its about wine of 2 region
WBM301 Assessment 1 Report Page 1 of 5 ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title WBM301 Wine and Beverage Management. Assessment Assessment 1- Report Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words (+/-10%) Learning Outcomes a) Outline the history of a range of beverages and explain their role & significance to different socio-cultural groups. b) Examine the ingredients, grape varieties, flavour profiles and methods used to produce a range of alcoholic & non-alcoholic beverages and discuss the factors that impact on quality. c) Identify the major wine & beverage producing regions in Australia & overseas and discuss the different characteristics, classifications and legislative requirements. Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 3 (Week 6) Weighting 30% Total Marks 100 marks Context: Wine and beverage knowledge is paramount in ensuring a positive dining experience to meet customer expectations and to support a business’s strategic goals. Wine and beverage management is a vital skill for a manager within the hospitality and tourism sectors to provide recommendations to guest to enhance their overall dining experience. Managers must be able to source information relevant to the needs of the business and examine the flavour profile, production methods and quality of a range of wine and other alcoholic beverages. This assessment addresses the need for managers to have a clear understanding of major wine & beverage producing regions in Australia & overseas and discuss the different characteristics, classifications and legislative requirements of these regions. The purpose of this assessment is to develop students’ ability to maintain current and relevant knowledge of wines & beverages. The assessment allows students to build knowledge on the history of a range of beverages and explain their role & significance in different regions around the world. WBM301 Assessment 1 Report Page 2 of 5 Instructions: Students are to choose two (2) wine regions that grow similar grape varieties and compare the characteristics of the regions. Student should select one (1) wine region from within Australia and one (1) Old-World wine region from Europe. Students should create a report in which they address following: Provide an overview of the chosen wine regions Discuss the history of the chosen wine regions and the development of wine & other beverages in these regions over time. Discuss how the different styles of wine are produced in both chosen regions and explain each step-in detail from vine to bottle. Students should consider the characteristics of the vineyard, grape growing techniques, harvesting & production methods and discuss the factors that impact on quality. Explain the classifications and legislative requirements related to wine production for both regions. Submission Instructions: This assessment must be submitted in compliance with the following: 1. Students should make significant references to the subject material and substantial wider reading. A minimum two (2) academic (textbooks & peer-reviewed journal articles) & six (6) other sources (newspaper article, trade publications, websites, etc.) must be used. These should be referenced in the APA style, both in-text and in a reference list. References to ‘Wikipedia’ or similar unsubstantiated sources will not be accepted. 2. Any detection of plagiarism will lead to an immediate fail grade in the task, and possible exclusion from the subject. 3. Extensions cannot be granted by the lecturer after the submission date. In the event of serious illness or unusual circumstances, a student may apply for Special Consideration in accordance with the rules and regulations governing this application, but it is important that such requests be made as soon as the circumstance is known. WBM301 Assessment 1 Report Page 3 of 5 Learning Rubric: Assessment 1 Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) Pass (Functional) Credit (Proficient) Distinction (Advanced) High Distinction (Exceptional) Overview of wine regions 10% Domestic and international wine regions not both discussed. Detail not provided for majority of the wine region characteristics required by the brief. Lacks a clear focus with large sections of unnecessary or irrelevant information included. Content is disjointed and does not align to main topic of the brief. Both wine regions identified, limited detail provided for some of the required characteristics for each wine region. Ill-defined focus with some unnecessary or irrelevant information included. Majority of content is disjointed and does not all align to main topic of the brief. Both wine regions identified, detail provided for majority of the required characteristics for each wine region. Broad focus with occasional unnecessary or irrelevant information included. Most content is clearly aligned to main topic of the brief. Both wine regions identified, detail provided for all of the required characteristics for each wine region. Clear focus with minimal unnecessary or irrelevant information included. All content is clearly aligned to main topic of the brief. Both wine regions identified, in-depth detail provided for all the required characteristics of each wine region Well defined focus supported by high quality content and discussion that expertly aligns to main topic of the brief History and development of beverages in the region 20% Does not meet minimum standard. No knowledge and understanding of the history and development of beverages in the chosen regions. Meets minimum standard. Limited knowledge and understanding of the history and development of beverages in the chosen regions. Moves beyond minimum standard. Comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the history and development of beverages in the chosen regions. Exceeds minimum standard. Highly developed knowledge and understanding of the history and development of beverages in the chosen regions. Exceeds minimum standard and exhibits high levels of independence. Sophisticated knowledge and understanding of the history and development of beverages in the chosen regions. WBM301 Assessment 1 Report Page 4 of 5 Grape varieties, wine styles, production methods and effects on quality 20% Does not meet minimum standard. No investigation of grape varieties, wine styles, production methods and effects on quality within the chosen regions discussed Meets minimum standard. Offers limited analysis of grape varieties, wine styles and production methods and effects on quality within the chosen regions Moves beyond minimum standard. Offers consistent analysis of grape varieties, wine styles and production methods and effects on quality within the chosen regions Exceeds minimum standard. Offers advanced and integrated analysis of grape varieties, wine styles and production methods and effects on quality within the chosen regions Exceeds minimum standard and exhibits high levels of independence. Offers advanced and insightful investigation of grape varieties, wine styles and production methods and effects on quality within the chosen regions Classifications and legislative requirements of both regions 20 % Does not meet minimum standard. Offers no explanation of classifications and legislative requirements of both regions Meets minimum standard. Offers limited explanation of classifications and legislative requirements of both regions Moves beyond minimum standard. Offers consistent explanation of classifications and legislative requirements of both regions Exceeds minimum standard. Offers advanced explanation of classifications and legislative requirements of both regions Exceeds minimum standard and exhibits high levels of independence. Offers advanced and insightful explanation of classifications and legislative requirements of both regions Correct citation of key resources and evidence 10% Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. No academic sources used. Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Minimal academic sources used. Demonstrates use of high quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. A couple of academic sources used, Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within the organisation Demonstrates use of high-quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within and without the WBM301 Assessment 1 Report Page 5 of 5 There are mistakes in using the APA referencing style. There are many mistakes in using the APA referencing style. There are several mistakes in using the APA style. for sourcing evidence. Several academic sources used There are minor mistakes in using the APA referencing style. organisation for sourcing evidence. Many quality academic sources used. There are no mistakes in using the APA referencing style. Structure 10 % Discussion points do not flow smoothly or logically, no connection between ideas. Paragraphs not used or lack structure. Minimal structure evident however