pfa
Unit 6 Multiple Regression Assignment 6 Calculating and interpreting Multiple Regression: For this assignment you will be presented with a data set that includes 4 variables. The data set contains four variables: 1. Self-Reported Criminality (Number of times a person has committed a crime in the past month. 2. Anti-Social Personality Score (A score from a psychological test designed to measure anti-social personality). The score ranges from 1-10. With a higher number representing a higher level of antisocial personality) Meaning those who score low do not have an antisocial personality, but high scores may. 3. Age (The respondents current age in years). 4. Social Class (The respondents social class: 1= lower class, 2 = middle class, 3 = upper class).Since this is a categorical variable it will need to be dummy coded. However, I already did this for you! So you do not need to recode.Remember your interpretation of b will be different than it is for the continuous variables. Your assignment is to run and interpret the results form a regression with self-reported criminality as the outcome variable, and Anti-Social Personality Score, Age, and Social Class as the predictor variables. You should use the forced entry method for the regression. Data Set You can Download the data set to use for this assignmentUnit 5.4 Homework Data.sav. Using this data please do the following: Imagine that you hypothesize the following: · There is a positive relationship between antisocial personality scores and criminality. · There is an inverse relationship between age and criminality. · Lower class individuals commit more criminality than upper and middle class individuals. Use multiple regression to test these hypotheses while controlling for the other variables. In other words run a regression with all of these variables included. Please do the following. 1. First answer the following question. What would be the benefits of conducting a multiple regression rather than simply running more than one bivariate regression? 2. Run a multiple regression with all of the variables in the data set included: a. You should test the assumptions and report your findings: Make sure to check the following assumptions. For the assignment test each assumption and report the results. Indicate whether the data meets each of the following assumptions and diagnostic tools: i. Outliers ii. No Zero Cells iii. Linearity iv. Level of Measurement v. Normally Distributed Error Term vi. No Auto Correlation vii. Multicollinearity b. For this second part assume that you met all of the assumptions to run a multiple regression (even if you did not). Report the results for the regression you ran as you would report them in a journal article. Make sure you include all relevant information. You should report the results for the following: i. The F test (And its Sig value) ii. R2 iii. B (slope) with significance for each variable iv. Beta for each variable (Rank order the Betas) Note: Like the previous assignments the more detail you provide the better. If you produce any tables or graphs you should consider cutting and pasting them into your .rtf document. As usual you should summit it as a word doc or .rtf file. Page 1 CRICOS Provider No. 00103D Assessment 1 ITECH 7400 IT Service Management and Professional Culture Name Ethical Discussion Forum Purpose The purpose of the critique is to help students develop a knowledge of ethics. Timelines and Expectations Percentage Value of Task: Post 1 (10%) + Post 2 (5%) = 15%. Post 1 – Ethical Theories 1 and 2 – Due: Week 4 – Friday 10, April 2020, 4:00 pm. Post 2 – Professional Ethics – Due: Week 6 – Friday 24, April 2020, 4:00 pm. Minimum time expectation: This task will take approximately 20 hours to complete. Learning Outcomes Assessed The following learning outcomes are assessed by completing this assessment: K1 – K4, S1 and A1. Assessment Details Case Study Robotic surgery sounds like the ultimate in safe, efficient and effective 21st-century health care. Instead of a surgeon's potentially fallible human hand, you have a robot with its precision-built mechanical arms able to perform micro-accurate procedures on tissues deep within the body. With robot-assisted surgery, the surgeon sits at a nearby console with a 3D view of the surgical site. Computer technology translates their hand movements into precise manoeuvres of the instruments. If the surgeon's hand develops a tremor, the computer system knows to ignore it. Page 2 CRICOS Provider No. 00103D The technology also means surgeons can use finer instruments that cause less damage to the body. In turn, this should reduce blood loss and the need for blood transfusions - and mean that patients recover more quickly. With this kind of promise, little wonder that multi-million-pound robot machines are performing ever more operations across Britain. The technology, which was first used in 2000, is employed increasingly in intricate surgery such as hysterectomy, gallbladder removal and repair of damaged heart valves. But while for many patients robot surgery will have been entirely smooth, the technology is not risk-free. And leading experts are now voicing growing fears about its safety and effectiveness, warning of a growing human toll. Good Health has learned of one particularly alarming case in which a man suffered grievous injuries from a robotic procedure that nearly killed him when it went wrong. The patient, who can't be named for legal reasons, was suffering from prostate cancer and recently had his prostate gland removed by keyhole surgery using robot technology. His solicitors say the remote camera attached to the robot arm damaged the man's bowel, leading to severe infection, organ failure and cardiac arrest (Nash, 2013). Ethical dilemma: To what extend are IT professionals responsible for the surgery accuracy of robots they program? Requirements This is an individual task. Students are required to write two (2) forum posts in moodle which provide an analysis of an ethical dilemma associated with robotic assisted surgery from a software developer’s perspective. • Post 1: In post one (1) students should provide an answer to the ethical dilemma through the lens of each of the ethical theories presented in lectures. These include utilitarianism, deontology, social contract theory, character-based ethics1. The post should be approximately two to three pages long (800-1200 words). It should contain a brief overview of each of the four ethical theories, and a discussion and proposed solution for the dilemma, from each of the four ethical theoretical viewpoints. The discussion should show an analysis and synthesis of research undertaken and your own ideas. • Post 2: In post two (2) students will apply ACS code of ethics2 in order to solve the ethical dilemma. The post should be approximately one page long (300-500 words). The discussion should show an analysis and synthesis of research undertaken and your own ideas. Each post should contain a bibliography containing authentic academic literature. Post 1 (approximately 6–10 references), and Post 2 (approximately 4–8 references). Gather these references from various sources such as the Internet, assigned textbooks and readings etc. For assistance with in-text referencing and formatting your reference list in APA format, see the link to General Guide to Referencing provided. 1 Select two (2) virtues 2 Select one (1) ACS element Page 3 CRICOS Provider No. 00103D A quality post will include an introduction and conclusion and demonstrate a synthesis of content, knowledge, skills and ideas acquired from lectures, tutorials and academic authors. For assistance in writing blog posts: https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=how+to+write+a+university++post&view=detail&mid=0CF 938FF24F90465FAB50CF938FF24F90465FAB5&FORM=VIRE Academic Presentation Blogs should be presented in accordance with: • General Guide to Writing and Study Skills: http://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/190044/General-Guide-to-Writing- and-Study-Skills.pdf • Assignment Layout and Appearance Guidelines: https://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/190043/General-Guide-to-Layout- and-Appearance.pdf Referencing • General Guide to Referencing: https://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/313328/FedUni-General-Guide-to- Referencing-2016ed.pdf Submission This task will be marked by the course coordinator, lecturer and/or tutors. Students will be required to submit an electronic copy of their post via Moodle. Students are encouraged to keep a copy in MS Word. Feedback Feedback and marks will be provided in Moodle. Marks will also be available in FDL Marks. Plagiarism Plagiarism is the presentation of the expressed thought or work of another person as though it is one's own without properly acknowledging that person. You must not allow other students to copy your work and must take care to safeguard against this happening. More information about the plagiarism policy and procedure for the university can be found at http://federation.edu.au/students/learning-and-study/online-help-with/plagiarism Please refer to the Course Description for information regarding late assignments, extensions, and special consideration. A reminder all academic regulations can be accessed via the university’s website, see: http://federation.edu.au/staff/governance/legal/feduni-legislation https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=how+to+write+a+university++post&view=detail&mid=0CF938FF24F90465FAB50CF938FF24F90465FAB5&FORM=VIRE https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=how+to+write+a+university++post&view=detail&mid=0CF938FF24F90465FAB50CF938FF24F90465FAB5&FORM=VIRE http://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/190044/General-Guide-to-Writing-and-Study-Skills.pdf http://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/190044/General-Guide-to-Writing-and-Study-Skills.pdf https://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/190043/General-Guide-to-Layout-and-Appearance.pdf https://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/190043/General-Guide-to-Layout-and-Appearance.pdf https://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/313328/FedUni-General-Guide-to-Referencing-2016ed.pdf https://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/313328/FedUni-General-Guide-to-Referencing-2016ed.pdf Page 4 CRICOS Provider No. 00103D Marking Criteria/Rubric Assessment Criteria Marking Scale Poor Excellent 1 5 Outline of theory 0 Discussion 0 Application and recommendations 0 Academic presentation – writing and layout 0 Referencing and bibliography 0 Total Mark [25 marks] 25.0 Total Worth [10%] + [5%] 10.0