Using the links above, choose a case which you find interesting - it need not be a case related to your profession or your profession of interest. Your assessment should address the following three points listsed below. Use thistemplate
for your assessment.
Summarise the case you have selected. (500 words)
Analyse the case, using the language of the Profession definitions to explain why this situation occurred (500 words).
In a pe
rsonal reflection, explain how your review of the case will influence your professional and personal behaviour in the future. (200 words).
There is no need to cite other works in this assignment.
1. Write the URL of the Case Summary you are using for the assessment. I must be able to retrieve the case from this URL (check before submission). Step 1 is to find the case that interests you 2. Summarise the case you have selected. (500 words) WHO was involved? The person, their profession, any other relevant information about the person and their career to date. WHAT happened – describe the event(s) associated with the misconduct WHAT was the outcome of the tribunal? If a case involves criminal conduct, such as theft, there will be a criminal court case before the health professional tribunal is held. A criminal case must start with the presumption of innocence. Don’t get the two different processes mixed up in your summary. WHAT was the penalty? Penalties vary from reprimand through to suspension or cancellation of registration. 3. Analyse the case, using the language of the Profession definitions to explain why this situation occurred (500 words). When I talk about the "language of professionalism" I am referring to the professionalism "buzz words" in the definition - ie accountability, altruism, integrity, competence etc. For example, if we had a case of a health professional who was stealing opioid drugs and then take them while on shift, I would expect you to identify that · the stealing shows a lack of integrity, · a lack of accountability is shown by working drug-affected, · a lack of altruism is shown towards the patients by working drug affected. · A person who steals opiates usually has a drug addiction - that person is also showing a lack of accountability about their health status. 4. In a personal reflection (200 words) explaining how your review of the case will influence your professional and personal behaviour in the future. You may not have thought about professional misconduct before and may be shocked by what you have read. The healthcare professions can be challenging, as we are with individuals at the worst and the best of times in their lives, and that sometimes will take a toll on the health professionals’ social and emotional well-being. Put yourself in the health professional’s shoes – could you see yourself in the same situation given the similar circumstances? What could you differently if faced with a similar situation? What would be the challenges of doing the “right thing” if you found yourself in this situation yourself? Student Name Student Number MARKING RUBRIC Criteria Outstanding Good Not Satisfactory Summary of case and reason for choosing case. (9 marks) Summary is well structured, summarises the key points and is within word count (500 words). Reason for choosing case is clearly articulated. (9 marks) Summary is appropriately structured, but does not cover all relevant points and/or does not meet the word count (over/under). Does not clearly articulate the reason for choosing the case. (6 marks) Summary is not well structured, does not cover all relevant points and does not meet word count (over/under). Does not articulate the reason for choosing the case. (3 mark) Analysis of the case (9 marks) Analysis is well structured, shows an excellent understanding of the concept of professionalism and is within the word count (500 words). (9 marks) Analysis is appropriately structured, shows a partial understanding of the concept of professionalism and/or does not meet the word count (over/under). (6 marks) Analysis is not well structured, does not cover all relevant points and does not meet the word count (over/under). (3 mark) Reflection (4 marks) Reflection is well written and meets the word count. Shows good insights into the issues raised by the case and makes links to personal growth. (4 marks) Reflections is satisfactorily written and meets word the count. Shows some insights of the issues raised by the case and makes some links to personal growth. (3 marks) Reflection is not well written, and does not meet the word count. Does not show good insight into the issues raised by the case and makes few, if any links to personal growth. (1 mark) Quality of writing – includes spelling, grammar and punctuation. (3 marks) Excellent writing, with no more than five spelling, grammar or punctuation errors. (3 marks) Satisfactory writing, with no more than ten spelling, grammar or punctuation errors. (2 marks) Unsatisfactory writing, with more than ten spelling, grammar or punctuation errors. (1 mark) Total 25/25 Comments: http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCAT//2019/161.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCAT/2018/382.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCAT/2017/442.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCAT/2019/36.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCAT/2016/472.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCAT/2017/431.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCAT/2018/416.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCAT/2019/24.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCAT/2018/419.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCAT/2018/164.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCAT/2019/52.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCAT/2019/74.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCAT/2016/473.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2016/1271.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2017/87.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2016/1436.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2019/203.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2018/1817.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2017/286.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2019/52.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2019/155.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2019/52.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2017/1000.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2018/1707.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2018/1340.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2018/1615.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2017/575.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2019/287.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2019/782.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2019/213.html https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2018/2063.html