Word limit1500 words +/- 10%
Assignment details
The review of evidence requires you to review the video of a cardiac arrest scenario from several years ago. The guidelines for management of cardiac arrest have changed in the intervening period, so you are required to compare the performance to the current best practice evidence, analyse the video for quality of performance and identify the areas of performance that are in keeping with the evidence as well as those that are different to the evidence.
The BLS video provided on this page only must be used.
You need to analyse the video and identify practices that are in line and not in line with the ARC guidelines. Where practice is not in line with the guideline you should identify what the participants should be doing differently. You also need to consider best practice evidence for non-technical skills in emergency situations and using that evidence, critique the performance in the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chMd3jjfrmo against that evidence, again noting what the participants should be doing if demonstrating evidenced based practice.
For all the discussion you need to link specifically to the ARC guidelines (do not use resuscitation guidelines from another country) and identify the research to provide evidence to support your comments. There are many journals with research into BLS and ALS so try and use these rather than a website (although the ARC website does provide reliable information as well. Examples of journals available via the library include: Resuscitation, Chest, Heart and Lung).
An example
Evidence Review
"It was noted the depth of compression appeared inadequate on multiple occasions. According to ARC guideline 5 (2019) depth of compression of at least 5cm is necessary to generate a cardiac output. Several studies have identified the importance of compression depth during cardiac arrest (Frank, 2015; Smyth, 2015; Simmonds, 2017; Alfonso & Sidonas, 2018). Franks (2019) study of survival from cardiac arrest found a statistically significant relationship between return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and compression depth. Those patients who had compressions of 6 cm had a greater likelihood of ROSC compared to those with a compression depth less than 5cm (p=0.01). ……………………………."
This is just an example (not to be re-used in your essay).
Submission Details
- 1500 word limit +/- 10% - anything over 1650 words will not be read or marked.
- 2.5cm margins on all sides of page with double spaced in 12 point Times New Roman in WORD format. You are required to comply with set work limits, deviations beyond 10% either way maybe penalised (do not count the words in your cover page and reference list but do count the words used in in-text headings and citations).
- Please include a cover page
- Submitting assignment in accordance withAPA 7threferencing style for both your in-text citations and reference list,
- You must used a minimum of 10 peer-reviewed references plus the ARC guidelines. These references must be from the last 10 years with preference given to sources from the last 5 yearsand wherever possible refer to Australian resources, as this is where we are nursing.