slides. Understanding of subject matter is not well demonstrated. Presentation slides indicate lack of understanding of resource guidelines or lack of effort in their creation. Subject matter displayed is not always consistent with the oral presentation. Presentation slides are structured and display understanding and application of resource guidelines. Understanding of subject matter is well demonstrated. Most of the content is in alignment with the oral presentation. Presentation slides are structured and meet most resource guidelines. Clear understanding of subject matter is demonstrated. Content perfectly aligns with the oral presentation. Presentation slides are structured and meet all resource guidelines. Clear understanding of subject matter is demonstrated. Content perfectly aligns with the oral presentation. Organisational Attributes Group number Group 1 Group 2 & 7 Group 3 Group 4 & 6 Group 5 & 8 Type Public Sector (State Government) Private (Not Listed Family owned) Not For Profit Private (Publically listed) Public Sector (Federal Government) Employees 10 employed 100 employed 1000 employed 3000 employed 10 000 employed Sector Defence Information Technology Construction Engineering Finance Industry Retail Government Education Services Mining Product /Service Energy and Utilities Healthcare / Pharmaceutical Industrial and Material Business Consulting Other Age of Organisation Org Process Assets Age – 2years OPA - Low Age – 3 years OPA - Low Age – 5 years OPA - High Age – 10 years OPA - High Age – > 10 years OPA - High Level Project Management Maturity PMM - 1 PMM – 2 PMM – 3 PMM – 4 PMM - 5 Appetite for Risk Risk Appetite Low Risk Appetite Low Risk Appetite High Risk Appetite- High Risk Appetite-High Operational Budget $10M $10M $100M $100M $100M Capital Budget $5M $10M $100M $15M $50M Impact of Changes to Environmental Factors IEF – Low IEF – Low IEF – High IEF – High IEF - High Number of Locations # Locations - 1 # Locations – 3 # Locations – 5 National # Locations – 10 Global # Locations – 50 Global