assignment



Unit BISY3005 Knowledge Management Assessment Type Report Assessment Number 2 Assessment Weighting Group Report 20% Alignment with Unit and Course Unit Learning Outcome Graduate Attributes Assessed ULO 01Illustrate the concepts and principles of Knowledge Management. ULO 02 Demonstrate how knowledge management can contribute to organizational effectiveness. ULO03 identify and critically assess the impacts of poor or ineffective knowledge management for businesses Communication: The ability to communicate effectively, both orally and in writing, with a diverse range of audiences Critical thinking and problem solving: The ability to address and solve problems creatively and in a structured and methodical way Due Date/Time Week 3, After session 6 / 20 May 2022 via Moodle Turnitin 6:00pm (AEST) Assessment Description Teams of 4-5 persons are required to write a report of 2000 words. The students have to choose one of the subtopics from the main topic in the table below and develop the Knowledge Management concepts, including the definitions, types, strategies and business models. Knowledge Management Topics (Session 1 – 6) TOPIC 1 - NATURE OF KNOWLEDGE TOPIC 2 - LEVERAGING KNOWLEDGE TOPIC 3 - CREATING KNOWLEDGE Subtopic 1 - Data, information, and knowledge Subtopic 1 - Intellectual capital Subtopic 1 - Organisational learning Subtopic 2 - History of managing knowledge Subtopic 2 - Strategic management perspectives Subtopic 2 - Learning organisations Subtopic 3 - Philosophical perspectives on knowledge Subtopic 3 - Knowledge management strategy Content: This assessment is to demonstrate that you have learned Knowledge Management concepts, including the definitions, types, strategies, and business models. This assessment is based on materials from Session 1 to Session 6. Structure: It should be written as a journal and should include the following: • One of the subtopics in the table above • What are the concepts, definitions, types, strategies, and business models? • How the knowledge gained will help your group in future career as an IT Professional • Minimum 5 journal articles (APA Referencing) https://apastyle.apa.org/ Research expectation: • The submission needs to be supported with information by credible sources. • Credible sources should be varied and include, but not limited to, the Textbook, Government reports, Industry reports, Newspaper articles, Books, and Journal articles. • Use the EBSCO Databases accessed through the Library and Learning Support page on Moodle to find journal articles, case studies and more to help you prepare your assessment. Speak with the library assistants or email ([email protected]) if you require further assistance. Detailed Submission Requirements Submit soft copy of the reflection to A2 Report Link on BISY3005 Moodle site. Please include: • Title page • Introduction/Conclusion/Content Table • Subtitles • Header/Footer details including page number • 2.5 cm margins • 1.5 point spacing • Calibri or Arial font • 12 size fonts • Submission must be 2000 words (not including executive summary, table of contents, tables, figures, or the reference list). • Use APA referencing including the reference list (https://apastyle.apa.org/) • All students must submit the peer evaluation form via relevant Moodle link before the assessment due date • One member of the group must submit the assessment through the Assessment 2 Turnitin link on Moodle site for this unit https://apastyle.apa.org/ mailto:[email protected] https://apastyle.apa.org/ Group Work • In Week 2, groups are formed by lecturer. • 4-5 students per group. • In the case where one team member ceases contact and/or contribution to the group work, the group must notify and consult with the Lecturer as soon as possible. • All students will submit a Peer Evaluation for their group members at the end of the assessment. • The Peer Evaluation Form can be accessed in the Assessment 2 folder on this Moodle page for this unit. Misconduct • The assessment will be submitted through Turnitin via your unit page on Moodle. • Turnitin is plagiarism software, which will identify if you have copied information and included it in your assessment. • Copying information from others (i.e. websites, partner company information, or other students etc.) without the acknowledging the author is classified as misconduct. • Engaging someone else to write any part of your assessment for you outside of the group work arrangement is classified as misconduct. • To avoid being charged with Misconduct, students need to submit their own work and apply Harvard Style Referencing (ask your lecturer or the learning support coordinator ([email protected]) if you do not know what this means, or you need assistance applying it). • The AIH misconduct policy and procedure can be read on the AIH website (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/). • Use the AIH referencing guide accessible via Library and Learning Support Page on Moodle. Late Submission • Any assessment submitted past the specific due date and time will be classified as Late. • Any Late submission will be subject to a reduction of the mark allocated for the assessment item by 5% per day (or part thereof) of the total marks available for the assessment item. A ‘day’ for this purpose is defined as any day of the week including weekends. Assignments submitted later than one (1) week after the due date will not be accepted, unless special consideration is approved as per the formal process. Special consideration • Students whose ability to submit or attend an assessment item is affected by sickness, misadventure or other circumstances beyond their control, may be eligible for special consideration. No consideration is given when the condition or event is unrelated to the student's performance in a component of the assessment, or when it is considered not to be serious. • Students applying for special consideration must submit the form within 3 days of the due date of the assessment item or exam. • The form can be obtained from the AIH website (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/current- students/student-forms/) or on-campus at Reception. mailto:[email protected] https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/ https://aih.nsw.edu.au/current-students/student-forms/ https://aih.nsw.edu.au/current-students/student-forms/ Marking Criteria, you will be marked according to the following criteria, with a final mark out of 30. However, it will be scaled down to 10 marks. Criteria Excellent (100% – 85%) Good (84% – 75%) Credit (74% – 65%) Pass (64% – 50%) Incomplete (49 – 0%) 1. Title page 2. Clear layout 3. Reference / Appendix Work done with exceptional care and attention to detail. Work done with excellent care and attention to detail. Work done with very good care and attention to detail. Work done with fairly understanding care and attention to detail. Work done with no care or attention to detail. Topics covered Exceptional description of topics encountered in the course. Excellent description of topics encountered in the course. Well done description of topics encountered in the course. Fairly detailed description of topics encountered in the course. Incoherent / limited description of topics encountered in the course. Critical thinking and synthesis of information Exceptional analysis of the assessment requirements. Excellent analysis of the assessment requirements. Well done analysis of the assessment requirements. Fairly detailed analysis of the assessment requirements. Incoherent analysis of the assessment requirements. Applicability of knowledge Exceptional explanation of the applicability of the assessment requirements. Excellent explanation of the applicability of the assessment requirements. Well done explanation of the applicability of the assessment requirements. Fairly detailed explanation of the applicability n of the assessment requirements. Unclear explanation of the applicability of the assessment requirements. APA Referencing The report follows a referencing style that complies with the APA referencing and the in- text citations are made purposefully. The report follows a referencing style that complies with the APA referencing and the in- text citations are made purposefully The report follows a referencing style that does not complies with the APA referencing and the in-text citations are made purposefully The report follows a referencing style that does not complies with the APA referencing or only includes either the in-text citations or the reference list The report does not include any citations or reference list. • The request form must be submitted to Student Services. Supporting evidence should be attached. For further information please refer to the Student Assessment Policy and associated Procedure available on (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about- us/policies-procedures/). https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/ https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/
Answered 7 days AfterMay 19, 2022

Answer To: assignment

Ayan answered on May 20 2022
85 Votes
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT        2
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Table of contents
Introduction    3
History of managing knowledge    3
An Economic Model and a Strategy Model    4
Concepts of Knowledge Management    5
Recommendation    6
Future of Knowledge Management    7
Conclusion    8
References    9
Introduction
In this report we are taking the subtopic of History of managing knowledge. Progressive executives and state run administrations like Singapore are prog
ressively chasing after dynamic strategies to construct and draw esteem from knowledge resources inside their undertakings. Private beliefs and deep-seated feelings that serious knowledge resources and their suitable abuse are vital for progress frequently drive these drives. Seldom are endeavors upheld by exhaustive assessments and very much established theories. For sure, the express spotlight on knowledge is new to such an extent that business practitioners keep on driving the charge in investigating and carrying out knowledge management frameworks. Besides in unambiguous specialized fields like applied man-made consciousness and the utilization of data innovation, there is still no significant help from scholastic and management research. Albeit various discrete, and on occasion different, hypotheses are being pushed, no general strategy to overseeing knowledge has been broadly acknowledged excessively far.
One concept is the utilization of specialized procedures to deal with unequivocal knowledge. It centers for the most part on data got from individuals, put away in PC knowledge bases, knowledge-based frameworks, and knowledge made accessible across innovation based networks through email, groupware, and different instruments. The management of scholarly capital as primary capital and human resources in individuals is a subsequent concept. In this part, we'll take a gander at a third way to deal with overseeing knowledge that takes a bigger perspective on all key knowledge-related issues that influence the undertaking's manageability and achievement. It integrates the accompanying concepts as well as most of the undertaking's knowledge-related techniques and tasks. With the contemporary economic reality, where knowledge is a separating cutthroat component for people, associations, and countries, orderly knowledge management takes on more prominent importance. This truth is pushing the boundless reception and improvement of compelling knowledge management methodologies and frameworks.
History of managing knowledge
Knowledge Management (KM) is a subject of genuine examination or scholastic knowledge move that has recently of late evolved as an express field of request for overseeing organizations (Holford, 2020). Obviously, data has been controlled verifiably however long people have considered their work truly. Whenever the earliest trackers set off to accumulate creatures, they were without a doubt worried about the experience and gifts of their colleagues. They additionally caused guaranteed that what they considered to be the best and best strategies were educated to hopeful trackers to get the gathering's drawn out presence. Insightful individuals have guaranteed long haul progression by giving top to bottom knowledge to the cutting edge from the beginning of mankind. Knowledge Management (KM) is a subject of genuine examination or scholarly knowledge move that has quite recently of late evolved as an unequivocal field of request for overseeing organizations (Rieu, 2021). Obviously, data has been controlled verifiably however long people have considered their work genuinely. At the point when the earliest trackers set off to assemble creatures, they were without a doubt worried about the experience and abilities of their colleagues. They additionally caused guaranteed that what they considered to be the best and best strategies were educated to hopeful trackers to get the gathering's drawn out presence. Insightful individuals have guaranteed long haul progression by giving top to bottom knowledge to the cutting edge from the beginning of mankind.
An Economic Model and a Strategy Model
A group of economists led by Paul Romer have taught us about the economics of ideas and the almost boundless open doors for economic turn of events and achievement that new innovations and knowledge-based organizations give (Leong, 2018). This model...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here