Untitled HI6006 COMPETITIVE STRATEGY ASSIGNMENT 2 Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Trimester T1 2020 Unit Code HI6006 Unit Title Competitive Strategy Assessment Type Group Assignment –...

1 answer below »
PLEASE SEE ATTACHED FILE.


Untitled HI6006 COMPETITIVE STRATEGY ASSIGNMENT 2 Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Trimester T1 2020 Unit Code HI6006 Unit Title Competitive Strategy Assessment Type Group Assignment – maximum 4 persons per group Note: Groups must be formed by week 6 and your lecturer informed in writing of each member’s name and student number. Once a group is formed, no changes are allowed. If you fail to form a group, your lecturer may allow you to submit individually. Assessment Title Report – Case Analysis and Application of Strategy Models Purpose of the assessment Students are required to explain in report format, with reference to a case of your choice, how any one of the following would be applied: Business Strategy, Competitive Dynamics, Corporate Strategy, Acquisitions and Structure, International Strategy. This is strictly required to be your own original work. Be sure to base your answer on the models studied in class and quote your academic sources. Weight 30%, comprising: Topic Approval 5% (week 6); Report 25% (week 10) Total Marks 30 [note: the total assignment is graded out of 30] Word limit Report not more than 2500 words Due Date Week 6 for the Topic Approval. Week 10 for the final report. [Late submission penalties accrue at the rate of -10% per day] Submission Guidelines • All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. • The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings and page numbers. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list, all using Harvard referencing style. • At the end of your report please include an appendix stating ‘who wrote which section’, i.e. provide the student name and number for each section of the report. Note: An in-class presentation may be required. This is at the lecturer’s discretion. Please check with the lecturer if you are required to make a presentation in-class. Your lecturer requires your group to submit a draft in week 7, stating the topic you intend to write about and the case upon which you will be basing your facts. HOLMES INSTITUTE FACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATION Page 2 of 4 HI6006 COMPETITIVE STRATEGY ASSIGNMENT 2 Purpose: Assignment 2 Specifications This assignment aims at ensuring that students have familiarised themselves with at least one significant case study and are able to apply the relevant foundational strategy development models that are applicable to the case. Details Select any case from the nine cases listed from Tutorial Cases found in the Lecture Notes file, select from the following aspects of competitive strategy and apply the theories of strategy development and implementation as relevant to the case you choose: • Business Strategy • Competitive Dynamics • Corporate Strategy • Acquisitions and Structure • International Strategy In this report, the use of sub-headings is essential. Be sure to use paragraphing. Be sure to reference your sources in-text and provide a list of references at the end, all in Harvard style. Your final submission is due Friday of week 10 at midnight. Late submissions attract penalties at the rate of -10% per day. Assignment Structure Required To ensure that all students participate equitably in the group assignment and that students are responsible for the academic integrity of all components of the assignment. You need to complete the following table which identifies which student/students are responsible for the various sections of the assignment: Cover page [this is essential and must be completed accurately] Executive Summary Table of Contents Body of the report to contain Section Headings – e.g. introduction, brief summary of the case; identification of strategic issues; relevant theoretical concepts, application of strategy model, conclusion. Sub-sections are to be numbered. Paragraphing must be used. Page Numbers must be used. Reference List at the end must be in Harvard format and mainly academic Journal Articles. Appendix: Statement of ‘who wrote which section’ (see below). Page 3 of 4 HI6006 COMPETITIVE STRATEGY ASSIGNMENT 2 Assignment Section Student Name and Number This table needs to be completed and submitted with the assignment as it is a compulsory component required before any grading is undertaken. Page 4 of 4 HI6006 COMPETITIVE STRATEGY ASSIGNMENT 2 Marking Rubric Excellent 4 marks Very Good 3.5 marks Good 3 marks Satisfactory 2 marks Unsatisfactory 1 or 0 marks Referencing (in- text) Max 3 marks n/a n/a Correct in all respects Some minor errors Largely incorrect or incomplete Reference List (at end) Max 4 marks Correct in all respects Correct in most respects Correct in general Some minor errors Largely incorrect or incomplete Executive Summary Max 3 marks n/a Clear, concise and compelling A good summary of the report A basic summary of the report Missing Summary of the Case Max 4 marks Clear, concise and compelling Clear, concise and compelling, but with some reservation A good summary of the case A satisfactory summary of the case Inaccurate or misconstrued content Explanation of Strategic issues Max 4 marks All key strategic Issues are identified and well-explained Most key strategic Issues are identified and explained Some key strategic Issues are identified and explained key strategic Issues are identified and explained, but with some reservation strategic Issues identified or explained incorrectly or poorly Application of Relevant Theoretical Concepts Max 4 marks The theoretical concepts have been matched to the issues in the case precisely and well applied The theoretical concepts match the issues in the case and are applied quite well A good attempt has been made to match and apply relevant theoretical concepts to the case A satisfactory attempt has been made to match and apply relevant theoretical concepts to the case The attempt made to match and apply relevant theoretical concepts to the case is unsatisfactory or negligible Format and Professionalism of the Report Max 8 marks The report is exceptionally well-documented was High Distinction / Virtuoso quality (8- marks) The report is very well- documented was Distinctive / stand-out quality (7 marks) The report is well- documented was credit- worthy quality (6 marks) The report is satisfactory was satisfactory (5 marks) The report is unsatisfactory was Unsatisfactory (0 - 5 marks) Total 30 marks* Comments Mark Awarded Untitled HI6006 COMPETITIVE STRATEGY ASSIGNMENT 2 Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Trimester T1 2020 Unit Code HI6006 Unit Title Competitive Strategy Assessment Type Group Assignment – maximum 4 persons per group Note: Groups must be formed by week 6 and your lecturer informed in writing of each member’s name and student number. Once a group is formed, no changes are allowed. If you fail to form a group, your lecturer may allow you to submit individually. Assessment Title Report – Case Analysis and Application of Strategy Models Purpose of the assessment Students are required to explain in report format, with reference to a case of your choice, how any one of the following would be applied: Business Strategy, Competitive Dynamics, Corporate Strategy, Acquisitions and Structure, International Strategy. This is strictly required to be your own original work. Be sure to base your answer on the models studied in class and quote your academic sources. Weight 30%, comprising: Topic Approval 5% (week 6); Report 25% (week 10) Total Marks 30 [note: the total assignment is graded out of 30] Word limit Report not more than 2500 words Due Date Week 6 for the Topic Approval. Week 10 for the final report. [Late submission penalties accrue at the rate of -10% per day] Submission Guidelines • All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. • The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings and page numbers. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list, all using Harvard referencing style. • At the end of your report please include an appendix stating ‘who wrote which section’, i.e. provide the student name and number for each section of the report. Note: An in-class presentation may be required. This is at the lecturer’s discretion. Please check with the lecturer if you are required to make a presentation in-class. Your lecturer requires your group to submit a draft in week 7, stating the topic you intend to write about and the case upon which you will be basing your facts. HOLMES INSTITUTE FACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATION Page 2 of 4 HI6006 COMPETITIVE STRATEGY ASSIGNMENT 2 Purpose: Assignment 2 Specifications This assignment aims at ensuring that students have familiarised themselves with at least one significant case study and are able to apply the relevant foundational strategy development models that are applicable to the case. Details Select any case from the nine cases listed from Tutorial Cases found in the Lecture Notes file, select from the following aspects of competitive strategy and apply the theories of strategy development and implementation as relevant to the case you choose: • Business Strategy • Competitive Dynamics
Answered Same DayApr 21, 2021HI6006

Answer To: Untitled HI6006 COMPETITIVE STRATEGY ASSIGNMENT 2 Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines...

Sourav Kumar answered on May 15 2021
139 Votes
Introduction:
Apple Inc. (AAPL) consists a book regard any similarity to which no association has ever watched. In the wake of trading places with Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) a couple of times on the summary all through the last barely any quarters, Apple's offer expense has since risen while Exxon Mobil's has fallen, giving the past about a $200 billion piece of breathing space. The gap among Apple and the accompanying greatest association is more important than the market capitalizations of everything with the exception of around 15 organization
s or so around the world as wonderfully clarified by A Tooze in his work (Tooze, 2018).
In the interim in South Korea, Samsung is not an organization to the extent as it is considered to be a world fiber prevailing everything in its path. By certain evaluations Samsung is answerable for about one-sixth of that country's total national output. The organizations that Samsung is not in are not much and kind of unimportant. The total's essential assistants consolidate goliath debacle assurance, improvement, and shipbuilding associations, yet by a wide edge its most noteworthy moneymaker over the globe is moreover its generally well known: Samsung Electronics.
Corporate Strategies of Apple:
The corporate-level procedures of Apple have incorporated the close by related expansion of its items at significant and moderate levels, including home computers, cell phones, programming and music stores, as explained by Yoffie (Yoffie, 2018). In addition, Apple has a mix of individual computing as well as diversion along with an elevated level of combination, helping them to be increasingly effective underway and conveyance of items at moderately costs while at equivalent staying productive. One suitable position of this technique is that customers are able to get their desired result of a high caliber and structure standard, as majority of the items are exceptionally incorporated and processed on the framework of equivalent working.
Another corporate philosophy incorporates surrounding essential associations in order to benefit by economies of scale, tap data from contenders, and offer risks and costs. Within the areas that Apple has entered someone may present AT&T for the production of iPhone, Microsoft is used for programming in Mac PCs, and Intel processors. Another corporate framework is Internationalization of creation is forgotten by Apple, whereby, the association has set up its manufacturing plant in China to misuse low cost of labor, easy access to unrefined materials, potential market and positive budgetary condition in view of the strength of China's economy. Here, Apple is beating contention by conveying standardized things in the overall market, as building plan and collecting are solidly controlled and bound together. It, as such, ends up being definitely not hard to recognize Apple's things, the primary customization being the power source in view of complexities in voltage in various countries.
Competitive Environment:
The development business is not kidding, given the closeness of various players working in it.. In the works by E M NOAM, he illustrated that Apple is facing solid rivalry in evey levels and in all channels of their business. In the following section, Apple witnessed extraordinary rivalry from Microsoft, IBM, Acer and HP; in the versatile and smart phones business, Samsung is regarded as the immediate contender; and also in convenient music gadgets, their primary rival is Microsoft (Noam, 2018). With the worldwide market proceeding to grow, rivalry is expanding because of the globalization of exchange. Basically, Apple's iPhone and iPad are contrasted and the Samsung cell phones. Regardless of this opposition, Apple's business-level methodologies have empowered it to keep controlling the market because of high separation technique that rotates around the organization's capacity to plan and build up its own product and equipment, proceeded with advancement and energetic innovative work group.
Differentiation Strategy: F. T Rothaermel had elaborated that Apple is a predominant power in case of the innovation business, and this is continuously improving by projecting presentation of better advances in iPad, iPhone and MacBook (Rothaermel, 2016). The region where Apple beats its opponents is partition of its things, where it has overpowered in PCs, mobile phones, propelled music players or online music stores. Another separation methodology which Apple has received identification with the dispersion of its items, where it is building up retail stores around the world. Additionally, the Apple’s administration conveyance is progressively and specially unrivaled, as its gloats of a best in class bar for specialized help, consistent and committed client care and permits clients to initially test their items before getting them.
Corporate strategies of Samsung:
All significant business associations utilize business-level and corporate-level systems to contend well in the commercial center and in this manner have a beneficial piece of the overall industry as explained by V. Chang (Chang, 2019). Business-level techniques are characterized as those procedures that are figured with the target of making an incentive for the client and accomplishing upper hand in the commercial center. Corporate-level techniques, then again, influence the whole association's course in issues system. To successfully contend, Samsung's comprehensive procedure and developing...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here