I page assignment Module 5: Evaluating Social Policies Drug and substance use, social issue topic; list one of the applicable social policies. Briefly describe the challenges identified by your social...

1 answer below »
Three attachments for three separate discussion assignmentsEvery topic must include an article. every reference must include a permalink


I page assignment Module 5: Evaluating Social Policies Drug and substance use, social issue topic; list one of the applicable social policies. Briefly describe the challenges identified by your social policy impact evaluation and present your mitigation or solution strategies. In week five, we take advantage of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) training resources and materials for the policy evaluation framework. Students will complete a six-part CDC online training: Introduction to Policy Evaluation in Public Health. This training is much more rigorous that the week 4 training on policy analysis. It will require more time to complete because it is chock full of scenario-based exercises to help students comprehend the application of all the components of the policy evaluation framework. Students should plan manage their schedules to carve out the time needed to complete this week's course material, which is critical for the completion of the week 5 paper assignment. As a reminder the CDC specifically focuses on public health, which is a related component of social work practice and advocacy. The public health and social work fields both focus on contextual factors, personal demographics, and personal histories that influence the sociological psychological, physical, and economic well-being of vulnerable populations. Both consider differences, diversity, and culture. Both fields use data for awareness campaigns and policy development. The role of public health in policy development is to deliver evidence-based science to inform decision-making (CDC, 2017a). Where social work exceeds public health is the act of using public health evidence-based data to bolster campaigns for social justice. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy (2018). The CDC Policy Process. https://www.cdc.gov/policy/polaris/training/policy-cdc-policy-process.html (Links to an external site.) Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2016f). Step by Step - Evaluating Violence and Injury Prevention Policies: Brief 5: Evaluating Policy Impact. https://www.cdc.gov/injury/pdfs/policy/Brief%205-a.pdf (Links to an external site.) Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Introduction to policy evaluation in public health: identifying policy options. https://www.train.org/cdctrain Overview of Policy Evaluation CDC (2016) defines policy as "At CDC, "policy" is defined as a law, regulation, procedure, administrative action, incentive, or voluntary practice of governments and other institutions." (slide, p. 2). CDC uses policy as a tool to advance public health awareness of significant health issues and enforce laws, regulations to promote health and well-being for all persons living in the U.S. CDC (2016) defines policy evaluation is the systematic collection and analysis of information to make judgments about contexts, activities, characteristics, or outcomes of one or more domains of the policy process (p. 11). CDC presents a five phased approach to demonstrate how policy is conceptualized, developed, adopted, implemented, and evaluated. The face critical steps of the policy making process are: · Problem Identification · Policy Analysis · Strategy and Policy Development · Policy Enactment · Policy Implementation Ideally, the steps will be sequential. However, depending on the policy, the steps may overlap. Evaluating the data, product and outcomes each phase is a necessary step prior to moving on to the next phase. A thorough examination on the quantity and quality of the research evidence collected to substantiate the problem, support or refute existing policy and strategy for communicating the policy must be assessed for viability. Regardless of the order of the steps, what will remain a constant in all the phases is the essential need for stakeholder engagement and education. The CDC Evaluation Framework The CDC (2016a) Framework for Evaluation in Public Health, provides six practical steps and four sets of standards for designing and implementing any evaluation (Rewrite). This framework is to be used as a tool by practitioners within the public health, and closely related fields like social work to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of existing and emerging policy. Like the policy making framework, these six steps are non-linear, are iterative and may overlap, but what remains consistent is the need for stakeholder engagement and education. Image Description Lessons 2 through 5 provide a comprehensive overview of each section mentioned above. Please be sure to carefully review each slide, as well as the supplemental readings and resources to ensure full comprehension of the policy evaluation process which is essential for the successful completion of the week 5 paper assignment, week 7 PowerPoint and week 8 peer evaluation assignment. Advancing Public Health Through Policy Evaluation Lesson 2 of the CDC (2016c) describes how policy evaluation can be used to advance public health goals and social policies. This section also discusses how practitioners can identify opportunities for policy evaluation throughout the policy making process. The benefits of policy evaluation are thoroughly discussed and several examples of public health policies that advances social policies for vulnerable populations are presented. Information is presented on several public health and social issues including vaccines-preventable diseases, tobacco control, maternal and infant health, motor vehicle safety, occupational safety and childhood lead poisoning prevention (CDC, 2016c, p. 3). The research evidence produced by these studies and many others demonstrate the immense contributions to the existing literature, emerging literature and research evidence for various public health and social issues. This section also provides a brief recap of the policy analysis process and introduces the evaluation process for determining which policies may be most effective (CDC, 2016c, p. 4). Several other concepts from the policy analysis process is revisited and aligned to the policy evaluation process. The concept of triaging to prioritize policy options based on effectiveness, feasibility, and other factors is also discussed as well as taking advantage of windows of opportunities (CDC, 2016c, p. 5). This lesson concludes with brief paragraphs aligning the relationship between policy analysis and policy evaluation when documenting and informing policy implementation, identification of contextual factors affecting policy enactment, identification of gaps in implementation and enforcement of policy. There are resources to elevate the student's understanding of each of the content discussed in lesson two. Students should set aside time to view these reading to ensure full comprehension of the content in this section. Policy Evaluation Using the CDC Evaluation Framework Engaging Stakeholders Lesson three provides the most detailed is the most robust of all the lessons in the introduction to Policy Evaluation in Public Health course. This lesson focuses on how to apply the CDC policy evaluation framework to the domains of the policy process. The lesson also focuses on the unique challenges associated with each of the policy domains. One of the most critical aspects of the policy evaluation process is stakeholder engagement. The CDC (2016c) presents three types of stakeholders: policy experts, evaluation experts and subject matter experts. Policy experts have demonstrated skill in the area of policy development and implementation. Evaluation experts have demonstrated skill in the area of evaluation design and methodology. The evaluation experts also have expertise with multiple data sources, analysis and interpretation of statistical data. Subject Matter experts have specialized contextual knowledge on a specific topic or field. Awareness of the type of stakeholder is an essential component to leverage the different skills and expertise that each stakeholder may offer to the policy evaluation process. Describing the Policy Effort The considerations for policy evaluation for the describing the policy effort domain includes a critical analysis of several components: · Goals and Objectives of the Policy · Content of the Policy · Context Surrounding the Policy · Underlying Logic and Casual Pathways Supporting the Policy Scrutinizing the goals and objectives of the policy is critical to the evaluation process. Clearly defining and articulating the intended purpose, design and function of the policy. Does the policy do what it is supposed to do, and delivery on its intended mission? Impact data, such as statistics to demonstrate the effects of the policy as an intervention is an import part of the evaluation process for this domain. Logic models are useful visualization tools to succinctly display the goals, inputs, activities, outputs, context and outcomes (short-term, intermediate and long-term) of policy implementation is also important to this phase of policy evaluation. Logic models can help policy makers and evaluators presenting relevant information and data to show alignment or discord with the intentions of the policy. Focusing the Evaluation Design Considerations for policy evaluations in the focusing the evaluation design domain of the evaluation process starts with reviewing the: · Purpose of the policy evaluation · The user of the information · The use of the information Next, is the identification of the type of evaluation that is best suited to the type of policy that must be conducted. The CDC (2016c) describes three types of evaluation models: Formative evaluation, Process evaluation and Outcome/impact evaluation. CDC definitions for each type of evaluation is as follows (p. 7): · Formative evaluation looks at the larger context and environment to determine the main problem and identify solutions that are feasible, appropriate, and meaningful for the target population. For a policy evaluation, this step would happen before a policy is adopted and implemented. It would also encompass questions related to the content of the policy. · Process evaluation examines the implementation of policy- related activities. For a policy effort, process evaluation could examine the implementation of a policy, focusing on the degree to which the inputs, activities, and outputs were implemented as planned, barriers to its implementation, and factors that support its implementation. · Outcome/impact evaluation examines whether the intended outcomes and impacts occurred and may also examine whether outcomes and impacts can be attributed to the policy. Identifying appropriate evaluation questions to illicit information about the policy characteristics and intended use is another crucial aspect of the policy evaluation framework. Example of policy characteristics questions from the CDC (2016c) training include (p. 15): · What type of policy is being evaluated (legislative, regulatory or organizational)? · What level of policy is being evaluated (local, state, national)? · What type of evidence base exists for this policy? Examples of intended use for policy questions from the CDC (2016c) training include (p. 15): · What is to be determined and accomplished with the evaluation? · How will the answers to this evaluation help move the field or policy forward? · How will the evaluation be used and who is the potential audience? Once the questions are formulated, an evaluation design must be selected and administered. The CDC (2016c) presents four types of evaluation design (p. 15): · Experimental (or randomized) designs compare a treatment group to a control group, and randomly assign the groups to try to assure an equal chance to all groups of being selected. · Quasi-experimental designs use comparison groups to draw causal inferences but do not use randomization to create the treatment and control groups. The treatment group is usually predetermined. The control group is selected to match the treatment group as closely as possible so that inferences on the impacts of the policy can be made. · Non-experimental/observational designs include, include, but are not limited to, time-series analysis, cross-sectional surveys, and case
Answered 1 days AfterAug 01, 2021

Answer To: I page assignment Module 5: Evaluating Social Policies Drug and substance use, social issue topic;...

Bidusha answered on Aug 02 2021
137 Votes
Evaluating Social Policies                                    4
EVALUATING SOCIAL POLICIES
Evaluating Social Policies
Effici
ent correspondence is fundamental to guarantee that received approaches and projects mirror the condition of information and have the best chance to further develop results. In open strategy conversations, logical outcomes are regularly mutilated. In guaranteeing that science is effectively reflected in strategies and projects, research experts have a significant task to carry out. Numerous arrangements and drives habitually have no satisfactory reason for confirmation or helpless adherence to the proof; inadvertent repercussions may...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here